ABSTRACT The Paleoamericans are classified phenotypically as African, Australian or Melanesian based on multivariate methods and quantitative analysis. This grouping should only be Sub-Saharan African and Australian populations because the Melanesians and Sub-Saharan Africans share the same craniometric measurements. The craniometrics illustrate that PaleoIndians belonged to the Black Variety, but they do not allow us to establish conclusively where the Paleoamericans originated. Some researchers believe the Paleoamericans came from East Asia across the Beringa Straits or from Europe because of the Solutrean tools found throughout North America. These points of origination are unlikely because the Ice shelf in the Northern Latitudes would have prevented passage from these destinations to South America where the oldest Paleoamerican sites have been excavated. The most likely place the Paleoamericans came from was Africa which is closer to the Americas, than either Europe or East Asia, and also the location where the Solutrean culture originated, and later expanded into Iberia.
.
Click on the Picture to see the articlePosts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
ABSTRACT The Paleoamericans are classified phenotypically as African, Australian or Melanesian based on multivariate methods and quantitative analysis. This grouping should only be Sub-Saharan African and Australian populations because the Melanesians and Sub-Saharan Africans share the same craniometric measurements. The craniometrics illustrate that PaleoIndians belonged to the Black Variety, but they do not allow us to establish conclusively where the Paleoamericans originated. Some researchers believe the Paleoamericans came from East Asia across the Beringa Straits or from Europe because of the Solutrean tools found throughout North America. These points of origination are unlikely because the Ice shelf in the Northern Latitudes would have prevented passage from these destinations to South America where the oldest Paleoamerican sites have been excavated. The most likely place the Paleoamericans came from was Africa which is closer to the Americas, than either Europe or East Asia, and also the location where the Solutrean culture originated, and later expanded into Iberia.
.
Click on the Picture to see the article
If this paper had been peer-reviewed, edited, or spell checked the following and others would have been corrected
The Gulf Stream does NOT flow from Africa to the New World. It Goes from the New World to England and Ireland.
Its Clovis not Colvis Paulo not Poloe Beringia not Beringa
Posts: 833 | From: Austin, TX | Registered: Jan 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: You can prove the first Americans were Khoisan based on craniometrics and the reconstruction of the first Americans. The Solutrean origin theory for the rise of the first Americans unite the Khoisan of Africa, Europe, and the Americas.
Researchers have found evidence that Solutrean artifacts have been found on North American sites where Paleo-Native Americans have been found. Soutrean is an ancient culture from Europe.This has led some researchers to create the so-called Solutrean hypothesis that proposes that ancient America was settled by ancient Europeans.
The proposed Solutrean migration route seems highly unlikely because these early men would have had to brave glaziers and Ice Age tempertures which would have made it impossible to reach North America.
Although a migration from Europe seems highly unlikely 20-30kya because of the Ice Age. Ancient man could have made their way to the Americas directly from Africa which is a shorter distance to the Americas than Europe, and also ancient sailors could have made their way to the Americas on Currents, especially the Gulf Stream, that regularly flow from Africa, to the Americas.
The first Americans Naia, and Luzia dating to 12,000 BC were Negroes
NAIA of Mexico
LUZIA of Brazil
Archaeologist have reconstructed the faces of ancient Americans from Brazil and Mexico. These faces are based on the skeletal remains dating back to 12,000BC.
Researchers agree that the first Americans, Naia of Mexico, Luzia of Brazil and Kennewick Man, found near the Columbia River in Washington, were all Negroes. This finding is not so significant because the first Europeans were also Blacks.
It appears that the first Europeans entered Western Europe across the Straits of Gibraltar. These people were Khoisan. The Khoisan took their art and culture to Europe 40kya. Here they contructed the Aurignacian, Grimaldi and Solutrean cultures. Since the first Europeans had come from North Africa, we also find a Solutrean culture in Africa.
Africa is closer to the Americas than Europe. As you can notice from the map above the Currents could have easily carried the Khoisan from Africa to the Americas. This view is supported by the face that most ancient archaeological sites of paleo-Indian habitation are nearer to the Atlantic Ocean, than the Pacific.
In addition in Africa we find the Dafuna boat. The Dafuna boat has been dated to 8000 B.C., the culture associated with the people who built the Dafuna boat date back to 12,000 BC. This would indicate that around the time Kennewick man, Naia and Luzia inhabited the Americas, Khoisan in Africa had the naval technology to have sailed to the Americas.
In summary , the Solutrean artifacts in the Americas probably relate to Khoisan from Africa sailing to America. The fact that these ancient people in Europe, Africa and the Americas indicate that for a considerable period of time the world was dominated by Black or Negro people.
posted
Eurocentrists love to lie about history to deny the role of Black people in history. The idea that the first Americans came from Asia had nothing to do with mongoloid people. The Original Asians who researchers thought were the ancestors of American Indians were Black Asians, especially Melanesians.
Controversy surrounds the origin of the paleoamericans. Hrdlička (1907, 1912) advanced the idea that the Paleoamericans were homogenous, a people that originated in East Asia or Melanesia. As everyone knows Melanesians are Black.
Other researchers were not so sure. Dixon (2001) Imbelloni (1938) and Rivet (1908, 1943), did not see the paleoamericans as a unitary population from East Asia, they felt that this population was probably more diverse.
Even though there was some debate on the origin of the Paleoamericans Hrdlička’s (1907, 1912) ideas prevailed and researchers began to accept the idea East Asia was the homeland of the Paleoamericans. The only difference was is that whereas Hrdlička’s (1907, 1912) thought the first Americans were Melanesians, white supremacist created the myth that the first Americans wetre mongoloids from Siberia, when they knew Hrdlička’s (1907, 1912) was claiming the Native Americans came from Melanesia and therefore Black Native Americans like the California Indians.
.
.
But as we know now the Black Native Americans came from Africa, in addition to Asia.
-------------------- C. A. Winters Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic