Genetic Data and Fossil Evidence Tell Differing Tales of Human Origins By NICHOLAS WADE After decades of digging, paleoanthropologists looking for fossilized human bones have established a reasonably clear picture: Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe. Geneticists studying DNA now say that, to the contrary, a previously unknown archaic species of human, a cousin of the Neanderthals, may have lingered in Africa until perhaps 25,000 years ago, coexisting with the modern humans and on occasion interbreeding with them.
The geneticists reached this conclusion, reported on Thursday in the journal Cell, after decoding the entire genome of three isolated hunter-gatherer peoples in Africa, hoping to cast light on the origins of modern human evolution. But the finding is regarded skeptically by some paleoanthropologists because of the absence in the fossil record of anything that would support the geneticists’ statistical calculations.
Two of the hunter-gatherers in the study, the Hadza and Sandawe of Tanzania, speak click languages and carry ancient DNA lineages that trace to the earliest branchings of the human family tree. The third group is that of the forest-dwelling pygmies of Cameroon, who also have ancient lineages and unusual blood types.
The geneticists, led by Joseph Lachance and Sarah A. Tishkoff of the University of Pennsylvania, decoded the entire genomes of five men from each of these groups. The costs of whole-genome sequencing have fallen so much that the technique can now be applied to populations for the first time, said Dr. Tishkoff, who paid the company Complete Genomics around $10,000 for each of the 15 genomes.
Among the DNA sequences special to pygmies, Dr. Tishkoff and colleagues found a variant of the usual gene that controls development of the pituitary gland, the source of the hormones that control reproduction and growth. This could be the cause of the pygmies’ short stature and early age of reproduction, the researchers say.
The genomes of the pygmies and the Hadza and Sandawe click-speakers contained many short stretches of DNA with highly unusual sequences. Through mutation, the genomes of species that once had a common ancestor grow increasingly unlike one another. Dr. Tishkoff’s team interprets these divergent DNA sequences as genetic remnants of an interbreeding with an archaic species of human. Genetic calculations suggest the interbreeding took place between 20,000 and 80,000 years ago.
From calculations of the amount of divergence in the DNA, the geneticists estimate that the archaic species split from the ancestors of modern humans about 1.2 million years ago, about the same time as did the ancestors of the Neanderthals, who dominated Europe during the end of the last ice age.
But the archaic species has a different DNA sequence from that of Neanderthals, whose genome has been reconstructed from DNA surviving in ancient bones, and so may be a sister species, the geneticists say.
Inquiries into human origins are on strong ground when genetic data and fossil evidence point in the same direction, but at present geneticists and paleoanthropologists have somewhat different stories to tell. All human fossil remains in Africa for the last 100,000 years, and probably the last 200,000 years, are of modern humans, providing no support for a coexistent archaic species. Another team of geneticists reported in 2010 the finding that Neanderthals had interbred 100,000 years ago with Europeans and Asians, but not Africans. This, too, conflicted with the fossil evidence in implying that modern humans left Africa 100,000 years ago, some 55,000 years before the earliest known fossil evidence of this exodus.
In a report still under review, a third group of geneticists says there are signs of Neanderthals having interbred with Asians and East Africans. But Neanderthals were a cold-adapted species that never reached East Africa.
These three claims of interbreeding have opened up a serious discordance between geneticists and paleoanthropologists. For digesting the geneticists’ claims, “sup with a long spoon,” advised Bernard Wood, a paleoanthropologist at George Washington University.
Richard Klein, a paleoanthropologist at Stanford University, said the new claim of archaic and modern human interbreeding “is a further example of the tendency for geneticists to ignore fossil and archaeological evidence, perhaps because they think it can always be molded to fit the genetics after the fact.”
Dr. Klein said the claims of interbreeding could be “a methodological artifact” in the statistical assumptions on which the geneticists’ calculations are based. The flaw may come to light when enough inconsistent claims are published. “Meanwhile, I think it’s important to regard such claims skeptically when they are so clearly at odds with the fossil and archaeological records,” he said.
Dr. Tishkoff said that she agreed on the need for caution in making statistical inferences, and that there are other events besides interbreeding, like a piece of DNA getting flipped around the wrong way, that can make a single DNA sequence look ancient. “But when you see it at a genomewide level, it’s harder to explain away,” she said.
A co-author, Joshua M. Akey of the University of Washington in Seattle, said he was “reasonably confident that what we are seeing in Africa does represent archaic introgression.” The archaic sequences make up only 2.5 percent of the genomes of the living hunter-gatherers, and there is no evidence that they are being favored by natural selection. They may, therefore, have no effect on a person’s physical form, which could explain why the fossils show little sign of them, Dr. Akey said.
Although all known African fossils are of modern humans, a 13,000-year-old skull from the Iwo Eleru site in Nigeria has certain primitive features. “This might have indicated interbreeding with archaics,” said Chris Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London. “For half of Africa we really have no fossil record to speak of, so I think it’s quite likely there were surviving archaic forms living alongside modern humans.”
Paleoanthropologists like Dr. Klein consider it “irresponsible” of the geneticists to publish genetic findings about human origins without even trying to show how they may fit in with the existing fossil and archaeological evidence. Dr. Akey said he agreed that genetics can provide only part of the story. “But hopefully this is just a period when new discoveries are being made and there hasn’t been enough incubation time to synthesize all the disparities,” he said.
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
But Neanderthals were a cold-adapted species that never reached East Africa.
These three claims of interbreeding have opened up a serious discordance between geneticists and paleoanthropologists. For digesting the geneticists’ claims, “sup with a long spoon,” advised Bernard Wood, a paleoanthropologist at George Washington University.
Richard Klein, a paleoanthropologist at Stanford University, said the new claim of archaic and modern human interbreeding “is a further example of the tendency for geneticists to ignore fossil and archaeological evidence, perhaps because they think it can always be molded to fit the genetics after the fact.”
Dr. Klein said the claims of interbreeding could be “a methodological artifact” in the statistical assumptions on which the geneticists’ calculations are based. The flaw may come to light when enough inconsistent claims are published. “Meanwhile, I think it’s important to regard such claims skeptically when they are so clearly at odds with the fossil and archaeological records,” he said.
No doubt more research is needed. But it is amusing to see some Europeans on various "biodiversity" websites trying to water down the fact of the emergence of anatomically modern humans in Africa, and not supposedly "mo betta" cold climate Europe or Asia. The article in any rate does demonstrate how important multiple lines of evidence are. Fossil and archaeological evidence should show at least some moderate correspondence to DNA estimates and speculation. Keita notes that this is especially important where African bio-history is concerned.
-------------------- Note: I am not an "Egyptologist" as claimed by some still bitter, defeated, trolls creating fake profiles and posts elsewhere. Hapless losers, you still fail. My output of hard data debunking racist nonsense has actually INCREASED since you began.. Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
several points stand out. 1. Although all known African fossils are of modern humans
2. For half of Africa we really have no fossil record to speak of
3. This, too, conflicted with the fossil evidence in implying that modern humans left Africa 100,000 years ago, some 55,000 years before the earliest known fossil evidence of this exodus.
which half of Africa have no fossil record?
Both south Africa and north Africa have fossil records. Are they talking the equatorial belt?
Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Perhaps. We have fossils from southern Africa via the Cape region, North Africa via Egypt and of course especially East Africa as that has always been the focal point of study no doubt to Eurocentric or Eurasiatic bias i.e. East Africa being the cradle of all Out-of-Africans.
There is good reason to be skeptical of these genetic findings. For one not only are there no fossils to back up these claims, but the genomes of many African populations still haven't been mapped yet which is why we only get a checkered view of the African genomic landscape which bio-anthropologists agree is the most diverse of any human populations on the planet. This is why you get Euronuts making all these claims about certain African lineages having Eurasian origin just because they resemble or are closely tied to lineages in Eurasia. How are they even certain if as Keita says, during the Paleolithic human groups were moving back and forth between Africa and Eurasia (specifically Arabia). This article about Neanderthal related species or even Neanderthals interbreeding with East Africans is why we get even Euronut claims that Masaai are part Eurasian. LOL Unless the proper assessment of genetic lineages in Africa is attained, these claims will continue to be just grasping in the dark for anything.
Posts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
48 chromosomes, source?? that is fundamental problems with this Neanderthal admixture stuff. Meosis/mitosis from high school biology.
Now that you mention it - the article contradicts itself. I agree, what is Homoerectus? Also most archaic human fossils are found IN Africa.
Yeah, they have a thing for Neanderthals and NOT Homo Erectus. Although Neanderthals are NOT their ancestors....
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
neanderrthal is the direct ancestor of the cracker! THIS IS A TEACHABLE MOMENT!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
quote:Originally posted by Apocalypse: ^ Tough day today?
Ignore VansertimaRectifiedIdiot. He is a troll that contributes nothing but idiotic commentary. If the moderators were around he and all of his posts would have been deleted. Posts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: sighhhh!! I am going to bite!
48 chromosomes, source?? that is fundamental problems with this Neanderthal admixture stuff. Meosis/mitosis from high school biology.
Now that you mention it - the article contradicts itself. I agree, what is Homoerectus? Also most archaic human fossils are found IN Africa.
Yeah, they have a thing for Neanderthals and NOT Homo Erectus. Although Neanderthals are NOT their ancestors....
Their 'thing' for Neanderthals is based on the fact that Neanderthal was the ORIGINAL Hominid of Europe i.e. modern Europeans' predecessors. That's why I laugh at all these programs on Neanderthals in channels like Discovery, all its sister channels, and Nat Geo. They talk about Neanderthals in Europe and then talk about the possibility that these Neanderthals may have crossed-bred with "our early ancestors" and thus "we may have Neanderthal genes". I'm sitting there like don't you mean Y'ALL as in 'we WHITES of Europe'! LOL Typical Eurocentric bias where Europeans somehow represent all of humanity and what about the rest of Eurasia?? How many of you recall the discovery of Homo floresiensis a.k.a. the 'Hobbit' which again shows the Eurocentric bias. The remains of the being was found in Indonesia NOT Nordic Europe or whatever Middle-Earth Tolkien crap.
And again, as I said these geneticists don't even have a full genomes on all indigenous peoples of the world let alone the indigenees of Africa so how the hell would they know which genetic signatures are that of primitive hominids??
Posts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
It's sad to see what the forum has come to Djehuti. I'm nostalgic for the old days when the likes of Rasol, Supercar (troll Patrol), Altakruri, Zaharan, Brada, Bass, and you made this a great place to learn and share ideas. Now it has unfortunately become a refuge for lunatics, reactionary white supremicists, black supremicists, and perverts. Very few of the newbies (Sweenet being one of the refreshing exceptions) are sane.
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Apocalypse: It's sad to see what the forum has come to Djehuti. I'm nostalgic for the old days when the likes of Rasol, Supercar (troll Patrol), Altakruri, Zaharan, Brada, Bass, and you made this a great place to learn and share ideas. Now it has unfortunately become a refuge for lunatics, reactionary white supremicists, black supremicists, and perverts. Very few of the newbies (Sweenet being one of the refreshing exceptions) are sane.
Those where the days - lets us not forget about what box, ru2religious, and a few others.
Posts: 951 | From: where rules end and freedom begins | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
TEACHABLE MOMENT for the sanitorium scholar-patient: The word is fallacious not fallaceous.
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
BTW Zaharan correctly picked up on what I think is salient about the article and the reason I posted it. The rush to embrace archaic contributions/introgression into to modern humans may be premature.
quote:Dr. Klein said the claims of interbreeding could be “a methodological artifact” in the statistical assumptions on which the geneticists’ calculations are based. The flaw may come to light when enough inconsistent claims are published. “Meanwhile, I think it’s important to regard such claims skeptically when they are so clearly at odds with the fossil and archaeological records,” he said.
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
the filthy pink assed monkey knows that this will not end well for it! LOL
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
skeletal remains of homo erectus have been found in China that are almost 2 million years old! And the oldest remains of Neanderthal that have been found date to 200,000 years Hmmmmmm
Homo Erectus preceeds Neanderthal by millions of years but yet Neanderthal went extinct BEFORE Homo Erectus did. Neanderthal sure must have been a dumb unevolved ape huh?
the filthy pink assed monkey knows that this will not end well for it! LOL
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Now you understand why these reprobates deem it so important to create the fantasy that Neanderthal wore clothes, cooked its food, buried its dead and even played the flute! Hahahaha! These beasts are even now saying that Homo erectus cooked its food, but we ALL know that Neanderthal no more cooked its food, than a Gorilla or a Chimp cooks its food!
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Neanderthal is lower on the evolutionary scale than a Chimpanzee or Gorilla! Now think about that for a moment yall!
Neanderthal is lower on the evolutionary scale than a Chimpanzee or Gorilla!
Now you understand why these reprobates deem it so important to create the fantasy that Neanderthal wore clothes, cooked its food, buried its dead and even played the flute! Hahahaha! These beasts are even now saying that Homo erectus cooked its food, but we ALL know that Neanderthal no more cooked its food, than a Gorilla or a Chimp cooks its food!
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Homo rhodesiensis (Rhodesian man) is a hominin species has been interpreted as an "African Neanderthal". However, when regarding the skulls extreme robustness, recent research has pointed to several features intermediate between modern Homo sapiens and Neanderthal, described from the fossil Kabwe skull, discovered in 1921 in Kabwe (formerly Broken Hill), Zambia. This skull was the first fossil of a human ancestor to be discovered in Africa. Saldanha – a skullcap discovered in 1953 in Elandsfontein, South Africa. This skullcap closely resembles the Broken Hill 1 skull in having large brow ridges, a broad, sloping forehead and a rear skull wall that is vertical rather than rounded or sloping.
Homo heidelbergensis Most current experts believe Rhodesian Man to be within the group of Homo heidelbergensis though other designations such as Archaic Homo sapiens and Homo sapiens rhodesiensis have also been proposed. According to Tim White, it is probable that Rhodesian Man was the ancestor of Homo sapiens idaltu (Herto Man), which itself was the ancestor of Homo sapiens sapiens. Other morphologically-comparable remains have been found from the same, or earlier, time period in southern Africa (Hopefield or Saldanha), East Africa (Bodo, Ndutu, Eyasi, Ileret) and North Africa (Salé, Rabat, Dar-es-Soltane, Djbel Irhoud, Sidi Aberrahaman, Tighenif). These remains were dated between 300,000 and 125,000 years old. Arago 21 and Arago – skull and lower jaw discovered in Arago Caves, Tautavel, France. Mauer 1 – a lower jaw discovered in 1907 in Mauer, near Heidelberg, Germany. The remains of at least 6 individuals found at the site of Gran Dolina, Atapuerca, in Spain
Neanderthals (Neander-thal, the ‘th’ pronounced as ‘t’) are our closest extinct human relative. Some defining features of their skulls include the large middle part of the face, angled cheek bones, and a huge nose for humidifying and warming cold, dry air. Their bodies were shorter and stockier than ours, another adaptation to living in cold environments. But their brains were just as large as ours and often larger - proportional to their brawnier bodies. Neanderthals made and used a diverse set of sophisticated tools, controlled fire, lived in shelters, made and wore clothing, were skilled hunters of large animals and also ate plant foods, and occasionally made symbolic or ornamental objects. There is evidence that Neanderthals deliberately buried their dead and occasionally even marked their graves with offerings, such as flowers. No other primates, and no earlier human species, had ever practiced this sophisticated and symbolic behavior. DNA has been recovered from more than a dozen Neanderthal fossils, all from Europe; the Neanderthal Genome Project is one of the exciting new areas of human origins research.
Denisovans An international team of scientists has identified a previously shadowy human group known as the Denisovans as cousins to Neanderthals who lived in Asia from roughly 400,000 to 50,000 years ago and interbred with the ancestors of today’s inhabitants of New Guinea.On the basis of the new findings, the scientists propose that the ancestors of Neanderthals and Denisovans emerged from Africa half a million years ago. The Neanderthals spread westward, settling in the Near East and Europe. The Denisovans headed east. Some 50,000 years ago, they interbred with humans expanding from Africa along the coast of South Asia, bequeathing some of their DNA to them.Nick Patterson, a Broad Institute geneticist, compared the Denisovan genome to the complete genomes of five people, from South Africa, Nigeria, China, France and Papua New Guinea. To his astonishment, a sizable chunk of the Denisova genome resembled parts of the New Guinea DNA.
Posts: 42925 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Yet all these species above were extinct by the time period that the article suggests the inter-mixture took place. Again we don't know what this species was exactly that supposedly mixed with humans IF such a thing even happened.
quote:Originally posted by Apocalypse: It's sad to see what the forum has come to Djehuti. I'm nostalgic for the old days when the likes of Rasol, Supercar (troll Patrol), Altakruri, Zaharan, Brada, Bass, and you made this a great place to learn and share ideas. Now it has unfortunately become a refuge for lunatics, reactionary white supremicists, black supremicists, and perverts. Very few of the newbies (Sweenet being one of the refreshing exceptions) are sane.
Ah yes, I miss those days as well. Even though we had our share of trolls, it wasn't as bad as nowadays. By the way, so sorry Apocalypse that your thread had to be ruined by the retard troll VansertimaRectifiedIdiot.
quote: BTW Zaharan correctly picked up on what I think is salient about the article and the reason I posted it. The rush to embrace archaic contributions/introgression into to modern humans may be premature.
Yes, I do find this very odd considering how it seems there are many in academia that are only reluctantly willing to admit to the single African origins of humanity and that our early ancestors were black. I'm sure you've seen the mental acrobatics performed in an attempt to dissociate these early human ancestors from the modern 'Negro' peoples of Africa. LOL Now, these scientists are bent on suggesting these early humans were mixed with more primitive hominids?!! Something ain't right about this, not only scientifically but psychologically. Posts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthal is lower on the evolutionary scale than a Chimpanzee or Gorilla! Now think about that for a moment yall!
Neanderthal is lower on the evolutionary scale than a Chimpanzee or Gorilla!
Now you understand why these reprobates deem it so important to create the fantasy that Neanderthal wore clothes, cooked its food, buried its dead and even played the flute! Hahahaha! These beasts are even now saying that Homo erectus cooked its food, but we ALL know that Neanderthal no more cooked its food, than a Gorilla or a Chimp cooks its food!
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Neanderthal is lower on the evolutionary scale than a Chimpanzee or Gorilla! Now think about that for a moment yall!
Neanderthal is lower on the evolutionary scale than a Chimpanzee or Gorilla!
Now you understand why these reprobates deem it so important to create the fantasy that Neanderthal wore clothes, cooked its food, buried its dead and even played the flute! Hahahaha! These beasts are even now saying that Homo erectus cooked its food, but we ALL know that Neanderthal no more cooked its food, than a Gorilla or a Chimp cooks its food!
For the life of me, I still have not figured out why these devils refuse to embrace their Neanderthal father! bwahahahahaha! Kinda makes ya wonder why you dont know more about homo erectus dosent it? we know that Neanderthal evolved from homo erectus, and that Homo eretus came MILLIONS of years before Neanderthal, but Homo erectus seemed to be the more evolved ape!LOL
Notice how the pink assed monkey in its many fake names does not refute a thing that I have said! (which is actually dissappointing) LOL The best that the pink assed monkey can come up with is a demand for a source showing that Neanderthal was a 48 chromosome ape (which is half of what I am seeking to accomplish here) In less than 24 hrs the low IQ reprobate will provide the second half, to complete this project, because as you all know by now.. I OWN this stringy haired pibnk ased monkey! I am this monkeys Master!
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
Posts: 3642 | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
Posts: 3642 | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
Posts: 3642 | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
Posts: 3642 | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
Neanderthal did not exist in any part of Africa, it did not exist in any part of East Asia and Neanderthal did not exist in any part of South Asia. Neanderthal only existed in parts of Western Asia, Central Asia (Which is neanderthals origin) and Europe
Now you can see why these filthy pink assed devils have now concoted the lie with respect to Neanderthal adding its genetic material to modern humans in the middle east. its really quite pathetic and amusing watching these monkeys lie, because with each lie that these beasts tell science forces them to create a new lie to cover up the old ones! Hahahaha Now Homo Erectus DID exist in Africa, and Homo Erectus DID exist in East Asia, and South Asia, as well as Western Asia and Europe too!
have you ever wondered how Homo erectus could exist in all of those places whereas Neanderthal did NOT? The answer is of course that Homo Erectus is much OLDER than Neanderthal and Neanderthal EVOLVED from Homo Erectus and much older apes much later in landlocked Central Asia. By the time that Neanderthal evolved it could not walk to East Asia or southern asia as its ancestor Homo erectus had, but it was still able to walk to Europe (which it did) and of course when modern man left Africa, we exterminated both Neanderthal AND Homo erectus whereever we found it. I bet you wont read that anywhere will ya?!
I like when the filthy pink assed monkey creates threads like this because it serves a dual purpose! You can see how these beasts use their media to manipulate you, for example, just look at the article that the jew york times had the nerve to print. But it also serves another purpose! We all get to watch this filthy beast twist its pathetic pink ass in knots when we present the facts!
You just have to love this! The google scholar searches the internet looking for any article or fallaceous source that it can find that suppports its world view! LOL
1)Homo Erectus fossils have been found all over Africa, with the oldest to date being found in Chad which is in CENTRAL Africa. But to be more specific, Homo Erectus has been found in East Afica, West Africa, South Africa and as I indicated earlier the OLDEST found to date was found in Chad which is CENTRAL AFRICA!... so what is this monkey talking about?
2)How can there be no fossil record for half of Africa when Homo Erectus fossils have been found in ALL of Africa?
3)The very fallaceous article that this monkey is using to try and trick you ADMITS that Neanderthal did not exist in Africa albiet you have to possess a certain understanding of cracker deception to see this admission. I will just quote the article
""" Modern humans arose in Africa some 200,000 years ago and all archaic species of humans then disappeared, surviving only outside Africa, as did the Neanderthals in Europe"""
What they are admitting is that Neanderthal NEVER existed in Africa which is a problem for these crackers, and its always why they go through these linguistic gymnasticca when discussing their Neanderthal daddy!
What the article admits, is that modern man arose from Africa just like ""archaic"" species of humans arose in Africa.
Without making this too complicated, archaic species of humans = Homo Erectus and Neanderthal etc. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THAT NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA!
The fact of the matter is that these are not archaic species of humans at all but rather Homo Erectus and Neanderthal were 48 chromosome apes, just like Gorillas and Chimpanzees are 48 chromosome apes. In fact Neanderthal and Homo Erectus are more distant from modern humans that either a Gorilla or a Chimp, with the caveat being that Neanderthal is the white mans daddy! Gorillas and Chimpanzeees are MORE human than either Neanderthal or Homo Erectus yall! Now can you see why these filthy pigs lie so much? NEANDERTHAL NEVER EXISTED IN AFRICA and thats a problem for these reprobates, because they KNOW that they are the offspring of Neanderthal.. a species of ape which never existed in Africa! The thread that I will post below will further enhance your understading
Posts: 3642 | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
posted
On this, the paleoanthropologists got it right. Geneticists tend to make over-reaching conclusions from finds that they are unable to explain, like in this case, and as admitted by the geneticists themselves, communicated through for example by "many short stretches of DNA with highly unusual sequences".
The geneticists involved figured that because these short strands featured "highly unusual" sequences, then they must necessarily belong to some unidentified "archaic" Homo Sapien variant. Indeed these highly speculative theories are inconsistent with fossil evidence. I've raised this matter time and again before, when allegations about Neanderthals interbreeding with modern humans was flying around...about the tendency of geneticists to make these sorts of premature allegations, from no other line of irrefutable evidence, but primarily based on the supposed "unusuality" of a DNA sequence at a selected locus.
Remember that even though rapid advances have been made, molecular genetics is still a fairly young discipline, and geneticists still don't know enough about a considerable portion of the genome.
Fossil records suggest that modern humans must have been around from about 200,000 years ago, yet none of the uniparental markers, that characterize most samples from contemporary populations, stretch that far back; the maternally-mediated DNA comes closest, but still falls short. Surely, there must have been male-mediated DNA that stretches as far back to the age suggested by fossil record, must it not? Would that Y-DNA not seem "peculiar" to geneticists, if it were found?
Besides, DNA samplings only factor in a fairly restricted segment of a population. How are geneticists then supposed to get a peek into *all* the possible variations within and across populations? against such backdrop, some "rare" sequences might appear "unusual", only to be pronounced as some exogenous DNA from an archaic era.
These premature allegations by geneticists, around finds that appear "unusual" to them, should be taken with a grain of salt until strong and irrefutable evidence renders it otherwise!
PS: I'd caution age-estimations made around "unusual" sequences whose phylogenetic structure have yet to even be established. In many of the hypervariable segments of DNA, or microsatellites in the case of nuclear DNA, reasonable age-estimations are usually made with the aid of certain reference sequences, be it UEPs, certain special microsatellite combination sequences or transitions/transversions, so as to examine the pattern of mutation rates within monophyletic units.
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Apocalypse: It's sad to see what the forum has come to Djehuti. I'm nostalgic for the old days when the likes of Rasol, Supercar (troll Patrol), Altakruri, Zaharan, Brada, Bass, and you made this a great place to learn and share ideas. Now it has unfortunately become a refuge for lunatics, reactionary white supremicists, black supremicists, and perverts. Very few of the newbies (Sweenet being one of the refreshing exceptions) are sane.
I used to post under the "Supercar" alias; "troll patrol" belongs to a different poster, just to point out, just in case it was not clear.
Posts: 7516 | From: Somewhere on Earth | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
The filthy, degenerate monkey is truly so detached from reality, and such a sorry excuse of its kind that it continues to be the running joke of the masses
I HAVE DESTROYED YOU MONKEY! IT STILL HAS NOT PENETRATED YOUR MONKEY BRAIN YET?
yOU ARE YOUR FAKE NAMES ARE LAUGHED AT! YOU CANT COMPREHEND THAT SHIITHEAD?
Posts: 3642 | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:I used to post under the "Supercar" alias; "troll patrol" belongs to a different poster, just to point out, just in case it was not clear.
Thanks for clarifying. I know that both Explorer and Supercar are your aliases. I (mistakenly)thought TP was too.
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by The Explorer: On this, the paleoanthropologists got it right. Geneticists tend to make over-reaching conclusions from finds that they are unable to explain, like in this case, and as admitted by the geneticists themselves, communicated through for example by "many short stretches of DNA with highly unusual sequences".
The geneticists involved figured that because these short strands featured "highly unusual" sequences, then they must necessarily belong to some unidentified "archaic" Homo Sapien variant. Indeed these highly speculative theories are inconsistent with fossil evidence. I've raised this matter time and again before, when allegations about Neanderthals interbreeding with modern humans was flying around...about the tendency of geneticists to make these sorts of premature allegations, from no other line of irrefutable evidence, but primarily based on the supposed "unusuality" of a DNA sequence at a selected locus.
Remember that even though rapid advances have been made, molecular genetics is still a fairly young discipline, and geneticists still don't know enough about a considerable portion of the genome.
Fossil records suggest that modern humans must have been around from about 200,000 years ago, yet none of the uniparental markers, that characterize most samples from contemporary populations, stretch that far back; the maternally-mediated DNA comes closest, but still falls short. Surely, there must have been male-mediated DNA that stretches as far back to the age suggested by fossil record, must it not? Would that Y-DNA not seem "peculiar" to geneticists, if it were found?
Besides, DNA samplings only factor in a fairly restricted segment of a population. How are geneticists then supposed to get a peek into *all* the possible variations within and across populations? against such backdrop, some "rare" sequences might appear "unusual", only to be pronounced as some exogenous DNA from an archaic era.
These premature allegations by geneticists, around finds that appear "unusual" to them, should be taken with a grain of salt until strong and irrefutable evidence renders it otherwise!
PS: I'd caution age-estimations made around "unusual" sequences whose phylogenetic structure have yet to even be established. In many of the hypervariable segments of DNA, or microsatellites in the case of nuclear DNA, reasonable age-estimations are usually made with the aid of certain reference sequences, be it UEPs, certain special microsatellite combination sequences or transitions/transversions, so as to examine the pattern of mutation rates within monophyletic units.
My point exactly. You have these geneticists make conclusions about African genomics without knowing about the entire African gene-pool, so how the heck do they know these "unusual" sequences are associated with archaic hominids if they don't even have info for the entire world gene-pool?
Posts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
This filthy pink assed monkey is unbelievable LOL Look chimpboy we have over 28,000 people that look at your nonsense regularly and laugh at you. But more importantly it is YOU that I an using to teach others about the tactics that you degenerates are using in order to deny your origons. You just make it so much easier to get the message out. We have over 28,000 highly educated members at my site that literally teach others the truth and a great many others that are finially opening their eyes. You provide a valuable service monkey, and if you have not figured out that you are the butt of the joke here,... so be it. You are finished
Posts: 3642 | Registered: Apr 2012
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Apocalypse: BTW Zaharan correctly picked up on what I think is salient about the article and the reason I posted it. The rush to embrace archaic contributions/introgression into to modern humans may be premature.
quote:Dr. Klein said the claims of interbreeding could be “a methodological artifact” in the statistical assumptions on which the geneticists’ calculations are based. The flaw may come to light when enough inconsistent claims are published. “Meanwhile, I think it’s important to regard such claims skeptically when they are so clearly at odds with the fossil and archaeological records,” he said.
Whatever you do, keep on posting stuff like this, even though the numbers have gone down. ES and related sites is one of the few places on the web that goes in-depth into this stuff. Someone's got to set the record straight, and at least put info out there "on the street."
Posts: 5905 | From: The Hammer | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Whatever you do, keep on posting stuff like this, even though the numbers have gone down. ES and related sites is one of the few places on the web that goes in-depth into this stuff. Someone's got to set the record straight, and at least put info out there "on the street."
Here's another study that casts further doubt on interbreeding between Humans and Neanderthal.
quote:Study casts doubt on human-Neanderthal interbreeding theory
Cambridge scientists claim DNA overlap between Neanderthals and modern humans is a remnant of a common ancestor
When scientists discovered a few years ago that modern humans shared swaths of DNA with long-extinct Neanderthals, their best explanation was that at some point the two species must have interbred.
Now a study by scientists at the University of Cambridge has questioned this conclusion, hypothesising instead that the DNA overlap is a remnant of a common ancestor of both Neanderthals and modern humans.
When the genetic sequence of Homo neanderthalensis was published in 2010, one of the headline findings was that most people outside Africa could trace up to 4% of their DNA to Neanderthals. This was widely interpreted as an indication of interbreeding between Neanderthals and early Homo sapiens just as the latter were leaving Africa. The two species would have lived in the same regions around modern-day Europe, until Neanderthals died out about 30,000 years ago.
But Andrea Manica said the analysis had over-estimated the amount of shared DNA between Neanderthals and humans that could be explained by interbreeding. The analysis had not taken into account the genetic variation already present between different populations of the ancestors of modern humans in Africa.
"The idea is that our African ancestors would not have been a homogeneous, well-mixed population but made of several populations in Africa with some level of differentiation, in the way right now you can tell a northern and southern European from their looks. The mixing is not complete within continents."
Taking these population differences, known as "substructuring", into account for early humans living in Africa, Manica and his colleague Anders Eriksson worked out that modern humans and Neanderthals must have shared a common ancestor some 500,000 years ago and that the subsequent evolution of this species was enough to account for the DNA crossover.
"There was an ancestor of both Neanderthal and modern humans – some archaeologists would call that Homo heidelbergensis – that would have covered Africa and Europe about half a million years ago," he said. "It wouldn't have been a single well-mixed population, it would have been like modern humans – populations that are closer to each other are more similar."
The results are published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
About 350,000 years ago, the European and African ranges of this last common ancestor became separate: the European range would later evolve into Neanderthals and the African range into anatomically modern humans, who left the continent 70,000 years ago to cover the world.
Prof Svante Pääbo, at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, who led the sequencing of the Neanderthal genome in 2010 and has championed the idea that modern humans interbred with Neanderthals, said he was surprised that Manica's work had been published, since his original paper had admitted a role for substructuring in Africa in the sharing of DNA between humans and Neanderthals. "But we regard this as a less parsimonious explanation," he said.
Pääbo has co-authored a paper, which is yet to undergo peer-review, to further support his thesis that humans and Neanderthals did in fact interbreed. "We find that the last gene flow from Neanderthals (or their relatives) into Europeans likely occurred 37,000-86,000 years before the present, and most likely 47,000-65,000 years ago," he writes. "This supports the recent interbreeding hypothesis, and suggests that interbreeding may have occurred when modern humans carrying Upper Paleolithic technologies encountered Neanderthals as they expanded out of Africa."
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ My doubts were pretty much confirmed ever since Rahoslips or some other Euronut troll posted a study claiming the African Maasai to have Neanderthal admixture. LOLPosts: 26252 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
There seems to be a growing body of opposition on scientific grounds to the idea of interbreeding. Paabo claims the mantle of parsimony but how can it be so when there are no other lines of evidence, archaeological for example, to support these conjectures based on DNA segments.
Posts: 1038 | From: Franklin Park, NJ | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic