posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by osirion:
Moses was not Black and during the time of Joseph Egypt was not ruled by Africans but by Hittites (Hyksos ).
It wasn't until the New Kingdom that Africans again ruled Egypt (the time of Moses) but by then the population had become significantly mixed such that to be Egyptian was a matter of culture rather than race.

---

Posts: 42925 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                         

quote:

---

Originally posted by the lioness:
1) Osirion were Moses and the Pharaoh of Egypt who was Pharaoh at the time Moses lived in Egypt both Hyksos?

2) were the ancient Hebrews inspired to be monotheist by Akhenaten's legacy?

---

Posts: 22721 | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by the lioness:
1) Osirion were Moses and the Pharaoh of Egypt who was Pharaoh at the time Moses lived in Egypt both Hyksos?

2) were the ancient Hebrews inspired to be monotheist by Akhenaten's legacy?

---

Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mike111:
As to your question: Surely by now you must know the Sand Niggers modus. They desperately grab at any opportunity to introduce ANY non-Blacks into the area, so as to justify their Bogus claim of authenticity.

And as always - it proves to be a lie!

The Hyksos ruled lower Egypt only. The last Hyksos king was Apepi I, he was opposed in the war of unification by Egyptian king "Tao" of upper Egypt.

Moses was an Egyptian Priest, NOT Prince, called "Osarsiph from Osyris."

There is only one surviving Hyksos statue:

This is it.




But the lack of Hyksos artifact is no problem. They were a part of a large ethnic group called Amorites from Anatolia and the north Syrian desert.

This group included not only the Hyksos and Hebrews, but also the people of Hammurabi's Sumer, and the later developing Aramaeans of Damascus and Edom etc. Eventually Aramaeans controlled most of the Middle East - Being mindful that Jesus DIDN'T speak Hebrew, but rather ARAMAIC!

---

There is only one surviving Hyksos statue?

There are other images that I am sure you don't like.

Posts: 4028 | From: NW USA | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by osirion:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mike111:
As to your question: Surely by now you must know the Sand Niggers modus. They desperately grab at any opportunity to introduce ANY non-Blacks into the area, so as to justify their Bogus claim of authenticity.

And as always - it proves to be a lie!

The Hyksos ruled lower Egypt only. The last Hyksos king was Apepi I, he was opposed in the war of unification by Egyptian king "Tao" of upper Egypt.

Moses was an Egyptian Priest, NOT Prince, called "Osarsiph from Osyris."

There is only one surviving Hyksos statue:

This is it.




But the lack of Hyksos artifact is no problem. They were a part of a large ethnic group called Amorites from Anatolia and the north Syrian desert.

This group included not only the Hyksos and Hebrews, but also the people of Hammurabi's Sumer, and the later developing Aramaeans of Damascus and Edom etc. Eventually Aramaeans controlled most of the Middle East - Being mindful that Jesus DIDN'T speak Hebrew, but rather ARAMAIC!

---

There is only one surviving Hyksos statue?

There are other images that I am sure you don't like.

---

Actually those depict the Nation of Edom who occupied the Southern Fringes of Israel and the Nomadic Lands North of Egypt..



which is why so many Images depict these Leuco-"Syrians" in Egyptian Relief because they were a great threat to Egypt..



^^^^
Authentic Image of a Nubian, Phonecian, Hebrew and Arab

Posts: 8804 | From: The fear of his majesty had entered their hearts, they were powerless | Registered: Nov 2007  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                      

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mike111:
osirion - You are getting to sound a lot like Lioness. I earlier demonstrated that those tiles were bogus, yet you still cite them?

Like I said, DESPERATE!


Jari - can you authenticate your identification of the tiles?

---

you demonstrated nothing. First of all you do is pick whatever image you like best and say the other one is fake. Proving an artwork is fake has to be verified by physical analysis of materials and comparison to many other similar works. In other words you have proved absolutely nothing.
Secondly the diversity of the area has been established. For instance the Mediterranean presence in littoral N. Africa has been going on since the Sea people from 4000 years ago.
Thirdly given artist rendition does not necessarily define how everybody of a given culture look, prime example the wide diversity of looks in Egyptian art.
Thirdly as you had show in some of what you call albino pictures:




the features in some of the above men some have wide noses and wide mouths.
You may easily find Caucasians with "pug noses" etc. So when you post a photo like this:



it proves nothing about skin color just like when I made false assumptions that dark skinned Africans couldn't have more protuberant and relatively thinner noses.

Posts: 42925 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged |