posted
Historic Scientific Racism & Modern DNA Studies is a continued study in the Euro establishment to prove the superiority of the white race. If one studies the history of scientific racism you will find a deep connection with today's DNA studies. Same ides with a different methodology.
Eurasion Adam & Eve or Basal Eurasion? Polygenism or the New multi regionism Race or Populations?
"The eighteenth century saw an efflorescenece of scientific inquiry, which directed its efforts to the understanding of man's place in the world. Modern science had developed a century earlier and had attempted to establish order in the universe; the nature of man, however, was not part of scientific investigation, but remained in the province of theology. This state of affairs became unsatisfactory to the later scholars, namely the philosophes of the Enlightenment, who tried to apply scientific methods to the study of man and whose theories as to the origin of the race often came into direct conflict with the Scriptures. The Negro's place in nature was the subject of great debate at that time. One of the crucial issues of this debate was the question of unity in"
"mankind, or monogenism, as opposed to the separate creation of races or polygenism. The concept of the Negro-Hamite was steadily losing ground because theological interpretation of the peopling of the world did not satisfy the men of the Enlightenment. The myth was now kept alive mainly by the clergy, who tried to keep their hold on the laity by discrediting the savants as infidels. The polygenist theories led to a widespread belief that the Negro was sub-human and at the same time de-emphasized his relationship to the accursed Ham. The monogenist theories attempted to explain Negro physical characteristics by natural rather than mythical causes. The conservative theologians still clung to the now classic exegesis of the Old Testament and discouraged any attempt at a different interpretation.15 At the end of the eighteenth century, many famous men espoused and popularized one of two views regarding the Negro. One was that he was the result of 'degeneration' due to various environmental conditions.16 The other and more frequent view was that he was a separate creation, subhuman"
Now West Africans have an archaic genome up to 19% or what white people hear is that negroes are closer to beasts... than the rest of humanity. add to this every time there is a DNA study the results are shown like this
23 JULY 2020 Neanderthal gene linked to increased pain sensitivity People who have inherited nerve-altering mutations from the ancient hominins tend to experience more pain.
“It’s a first example, to me, about how we begin to perhaps get an idea about Neanderthal physiology by using present-day people as transgenic models,” says Svante Pääbo at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who led the work with Hugo Zeberg at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm.
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ You do realize that the Nazi philosophy and ideology of racial eugenics originated in the U.S.A. specifically among prominent members of the Democratic party as part of the early "progressive" movement! The Negro Laws and Jim Crow Laws to ensure racial segregation and prevent 'race-mixing' was the basis for the racial purity laws of the Nazis including the Jewish ghettos. Three prominent families who espoused eugenics were the Carnegies via the Carnegie Institute, the Rockefellers via the Rockefeller Foundation, the Kellogs via the Kellog Foundation, and the Harrimans via the Harriman Foundation. These American barons were allied with the top scientists and medical doctors from Ivy League universities like Harvard, Stanford, and Princeton to further their agenda via "race science" which Europeans like the Germans adopted. By the way, Bill Gates and his family have become the successors to David Rockefeller and his family in that regard. It's estimated that over 60,000 Americans were involuntarily sterilized and there were plans by the Race Betterment Foundation and the Eugenics Record Office to sterilize others and wipe out the bloodlines of entire families and even populations the majority of which were non-white. Sterilization was viewed as the most "humane" form of genocide and racial cleansing but there were proponents who proposed further methods. Harry H. Laughlin who was head of the Eugenics Record Office was the one who came up with the idea of "lethal chambers" or gas chambers to euthanized the undesirable races which was adopted by the Nazis 20 years later. Dr. Paul Popenoe who was a WWI physician who specialized in venereal diseases wrote the book Applied Eugenics wherein he promoted the idea of eliminating lesser races in a way that would be beneficial to the worthy races via medical experimentation such as injecting undesirables with bacteria or viruses or poisons and then study their cadavers after they die. This policy was instituted first by the United States Public Health Service before the Nazis utilized it in their concentration camps. Of course the most infamous case of the USPH human experimentation was done in concert with Tuskegee University in Alabama known as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment where hundreds of black men were purposely infected with syphilis. And of course there was Margaret Sanger founder of the Women's Chapter of the Ku Klux Klan as well as the founder of Planned Parenthood. Sanger in her diaries described the U.S. as "a garden of white lilies", and like any garden there must be tending by pruning those lilies that are sick and diseased so they won't infect the other lilies. Of course she also said "The Negro race is a weed that must be eliminated", as well as this:
Suffice to say over 80% of Planned Parenthood clinics are in black neighborhoods and they often advertise using black women.
Of course in Nazi Germany they forced abortions on pregnant Jews and other undesirable women.
-------------------- Mahirap gisingin ang nagtutulog-tulugan. Posts: 26249 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
the ties between American, British and German racists still exist today.
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
quote: The ‘Basal Eurasians’ are a lineage hypothesized
~Iosif Lazaridis Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East
quote:And long before “Support from the relationship of genetic and geographic distance in human populations for a serial founder effect originating in Africa”.
posted
I discussed this issue in my latest book:Manufactured Genetic Origins: The Fake Eurasian Back Migration. Click the picture to order the Paperback.
.
.
-------------------- C. A. Winters Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: I discussed this issue in my latest book:Manufactured Genetic Origins: The Fake Eurasian Back Migration. Click the picture to order the Paperback.
When is the iBook version coming out?
Posts: 22234 | From: האם אינכם כילדי הכרית אלי בני ישראל | Registered: Nov 2010
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: I discussed this issue in my latest book:Manufactured Genetic Origins: The Fake Eurasian Back Migration. Click the picture to order the Paperback.
When is the iBook version coming out?
.
The ibook is already out go to Amazon Kindle books .
-------------------- C. A. Winters Posts: 13012 | From: Chicago | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
So basically eugenics and "race science" is a war on the present, a war on the past and a war on the future. Europeans, after they began going around the world and stealing, through war, theft and destruction (war on the present), decided they needed to alter the history of the planet (war on the past), in order to guarantee their ongoing domination (war on the future). Makes sense. There is nothing really scientific about it.
Posts: 8893 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
^ Speaking of 'war on the future', look at what Bill Gates and his ilk are planning-- they want to vaccinate the globe against corona virus and they want to start with minorities and peoples from developing countries with the highest populations!
This is the same man who says he wants to curb populations starting with those in Africa. I am reminded by the Imperial Japanese plans during WWII which were influenced by Nazi eugenics, wherein if the Japs won they would have sterilized other Asian populations as part of a false campaign of "vaccination" and then replaced with Japanese.
Whatever you do don't take the vaccine!
Posts: 26249 | From: Atlanta, Georgia, USA | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:It is understandable that Hanania prefers to present himself as a mainstream, respectable intellectual, rather than as a creep interested in the attractiveness of cartoon characters and the genitalia of the Founding Fathers. The eagerness of some of his allies to accept his rather superficial apology—Katz notes that Substack CEO Chris Best praised him for “an honest post on a difficult subject”—is a little more puzzling. As Mathias writes, Hanania’s genetic determinism appears to be popular among wealthy Silicon Valley types, several of whom have blurbed his forthcoming book arguing that civil-rights laws should be dismantled.
quote:One explanation for the resurgence of scientific racism—what the psychologist Andrew S. Winston defines as the use of data to promote the idea of an “enduring racial hierarchy”—is that some very rich people are underwriting it. Mathias notes that “rich benefactors, some of whose identities are unknown, have funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars into a think tank run by Hanania. ” As the biological anthropologist Jonathan Marks tells the science reporter Angela Saini in her book Superior, “There are powerful forces on the right that fund research into studying human differences with the goal of establishing those differences as a basis of inequalities.”
quote:Of course it’s nonsense—racial categories are recent inventions, inconsistent over time and from place to place. The examples we’ve been discussing illustrate the point. Gonzalez is Hispanic (a census category adopted in 1970 that can apply to people who can trace their ancestors to South America, Spain, Japan, or West Africa), Hochman is Jewish (Jews were targeted by eugenicists in the immigration restrictions of the 1920s), and Hanania is of Palestinian background (Syrians, another group of Levantine Arabs, were declared “white persons” by U.S. courts “in 1909, 1910, and 1915, but not in 1913 or 1914.”) Perhaps diversity is a strength.
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
So this is the guy who thinks he is superior to " Backs" " Negroes" "Africans' You can't make it up
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
posted
“I didn’t realize the extent to which a number of the past presidents and people who have been very well-respected in terms of their contributions to human genetics … believed in this eugenic ideology,” Tishkoff says.
-------------------- It's not my burden to disabuse the ignorant of their wrong opinions Posts: 2699 | From: New York | Registered: Jun 2015
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Yatunde Lisa Bey: [QB] So this is the guy who thinks he is superior to " Backs" " Negroes" "Africans' You can't make it up
You are not doing a proper expose. You should start with the evidence, full sentence referenced quotes of Richard-Hanania saying racist things before you get to articles with authors comments about him. So far you just have anti-fat remarks
Also does he even have a scientific background? To fit the topic we would need to see claims that are suggested to be scientific, ether by a scientist or quotes of the person's commentary where they reference scientific sources
Otherwise it is potentially just political opinion
Posts: 42925 | From: , | Registered: Jan 2010
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic