...
EgyptSearch Forums Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» EgyptSearch Forums » Egyptology » The Nubian Kametian Sumerian Dravidian World View (Page 1)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: The Nubian Kametian Sumerian Dravidian World View
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
To understand the Nubian Kametian Sumerian and Dravidian (NKSD) civilization you have to understand that Afrocentric researchers are falsificationist. We either confirm or disconfirm a theory.

Linguistic evidence suggest that their is a Sumero- Tamil connection. Yet Eurocentrists reject this evidence without comment and
counter eduttukkaadu (evidences). This makes their discussion of ancient history in my opinion untrue.

I am a product of Western Civilization. As a
result, I was indoctrinated from an early age via TV
and books that blacks were inferior. Although I was
provided this indoctrination many adults during my
socialization and induction into the community in
which I grew up in , on the Southside of Chicago
(i.e., 47th and Evans) taught me at an early age that
Blacks were the founders of civilization based on
their reading of the Bible, and the story about the
Children of Ham.

As a result, when I undertook the acquisition of
abstract sign systems during my forming schooling/
instruction I had already acquired a metacognition (
awareness of your own thinking) that filtered the bias
teachings out of me during my years of schooling. I
knew who I was based on the truth of the ancient model
of history.

Science is hypothesis testing. We either confirm a
theory or disconfirm a theory based on eduttukkaadu. A
true scientist would never dispute a theory without
offering counter eduttukkaadu in support of the
counter hypothesis, but Eurocentric researchers get
away with this unscientific attack on the ideas of
Blacks, Native Americans and Asians everyday due to
Eurocentrism.

Science goes out the window when theories are
advocated by researchers that are not accepted by the
Academe. We like to believe that schooling broadans
our knowledge base and makes us wiser but this is not
the case.

Schooling provides an environment that constructs
the cognitive structures, we use to interpret our
environment. If that environment teaching us
falsehood, we will learn untruths instead of the
Truth. This results from the fact that the growth of
the mind is strongly influenced by the cultural sign
system in which we live. It is the sign system
presented via culture that provides first the child,
and later the sdult the psychological tools to
interpret the world.

To understand the NKSD cultures it requires more
that one's racial status and being. Being a African
African American or Dravidian will not gain you entry
into understanding these cultures. You can only
understand these cultures if you find cognitive and
psychological engagement with the study of ancient
history based on the Truth covering law, of the
Ancient Model of History.

Cognitive engagement is an internal indicator.
These indicators are process, recognition and desire.
Firstly, cognitive engagement requires that you learn
how to process information from a self-based approach.
This information is processed both by neurological
processes, genetics and the mind. The neurogic system
helps us understand the mechanics behind our
learning.

It makes clear the processes involved in thinking.
The mind allows us to interpret knowledge. We
don't know where this mind is, but we do know that it
has a physical and a meta-physical base. The physical
mind is structure by or experiences that form
representations or schmata to interpret the
experiences we have had and explain what we find in
the environment.

The mind is also metaphysical. This part of the
mind helps us to find information and answers to the
questions we may have about phenomenon through our
dreams. ( I can not number the times I went to bed
with a question about ancient history that was
answered in a dreamthat directed me to sources /
evidence to support my inquiry.)

Seeking truth is also genetic. We often discuss
the genes and how they make us unique. But no one
really discusses the possibility that a genetic memory
also exist. This genetic memory would consist of the
memories we obtain from our both our parents up to the
time of our birth, and the memories of our parents
parents , and so on up tothe time of their birth. This
memory may even go back to the first human ancestors.
This genetic memory would allow us to tap into the
memories of our ancestors.

The second feature of cognitive engagement in our
quest for the Truth is recognition. Recognition,
simply refers to the way you think, learn and process
information. Your ability to find Truth will result
from three factors, a) your ability to access genetic
based knowledge; b) interactions with known knowledge
( via multiple intelligences); and c) desire to know
the Truth.

A good example of accessing the Truth
genetically, was made clear by a Western scholar who
said he did not understand Greek philosophy until he
studied Ethiopian civilization. He even claimed that
he formerly may have been an Ethiopian. A Eurocentric
scholar would belittle the idea expressed by this
scholar, but in reality, maybe he was able to access
knowledge relating to the Ethiopians from his genetic
memory from his ancestors who may have lived in
Ethiopia, because he kept himself open to Truth and
Truth came his way.

Finally, to complete your quest for cognitive
engagement the heuristic used for task analysis and
completion must include a self-monitoring process
guided by Truth Seeking based on the Ancient Model of
History.

Psychological engagement is both an internal and
external indicator used to interpret the truth. You
need psychological engagement of the NKSD culture to
understand the phenomenon. Psychological engagement
has three parts 1) identification with an intellectual
school of thought ( in this case the Ancient Model of
History); a sense of belonging and connection to a
group; and 3) a positive relationship with teachers
and peers.

It is easy to find identification with a research
model, but finding a sense of belonging and positive
relationship with teachers is more difficult. You must
love yourself and your ethnic group before you can use
the ancient model of history to discovery aspects of
the past. Yet, you can not be racist. You have to
recognize that there is one mankind, eventhough we
have different colors, because we all came from God.
Finding teachers is also difficult. It is hard to
find teachers for the study of NKSD at Universities
and Colleges because most of the faculty members at
these institutions maintain the status quo. As a
result, your teachers will be scholars who are outside
the Academe. Scholars who provide the necessary
eduttukkaadu (evidences)to support and test their
hypotheses.

In summary, Truth seeking is the result of
cognitive and psychological engagement along with
socializing agents who provide us with the schemata we
use to recognize Truth in our research. Truth is like
beauty, it is only recognized by the eyes of the
beholder of what ever one believes to be true, and
interpreted via the Model of History you chose to
understand the past.

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What is the character of the soul among the
Kametians, Sumerians, Olmecs and Dravidians. For
purposes of this paper we will call the Sumerians,
Olmecs and Dravidians Kushites, since the ancestors of
these people lived in the Highland Areas of Middle
Africa: the Proto-Sahara, and practiced a culture and
civilization –as typified by the rock art in the
region--similar to that of the C-Group people. Below
we discover the ultimate objective of the Kushite for
the soul to become pure or white.

If this is correct in this interpretation of the
Kametian-Sumerian- Kushite-Dravidian view of man’s
soul it should be present in the languages of these
people. To test this hypothesis we will discuss the
culture terms from these languages related to the term
‘soul’.

In most of these languages the basic ideas
about purity and the soul is indicated by two words
ba/pa and or bo/po, with the possible addition of an /
l / or /r/ as a final element to these monosyllabic
terms.

We learn from the seals of the Dravidian speaking
Harappans that they sought righteousness and a
spotlessly pure mind, for purity of mind was the sine
quo non for happiness within. You can find out more
about Harappan religion and writing at the following
sites:
http://www.geocities.com/olmec982000/Indus.html

http://geocities.com/olmec982000/grammar1.pdf
http://geocities.com/olmec982000/IndusInspiration.pdf

Tolkappiyam makes it clear that in Tamil pa(l),
denoted Karma. In Sangam times pal was considered the
sum and the consequences of a person’s action, i.e.,
his Fate or destiny. Tiruvallur used pal to denote
Fate or the Law of Nature. K. Appadurai, in the Mind
and Thoughts of Tiruvallur, noted that pal in its
external form is the veda, or word of God that makes
everything perfect, undying, everlasting and that
forever grows, and is growing internal Bliss. The fact
that pal represents that undying and perfect aspect of
man corresponds to Loga’s interpretation of the
Kushite view of the soul reflected that this aspect of
man was both eternal and perfect.

In Dravidian we also find that in addition to pal
meaning “Fate”, it also meant distribution, while pala
in Tamil means ‘many and diverse’.
The Tamil concept of pal corresponds to that of
the Sumerians. In Sumerian we find the word bar . Bar
has several meanings including ‘soul’ and ‘white’.The
view here that the bar is both the soul and also
something that is white or pure corresponds favorably
to pal the Tamil conception of that aspect of man
which is both everlasting and pure.

The Dravidians and Mande people who founded the
Shang and Xia civilizations, respectively in China,
also took the concept that the soul was pure to the
Mongoloid Chinese people. We know very little about
the sounds of ancient Chinese because Ancient Chinese
was different from Old Chinese and Middle Chinese and
the modern Chinese dialects. (Ramsey 1987, pp.137-138)
This results from the fact that the Chinese dynasties
were founded by diverse ethnic groups e.g., Xia and
Shang li (i.e., Black Shang) were founded by Dravidian
and Manding speakers. Shang-Yin was founded by
classical mongoloids, and the Zhou by the contemporary
Chinese. ) This explains the difference in
pronunciation for Ancient Chinese spoken by the Xia
and Shang peoples who were Africans and Dravidians
formerly belonging to the C-Group people of Middle
Africa, and Old and Middle Chinese or a variant there
of, which was probably spoken by the Zhou and later
Mongoloid Chinese people. See:
http://geocities.com/olmec982000/xia.htm

http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/DRAVIDIANS.html

http://geocities.com/olmec982000/blshang2.htm

http://clyde.winters.tripod.com/junezine/id1.html

The Shang characters compare favorably to the ancient
Proto- Saharan script used by the Harappans in the
Indus Valley and the Manding script used in the
ancient Sahara and Crete . Winters (1985c) outlined
the spread of the Proto-Saharan script to Harappa, and
throughout Saharan Africa and Asia by the Dravidians
and Manding.
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Bay/7051/anwrite.htm

Evidence of Chinese writing first appears around 2000
B.C. as pottery marks. The shell-and-bone characters
represented writing they were not pictures. The Shang
symbols compare favorably with ancient Manding
symbols.

In Chinese the term for ‘white’ is bai, while the
term for ‘soul’ is bo. Because the pronounciation of
Chinese has changed over the centuries because of the
frequent conquest of the ‘country’ by diverse people
since the fall of the Xia and Shang civilizations
Chinese researchers have developed many theories to
explain the origin of bai in Chinese for the terms
white (and soul). Some scholars believe that bai , may
have got its meaning for white, from bo ‘soul’,
through the idea that soul, represents emptiness . I
believe that this view for the origin of bai , may be
wrong. This results from the fact that many people
have attempted to use bai, in relation to its
association with humans and ethnic groups to describe
these people as literally white. Thus they may
translate bai ren as “white men/man”.

During Zhou, times many Dravidians (Shang) and
Xia (Mande) people were sacrificed by the Mongoloid
Chinese. Theses people were later called li Qiang
‘Black Qiang’ by the Zhou. In many of the oral bone
inscriptions of the Zhou we see the phrase bai Qiang,
some Chinese researchers have translated this phrase
as “white Qiang”. This interpretation is probably
wrong. The fact that bai, is related to ‘soul’ and
‘white’ suggest that bai Qiang, may be interpreted as
“holy Qiang” or “Pure Qiang”, in reference to the
sacrifice of Qiang religious men during Zhou rituals.

This belief in sacrificing Qiang (Dravidians and
Mande) by the Zhou to obtain blessing from their gods,
may correspond to the popularity during the lated 19th
Century and first half of the 20th Century of burning
and lynching blacks by the KKK as a form of ritual
sacrifice of Blacks to purify the white racists of the
American South and Midwest. This suggest that just as
bar in Sumerian meant both ‘soul’ and ‘white’, bai and
bo had similar meanings because they entered the
Chinese language via the Dravidians and Mande who
founded Chinese civilization.

The view that the soul is pure, appears to have
also been the belief of the Olmec people. The Olmec
people of Mexico are considered to be the “Mother
Civilization” of all Meso-American civilizations. The
Olmec called themselves Xi (Shi), they spoke a
language similar to Malinke-Bambara which is a member
of the Mande family of languages. It is interesting to
note that the symbol for bai in Chinese, is a box.

Among the Olmec the box shaped symbol is pronounced po
‘pure, superlative of white and clean’, just as in the
Mande languages. Among the Olmec the term bo meant ‘
spirit, principal of life, great, moral gradeur and
ghost’. The identification of the Olmec representation
of ‘white, pure and spirit (which may denote an aspect
of man akin to soul)’ as po/ bo highlights Loga’s
identification of the Kushite concept of this aspect
of man as both the soul and purity/ white.

In conclusion, although their are different
contemporary pronunciations ba/pa and bo/po , along
with the symbols used to represent these words in
Chinese and Olmec writing, they have the same meaning
and shape. This suggest a genetic relationship between
the idea of the soul as pure among the
Kametians-Dravidians-Olmecs-Mande-Sumerians. The
present pronunciation of the Chinese symbols probably
has little relationship to the ancient pronunciation
of Chinese spoken in Xia and Shang times when these
characters were first used, but the recovery of the
actual meaning of these words from looking at Olmec
and Tamil, make it clear that Chinese bai did not come
from emptiness, it obtained its meaning from the
recognition that bo represents the soul’s migration to
attain purity.

This cognation of specialized terms for
soul, and white; and the writing systems supports the
proposed Dravidian and Manding migration and
settlement of ancient Sumer, Mexico , China during Xia
times and the Indus Valley. It was in these diverse
geographical areas that the Kushites left their
recognition that the soul is pure.

--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nefar
Member
Member # 13890

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Nefar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"The Nubian Kametian Sumerian Dravidian World View"

wth? im confused...

Posts: 229 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thee members of these nations originated in the ancient sahara and spread to other parts of the world when the region turned into a desert.
Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
markellion
Member
Member # 14131

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for markellion     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Allot of this stuff bothers me because allot of the time it's just propoganda to make yourself look superior

http://youtube.com/watch?v=MS_Mt_hseNA

Must be flattering to Chinese and Indians that everyone wants a piece of their history [Razz]

Are Dravadins even related to Africans at all?

Posts: 2642 | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
markellion
Member
Member # 14131

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for markellion     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
This belief in sacrificing Qiang (Dravidians and
Mande) by the Zhou to obtain blessing from their gods,
may correspond to the popularity during the lated 19th
Century and first half of the 20th Century of burning
and lynching blacks by the KKK as a form of ritual
sacrifice of Blacks to purify the white racists of the
American South and Midwest.

!
Posts: 2642 | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Nefar
Member
Member # 13890

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Nefar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Are Dravadins even related to Africans at all?"

no not at all. which is one of the reasons why his whole post confuses me.

Posts: 229 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Maahes
Member
Member # 8482

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Maahes   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Nefar:
"Are Dravadins even related to Africans at all?"

no not at all. which is one of the reasons why his whole post confuses me.

I'm confused by the post as well but Dravidians and Arabians are descendants of Africans

"One thing is certain, Greek and Latin have Egyptian linguistic influences although both are Indo-European languages. Besides, the term "Indo" comes from "India," the word "India" came from the Arabs, who pointed out that Kush, a son of Ham had two sons, "Hind," and "Sind." Hind of Kush established a culture in India, Sind of Kush established a culture in the Arabian region. Nimrod established in parts of Mesopotamia."
That quote isnt meant as evidence per se but it widely understood that Horn Africans migrated into Yemen/Oman and what would be known as the Hindu Kush region. Cattle grazing on an enormous scale was possible in the Hindu Kush just as it was in the Nile Valley Kush.

Posts: 152 | From: Boston MA USA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
markellion
Member
Member # 14131

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for markellion     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Nefar:

no not at all. which is one of the reasons why his whole post confuses me.

My interpretation is basicly Indians are a black African colony, so was China until "Mongoloids" came out and sacrificed the black people like the KKK

quote:
This belief in sacrificing Qiang (Dravidians and
Mande) Dravidians being colonists from Africa by the Zhou to obtain blessing from their gods,
may correspond to the popularity during the lated 19th
Century and first half of the 20th Century of burning
and lynching blacks by the KKK as a form of ritual
sacrifice of Blacks to purify the white racists of the
American South and Midwest. This suggest that just as
bar in Sumerian meant both ‘soul’ and ‘white’, bai and
bo had similar meanings because they entered the
Chinese language via the Dravidians and Mande who
founded Chinese civilization.


Posts: 2642 | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
markellion
Member
Member # 14131

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for markellion     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Also Africans Civilized the Mexicans
Posts: 2642 | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Evergreen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Evergreen Writes:

The Dravidians were originally Black Terrestrial Beings (BTBs) from the planet NubeeOn. They were stranded on earth during the second intergalactic ice age and merged with the Ancient Egyptians in Oman. I know this is true because Will Smith has a film coming out on this topic.

--------------------
Black Roots.

Posts: 2007 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Evergreen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Evergreen:
Evergreen Writes:

The Dravidians were originally Black Terrestrial Beings (BTBs) from the planet NubeeOn. They were stranded on earth during the second intergalactic ice age and merged with the Ancient Egyptians in Oman. I know this is true because Will Smith has a film coming out on this topic.

^^ I'm just BSing, just like Clyde is doing with this thread.
Posts: 2007 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Yom
Member
Member # 11256

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Yom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Clyde Winters, while not a troll, has severely distorted views of India, Sumer, Olmec, and other civilizations with dark-skinned and non-African civilizations/cultures. To him, the two (dark skin and Africanness) are indistinguishable.

--------------------
"Oh the sons of Ethiopia; observe with care; the country called Ethiopia is, first, your mother; second, your throne; third, your wife; fourth, your child; fifth, your grave." - Ras Alula Aba Nega.

Posts: 1024 | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rasol
Member
Member # 4592

Icon 1 posted      Profile for rasol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes. Skin color is not racial. It does not relate lineage. Neither does skull-shape, the favorite pet-pheno of K-zoid race mythologists.

A student of African history who understands this - has no need to make all Black people into Africans.

It's funny but white anthropologist put it nicely, and objectively - "African entails black, but black does not entail African". - CL Brace.

I wonder if Winters knows what that means, or would care to comment on it?

Posts: 15202 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
alTakruri
Member
Member # 10195

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for alTakruri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Beware informant!

We know you're not BSing.

You have violated your oaths.

NewBeIng Order Age-Ints will take care of you soon.

quote:
Originally posted by Evergreen:
quote:
Originally posted by Evergreen:
Evergreen Writes:

The Dravidians were originally Black Terrestrial Beings (BTBs) from the planet NubeeOn. They were stranded on earth during the second intergalactic ice age and merged with the Ancient Egyptians in Oman. I know this is true because Will Smith has a film coming out on this topic.

^^ I'm just BSing, just like Clyde is doing with this thread.

Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
alTakruri
Member
Member # 10195

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for alTakruri   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Look's like it's all a matter of style and presentation.

Dr. Winters presents this outlook scientifically and is rejected.

Maahes presents it folklorically, as his alleged intertribe
clan's "history."

And, as Sundiata aptly noted, the same folk who rejected
it from Dr. Winters will readily drink it down like
Kool-Aid when it's poured from Maahes' pitcher.

Glider's thread could be most revealing about the process
allowing for this left hand rejection/right hand acceptance.

Marketing reps just call it good will and packaging.

Posts: 8014 | From: the Tekrur in the Western Sahel | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Evergreen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by alTakruri:


Dr. Winters presents this outlook scientifically and is rejected.

Maahes presents it folklorically, as his alleged intertribe clan's "history."

Evergreen Writes:

Neither presentation has scientific merit.

Posts: 2007 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Evergreen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by rasol:
I wonder if Winters knows what that means, or would care to comment on it?

Evergreen Writes:

He knows what this means. This issue has been covered with him dozens of times over the last few years. His position on Blacks in Sumeria and Indus-Kush detracts from the credibility of those who espouse a so-called Afrocentric position.

Posts: 2007 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
meninarmer
Member
Member # 12654

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for meninarmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:


Cognitive engagement is an internal indicator.
These indicators are process, recognition and desire.
Firstly, cognitive engagement requires that you learn how to process information from a self-based approach.
This information is processed both by neurological
processes, genetics and the mind. The neurogic system helps us understand the mechanics behind our learning.

It makes clear the processes involved in thinking.
The mind allows us to interpret knowledge. We
don't know where this mind is, but we do know that it has a physical and a meta-physical base. The physical mind is structure by or experiences that form representations or schmata to interpret the
experiences we have had and explain what we find in the environment.

The mind is also metaphysical. This part of the
mind helps us to find information and answers to the questions we may have about phenomenon through our dreams. ( I can not number the times I went to bed with a question about ancient history that was
answered in a dreamthat directed me to sources /
evidence to support my inquiry.)

Seeking truth is also genetic. We often discuss
the genes and how they make us unique. But no one
really discusses the possibility that a genetic memory also exist. This genetic memory would consist of the memories we obtain from our both our parents up to the time of our birth, and the memories of our parents parents , and so on up tothe time of their birth. This memory may even go back to the first human ancestors.
This genetic memory would allow us to tap into the
memories of our ancestors.


Dr. Winters

I agree with this following reading Dr. Francis Cress-Welsings work, The Isis papers.
In this work she speaks of cellular history and it's impact on learning, particularly in people who contain higher concentrations of melanin.
It would explain why, following over 400 years of living in America, black Americans are not able to fully transition to the Anglo world-view as easy as Asians, and score lower of standardized anglo-centric based testing. For them, it is not as simple as ingesting material, but rather a complete reversal in their cellular world-view. A decision that when reviewed goes against common sense.

It also explains why early in American history uneducated slaves were the innovators of invention, and why more people worldwide recognize P.Diddy, Micheal Jordan, Muhammad Ali compared to Norman Mailer.
I find it amazing that a black like Jack Johnson, America's 1st black heavyweight champion with no more then a 6th grade education was granted 2 patents by the US patent office.

Posts: 3595 | From: Moved To Mars. Waiting with shotgun | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Evergreen
Member
Member # 12192

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Evergreen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by meninarmer:
[QUOTE]I agree with this following reading Dr. Francis Cress-Welsings work, The Isis papers.
In this work she speaks of cellular history and it's impact on learning, particularly in people who contain higher concentrations of melanin.

Evergreen Writes:

Cress-Welsings assumptions have not been peer-reviewed and assessed utilizing the scientific approach. Her work has therefore not been validated in this regard.

quote:
Originally posted by meninarmer:
[QUOTE]It would explain why, following over 400 years of living in America, black Americans are not able to fully transition to the Anglo world-view ....

Evergreen Writes:

What is the "Anglo-Worldview" you allude to here?

Posts: 2007 | From: Washington State | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fellati achawi
Member
Member # 12885

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for fellati achawi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
That quote isnt meant as evidence per se but it widely understood that Horn Africans migrated into Yemen/Oman and what would be known as the Hindu Kush region. Cattle grazing on an enormous scale was possible in the Hindu Kush just as it was in the Nile Valley Kush.
There is an old book written by an iraqi historian jawad 'ali in which he says the same thing about the arabian peninsula. diefferent migrations of people coming from africa, iraq, and the india area

--------------------
لا اله الا الله و محمد الرسول الله

Posts: 495 | From: anchorage, alaska | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
meninarmer
Member
Member # 12654

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for meninarmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dr. Cress-Welsing's work has been debated for quite some time now. Many researchers have agreed and validated some of her work, while the mainstream has found issue but provided no research to actually refute it. In fact, in unrelated research dealing with the importance of melanin in brain activity (more melanin=faster synaptic switching), sexual reproduction (more melanin=more potency), sensory acuteness (more melanin=better eyesight/earing/muscle response), they have directly and inadvertently provided additional validation to her theories, as well as what Dr, Winters is proposing above.

Dr. Jewel Pookrum offers some additional information on the importance of melanin, and she calls melanin and it's properties, Biological Living Light.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=A9J0F5SLRsE

Posts: 3595 | From: Moved To Mars. Waiting with shotgun | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
meninarmer
Member
Member # 12654

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for meninarmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Methods of treating Parkinson's disease using melanin
Document Type and Number:
United States Patent 5210076
Link to this page:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5210076.html
Abstract:
The invention is directed to the treatment of degenerative diseases of tissues which have lost melanin and which share a common embryological basis as tissues of the nervous system by the administration of an active substance which causes an increased concentration of melanin in the tissue. Such active substances include melanin, melanin variants, melanin analogs, melanin derivatives, tyrosinase, tyrosinase gene, melanin-concentrating hormone and combinations thereof. Examples. of such diseases include Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, retinitis pigmentosa, schizophrenia and dementia. The invention is also useful in assisting in the repair of neurons in a mammal having neuron damage by administering an effective amount of an active substance which causes an increased concentration of melanin in the neuron to aid in nerve repair. The invention is further useful in protecting a mammal from a toxin-induced disease or from the adverse effects of a toxin by administering an effective amount of the active substance described above.
Inventors:
Berliner, David L. (Atherton, CA, US)
Erwin, Robert L. (Vacaville, CA, US)
McGee, David R. (Vacaville, CA, US)
Application Number:
609311
Filing Date:
11/05/1990
Publication Date:

Posts: 3595 | From: Moved To Mars. Waiting with shotgun | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Nubian-Kametic-Sumerian-Dravidian culture I call Proto-Saharan is supported by archaeological research in addition to anthropological and linguistic evidence.

The members of the NKSD civilization maintained an extensive trade network in the 3rd and 4th millennium BC. The vessels recovered from these civilizations indicate that the peoples share religious beliefs, and culture.


This is supported by red-and-black pottery which originated in Nubia, and vessels from the IVBI workshop at Tepe Yahya. The IVBI workshop was located in West Asia. Vessels here have a uniform shape and design. The red-and black pottery, and vessels sharing this style are distributed from Egypt to China, the Soviet Uzbekistan and the Indus Valley. Philip L. Kohl, in “The balance of trade in the mid-Third millennium BC”, Current Anthropology (19,1978: 463-492) noted that the intercultural style vessels show clear parallels between Nubia/Kemetian-Iranian-Sumerian and Dravidian (Indus Valley) sites.

The discovery of Intercultural Style vessels from Susa, Sumer, Egyptian and Indus Valley sites suggest a shared ideological identity among the NKSD people. The shared iconographic symbols and beliefs within these diverse areas suggest cultural and ethnic unity among the NKSD cultures. These common naturalistic motifs shared by major NKSD civilizations include combatant snakes, the scorpion, the bull and etc.

It is clear that genetic evidence also supports the NKSD civilization. A look at the Y-chromosome map below shows the unity of these civilizations.

http://www.scs.uiuc.edu/~mcdonald/WorldHaplogroupsMaps.pdf


This map makes it clear that Dravidians and Africans share haplotypes RxR1 and K. The present inhabitants of Mesopotamia and Persia and Africans according to this map carry the H,A and K haplotypes. . For example, the H1 haplotype is found among many Dravidians (26% in a study by Sengupta et al 2006).

The haplotype M173 is derived from M9. This M9 is mainly found in Eurasia.
The haplotype M9 is related to haplogroups K to R and are often associated with Eurasians or non-African people (Cruciani et al, 2002;Coia, 2004). Coia et al (2004) believe that Asians migrated to Cameroon and passed on R1*M173 to Africans.

It is interesting to note that haplogroup R1*M173 has its highest frequency in Africa, not Eurasia (Cruciani et al, 2002; Coia, 2004). In Cameroon the frequency of R1*M173 is between 7%-95% and averages 39% (Coia, 2004). This suggest that this haplogroup may have originated in Africa, not Asia.


The discovery of shared vessels, religious beliefs, and genes make it clear that members of the NKSD civilizations came from Africa. This means that the people were not only Black, they were Black due to their African heritage.


.

--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Rate Member
Icon 10 posted      Profile for Djehuti     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^ Just for humor, would you care to share some of this so-called archaeological 'evidence'??

Also, non of the genetic studies (as usual) support your claims. All the haplotypes peoples in India and Iraq have in common with Africans are all derived from ancestral haplogroups from the Paleolithic which makes sense since *all* humans originated in Africa. [Embarrassed]

Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ Just for humor, would you care to share some of this so-called archaeological 'evidence'??

Also, non of the genetic studies (as usual) support your claims. All the haplotypes peoples in India and Iraq have in common with Africans are all derived from ancestral haplogroups from the Paleolithic which makes sense since *all* humans originated in Africa. [Embarrassed]

Sure.

This is supported by red-and-black pottery which originated in Nubia, and vessels from the IVBI workshop at Tepe Yahya. The IVBI workshop was located in West Asia. Vessels here have a uniform shape and design. The red-and black pottery, and vessels sharing this style are distributed from Egypt to China, the Soviet Uzbekistan and the Indus Valley. Philip L. Kohl, in “The balance of trade in the mid-Third millennium BC”, Current Anthropology (19,1978: 463-492) noted that the intercultural style vessels show clear parallels between Nubia/Kemetian-Iranian-Sumerian and Dravidian (Indus Valley) sites.

The genetic evidence speaks for itself. The origin of these genes do not go back to the paleolithic exit from africa, there origin was Africa, and the people carrying these genes today point back to their African origin.

.

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If the NKSD people came from the same cultural and
genetic background, we can hypothesize that they would
have similar terms for sea going vessels or boats. To
test this hypothesis we must look at the history of
naval technology in Middle Africa, the original homeland of
the Kametian –Sumerian-Dravidian speaking people.
Boat building has been known in Africa for thousands of
years.
 -
Reed boats, and reed boat illustrations throughout Middle Africa.
For example, today reed boats are still constructed by the Mande
speaking Bozo people and Dravidian speaking people in India.

The boat has played an important role in Africa
since prehistoric times. As early as Nagada I (4000-3500 BC)
Africans were depicting boats on their pottery (Robert
Partridge, ,p.16). The same style boats are found in the Sahara at Tin
Tazarift (Ki-Zerbo,1979,1981). Between 3500-3000BC we
find evidence of sails on pottery from Nubia and Egypt
( Partridge,1996).

The Prophet Isaiah mentions the expertise of the
Kushites when he noted in the Bible at Isaiah 18:12
that: " Country of the whirring wings beyond the
rivers of Cush, who send ambassadors by sea, in papyrus
ships over the waters". This indicates that as late as the Meroitic
Kushite empire papyrus boast were still being used by Africans.
Because the early civilization builders in Mesopotamia, the
Indus Valley, Africa, and China after 3500 BC, originated in the
Sahara there existed great similarity between boats
engraved on rocks in Mesopotamia, Indus Valley/ India and ancient
boats in the Sahara and Nile Valley (Hornell,1920).


Walter Resch (1967), noted that apart from human and animal figures appearing on the Nubian rock drawings, the most dominant motif is that of reed
boats, many of these boats like the boats at Nagada II, had sails.

Henri Lhote during his 1956 expedition to the Highland Tassili region of Algeria also found
reed boat engravings (Lhote, 1957). Boats with sails were still being used in throughout Africa in 1500BC. Queen Hatshepsut of Egypt, recorded in her temple at Deir el Bahri a Puntite ship which had sails and 60 oars. This indicates that African ships were usually prepared for sailing
the oceans through the power of the wind, and /or by sail.

Punt is believed to be ancient Somalia/Ethiopia. The people who presently live in Ethiopia call the Puntite empire, the Arwe empire. Other examples of reed boats have been found in Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley. It is among the engraved Saharan boats that we see the first use of masts and sails, along with cabins on the decks of ships as early as 3100 BC. As a result the ancient Proto-Saharans share the same name for boat:
  • Dravidian (Tamil) Kalan
    Sumerian Kalam
    Mande Kulu

Papyrus boats were capable of traveling thousands of miles over the open seas. Earastosthenes, chief librarian of the
Egyptian papyrus library in Alexandria said that papyrus ships,with the same sails and riggings as on the Nile sailed as far as Ceylon and the mouth of the Ganges (Indus Valley)(Hyderdahl, 1981).

In summary, the rock art from the Sahara, across Mesopotamia, and India are identical. It indicates that during Proto-Saharan times
each community (Mande >Proto-Olmec, Sumerian, Dravidian, etc.) had marine architects, shipbuilders and expert sailors.

The presence of an elevayed bow and stern and the peculiar "bowstring" astern and "fuse" for the rudder oar, indicate that the ships used by the Proto-Saharans, including the Mande and Dravidians were used for navigation in the open seas. As a consequence of the shared term for
boat among the Dravidian and Sumerian people we must accept the theory that these people developed their seafaring skills in a common
homeland before they settled Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley.

The fact that the Mande speaking people, who formerly lived predominately in the Fezzan (Libya), but now are found in West Africa, have the same term for boat used by the Sumerians and Dravidians make it clear that the homeland for these people by Col. Rawlinson was Middle Africa. The evidence of common boat technology for Mesopotamians and Harappans, and term
for boat indicate that their seafaring skill can be explained by their former habitation of Middle Africa,before they moved into Asia.


Reference:

Heyderdahl,T. (1981). Early Man and the Sea, New
York.

Hornell,__.(1920). Indian Boat Designs", Mem. As.
Soc. Bengal, 7(3): 192).

Ki-Zerbo,J. (1979). "Old Masters of the New Stone
Age", The Unesco Courier.

Ki-Zerbo,J. (1981). African Preclassic Art. In
General History of Africa: methodology and African
Prehistory, (Ed.) by J. Ki-Zerbo (pp.672,676). UNESCO.

Lhote,H.(1957). A la decouverte des freques,
Paris).

Partridge,R.(1996).Transport in ancient Egypt,The
Rubicon Press.

Resch,W.F.E.(1967). Die Felsbilder Nubiens. Graz

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Quetzalcoatl
Member
Member # 12742

Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Quetzalcoatl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:
Originally posted by Djehuti:
^ Just for humor, would you care to share some of this so-called archaeological 'evidence'??

Also, non of the genetic studies (as usual) support your claims. All the haplotypes peoples in India and Iraq have in common with Africans are all derived from ancestral haplogroups from the Paleolithic which makes sense since *all* humans originated in Africa. [Embarrassed]

Sure.

This is supported by red-and-black pottery which originated in Nubia, and vessels from the IVBI workshop at Tepe Yahya. The IVBI workshop was located in West Asia. Vessels here have a uniform shape and design. The red-and black pottery, and vessels sharing this style are distributed from Egypt to China, the Soviet Uzbekistan and the Indus Valley. Philip L. Kohl, in “The balance of trade in the mid-Third millennium BC”, Current Anthropology (19,1978: 463-492) noted that the intercultural style vessels show clear parallels between Nubia/Kemetian-Iranian-Sumerian and Dravidian (Indus Valley) sites.

The genetic evidence speaks for itself. The origin of these genes do not go back to the paleolithic exit from africa, there origin was Africa, and the people carrying these genes today point back to their African origin.

.

Again a reference that does not support what is claimed. Kohl's paper is about the use of characteristic stone vessels made in Tepe Yahya to trace long distance trade between the Iran Highlands, the Mesopotamian lowlands, Syria and Uzbekistan. It does not claim that there was a common civilization between them.

The words "Nubian," "dravidian," and "red and black pottery" do not appear anywhere in the article. References to "Egypt," "Nile Valley, and "China" are used in comparing other instances of long distance trade not as components of this trade in stone vesels.

Some quotes from the article:
quote:
I shall develop this position by summarizing recent
archaeological work in highland Iran which has shown how
long-distance trade in both finished commodities and raw
materials linked geographically separated centers on the
Iranian plateau with the urban communities of the alluvial
plains of Mesopotamia and Khuzistan. I shall review the
archaeological evidence for this trade and discuss its relevance for understanding the development of early state societies in southwestern Asia and the nature of prehistoric exchange networks.
. . .

Tepe Yahya, a site located in the small intermontane Soghun Valley roughly midway between Kerman and the port city of Bandar 'Abbas, provides a particularly clear illustration of cultural interaction in the 4th and early 3d millennia between the highland communities on the Iranian plateau and the more densely populated settlements on the alluvial plains of Mesopotamia and Khuzistan.
. . . .

The products of the IVBl workshop at Tepe Yahya form a corpus of stone material uniform in material, shape, and design motifs. Vessels belonging to this corpus share a characteristic style and are widely distributed from Soviet Uzbekistan and the Indus Valley to present-day Syria; hereafter, I shall refer to them as Intercultural Style vessels (cf, figs. 1 and 2).
. . . .

Fragments from the excavations at Tepe Yahya are particularly
instructive in that they are found in association with half-finished bowls and debitage chips and are limited to certain
levels of the sequence. The vessels were carved from chlorite,
a soft green magnesium silicate, which was locally available
in the mountains north and west of the Soghun Valley. Several chlorite outcrops, scarred with pick and saw marks, were
discovered, attesting to the former removal and utilization of
the stone (Kohl 1975a:21, figs. 4, 5). Both archaeological and
geological evidence suggested that some of the elaborately carved Intercultural Style vessels which had been buried in "royal" tombs at Ur and placed in major "temples" throughout Sumer had been carved in the stone workshops of the small town at Tepe Yahya.


Posts: 833 | From: Austin, TX | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Kohl did not mention the red-and-black ware. This ceramic style was found at NKSD sites and is discussed by Singh and Andersson.

Rawlinson was convinced that there was a relationship between the Sumerians and Africans. As a result he used two African languages: one
Semitic and the other Cushitic to decipher the cuneiform writing. Rawlinson was sure that the ancient Nubians and Puntites founded Mesopotamian civilization.(1)

The Sumerians came from the Sahara before it became a desert. Affinities exist between Nubia ware and pottery from Ennedi and Tibesti.

These Saharan people were round-headed ancient Mediterranean type. They were often referred to as Cafsa or Capsians; a group of people not devoid of negroid characteristics according to J Desanges.(11) Wyatt MacGaffey, claims that the term "Mediterranean" is an anthropological euphemism for "Negro".

The boats of the Saharan people are similar to those found on ancient engravings of boats in Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley. Many of the boats found in the eastern desert of Egypt and among the Red Sea Hills show affinities to Mesopotamian models.

S.N. Kramer in The Sumerians, claimed that Makan was Egypt, Mekluhha was Nubia-Punt, and the Indus Valley was Dilmun. Today Dilmun is believed to be found near Arabia. But the archaeological evidence suggest that the Indus Valley which was settled by Dravidian speakers was the source of the lapis lazuli , which made Dilmun famous .(2)

Archaeological research has confirmed that cultural interaction existed between the contemporary civilizations of the 4th and 3rd millenia B.C. Extensive trade routes connected the Proto-Dravidians of the Indus Valley, with African people in Egypto-Nubia, and the Elamites and Sumerians. P. Kohl discovered that vessels from IVBI worshop at Tepe Yahya, have a uniform shape and design. Vessels sharing this style are
distributed from Soviet Uzbekistan to the Indus Valley, and Sumerian, Elamite and Egyptian sites. (2) In addition, we find common arrowheads at Harappan sites, and sites in Iran, Egypt, Minoan Crete and Heladic Greece.

It appears that the locus for this distribution of cultural traditions and technology was the Saharan-Nubian zone or Kush. This would explain why the Sumerians and Elamites often referred to themselves as "ksh". For example the ancient Sumerians called their dynasty "Kish". The words "kish", "kesh" and "kush" were also names for ancient Nubia-Sudan.

The Elamites also came from Kush. According to the classical writer Strabo, Susa the centre of the Elamite civilization was founded by Tithonus, king of Kush.

B.B. Lal has shown conclusively that the Dravidians came from Nubia and were related to the C-Group people who founded the Kerma dynasty.(3) They both used a common black-and-red ware (BRW) which Lal found was analogous to ceramics used by the megalithic people in India who also used analogous pottery signs identical to those found in the corpus of Indus Valley writing. (4)


Singh believes that this pottery spread from Nubia, through Mesopotamia and Iran southward into India.(5) The earliest examples of this BRW date to the Amratian period (c4000-3500 B.C.).

This same BRW was found at the lowest levels of Harappan sites at Lothal and Rangpur. After 1700 B.C. This ceramic tradition spread southward into
megalithic India.(6) It is also found in Uzbekistan and China. (12)

Dilmun was an important source of lapis lazuli. If the Indus Valley civilization was Dilmun as hypothesized by Kramer, it would explain the control of the Harappans/ or Dilmunites of this important metal.

The Indus Valley people spoke a Dravidian language.(7) The Harappans controlled the lazurite region of Badakhshan, and the routes to the tin and copper fields of central Asia.(8)

The major city of the Harappans/Dilmunites in the lapis lazuli region was Shortughai. Francefort believes that many lapis lazuli works were transported to Iran and Mesopotamia from Shortughai.(9) The BRW at Shortughai is typically Harappan.

When we put all of this evidence together we must agree that there is some historical evidence for a connection between the NKSD people. These people used similar arrow heads, red-and-black pottery, and intercultural vessels.This shows the common culture of these people.

Footnotes

(1)C.B. Rawlinson, "Notes on the early history of Babylon", Jour. Royal Asiatic Society (First Series) 15, p.230.

(2). Philip L. Kohl, "The balance of trade in the mid-Third millenium BC", Current Anthropology, 19 (1978), pp.463-492.

(3)B.B. Lal, "From megalithic to the Harappan: Tracing back the graffiti on pottery", Ancient India, 16 (1960).

(4)B.B. Lal, "The only Asian mission in threatened Nubia", The Illustrated London Times, 20 April 1963.

(5) H.N. Singh, History and Archaeology of Black-and-Red Ware , Delhi, 1982.

(6) C.A. Winters, "The Dravido-Harappan Colonization of Central Asia", Central Asiatic Journal , 34 (1-2), pp.120-144.

(7) C.A. Winters, "The Dravidian language of the Harappan script", Archiv Orientalni, (1990).

(8) B. Brenjes, "On Proto-Elamite Iran", Current Anthropology, 24 (2) (1984), pp. 240-.

(9) Henri-Paul Franceport, "La civilisation de l'Indus aux rives de l'Oxus", Archeologie , (Decembre) p.50.

(10) Ibid., p.49.

(11) J. Desnages, "The Proto-Berbers". In General History of Africa vol.2, (Ed.) by G. Mokhtar (Heinemann Educational Books, London) p.25.

(12) Andersson,T.G. 1934. CHILDREN OF THE YELLOW EARTH:STUDIES IN PREHISTORIC CHINA. London.

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BrandonP
Member
Member # 3735

Icon 1 posted      Profile for BrandonP   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
@ meninarmer

Care to explain to us why we should find melanin theory more compelling, than, say, anything in the Bell Curve?

Posts: 7069 | From: Fallbrook, CA | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
meninarmer
Member
Member # 12654

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for meninarmer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Charles Murray = American Enterprise Institute
Other then Rush Limbaugh listeners and our Hammer, Do people actually believe anything that comes out of AEI? Especially debunked IQ based theory.
Also, see AEI's Gun Control Scandal, John R. Lott (AKA Mary) who mistakenly followed Murray's lead, and paid for it. Also, reference AEI's Bellesiles' research, and discredit.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0312.wallace-wells.html

On the other hand, Melanin research is God's design, and has been proven at every major university and neurological research center in the world.

Posts: 3595 | From: Moved To Mars. Waiting with shotgun | Registered: Dec 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
yazid904
Member
Member # 7708

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for yazid904     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mr Winters approach is far superior to others because he seeks to diminish his own individual bias with the scientific method.

What is the hypothesis?
WHat is the alterntive hypothesis?
We want to confirm a theory by using objective criteria/ananlysis!

Here is my take on an ineresting case study:
As an example, the present DNA crowd want us to beileive that Haplogroup U is European one but recent genotyping have found it exists in Cameroon and some Fulbe (Fula/Fula) groups but they never explain! Why don't they? haha! They realize something is amiss! A simple solution would be to see which of haplogroup U is the oldest but they hesitate. Do you know why?

They have invested time and money and economic benefit to perpetrate certaim lies and myths that will never die! Say a lie long enough and people will believe it and it does work!

There are a few authors out there who have shown convincingly that Japanese, Turkish and Indo-European language are related! Let me back up to say the very term Indo-European is a myth but it has been in use long enough where we have come to accept it.
Now people like Dr Winters has the best of scientific and documentable information in the assertion of his research and he is automatically labelled 'an upstart'.
Dr Winters is not saying that Olmecs are African or Dravidians are Africans. There is a root group of Africans who separated from their main group and went on to form new groups with separate identity.

Since Turkey is my favourite reference point in modern history, the Turks' origin is Central Asia but the people in Turkey, while speaking a version of modern Turkish, are far removed from their Central Asian brethren. Style of life, modernity, deitary habits, etc.
If I were to look at Suleiman the Magnificant, give him a haircut and dress him in Eurocentric clothing, he would be seen as possibly Irish or Welsh!

All I am saying is that we examine with our open eyes and then see if the evidence supports what we imagine or not imagine as the semblance of truth.

Posts: 1290 | From: usa | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Djehuti
Member
Member # 6698

Rate Member
Icon 10 posted      Profile for Djehuti     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Has anyone noticed that this latest silly thread by Clyde bears a strikingly resemblance to Marc's CAPSA thread?? LOL

Add this to Meninarmer's melanin powers theory, and perhaps the topic of this thread should be changed into PSBSS (psuedo-scholaraly black supremacist stuff). [Big Grin]

Posts: 26238 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by yazid904:
Mr Winters approach is far superior to others because he seeks to diminish his own individual bias with the scientific method.

What is the hypothesis?
WHat is the alterntive hypothesis?
We want to confirm a theory by using objective criteria/ananlysis!

Hypothesis: There will be a relationship between Nubian, Kemetian, Sumerian and Dravidian civilizations.

Alternative hypothesis: There is no relationship between the NKSD civilizations.

Hypothesis confirmed by linguistic,historical, anthropological, and archaeological evidence:

1. genetically related languages
2. Intercultural style artifacts
3. common arrow heads
4. red-and-black pottery
5. presence of similar genes carried by African, and Eurasian populations
6. Historical evidence from Bible and Greco-Roman sources

Please present the evidence disconfirming this hypothesis.

.

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Kushites of Sumer and Akkad


Controversy surrounding the Kushite/African/Black origins of the Elamites, Sumerians, Akkadians and “Assyrians” is simple and yet complicated. It involves both the racism exhibited toward the African slaves in the Western Hemisphere and Africans generally which led to the idea that Africans had no history ; and the need of Julius Oppert to make Semites white, to accommodate the “white” ancestry of European Jews.

To understand this dichotomy we have to look at the history of scholarship surrounding the rise of Sumero-Akkadian studies. The study of the Sumerians, Akkadians. Assyrians and Elamites began with the decipherment of the cuneiform script by Henry Rawlinson. Henry Rawlinson had spent most of his career in the Orient. This appears to have gave him an open mind in regards to history. He recognized the Ancient Model of History, the idea that civilization was founded by the Kushite or Hamitic people of the Bible.

As result, Rawlinson was surprised during his research to discover that the founders of the Mesopotamian civilization were of Kushite origin. He made it clear that the Semitic speakers of Akkad and the non-Semitic speakers of Sumer were both Black or Negro people who called themselves sag-gig-ga “Black Heads”. In Rawlinson’s day the Sumerian people were recognized as Akkadian or Chaldean, while the Semitic speaking blacks were called Assyrians.

Rawlinson identified these Akkadians as Turanian or Scythic people. But he made it clear that these ancient Scythic or Turanian speaking people were Kushites or Blacks.

A major supporter of Rawlinson was Edward Hincks. Hincks continued Rawlinson’s work and identified the ancient group as Chaldeans, and also called them Turanian speakers. Hincks, though, never dicussed their ethnic origin.

A late comer to the study of the Sumerians and the Akkadians was Julius Oppert. Oppert was a German born of Jewish parents. He made it clear that the Chaldean and Akkadian people spoke different languages. He noted that the original founders of Mesopotamia civilization called themselves Ki-en-gi “land of the true lords”. It was the Semitic speakers who called themselves Akkadians.

Assyrians called the Ki-en-gi people Sumiritu “the sacred language”. Oppert popularized the Assyrian name Sumer, for the original founders of the civilization. Thus we have today the Akkadians and Sumerians of ancient Mesopotamia.

Oppert began to popularize the idea that the Sumerians were related to the contemporary Altaic and Turanian speaking people, e.g., Turks and Magyar (Hungarian) speaking people. He made it clear that the Akkadians were Semites like himself . To support this idea Oppert pointed out that typological features between Sumerian and Altaic languages existed. This feature was agglutination.

The problem with identifying the Sumerians as descendants from contemporary Turanian speakers resulted from the fact that Sumerian and the Turkish languages are not genetically related. As a result Oppert began to criticize the work of Hincks (who was dead at the time) in relation to the identification of the Sumerian people as Turanian following the research of Rawlinson.

Oppert knew Rawlinson had used African languages to decipher cuneiform writing. But he did not compare the Sumerian to African languages, probably, due to the fact that he knew they were related given Rawlinson's earlier research.

It is strange to some observers that Oppert,never criticized Rawlinson who had proposed the Turanian origin of the Ki-en-gi (Sumerians). But this was not strange at all. Oppert did not attack Rawlinson who was still alive at the time because he knew that Rawlinson said the Sumerians were the original Scythic and Turanian people he called Kushites. Moreover, Rawlinson made it clear that both the Akkadians and Sumerians were Blacks. For Oppert to have debated this issue with
Rawlinson, who deciphered the cuneiform script, would have meant that he would have had to accept the fact that Semites were Black. There was no way Oppert would have wanted to acknowledge his African heritage, given the Anti-Semitism experienced by Jews living in Europe.

Although Oppert successfully hid the recognition that the Akkadians and the Sumerians both refered to themselves as sag-gig-ga “black heads”, some researchers were unable to follow the status quo and ignore this reality. For example, Francois Lenormant, made it clear, following the research of Rawlinson, that the Elamite and Sumerians spoke genetically related languages. This idea was hard to reconcile with the depiction of people on the monuments of Iran, especially the Behistun monument, which depicted Negroes (with curly hair and beards) representing the Assyrians, Jews and Elamites who ruled the area. As a result, Oppert began the myth that the Sumerian languages was isolated from other languages spoken in the world evethough it shared typological features with the Altaic languages. Oppert taught Akkadian-Sumerian in many of the leading Universities in France and Germany. Many of his students soon began to dominate the Academe, or held chairs in Sumerian and Akkadian studies these researchers continued to perpetuate the myth that the Elamite and Sumerian languages were not related.

There was no way to keep from researchers who read the original Sumerian, Akkadian and Assyrian text that these people recognized that they were ethnically Blacks. This fact was made clear by Albert Terrien de LaCouperie. Born in France, de LaCouperie was a well known linguist and China expert. Although native of France most of his writings are in English. In the journal he published called the Babylonian and Oriental Record, he outlined many aspects of ancient history. In these pages he made it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and even the Assyrians who called themselves şalmat kakkadi ‘black headed people”, were all Blacks of Kushite origin. Eventhough de LaCouperie taught at the University of London, the prestige of Oppert, and the fact that the main centers for Sumero-Akkadian studies in France and Germany were founded by Oppert and or his students led to researchers ignoring the evidence that the Sumerians , Akkadians and Assyrians were Black.

In summary, the cuneiform evidence makes it clear that the Sumerians, Akkadians and Assyrians recognized themselves as Negroes: “black heads”. This fact was supported by the statues of Gudea, the Akkadians and Assyrians. Plus the Behistun monument made it clear that the Elamites were also Blacks.

The textual evidence also makes it clear that Oppert began the discussion of a typological relationship between Sumerian and Turkic languages. He also manufactured the idea that the Semites of Mesopotamia and Iran, the Assyrians and Akkadians were “whites”, like himself. Due to this brain washing, and whitening out of Blacks in history, many people today can look at depictions of Assyrians, Achamenians, and Akkadians and fail to see the Negro origin of these people.

To make the Sumerians “white” textbooks print pictures of artifacts dating to the Gutian rule of Lagash, to pass them off as the true originators of Sumerian civilization. No Gutian rulers of Lagash are recognized in the Sumerian King List.

--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I believe that the Sumerians, Harappans, Elamites and Manding speaking people all came from an ancient civilization that formerly existed in the ancient Sahara, of middle Africa.

The Fertile Saharan Crescent is an arc shaped series of highland regions in the Saharan zone of Africa. The Saharan zone is
bounded on the north by the Atlas mountains, the Atlantic Ocean in the West, the tropical rain forest in the south and the Red
Sea in the East. It was here that the ancestors of the founders of the river valley civilizations in Africa, the Middle East, China
and Indus Valley developed their highly organized and technological societies (Winters 1983a, 1985b).

The discovery of Intercultural style vessels from Susa (in Iran),Sumerian, Egyptian and Indus Valley sites suggest a shared
ideological identity among these people . In fact the appearance of shared iconographic symbols and beliefs within diverse areas suggest cultural and ethnic unity among the people practicing these cultures. The common naturalistic motifs shared by the major civilizations include, writing (symbols), combatant snakes , the scorpion, bull and etc. This evidence of cultural unity is explained by the origin of these people in the Proto-Sahara.

The Proto-Saharans similar terms for writing. In general the term for writing was formed by the labial stops /p/ and /b/. For example:
  • Dravidian par 'write'
    Manding bo, bu 'make a stroke', sebe 'write'
    Elamite tipu 'to write'
    Galla tafa 'to write'
There are also other corresponding terms for 'mark', or 'draw' that begin with velar stops:
  • Dravidian kiri, kuri 'write, draw, mark'
    Egyptian hti 'carve'
    Manding kiri, kiti 'mark'

In Egyptian we have several terms for write 0 ss #, 0 zs # , and 0 ssw #. During the Old Kingdom writing was referred to as 0
iht # .

The Egyptian term for writing 0 ssw # is analogous to the Mande terms 0 sewe # or 0 sebe # 'writing, trace, design'. In
Dravidian among other terms we have rasu 'write', and shu 'writing' in Sumerian. The Egyptian term 0 zs # is also closely
related to Sumerian 0 shu #.

Writing systems among African people were mainly devised for two purposes. Firstly, to help merchants keep records on the
business venture they made. Secondly, the Proto-Saharan script was also used to preserve religious doctrines or write
obituaries.

The scarcity of documents, written for historical preservation among ancient African groups resulted from the fact that the keeping of history, was usually left in the hands of traditional (oral) historians. These historians memorized the histories of their nation and people for future recitation before members of their respective communities. This oral history was often accompanied by music or delivered in poetic verse and remains the premier source for the history of most African nations even today.


It is obvious that the first inscriptions were engraved in stone by the Proto-Saharans , or a stylus was used to engrave wet clay. The use of the stylus or stick to engrave clay is most evident in the pottery marks found on the pottery excavated at many ancient sites which possess similar symbols impressed on the pottery.

This view is supported by the fact that the term for writing in Dravidian and Egyptian include the consonants /l/, /r/ or /d/.

A "u", is usually attached to the initial consonants (Winters 1985b). For example:
  • Sumerian ru, shu
    Elamite talu
    Dravidian carru
    Egyptian drf



These terms agree with the Manding terms for excavate or hollow out 0 du #, 0 do #, 0 kulu #, 0 tura #, etc. The Sumerian term for writing was 0 du #. This show that the Proto-Saharan term for writing denoted the creation of impressions on wet clay and hard rock.

The origin of writing among the Proto-Saharans as an activity involving the engraving of stone is most evident in the Egyptian
language. This hypothesis is supported by the Egyptian words 0 m(w)dt #. The term 0 md t # means both '(sculptor's) chisel'
and 'papyrus-roll, book'. The multiple meanings of 0 md t # makes it clear that the Egyptian, and probably other descendants of the Proto-Saharans saw a relationship between engraving stone and the creation of books.

Other Egyptian lexical items also support the important role Proto-Saharans saw in engraving rocks, and writing. In addition to 0md t # we have, 0 hti # 'carve, sculpture' and 0 iht # 'writing'. The fact that iht is an Old Kingdom term for writing, almost identical to hti, is further evidence that writing involved the engraving of stone.


The ancient Proto-Saharan settlers of of Asia and Africa, as their ancestors in the Fertile African Crescent used the term Ko to denote a rock, stone, envoy and God. Ko, may have been a variation of the word Kos "horned ram". The ram among the dwellers of the Fertile African Crescent was the primordial symbol of the Deity who was usually called: Amma, Amon/Amun, Amen and etc. The earliest representation of this deity are found in the Sahara which predate the worship of Amon-Ra in Egypt by 1000 years. Also, an unexcavated ram headed sphinx much older than the Egyptian sphinx, believed to be a rock formation, is presently situated at Siwa, in the Eastern Desert.

Due to the fact that Ko, in the languages spoken by the Proto-Saharans meant 'stone', made it natural for this term to symbolize
God, since the Deity represents both stability and power. Moreover since the Fertile African Crescent and later the Carpathian Basin were settled during a Golden Age, characterized by stability and reason, gave the term Ko a double meaning among the Proto-Saharans 1) stability and 2) power, God.

  • ………….Man child woman person

    Dravidian al mog manuci, asa uk

    Sumerian tin,mu, lu manus uku

    Manding tye, molo musa musu moko

    Magyar muki, el 'person' mag anyuci,asszony muki



  • ENGLISH SUMERIAN MANDING TAMIL

    chief kal,kala kele-tigi gasa(n)

    field gan ga kalan

    eye(l) igi akki

    eye(2) ini,en nya kan

    arrow kak kala kakam

    granary kur k'ur-k'ur kutir

    road sila sila caalai

    father pap pa appan

    lord manus mansa mannan

    male mu moko maakkal

    to recite sid siti

    to buy sa sa cel

    grain se se

    seed gen ge 'to sprout'

The linguistic data support the unity of NKSD civilizations.

--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There are a number of articles which discuss the Sumerian relationship with African and Dravidian languages including the following:

David, H S , "Some contacts and affinities between the Egypto-
Minoan and the Indo(-Dravido) Sumerian Culture",Tamil
Culture 4, no2 (1955), pages 169-175.

Winters,Clyde Ahmad,"Tamil,Sumerian and Manding and the Genetic Model",International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 18,(1989) nol.

Winters, Clyde Ahmad. (1991). The Proto-Sahara. The Dravidian Encyclopaedia. (Trivandrum: International School of Dravidian Linguistics) pp.553-556. Volume 1.

The Sumerian, Dravidian and African speakers originated in the Fertiel African Crescent, which was the Highland regions of Middle Africa. These people belonged to the Maa Clan.The Maa Confederation was the name of the major Paleo-African clan during the last great wet period in Saharan history 5000-3000 B.C. The Maa confederation includes the Egyptians, Elamites, Dravidians, Manding and Sumerians. In this paper we call members of this civilization: Proto-Saharans. To denote their ethnic origin they added the term Ma, to their ethnonyms, e.g., the Manding called themselves Ma-nde (the children of Ma); and the Sumerians called themselves Mah-Gar-ri (exalted God's children).For more information about the Proto-Saharans and the Maa civilization see Clyde A. Winters, The Proto-Culture of the Dravidians, Manding and Sumerians, Tamil Civilization,3(1), 1-9.
The Sumerian language shares many features with African and Dravidian languages.
  • PRONOUNS
    There is a similarity in pronouns:
    Language Singular Plural
    1st.Per.2nd Per. 3rd Per. 1st Per. 2nd Per. 3rd Per.
    Dravidian an,naa l a an an,ani aru
    Manding na, n' i a, e alu
    Elamite u nu ri un nun r: ir
    Sumerian ga, gal za, au ene men zu,ne ene-ne
    DEMONSTRATIVE
    Language Proximate Distant Finite
    Dravidian i a u
    Manding i a u

    Sumerian bi a

The Proto-Saharan languages share locative constructions. These directional elements can be simple or compound. Common suffixial directional elements include:
  • Elamite Sumerian English Manding
    -ak and ka
    kuttu so,also,as ka
    -hi this ni
    ukku ku on ku, kuna
    -ma ﷓na in,at na
    itaka da with la, ti
    -na of -no
    -lina -ta for -ti
Common directional elements include:
  • ma -a in na
    imma, ni out,of ma, no
    ikku (ikki) -ra to koro
    lina ta for ti
    mar from a place ma 'area,land'
    itaka da with la, ti


All the Proto-Saharan languages share certain grammatical features. Those grammatical elements shared by Dravidian, Elamite, Sumerian and Black African languages include 1) vowel harmony, 2) absence of initial clusters of consonants, 3) abundance of geminated consonants,4) distinction of inclusive and exclusive pronouns in first person plural, 5) absence of
degrees of comparison for adjectives and adverbs as distinct morphological categories, 6) consonant alteration on nominal increments noticed by different classes,7) distinction of completed action among verbal paradigms as against specific tense distinction and 9) use of reduplication for emphasis (and plural).
AFFIXES
In the Dravidian, Egyptian, Elamite, Manding and Dravidian languages words are formed by adding an affix to a radical. In this section we will discuss certain aspects of shared Proto-Saharan morphology.

In these languages suffixes are usually used to create words. These suffixes can be a single consonant (C) or vowel (V), or a monosyllabic form (CV). The most common suffix in Dravidian, Egyptian, Elamite, Manding and Sumerian are the postfixes -ki, -ka and -ta , which are used to denote clans, nationality, lands and countries .
PLURAL

In the Proto﷓Saharan languages the plural is formed by adding -u,-w,-ba, -pa and -lu.In Egyptian, the -w suffix is used to form the plural. In the Dravidian (Dr.) . languages the plural if formed by -lu, especially in Telugu. In the Manding (M) group, and other African languages we find -lu or -u (-w), e.g., M. mogo 'husband,(pl.) mogo﷓lu 'husbands'; Telugu magaadu 'husband , man', (pl.) magaalu 'husbands'.

In many Black African languages ba means 'abundance, many'. In Elamite pa or fa is used to make plural numbers, e.g., ko-fa inna 'of the Kings', Bapitu fa-pa "to the Babylonians". The use of -pa, by the Elamites corresponds to the Manding use of the -ba suffix , which is joined to nouns to denote the idea of greatness, physical or moral e.g., na-folo 'good,rich'
, no-folo-ba 'great fortune'; and so-kalo 'piece', so-kala-ba 'considerable quarter of a village'.

NEGATIVE
In Black African languages including Egyptian the -n, is used to show negation. In Egyptian we often find -nn, e.g., nn wn 'there is nothing'. In Elamite the negative is formed by an uninflected nominal derivative in -n (active participle), e.g., ink 'I not", inr 'he not' and ani 'not'. This suffix is analogous to the M. negative suffix -na, employed as a suffix to -ka, e.g., ka na ku na tara so "I did not say I was going to the house" .

In Tamil the negative verbal participle is formed by suffixing a﷓mal or a-mei, e.g., sey (y)-a-mal 'without stopping'. The Tamil suffix -mei is also used as a termination for abstract nouns.

The negative suffix in Manding is -na, which is proceeded by ka and nt'i, e.g., kalu mba-nt'i. In Sumerian the negation of the verb is expressed by the prefixes nu- or la-, e.g., nu-zu "not to know", la-gin "not to fix" and nu-dug "not good. The optative mood are negatived by the element na,na-ma-pad "she may not".

PARTICLES

In Elamite personal nouns are formed by adding -ra, e.g., Kellira 'commander', kutira 'bearer'. This relates to the Manding suffix of the past and present participle -ra, this particle is used to make verbs passive or active, e.g., kyi 'send', kyi-ra 'messenger', gyi (ji) 'dry up', gyi-ra 'arid'.

In Sumerian the dative is expressed by the suffix -ra, which may appear in the form of -ar, -ir , and -ur, e.g., ma-ra 'to me', lugal-e-a-ra ' to the owner of the house'. This parallels the Manding locative suffix -ra, and -la , which can represent 'to,or, for, in ', e.g., tu-ra 'in the forest'.

The Elamite indefinite article is -ra, e.g., Parsar-ra 'a Persian', Afartu-ra 'an Elamite'. This corresponds to the Manding locative suffix -ra, e.g., Ton-ra 'land of Ton'.

The Proto-Saharan languages share the present participle -tu/-to. In Telugu (Tel.),the suffix -tu , is used as the present participle while in the Manding languages -to has the same function e.g., Tel. chestu 'made', M.tege 'to cut', tege-to 'cutting'.

The active participle in Elamite is -n, e.g., talu-n 'writing', or hali-n 'toiling'. This corresponds to the Manding -ni and -li elements e.g., sa 'buy', sanni 'buying', or du-mu 'eat', dumu-ni 'eating'. This -n, active participle is found in many other Black African languages including Egyptian.

The use of the -ka element is frequently found in the formation of Dravidian, Elamite, Egyptian, Manding and Sumerian languages. In Egyptian as outlined by Cheikh Anta Diop, in Nouvelles Recherches Sur l' Egyptien Ancien et Langues Negro-Africaines Modernes (pp.55-57), he outlines the use of /k/ and /t/ , to form agent nouns. In Parente genetique de l'Egyptien Pharonique et des langues Negro-Africaines (p.18), Diop explains the evolution of the -ky, and -kt particles.

In Elamite the passive participle is formed by -ka, e.g., hulta-ka 'done', turu-ka 'said'. This corresponds to the Manding -ka 'make, do',e.g., nyine 'see', nyini-ka 'interogate'.

In the Dravidian and Manding languages -ka, is used to represent the verb 'to be', as well as the subjunctive. For example in Manding languages ka, is a particle of different values, which corresponds to -kaa, the infinitive element in Telugu of the verb ag-uta 'to become'. In Tamil this element appears as aaga. For example, in Manding we have a ka-nye 'it's good'; and in Telugu kaa valenu 'it is necessary'. The same radical -ka represents the optative form in Telugu, e.g., aapani mundara kani 'how is labor given first place?'

In the Dravidian languages the suffixes -ke, -ge and -ka are used as the primitive verb 'to be' or 'to do'. They are usually used with abstract nouns e.g., ol 'to reign', ol-ka 'domination'. This corresponds to the Manding verb 'to do' ke , which is often joined to -la to form derived nouns e.g., sene 'cultivate', sene-li ke-la 'cultivator'.

These languages also share many cognate terms.


  • ENGLISH SUMERIAN MANDING TAMIL
    chief kal,kala kele﷓tigi gasa(n)
    field gan ga kalan
    eye(l) igi akki
    eye(2) ini,en nya kan
    arrow kak kala kakam
    granary kur k'ur﷓k'ur kutir
    road sila sila caalai
    father pap pa appan
    lord manus mansa mannan
    male mu moko maakkal
    to recite sid siti
    to buy sa sa cel
    grain se se
    seed gen ge 'to sprout'


--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Up^
Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
unfinished thought
Member
Member # 15848

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for unfinished thought     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
 -
Posts: 504 | Registered: Sep 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
In 1989 I compared the Mande (Bambara-Malinke), and Tamil languages to use glottochronology to determine the date of separation for these languages. Below are a few of the cognates.
  • ENGLISH SUMERIAN MANDING TAMIL

    chief kal,kala kele-tigi gasa(n)

    field gan ga kalan

    eye(l) igi akki

    eye(2) ini,en nya kan

    arrow kak kala kakam

    granary kur k'ur-k'ur kutir

    road sila sila caalai

    father pap pa appan

    lord manus mansa mannan

    male mu moko maakkal

    to recite sid siti

    to buy sa sa cel

    grain se se

    seed gen ge 'to sprout'
The lexical evidence above supported the hypothesis that a genetic relationship exist between the Mande language which is a member of the Niger-Congo family , Tamil (Dravidian), and Sumerian. This linguistic data illustrates that a common cultural macrostructure is shared by these speakers which subsequently evolved along separate lines.

Given this genetic unity of these languages I call this group of Paleo-African languages situated in Africa and Asia B(lack) Af(rican), S(umerian, Draa(vidian), (E)lam: or Bafsudraalam subset of the Proto-Saharan Superset of languages.(Winters 1989)

The theory of borrowing in ancient time can not account for these morphological, lexicological and phonetic correspondences between Dravidian , Elamite, Egyptian, Manding and Sumerian, because of geographical discontinuity. This cognition illustrates a genetic relationship between the Bafsudraalam subset of the Proto-Saharan family of languages.

In Winters (l989) after a comparison of 100 lexical items from Manding and Dravidian indicated a cognate rate of 70 to 75 percent . The retention rate corresponds to a minimum separation of 1.18 millennia.

Using the standard rates of retention for glottochronology, the rate for corresponding Manding, Sumerian and Tamil terms together is 50 percent retention rate, and suggest a minimum length of separation of 2.29 millennia for the group as a whole.(Winters 1989)

But when we compare Manding-Sumerian the retention rate was 70 percent or a minimum length of separation of 1.18 millennia. A comparison of Sumerian-Tamil corresponds to a 57 percent retention rate or a minimum separation of 1.50 millennia.

The length of separations for these languages are far too recent. Formerly I believed that Sumerian had been absorbed by the Akkadian language much earlier then 2.29 millennia ago. I was wrong Sachs (1976) proved that Sumerian was still in use by the first century C.E. The fact that the retention rate for Sumerian and Mande is 1.18 millennia corresponds to the date for the end of Sumerian writing in Mesopotamia.

Reference:
A. Sachs 'The Latest Datable Cuneiform Tablets'; Kramer Anniversary Volume,1976. the passage of time".

--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AGÜEYBANÁ II (Mind718)
Member
Member # 15400

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AGÜEYBANÁ II (Mind718)     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^^^^^^^^^Yet 20 years later you're still wrong.
Clyde, don't you understand that you're wrong about everything you've proposed so far?

NO wonder Clarence Thomas tells us to discard Afro-centrism.......


I wonder how it feels to watch your life work go down the drain......

Posts: 6572 | From: N.Y.C....Capital of the World | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
 -
Move it up.

--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Knowledgeiskey718:
^^^^^^^^^Yet 20 years later you're still wrong.
Clyde, don't you understand that you're wrong about everything you've proposed so far?

NO wonder Clarence Thomas tells us to discard Afro-centrism.......


I wonder how it feels to watch your life work go down the drain......

LOL. Your adoration of Clarence Thomas, is illustrative of your self-hate of African people and being, as an uncle Tom.

.

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
malibudusul
Member
Member # 19346

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for malibudusul     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Do you have paintings of India
before the Aryan invasion?

And paintings of Sumerian?

Posts: 2922 | From: World Empire of the Black People | Registered: Jul 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
 -

Ancient Woman from Indus Valley

 -

sumerian


In textbooks Gutians are passed off as Sumerians.


 -

Gutian....Sumerian

.

--------------------
C. A. Winters

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MelaninKing
Member
Member # 17444

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for MelaninKing     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:
Originally posted by Knowledgeiskey718:
^^^^^^^^^Yet 20 years later you're still wrong.
Clyde, don't you understand that you're wrong about everything you've proposed so far?

NO wonder Clarence Thomas tells us to discard Afro-centrism.......


I wonder how it feels to watch your life work go down the drain......

LOL. Your adoration of Clarence Thomas, is illustrative of your self-hate of African people and being, as an uncle Tom.

.

That's pretty much standard M.O.!

If things are as consistent as always, next he'll be quoting Showell.

Posts: 2403 | Registered: Feb 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
the lioness,
Member
Member # 17353

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for the lioness,     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Twenty-seven statues of Gudea were found during Ernest de Sarzec's excavations in the court of the palace of Adad-nadin-ahhe in Telloh (ancient Girsu).


Various Gudea sculptures

Gudea (nose broken)
 -


below, same sculpture, side view
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:


 -


Other Gudea statues:

 -
 -
 -

 -
 -

"Seated statue of Gudea [Probably Tello (ancient Girsu), southern Mesopotamia] (59.2)". In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/02/wam/ho_59.2.htm (October 2006)

Posts: 42918 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
the Iioness,
Member
Member # 19312

Icon 1 posted      Profile for the Iioness,     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

Posts: 558 | From: forum | Registered: Jul 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Clyde Winters
Member
Member # 10129

Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Clyde Winters   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by the lioness:
Twenty-seven statues of Gudea were found during Ernest de Sarzec's excavations in the court of the palace of Adad-nadin-ahhe in Telloh (ancient Girsu).


Various Gudea sculptures

Gudea (nose broken)
 -


below, same sculpture, side view
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Winters:


 -


Other Gudea statues:

 -
 -
 -

 -
 -

"Seated statue of Gudea [Probably Tello (ancient Girsu), southern Mesopotamia] (59.2)". In Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2000–. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/02/wam/ho_59.2.htm (October 2006)

As you probably know just about all the statues you published were reproductions,

.

Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zarahan aka Enrique Cardova
Member
Member # 15718

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zarahan aka Enrique Cardova     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dr. Cress-Welsing's work has been debated for quite some time now. Many researchers have agreed and validated some of her work..

Exactly what researchers have validated and agreed
with Cress-Wesling's work? What parts specifically
do they agree with?

Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3