posted
"Most archeologist now agree that the Pharaonic civilization.....is entirely indigenous".
Indigenous = African.
And many now admit to and important African and therefore non indigenous component to the Eurasian neolithic.
Finally, on the terms by which civilization is defined above - sendantism, animal domestication and agriculture, European civilization can only defined as non-indigenous.
"Civilized" people invaded Europe from SouthWest Asia and Africa.
Posts: 15202 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is it me, or does it seem like archaeology has been confirming over and over and over agin, something that has been established for a long while now by archaeology decades ago?
Posts: 26286 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Djehuti: Is it me, or does it seem like archaeology has been confirming over and over and over agin, something that has been established for a long while now by archaeology decades ago?
Yes, and genetics and linguistics.
Wally would just say that all these disciplines confirm what the AE told us to begin with, and what was always accepted.
That is until European Egyptologists invented the propaganda myths of - the middle east - western civilisation - the caucasian race, and so forth, which are designed precisely to facilitate historical imperialism.
Imperialism may be defined as the theft of nations or peoples.
Historical imperialism is the theft of the history of nations/peoples.
Posts: 15202 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
^^Don't forget Arab Imperialism and it's awful offspring, Arabizism! Which is why we have some folks now trying to 'mix up' African history!
Posts: 26286 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Embarrassed]](redface.gif)
Which is why we have some folks now trying to 'mix up' African history!
Printer-friendly view of this topic