posted
Gene flow from North Africa contributes to differential human genetic diversity in southern Europe Laura R. Botigué
------------- Quotes: “Multiple models have been proposed to explain clinal gradients of human genetic diversity in Europe including directional migration, climate, natural selection, and isolation by distance (1–4). A particular pattern of interest is the higher level of genetic diversity in southern European populations compared with those in northern latitudes. Three main hypotheses have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. Under the first hypothesis, populations retreated to glacial refugia in southern Europe about 20,000 y ago (ya), but when these populations later recolonized the continent, only a subset of the genetic diversity was carried into northern regions (5). The second hypothesis is that gene flow from the Near East, associated with the demic diffusion of agriculture, differentially affected geographic regions and in particular introduced additional genetic diversity to southeastern Europe (6, 7). The third hypothesis suggests that increased genetic diversity is the result of migrations from the African continent into southern Europe (8, 9). These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive; however, we focus on testing a hypothesis of gene flow from Africa to Europe, which has ***received the LEAST AMOUNT OF ATTENTION ***and may be the easiest to detect due to the recent time frame of the proposed demographic event.
However, strong similarities in pottery production are also found between southern Iberia and Northwest Africa 7,500 ya. The existence of “maritime pioneers” in the Mediterranean Sea during this period has been hypothesized (21).” --------------
oH! The quotes aren’t mine. HA! HA! HA! hA! Lol! I guess Laura found it to be hilarious also. I wasn’t the only one.
Continuing ----------- Lastly, three recent studies highlight the possibility of genetic exchange between Europe and Africa. Moorjani et al. (9) estimated that about 1–3% of recent Sub-Saharan African ancestry is present in multiple southern European populations; Cerezo et al. (23) find evidence of older (11,000 ya) Sub-Saharan gene flow toward Europe based on mtDNA genomes; and Auton et al. (8) found that short haplotypes were shared between the Yoruban Nigerians and southwestern Europeans. However, given the geographic barrier imposed by the Sahara Desert between North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa, and the proximity of North Africa to Europe, it is plausible that gene flow from Africa to Europe actually originated in North Africa. North Africans are significantly genetically diverged from Sub-Saharan populations (24, 25), and hence previous studies may not have accurately estimated the proportion or range of admixture in Europe by using a Sub-Saharan sample as a source population.
We aim to quantify the extent and pattern of recent gene flow between European and African populations. We use allele frequencies to estimate North African ancestry proportions in European populations. To quantify the variance in ancestry in European populations and obtain bounds on the time since admixture, we use a quantitative model for the decrease in ancestry variance with the time since admixture (30). We additionally detect gene flow between populations by analyzing long haplotypes shared identically by descent (IBD) with high-density SNP genotyping data (31, 32). We investigate regional patterns of haplotype sharing between North Africa, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Near East, and Europe in detail, and observe a*** significant latitudinal gradient**** of North African ancestry within Europe characterized by a dramatic difference between the Iberian Peninsula and the neighboring regions.
To estimate allele-based sharing between Africans and Europeans, we applied an unsupervised clustering algorithm, ADMIXTURE (33), to data from all populations (SI Appendix, Table S1). We explored k = 2–10 ancestral populations and performed 10 iterations for each k(SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S2). Our analysis does not assume that source populations are unadmixed; that is, since the analysis is run unsupervised, Sub-Saharan African ancestry, for example, can be detected in both North Africans and Europeans. Furthermore, estimates of admixture based on hundreds of thousands of markers (as we use here) show little bias using an unsupervised approach when the ancestral populations are significantly diverged (34). As the number of k ancestral clusters increased, we observed several well-supported population-specific ancestry clusters. We conservatively present k = 3 through 6 (Fig. 1) but additional results are presented in the SI Appendix.
At k = 4, the ancestry assignment differentiated between non-Jewish European populations (from now on referred to as “European”), European Jews, Sub-Saharan Africans, and a group formed by Near Eastern and North African populations. At k = 5,6 components mainly assigned to North African populations and Tunisian Berbers, respectively, clearly appear. European populations sharing this North African ancestral component are almost exclusively in southern Europe (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Southern European populations have a high proportion (5–35%) of joint Near Eastern | North African ancestry assigned at k = 4. However, identification of distinct Near Eastern and North African ancestries in k ≥ 5 differentiates southeastern from southwestern Europe. Southwestern European populations average between 4% and 20% of their genomes assigned to a North African ancestral cluster (SI Appendix, Fig. S3), whereas this value does not exceed 2% in southeastern European populations
Additionally, IBD sharing between North Africa and Europe is nearly an order of magnitude higher than that between Sub-Saharan Africa and Europe, of which a total of 30% of its IBD segments are also shared between North Africa and Europe.
This sharing is highest in the Iberian Peninsula for both North Africa and Sub-Saharan African IBD segments. Overall, these results support the hypothesis that Sub-Saharan gene flow detected in Europe entered with North African gene flow.
To pinpoint which specific North African regions exchanged migrants with Europe, we calculated WEA between a given European population and each of the seven North African and Near Eastern populations (Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Table S3). Southwestern European populations, and in particular the Canary Islands, show the highest levels of IBD sharing with northwestern African populations (i.e., the Maghreb: Morocco, Western Sahara, Algeria, and Tunisia), whereas southeastern European populations share more IBD segments with Egypt and the Near East (SI Appendix, Fig. S7). Whereas inferred IBD sharing does not indicate directionality, the North African samples that have highest IBD sharing with Iberian populations also tend to have the lowest proportion of the European cluster in ADMIXTURE (Fig. 1), e.g., Saharawi, Tunisian Berbers, and South Moroccans. For example, the Andalucians share many IBD segments with the Tunisians (Fig. 3), who present extremely minimal levels of European ancestry. This suggests that ***GENE FLOW OCCURRED FROM AFRICA TO EUROPE RATHER THAN THE OTHER WAY AROUND.***
These results also rule out a model where observed sharing between Europe and North Africa is the result of recent gene flow from the Near East into both regions.
These results also rule out a model where observed sharing between Europe and North Africa is the result of recent gene flow from the Near East into both regions. We compared IBD between Qatari (the best Near Eastern representatives genotyped with the Affymetrix platform currently available, SI Appendix, Fig. S8), Europe, and North Africa. As shown in Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Fig. S7), southwestern Europe has more IBD segments shared with the Maghreb than Qatar, whereas eastern Mediterranean populations share more segments IBD with the Near East than with western North Africa. On the other hand, northern European populations show only limited IBD sharing with both North Africa and the Near East (Figs. 2C and and33 and
The southwest-to-northeast gradient of North African IBD sharing (Fig. 2B) and the distinct peak in sharing between Iberia and the Maghreb (Fig. 3) indicate that sharing in southwestern Europe is independent of gene flow from the Near East. It is possible that this sharp peak of North African IBD sharing in Iberia contributes to the apparent isolation of Iberian populations from other Europeans (43).
-----
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
What are the main points here? 1. There is a South-North cline of genetic material from North Africa to Southern Europe to Northern Europe 2. North Africans are distinct from Near east example Qataris 3. Canary Islanders are essentially North Africans with significant amount of SSA ancestry . 4. SSA Ancestry is prevalent in Western Europe 5. This maritime farmers on ships is exactly that…nonsense 6. The Farmers that Entered Western Europe were NOT from the Near East 7. They have deliberated NOT given the African Neolithics migration to Western Europe equal amount of attention 8. Of course it was never from SSA to Europe. North Africa mitigated the migration 9. Tunisians are the least admixed with “European” ancestry regardless of visuals and pop-culture. DNATribes proved that years ago 10. Western Europeans are a subset of Maghrebians and not Levantines. Wait hold up! Arnaiz-Villens proved the same thing and he was ostracized
-
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
To those who haven’t connect the dots as yet. The Nile Valley seems to be the key to everything. The Nile Valley separated “Maghrebians/North Africans/Europeans”’ from ancient Levantines. This separation occurred BEFORE or early during the Holocene. Long before the Nile Valley Civilization. Prior to that West Africans (preBantu) formed a homogenous block with Western and Northern Europe. The populations that arrived post Holocene formed a genetic layer over old West Africans and western Europe. This same population diverged and spread into the Levant and Near East into the Harrapa Valley. Understand Tarforalt are diverse from Natufians. This separation of populations along the Nile Valley has been going on for over 10,000years. They all are recent African migrants.
That is why recent research has shown that Natufians are actually admixed with Tarforalt and NOT the other way around.
I have been saying this for over ten years now DNA is proving me right. This is not rocket science
-------------------- Without data you are just another person with an opinion - Deming Posts: 12143 | From: When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable | Registered: Jun 2007
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: To those who haven’t connect the dots as yet. The Nile Valley seems to be the key to everything. The Nile Valley separated “Maghrebians/North Africans/Europeans”’ from ancient Levantines. This separation occurred BEFORE or early during the Holocene. Long before the Nile Valley Civilization. Prior to that West Africans (preBantu) formed a homogenous block with Western and Northern Europe. The populations that arrived post Holocene formed a genetic layer over old West Africans and western Europe. This same population diverged and spread into the Levant and Near East into the Harrapa Valley. Understand Tarforalt are diverse from Natufians. This separation of populations along the Nile Valley has been going on for over 10,000years. They all are recent African migrants.
That is why recent research has shown that Natufians are actually admixed with Tarforalt and NOT the other way around.
I have been saying this for over ten years now DNA is proving me right. This is not rocket science
It is not rocket science. Population genetics just provides raw data that you have to interpret. It is not "science" based because you can not make hypothesis when you use Bayesian statistics to evaluate data that fits the opinions the researchers already has made As a consequence the results provide what ever you want them to provide.
.
-------------------- C. A. Winters Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: It is not rocket science. Population genetics just provides raw data that you have to interpret. It is not "science" based because you can not make hypothesis when you use Bayesian statistics to evaluate data that fits the opinions the researchers already has made As a consequence the results provide what ever you want them to provide.
.
UP! Now I understand, why Bayesian statistics gave me a tough time to understand! Clyde, I hope to see you more often in this forum.
Posts: 2198 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: It is not rocket science. Population genetics just provides raw data that you have to interpret. It is not "science" based because you can not make hypothesis when you use Bayesian statistics to evaluate data that fits the opinions the researchers already has made As a consequence the results provide what ever you want them to provide.
.
UP! Now I understand, why Bayesian statistics gave me a tough time to understand! Clyde, I hope to see you more often in this forum.
Hi I am still here. I post only when I believe my statements may not be deleted
-------------------- C. A. Winters Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic