An African emperor who ruled Mali in the 14th century discovered America nearly 200 years before Christopher Columbus, according to a book to be launched this month.
Abubakari II ruled what was arguably the richest and largest empire on earth - covering nearly all of West Africa.
According to a Malian scholar, Gaoussou Diawara in his book, 'The Saga of Abubakari II...he left with 2000 boats', the emperor gave up all power and gold to pursue knowledge and discovery.
Abubakari's ambition was to explore whether the Atlantic Ocean - like the great River Niger that swept through Mali - had another 'bank'.
In 1311, he handed the throne over to his brother, Kankou Moussa, and set off on an expedition into the unknown.
His predecessor and uncle, Soundjata Keita, had already founded the Mali empire and conquered a good stretch of the Sahara Desert and the great forests along the West African coast.
Gold fields
The book also focuses on a research project being carried out in Mali tracing Abubakari's journeys.
"We are not saying that Abubakari II was the first ever to cross the ocean," says Tiemoko Konate, who heads the project
"There is evidence that the Vikings were in America long before him, as well as the Chinese," he said.
The researchers claim that Abubakari's fleet of pirogues, loaded with men and women, livestock, food and drinking water, departed from what is the coast of present-day Gambia.
They are gathering evidence that in 1312 Abubakari II landed on the coast of Brazil in the place known today as Recife.
"Its other name is Purnanbuco, which we believe is an aberration of the Mande name for the rich gold fields that accounted for much of the wealth of the Mali Empire, Boure Bambouk."
Another researcher, Khadidjah Djire says they have found written accounts of Abubakari's expedition in Egypt, in a book written by Al Omari in the 14th century.
"Our aim is to bring out hidden parts of history", she says.
Black traders
Mr Konate says they are also examining reports by Columbus, himself, who said he found black traders already present in the Americas.
They also cite chemical analyses of the gold tips that Columbus found on spears in the Americas, which show that the gold probably came from West Africa.
But the scholars say the best sources of information on Abubakari II are Griots - the original historians in Africa.
Mr Diawara says the paradox of Abubakari II, is that the Griots themselves imposed a seal of silence on the story.
"The Griots found his abdication a shameful act, not worthy of praise," Mr Diawara said.
"For that reason they have refused to sing praise or talk of this great African man."
Mr Diawara says the Griots in West Africa such as Sadio Diabate, are slowly starting to divulge the secrets on Abubakari II.
'Hard-nosed historians'
But the research team says an even bigger challenge is to convince hard-nosed historians elsewhere that oral history can be just as accurate as written records.
Mr Diawara believes Abubakari's saga has an important moral lesson for leaders of small nation states in West Africa, which were once part of the vast Mande-speaking empire.
"Look at what's going on in all the remnants of that empire, in Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea.
"Politicians are bathing their countries in blood, setting them on fire just so that they can cling to power," says Mr Diawara.
"They should take an example from Abubakari II. He was a far more powerful man than any of them. And he was willing to give it all up in the name of science and discovery."
"That should be a lesson for everyone in Africa today," concludes Mr Diawara.
^^lol at new troll account trying to spark "controversy" after which the "Afrocentrics" can be "refuted."
Posted by MANGO (Member # 19731) on :
quote:Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: ^^lol at new troll account trying to spark "controversy" after which the "Afrocentrics" can be "refuted."
i've no idea what you're talking about, i'm native american bro Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
Check out my video on Abubakari's voyage to America:
Very cool thread Mango, I've heard of a bit of this but hadn't heard they were coming out with a book, thanks.
Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
Probably the most interesting thing I have read in awhile. Especially considering this mural:
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by osirion: Probably the most interesting thing I have read in awhile. Especially considering this mural:
Look at the color of the figures's hands and feet-- not black. They are either pained black or wearing black costumes.
Posted by facts (Member # 19596) on :
Supreme idiocy!
Look at the feet, chin and eyes of the two in question on the mural. Very revealing LMAO!!! This is what you are seeing, as the tradition, body paint/art, lingers on today...
SMDH at sheer buffoonery.
quote:Originally posted by osirion: Probably the most interesting thing I have read in awhile. Especially considering this mural:
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by MANGO: Africa's 'greatest explorer'
Wednesday, 13 December, 2000, 22:27 GMT
By Joan Baxter in Mali
An African emperor who ruled Mali in the 14th century discovered America nearly 200 years before Christopher Columbus, according to a book to be launched this month.
Abubakari II ruled what was arguably the richest and largest empire on earth - covering nearly all of West Africa.
According to a Malian scholar, Gaoussou Diawara in his book, 'The Saga of Abubakari II...he left with 2000 boats', the emperor gave up all power and gold to pursue knowledge and discovery.
Abubakari's ambition was to explore whether the Atlantic Ocean - like the great River Niger that swept through Mali - had another 'bank'.
In 1311, he handed the throne over to his brother, Kankou Moussa, and set off on an expedition into the unknown.
His predecessor and uncle, Soundjata Keita, had already founded the Mali empire and conquered a good stretch of the Sahara Desert and the great forests along the West African coast.
Gold fields
The book also focuses on a research project being carried out in Mali tracing Abubakari's journeys.
"We are not saying that Abubakari II was the first ever to cross the ocean," says Tiemoko Konate, who heads the project
"There is evidence that the Vikings were in America long before him, as well as the Chinese," he said.
The researchers claim that Abubakari's fleet of pirogues, loaded with men and women, livestock, food and drinking water, departed from what is the coast of present-day Gambia.
They are gathering evidence that in 1312 Abubakari II landed on the coast of Brazil in the place known today as Recife.
"Its other name is Purnanbuco, which we believe is an aberration of the Mande name for the rich gold fields that accounted for much of the wealth of the Mali Empire, Boure Bambouk."
Another researcher, Khadidjah Djire says they have found written accounts of Abubakari's expedition in Egypt, in a book written by Al Omari in the 14th century.
"Our aim is to bring out hidden parts of history", she says.
Black traders
Mr Konate says they are also examining reports by Columbus, himself, who said he found black traders already present in the Americas.
They also cite chemical analyses of the gold tips that Columbus found on spears in the Americas, which show that the gold probably came from West Africa.
But the scholars say the best sources of information on Abubakari II are Griots - the original historians in Africa.
Mr Diawara says the paradox of Abubakari II, is that the Griots themselves imposed a seal of silence on the story.
"The Griots found his abdication a shameful act, not worthy of praise," Mr Diawara said.
"For that reason they have refused to sing praise or talk of this great African man."
Mr Diawara says the Griots in West Africa such as Sadio Diabate, are slowly starting to divulge the secrets on Abubakari II.
'Hard-nosed historians'
But the research team says an even bigger challenge is to convince hard-nosed historians elsewhere that oral history can be just as accurate as written records.
Mr Diawara believes Abubakari's saga has an important moral lesson for leaders of small nation states in West Africa, which were once part of the vast Mande-speaking empire.
"Look at what's going on in all the remnants of that empire, in Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Guinea.
"Politicians are bathing their countries in blood, setting them on fire just so that they can cling to power," says Mr Diawara.
"They should take an example from Abubakari II. He was a far more powerful man than any of them. And he was willing to give it all up in the name of science and discovery."
"That should be a lesson for everyone in Africa today," concludes Mr Diawara.
quote:Originally posted by osirion: Probably the most interesting thing I have read in awhile. Especially considering this mural:
Interesting storyline, Mango.
Song Ge et al.
Phylogeny of rice genomes with emphasis on origins of allotetraploid species
The African cultivated species, Oryza glaberrima, is most closely related to two African wild species, Oryza barthii and Oryza longistaminata, and also to Oryza glumaepatula, which occurs in Central and South America.
This picture has nothing to do with Mexico. This picture is of childrn of the Amazon. The research associatede with the photo makes it clear that the practicing painting the body is a female cultural activity.
THERE ARE MANY OLMEC PYRAMIDS UNDER PRECLASSIC MAYAN PYRAMIDS .
THESE PYRAMIDS USUALLY INCLUDE AN OLMEC FAÇADE. THE EL-ZOTZ PYRAMID APPEARS TO BE AN OLMEC PYRAMID. THE ZOLZ PYRAMID IS NEAR TIKAL WHICH ALSO HAS A OLMEC PYRAMID UNDER THE STRUCTURE.
ARTIFACTS FROM Royal Tomb. El Diablo, El Zotz, Petén.
.
Posted by Crush Black Lies (Member # 20324) on :
Either you take pleasure in your lies, Clyde, or your ability to reason logically is taken hostage by the madness of your delusions. I would prefer to assume the former is true.
SMDH.
Explain this, Clyde.
Notice the motif of colors.
Posted by Crush Black Lies (Member # 20324) on :
And while you are at it, explain this one too!
SMDH
Posted by Crush Black Lies (Member # 20324) on :
The final nail in Clyde's coffin.
And these two are Blacks too huh? The Mayans are worshiping some Black dude in the procession, heh? LMAO!
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol:
Song Ge et al.
Phylogeny of rice genomes with emphasis on origins of allotetraploid species
The African cultivated species, Oryza glaberrima, is most closely related to two African wild species, Oryza barthii and Oryza longistaminata, and also to Oryza glumaepatula, which occurs in Central and South America.
What's the point? O. glumaepatula is a wild species native to Brazil. O. glaberrima is also closely related to O. sativa cultivated in china, O. nivara wild in laos, O. rufipogon wild in China, and O. meridionalis found in Australia.
Posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist (Member # 18853) on :
Jesus Christ, this stuff is old and was debunked back in the 1990's when Sertima published his crackpot 'Before Columbus' book. See the following studies:
Robbing Native American Cultures: Van Sertima's Afrocentricity and the Olmecs Gabriel Haslip‐Viera, Bernard Ortiz de Montellano, Warren Barbour Current Anthropology, Vol. 38, No. 3 (June 1997), pp. 419-441
They Were NOT Here before Columbus: Afrocentric Hyperdiffusionism in the 1990s Bernard Ortiz de Montellano, Gabriel Haslip-Viera, Warren Barbour Ethnohistory, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Spring, 1997), pp. 199-234
Posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist (Member # 18853) on :
Posted by Crush Black Lies (Member # 20324) on :
RFLOL!!!!!!!!!!
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist:
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
LOL. You know nothing about Mayan history. If you did you would recognize that there were many Black Mayas.
The Popol Vuh, gives us insight into Mayan history.
In the Popol Vuh it is made clear that the ancestors of the Quiche Maya came from across the sea. We will use quotes from Tedlocks translation of the Popol Vuh
We shall write about this now amid the preaching of God,in Christendom now. We shall bring it out because there is no longer a place to see it, a Council Book, a place to see “The Light That Came from Beside the Sea”, the account of “Our Place in the Shadows”, a place to see “The Dawn of Life”……(p.63).
The ancestors of the Maya came from east. “…[b]the first people came from beside the sea, from the east. They came here in ancient times. When they died they were very old” (p.175).
Claiming that the nacestors came from the East is very important. East of the Maya, would be the Gulf Region where the Mande/Olmec people settled and founded the Olmec civilization.
You guys, in your racism assume that their were no Blacks among the Maya. This is a false view. The Popol Vuh notes that: They didn’t know where they were going. They did this for a long time, when they were there in the grasslands:the black people, the white people, people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain there at the edge of the sky (pp.149-150).
The Blacks introduced civilization among the Maya. In the Popol Vuh, it is noted that And then the boys made fire with drill and rosted, the bird over the fire. And they coated one of the birds with plaster, they put gypsum on it (p.86).
It is interesting to note that the boys drilling are depicted as Blacks in the Dresden and Tro-Cotesianus Codexes.
As a result, the color Black and Black individuals were recognized as important in Mayan culture. The major Black gods were God C, Xaman and Ekchuah. God C is personification of the concept of sacreness. It has the phonetic value of ku or ch’in deity or sacreness. The Mayan term for deity/god is of Mande Olmec origin:
Maya ……..English………Mande
Kin………….day…………..kene
K’u,ku……..sacre,god………Ku
This is another indication of the Olmec origin of Mayan civilization.
The jaguar played an important role in Mayan society as it did in Africa. The jaguar pelt or cushion was the symbol of the ‘enthroned lord’. This is why we see the jaguar pelt around the neck of the Black royal represented in the Chama vase.
Blacks also introduced writing and trade among the Maya. The usual Mayan term for black is ’Ek’. Thus the merchant god signified by the back pack staff and etc was called Ekchuah. Thus we see these Blacks, gods etc. represented in many Mayan Codexes. .
God C
. Given this review of the fact that there were Black Maya, and that these Blacks played an important role in Mayan society I will answer the question posted earlier
quote:
Crush Black Lies asked the question “And these two are Blacks too huh? The Mayans are worshiping some Black dude in the procession, heh?”
The answer is yes. These Mayan people are showing respect to their African/Black heritage.
In the photo above we see figures that are black and with jaguar spots. This picture is simply denoting that black and jaguar spots would represent royalty.
The picture above illustrates personages draped in black. The blackness of the Mayan grab suggest that this photo represents wise men.
The picture above is just what you thought it was. It is recognizing the enthronement of a Black Mayan as ruler. This ruler is being carried by the other Maya. There is also another Black in the entourage. This person wears a backpack. This suggest that he may have been an envoy from one of the Black Mayan cities.
You guys are a joke. You know nothing about ancient Mexico, so you have allowed your hate and racism toward Blacks to cloud your mind and interpret these works of art based on your own views about blacks. Shame on you.
Posted by Crush Black Lies (Member # 20324) on :
Do you think the artist ran out of black paint while coloring the face, Clyde?
Clyde, there is something frighteningly wrong with you. Now I understand why you were fired by the University, and why the Chicago Police did not hire you.
Posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist (Member # 18853) on :
quote:The Popol Vuh notes that: They didn’t know where they were going. They did this for a long time, when they were there in the grasslands:the black people, the white people, people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain there at the edge of the sky (pp.149-150).
So who are the ''white people''? Are you saying some of the Mayans were now white?
Posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist (Member # 18853) on :
LOL!
The paragraph Clyde omits -
quote:And those of the Quiba House, those of the Yokes House, Acul people, Jaguar House, Guardians of the Spoils, Jaguar Ropes. It is sufficient that we speak of only the largest tribes from among the allied tribes; we have only noted the largest. Many more came out afterward, each one a division of that citadel. We have not written their names, but they multiplied there, from out of the east. There came to be many peoples in the blackness: they began to abound even before the birth of the sun, and the light. When they began to abound they were all there together; they stood and walked in crowds, there in the east. There was nothing they could offer for sustenance, but even so they lifted their faces to the sky. They did not know where they were going. The did this for a long time when they were there in the grasslands, black people, white people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain, there at the edge of the sky
the ''black'' people is a reference to those shrouded in darkness, and the ''white'' people those lit by the sun.
Obsolutely nothing to do with race.
Posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist (Member # 18853) on :
quote:Clyde, there is something frighteningly wrong with you
This guy must know to himself he is lieing. See just above. How do people like this sleep at night?
Posted by facts (Member # 19596) on :
What you show here is very telling about this guy. I think Clyde has transformed into a monster because of his failed academic career. He wants to commit maximum damage against the establishment. I believe that this man is very bitter which drives him to this madness.
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist:
quote:Clyde, there is something frighteningly wrong with you
This guy must know to himself he is lieing. See just above. How do people like this sleep at night?
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: Jesus Christ, this stuff is old and was debunked back in the 1990's when Sertima published his crackpot 'Before Columbus' book. See the following studies:
Robbing Native American Cultures: Van Sertima's Afrocentricity and the Olmecs Gabriel Haslip‐Viera, Bernard Ortiz de Montellano, Warren Barbour Current Anthropology, Vol. 38, No. 3 (June 1997), pp. 419-441
They Were NOT Here before Columbus: Afrocentric Hyperdiffusionism in the 1990s Bernard Ortiz de Montellano, Gabriel Haslip-Viera, Warren Barbour Ethnohistory, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Spring, 1997), pp. 199-234
This paper was related to van Sertima not me.
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist:
quote:The Popol Vuh notes that: They didn’t know where they were going. They did this for a long time, when they were there in the grasslands:the black people, the white people, people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain there at the edge of the sky (pp.149-150).
So who are the ''white people''? Are you saying some of the Mayans were now white?
Here are the whites.
Temple of the worriors Chichen-Itza
Below one of the whites is sacrficed by the Black Maya.
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: LOL!
The paragraph Clyde omits -
quote:And those of the Quiba House, those of the Yokes House, Acul people, Jaguar House, Guardians of the Spoils, Jaguar Ropes. It is sufficient that we speak of only the largest tribes from among the allied tribes; we have only noted the largest. Many more came out afterward, each one a division of that citadel. We have not written their names, but they multiplied there, from out of the east. There came to be many peoples in the blackness: they began to abound even before the birth of the sun, and the light. When they began to abound they were all there together; they stood and walked in crowds, there in the east. There was nothing they could offer for sustenance, but even so they lifted their faces to the sky. They did not know where they were going. The did this for a long time when they were there in the grasslands, black people, white people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain, there at the edge of the sky
the ''black'' people is a reference to those shrouded in darkness, and the ''white'' people those lit by the sun.
Obsolutely nothing to do with race.
LOL.You can't read. It clearly says " The[y] did this for a long time when they were there in the grasslands, black people, white people of many faces, people of many languages, uncertain, there at the edge of the sky "
The key words are 'faces' and languages. Use of these word makes it clear they are refering to people, not an emotion.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Crush Black Lies: Do you think the artist ran out of black paint while coloring the face, Clyde?
Clyde, there is something frighteningly wrong with you. Now I understand why you were fired by the University, and why the Chicago Police did not hire you.
This what I wrote.
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde Winters
The picture above is just what you thought it was. It is recognizing the enthronement of a Black Mayan as ruler. This ruler is being carried by the other Maya. There is also another Black in the entourage. This person wears a backpack. This suggest that he may have been an envoy from one of the Black Mayan cities.
You guys are a joke. You know nothing about ancient Mexico, so you have allowed your hate and racism toward Blacks to cloud your mind and interpret these works of art based on your own views about blacks. Shame on you.
You still have not disputed anything I wrote.
The fact remains that Black people lived among the Maya and black was the symbol for royalty and civilization.
. .
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: The fact remains that Black people lived among the Maya and black was the symbol for royalty and civilization.
. .
As usual, Clyde makes claims derived solely from his fevered idiosyncratic imagination. Provide us with some authoritative quotes not paraphrases or truncations from scholars who have really published on the Maya to the effect that black was the symbol for royalty. In fact, the colors associated with royalty were the white headband and the green of the quetzal
quote:p. 8 Thus a total of twenty-two years and 114 days are added to K’uk’ Bahlam’s birth (indicated by the “upended frog” at P7) to arrive at the date of his accession. The verb for accession (at Q7) is a “flat hand” holding out two glyphs, the one on the left being the color “white” and the one on the right representing the headband of rulership. “White” is sak in Mayan, and the headband is huun. Sak Huun is the name of the headband and also a name of the Jester God, a Maya deity associated with rulership.
%%%%%%%%
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE A Study of Classic Maya Rulership A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Mark Alan Wright August 2011
quote:p. 151 In general, accession phrases fall into two categories; those that refer to the office itself and those that refer to the accoutrements of power received by the ruler during his accession (Eberl and Graña-Behrens 2004:102). The statements that refer to the office itself include chumlaaj ti/ta ajawlel ―to sit down in rulership‖ and joy?-aj ti/ta ajawlel ―to be ‗encircled‘ in rulership‖ (‗encircling‘ may make reference to the headband being wrapped around the head). The statements explicitly referring to the accoutrements that the ruler received include ch’am/k’am k’awiil ―to take or receive the K‘awiil scepter‖ or k’al u sak hu’unal tu b’ah ―to wrap the white headband around oneself‖ (ibid.). . . . . p. 156 Janab Pakal‘s son, K‘inich Kan Bahlam II, also displayed a restorationist (or perhaps revisionist) bent. He hearkens back to deep time in order to associate himself with the mythical founders of Palenque. On the Tablet of the Cross (Figure 3.9), he uses the T713/757 k’al sak juun (―the white headband was tied‖) expression to declare the accessions of the purely mythical Muwaan Mat (the Triad Progenitor; at F7-F8), . . . . p. 176-77 Perhaps the most common headdress across the Maya area is the sak hu’n, or ―white headband, which typically has a ―Jester God diadem attached to it (Figure 3.29). The cloth headband was the principal symbol of the status of ajaw (Stuart 2004b:263). As discussed earlier, the T713/757 compound makes reference to the tying of a headband upon the ruler‘s head as part of the accession ceremony, and this phrase is most commonly found in the Western Maya region. Although the glyphic phrase is the same and the iconography is similar, it should be noted that the headdress itself differs at each site, although they almost all share some form of the Jester God as a component (Le Fort 1994:50). The taking of a headdress at accession has considerable time depth, with presentation scenes appearing among the Late Preclassic Maya at San Bartolo and the wearing of trefoil headbands by rulers extending back to the Middle Formative period among the Gulf Coast Olmec (Figure 3.31) (Fields 1991) and continuing into Preclassic Nakbe (Hansen 1994:30).
and
Sharer, R. J. 1994 The Ancient Maya 5th ed Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press
quote:p. 725-726 The color symbolism used in highland Guatemalan textile designs still bears some relation to that used by the ancient Maya. Black, the color of obsidian, represents weapons; yellow, the color of corn, symbolizes food; red represents blood; and blue means sacrifice. The royal color is green, because that is the color of the quetzal bird’s plumage, which was reserved for rulers.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
As a result, the color Black and Black individuals were recognized as important in Mayan culture. The major Black gods were God C, Xaman and Ekchuah. God C is personification of the concept of sacreness. It has the phonetic value of ku or ch’in deity or sacreness. The Mayan term for deity/god is of Mande Olmec origin:
Maya ……..English………Mande
Kin………….day…………..kene
K’u,ku……..sacre,god………Ku
This is another indication of the Olmec origin of Mayan civilization. .
This is boring. Clyde's misuse of linguistics with respect to the Mayan languages has been refuted since 1998. However, a lot of newcomers may be intimidated by Clyde's supposed mastery of Mande. From a previous posting on ES
In all his work Winters makes much of supposed linguistic correspondences between the languages of peoples supposedly influenced or genetically related to the Mande. However, there is a tremendous fundamental flaw in his work that makes these comparisons invalid; Winters does not provide accurate phonetic transcriptions of the words he compares making the supposed ”resemblance” invalid. Even Wikipedia is a good enough source for this [URL] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_method[/URL] quote:
quote:The comparative method (in comparative linguistics) is a technique used by linguists to demonstrate genetic relationships between languages. It aims to prove that two or more historically attested languages are descended from a single proto-language by comparing lists of cognate terms. From these cognate lists, regular sound correspondences between the languages are established, and a sequence of regular sound changes can then be postulated which allows the proto-language to be reconstructed from its daughter languages. Relation is deemed certain only if a partial reconstruction of the common ancestor is feasible, and if regular sound correspondences can be established with chance similarities ruled out.
When Winters transcribes his Mande words from Delafosse, he doesn’t distinguish between vowels that are nasal and those that aren’t; between ê as in French tête and è as in père for example and similar variations in the other vowels; u that really sounds as [ou] as in “sou”, û that sounds as [oû] as in croûte; or the ü that sounds like [u] in “surdite”; in consonants: g(dot), n (dot), r(dot), and x (dot) sound like [gh], [ng] as in English “sing”, [rh], [kh] as in Spanish “jota: respectively; gy is [gui[, etc. All of these examples from Delafosse (1929, pp.29-35)
Another problem is that Delafosse in his dictionary does not record differences in tone. This is why we often see a number of different definitions for the exact same word, as we will see for ku later.
Here is a quote explaining this
Ward, I. C. 1944. “ A Phonetic Introduction to Mende,” in K.H. Crosby An Introduction to the Study of Mende Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons
quote:p.5 “THE TONES OF MENDE, (xi) Mende is a tone language, i.e. the pitch of a word is as much a part that word as any other element. It is almost impossible to over-emphasize the importance of tones in Mende. In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that of the three factors of speech, tone, vowel and consonant, tone is the most important and consonant the least important (see Practical Suggestions for the Learning of an African Language in the Field, Ida C. Ward, p.21). Tone can distinguish words from each other. E.g. [I]kali[rising tone] = “snake”; kali[falling tone] = “hoe”; ndapi[rising] = fight; ndapi[hightone] = “swim”. . . (xii) In addition to distinguishing meaning, tone plays a part in the construction of sentences, i.e. every verb form has its own particular tone pattern; closely related groups of words such as noun+noun, noun+adjective, noun+ postposition, have their tone pattern… . .”
In Maya, as I’ve written before Winters never takes into account the sound value of the glottal stop, a consonant, a crucial component of the language just as it is in Arabic. Another problem, as we will see, is that Winters cherry picks his words so that, instead of comparing words that have identical meanings, he uses words that often require a stretch of the imagination to achieve similarity.
Participants in ES should be concerned about this since it applies to claims about Dravidian, Japanese, Mixe, and other “languages related to Mande” not just Maya. It takes work but it would be worthwhile to carry out an exercise like this for other languages.
For reference in Delafosse /â/ like Fr. “pâte”, /ê/ = “tête”, /î/ “pître”, /ô/ = côte’, /û/ = croûte”,/ü/= “surdite”,/u/= “sou”
1) I dealt with k’in/kene previously, but here it is again;
The Maya name k’in phonetically is k/glottal stop/in. As those of you who speak Arabic know glottal stops (hamza) are very important consonants. Mande does NOT have glottal stops, but Winters never puts glottal stops in his comparisons of Maya and Mande and his comparisons therefore are invalid. [kene] does not sound like [k[glottal stop]in]
More importantly, why do you not choose the true equivalent words to compare instead of fudging the scales to try to force a match? k’in (Cordemex, p. 400) is defined as “day” generally, “sun”. The really equivalent word is: tele defined as “day (in general), sun, day (opposed to night)” (Delafosse 1955, p. 737). tele does not sound like k’in
The word Winters chooses: kenè, kêna is defined as “light, daylight, luminous space, open space” (Delafosse, 1955, p. 358) which is a stretch to get to the meaning “day”.
2) god ku/ ku
a) Maya k’/glottal stop/u (Cordemex p. 406) and k’/glottal stop/uul (Cordemex p. 421) means “god” “divine” and “soul”
b) Mande If you look up the word “dieu” in Delafosse (1929) p. 431 you get: Alla which is the borrowed “Allah”. However, (p. 434) “divinité” is n’[e]-ya – locale, l/â/-siri, d/â/-siri
This in no way sounds like k[glottal stop]in
Winters proposes, with no page reference, ku= “god” Delafosse (1955 pp 415-420) has a number of definitions – none of them “god” 1 k/uo/ = “washing, to wash, to bathe” 2. k/uo/ = “yam Dioscorea alata” 3. k/uo/ = “tail, to stand in line, “ 4. k/uo/ = “evil, bad, poor” Four identically sounding words— they must be different tones
5. k/oun nasal vowel/] = “head, summit” 6. k/on nasal vowel/] = “that which should be isolated, to be sacred, adult, respect, etc.” p. 381
kuo, koun, kon do not sound like k/glottal stop/u, or k/glottal stop/uul or have the meaning of “god”. Neya does not sound like k/glottal stop/u either.
Delafosse, M. 1929. La langue Mandingue et ses dialectes Paris: Paul Geuthner Delafosse, M. 1955. La langue Mandingue et ses dialectes vol. 2 Paris: Paul Geuthner Barrera Vasquez, A. Ed. 1980 Diccionario Maya Cordemex Merida: Ediciones Cordemex
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
As a result, the color Black and Black individuals were recognized as important in Mayan culture. The major Black gods were God C, Xaman and Ekchuah. God C is personification of the concept of sacreness. It has the phonetic value of ku or ch’in deity or sacreness. The Mayan term for deity/god is of Mande Olmec origin:
Maya ……..English………Mande
Kin………….day…………..kene
K’u,ku……..sacre,god………Ku
This is another indication of the Olmec origin of Mayan civilization. .
This is boring. Clyde's misuse of linguistics with respect to the Mayan languages has been refuted since 1998. However, a lot of newcomers may be intimidated by Clyde's supposed mastery of Mande. From a previous posting on ES
In all his work Winters makes much of supposed linguistic correspondences between the languages of peoples supposedly influenced or genetically related to the Mande. However, there is a tremendous fundamental flaw in his work that makes these comparisons invalid; Winters does not provide accurate phonetic transcriptions of the words he compares making the supposed ”resemblance” invalid. Even Wikipedia is a good enough source for this [URL] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_method[/URL] quote:
quote:The comparative method (in comparative linguistics) is a technique used by linguists to demonstrate genetic relationships between languages. It aims to prove that two or more historically attested languages are descended from a single proto-language by comparing lists of cognate terms. From these cognate lists, regular sound correspondences between the languages are established, and a sequence of regular sound changes can then be postulated which allows the proto-language to be reconstructed from its daughter languages. Relation is deemed certain only if a partial reconstruction of the common ancestor is feasible, and if regular sound correspondences can be established with chance similarities ruled out.
When Winters transcribes his Mande words from Delafosse, he doesn’t distinguish between vowels that are nasal and those that aren’t; between ê as in French tête and è as in père for example and similar variations in the other vowels; u that really sounds as [ou] as in “sou”, û that sounds as [oû] as in croûte; or the ü that sounds like [u] in “surdite”; in consonants: g(dot), n (dot), r(dot), and x (dot) sound like [gh], [ng] as in English “sing”, [rh], [kh] as in Spanish “jota: respectively; gy is [gui[, etc. All of these examples from Delafosse (1929, pp.29-35)
Another problem is that Delafosse in his dictionary does not record differences in tone. This is why we often see a number of different definitions for the exact same word, as we will see for ku later.
Here is a quote explaining this
Ward, I. C. 1944. “ A Phonetic Introduction to Mende,” in K.H. Crosby An Introduction to the Study of Mende Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons
quote:p.5 “THE TONES OF MENDE, (xi) Mende is a tone language, i.e. the pitch of a word is as much a part that word as any other element. It is almost impossible to over-emphasize the importance of tones in Mende. In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that of the three factors of speech, tone, vowel and consonant, tone is the most important and consonant the least important (see Practical Suggestions for the Learning of an African Language in the Field, Ida C. Ward, p.21). Tone can distinguish words from each other. E.g. kali[rising tone] = “snake”; kali[falling tone] = “hoe”; ndapi[rising] = fight; ndapi[hightone] = “swim”. . . (xii) In addition to distinguishing meaning, tone plays a part in the construction of sentences, i.e. every verb form has its own particular tone pattern; closely related groups of words such as noun+noun, noun+adjective, noun+ postposition, have their tone pattern… . .”
In Maya, as I’ve written before Winters never takes into account the sound value of the glottal stop, a consonant, a crucial component of the language just as it is in Arabic. Another problem, as we will see, is that Winters cherry picks his words so that, instead of comparing words that have identical meanings, he uses words that often require a stretch of the imagination to achieve similarity.
Participants in ES should be concerned about this since it applies to claims about Dravidian, Japanese, Mixe, and other “languages related to Mande” not just Maya. It takes work but it would be worthwhile to carry out an exercise like this for other languages.
For reference in Delafosse /â/ like Fr. “pâte”, /ê/ = “tête”, /î/ “pître”, /ô/ = côte’, /û/ = croûte”,/ü/= “surdite”,/u/= “sou”
1) I dealt with k’in/kene previously, but here it is again;
The Maya name k’in phonetically is k/glottal stop/in. As those of you who speak Arabic know glottal stops (hamza) are very important consonants. Mande does NOT have glottal stops, but Winters never puts glottal stops in his comparisons of Maya and Mande and his comparisons therefore are invalid. [kene] does not sound like [k[glottal stop]in]
More importantly, why do you not choose the true equivalent words to compare instead of fudging the scales to try to force a match? k’in (Cordemex, p. 400) is defined as “day” generally, “sun”. The really equivalent word is: tele defined as “day (in general), sun, day (opposed to night)” (Delafosse 1955, p. 737). tele does not sound like k’in
The word Winters chooses: kenè, kêna is defined as “light, daylight, luminous space, open space” (Delafosse, 1955, p. 358) which is a stretch to get to the meaning “day”.
2) god ku/ ku
a) Maya k’/glottal stop/u (Cordemex p. 406) and k’/glottal stop/uul (Cordemex p. 421) means “god” “divine” and “soul”
b) Mande If you look up the word “dieu” in Delafosse (1929) p. 431 you get: Alla which is the borrowed “Allah”. However, (p. 434) “divinité” is n’[e]-ya – locale, l/â/-siri, d/â/-siri
This in no way sounds like k[glottal stop]in
Winters proposes, with no page reference, ku= “god” Delafosse (1955 pp 415-420) has a number of definitions – none of them “god” 1 k/uo/ = “washing, to wash, to bathe” 2. k/uo/ = “yam Dioscorea alata” 3. k/uo/ = “tail, to stand in line, “ 4. k/uo/ = “evil, bad, poor” Four identically sounding words— they must be different tones
5. k/oun nasal vowel/] = “head, summit” 6. k/on nasal vowel/] = “that which should be isolated, to be sacred, adult, respect, etc.” p. 381
kuo, koun, kon do not sound like k/glottal stop/u, or k/glottal stop/uul or have the meaning of “god”. Neya does not sound like k/glottal stop/u either.
Delafosse, M. 1929. La langue Mandingue et ses dialectes Paris: Paul Geuthner Delafosse, M. 1955. La langue Mandingue et ses dialectes vol. 2 Paris: Paul Geuthner Barrera Vasquez, A. Ed. 1980 Diccionario Maya Cordemex Merida: Ediciones Cordemex
LOL. You don't know anything about comparative linguistics. You look for analogous consonants to determine a relationship.
For example lets look at the word feeble 'weak': (Latin) flabilis > (Fr.)faible > (Eng) Feeble=weak. If you notice these words have different vowels, but they share a similar phonological pattern: f-b-l. The words from these diverse languages shows regular sound correspondences. Thus we can say they are related.
You only concentrate on vowels when reconstructing a proto-language.
You would know this if you were a linguist.
Due to the regular correspondence between Mayan K’u ,qu and Mande Ku I wrote God C is personification of the concept of sacreness.
God C
It has the phonetic value of ku or ch’in deity or sacreness. The Mayan term for deity/god is of Mande Olmec origin:
Maya ……..English………Mande
Kin………….day…………..kene
K’u,ku……..sacre,god………Ku
This is another indication of the Olmec origin of Mayan civilization.
Also, please cite the 1998 article where my comparisons of Mayan and Mande terms was refuted.
.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
As a result, the color Black and Black individuals were recognized as important in Mayan culture. The major Black gods were God C, Xaman and Ekchuah. God C is personification of the concept of sacreness. It has the phonetic value of ku or ch’in deity or sacreness. The Mayan term for deity/god is of Mande Olmec origin:
Maya ……..English………Mande
Kin………….day…………..kene
K’u,ku……..sacre,god………Ku
This is another indication of the Olmec origin of Mayan civilization. .
This is boring. Clyde's misuse of linguistics with respect to the Mayan languages has been refuted since 1998. However, a lot of newcomers may be intimidated by Clyde's supposed mastery of Mande. From a previous posting on ES
In all his work Winters makes much of supposed linguistic correspondences between the languages of peoples supposedly influenced or genetically related to the Mande. However, there is a tremendous fundamental flaw in his work that makes these comparisons invalid; Winters does not provide accurate phonetic transcriptions of the words he compares making the supposed ”resemblance” invalid. Even Wikipedia is a good enough source for this [URL] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_method[/URL] quote:
quote:The comparative method (in comparative linguistics) is a technique used by linguists to demonstrate genetic relationships between languages. It aims to prove that two or more historically attested languages are descended from a single proto-language by comparing lists of cognate terms. From these cognate lists, regular sound correspondences between the languages are established, and a sequence of regular sound changes can then be postulated which allows the proto-language to be reconstructed from its daughter languages. Relation is deemed certain only if a partial reconstruction of the common ancestor is feasible, and if regular sound correspondences can be established with chance similarities ruled out.
When Winters transcribes his Mande words from Delafosse, he doesn’t distinguish between vowels that are nasal and those that aren’t; between ê as in French tête and è as in père for example and similar variations in the other vowels; u that really sounds as [ou] as in “sou”, û that sounds as [oû] as in croûte; or the ü that sounds like [u] in “surdite”; in consonants: g(dot), n (dot), r(dot), and x (dot) sound like [gh], [ng] as in English “sing”, [rh], [kh] as in Spanish “jota: respectively; gy is [gui[, etc. All of these examples from Delafosse (1929, pp.29-35)
Another problem is that Delafosse in his dictionary does not record differences in tone. This is why we often see a number of different definitions for the exact same word, as we will see for ku later.
Here is a quote explaining this
Ward, I. C. 1944. “ A Phonetic Introduction to Mende,” in K.H. Crosby An Introduction to the Study of Mende Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons
quote:p.5 “THE TONES OF MENDE, (xi) Mende is a tone language, i.e. the pitch of a word is as much a part that word as any other element. It is almost impossible to over-emphasize the importance of tones in Mende. In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that of the three factors of speech, tone, vowel and consonant, tone is the most important and consonant the least important (see Practical Suggestions for the Learning of an African Language in the Field, Ida C. Ward, p.21). Tone can distinguish words from each other. E.g. kali[rising tone] = “snake”; kali[falling tone] = “hoe”; ndapi[rising] = fight; ndapi[hightone] = “swim”. . . (xii) In addition to distinguishing meaning, tone plays a part in the construction of sentences, i.e. every verb form has its own particular tone pattern; closely related groups of words such as noun+noun, noun+adjective, noun+ postposition, have their tone pattern… . .”
In Maya, as I’ve written before Winters never takes into account the sound value of the glottal stop, a consonant, a crucial component of the language just as it is in Arabic. Another problem, as we will see, is that Winters cherry picks his words so that, instead of comparing words that have identical meanings, he uses words that often require a stretch of the imagination to achieve similarity.
Participants in ES should be concerned about this since it applies to claims about Dravidian, Japanese, Mixe, and other “languages related to Mande” not just Maya. It takes work but it would be worthwhile to carry out an exercise like this for other languages.
For reference in Delafosse /â/ like Fr. “pâte”, /ê/ = “tête”, /î/ “pître”, /ô/ = côte’, /û/ = croûte”,/ü/= “surdite”,/u/= “sou”
1) I dealt with k’in/kene previously, but here it is again;
The Maya name k’in phonetically is k/glottal stop/in. As those of you who speak Arabic know glottal stops (hamza) are very important consonants. Mande does NOT have glottal stops, but Winters never puts glottal stops in his comparisons of Maya and Mande and his comparisons therefore are invalid. [kene] does not sound like [k[glottal stop]in]
More importantly, why do you not choose the true equivalent words to compare instead of fudging the scales to try to force a match? k’in (Cordemex, p. 400) is defined as “day” generally, “sun”. The really equivalent word is: tele defined as “day (in general), sun, day (opposed to night)” (Delafosse 1955, p. 737). tele does not sound like k’in
The word Winters chooses: kenè, kêna is defined as “light, daylight, luminous space, open space” (Delafosse, 1955, p. 358) which is a stretch to get to the meaning “day”.
2) god ku/ ku
a) Maya k’/glottal stop/u (Cordemex p. 406) and k’/glottal stop/uul (Cordemex p. 421) means “god” “divine” and “soul”
b) Mande If you look up the word “dieu” in Delafosse (1929) p. 431 you get: Alla which is the borrowed “Allah”. However, (p. 434) “divinité” is n’[e]-ya – locale, l/â/-siri, d/â/-siri
This in no way sounds like k[glottal stop]in
Winters proposes, with no page reference, ku= “god” Delafosse (1955 pp 415-420) has a number of definitions – none of them “god” 1 k/uo/ = “washing, to wash, to bathe” 2. k/uo/ = “yam Dioscorea alata” 3. k/uo/ = “tail, to stand in line, “ 4. k/uo/ = “evil, bad, poor” Four identically sounding words— they must be different tones
5. k/oun nasal vowel/] = “head, summit” 6. k/on nasal vowel/] = “that which should be isolated, to be sacred, adult, respect, etc.” p. 381
kuo, koun, kon do not sound like k/glottal stop/u, or k/glottal stop/uul or have the meaning of “god”. Neya does not sound like k/glottal stop/u either.
Delafosse, M. 1929. La langue Mandingue et ses dialectes Paris: Paul Geuthner Delafosse, M. 1955. La langue Mandingue et ses dialectes vol. 2 Paris: Paul Geuthner Barrera Vasquez, A. Ed. 1980 Diccionario Maya Cordemex Merida: Ediciones Cordemex
LOL. You don't know anything about comparative linguistics. You look for analogous consonants to determine a relationship.
For example lets look at the word feeble 'weak': (Latin) flabilis > (Fr.)faible > (Eng) Feeble=weak. If you notice these words have different vowels, but they share a similar phonological pattern: f-b-l. The words from these diverse languages shows regular sound correspondences. Thus we can say they are related.
You only concentrate on vowels when reconstructing a proto-language.
You would know this if you were a linguist.
Due to the regular correspondence between Mayan[b] K’u ,qu and Mande Ku I wrote God C is personification of the concept of sacreness.
God C
It has the phonetic value of ku or ch’in deity or sacreness. The Mayan term for deity/god is of Mande Olmec origin:
Maya ……..English………Mande
Kin………….day…………..kene
K’u,ku……..sacre,god………Ku
This is another indication of the Olmec origin of Mayan civilization.
Also, please cite the 1998 article where my comparisons of Mayan and Mande terms was refuted.
.
LOL yourself. 1) please quote a linguistics textbook that says that only consonants are important in determining genetic relationships-- you make things up all the time. 2) Even by your standard your methodology is erroneous since you completely ignore the key role that glottal stops CONSONANTS play in Mayan languages and the fact that Mande does not have the CONSONANT glottal stop. Thus no sound correspondence is possible. 3) sound correspondences are not the only thing that is involved in these determinations, there also has to be a corresponding MEANING as in your "feeble example. None of the many meanings of KU is "god"
just more spam
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: LOL yourself. 1) please quote a linguistics textbook that says that only consonants are important in determining genetic relationships-- you make things up all the time. 2) Even by your standard your methodology is erroneous since you completely ignore the key role that glottal stops CONSONANTS play in Mayan languages and the fact that Mande does not have the CONSONANT glottal stop. Thus no sound correspondence is possible. 3) sound correspondences are not the only thing that is involved in these determinations, there also has to be a corresponding MEANING as in your "feeble example. None of the many meanings of KU is "god"
just more spam
LOL. You don't know anything about comparative linguistics. You look for analogous consonants to determine a relationship.
For example lets look at the word feeble 'weak': (Latin) flabilis > (Fr.)faible > (Eng) Feeble=weak. If you notice these words have different vowels, but they share a similar phonological pattern: f-b-l. The words from these diverse languages shows regular sound correspondences. Thus we can say they are related.
The same thing is true of Mayan Ku/Qu 'god' and Mande Ku 'to be sacre'. To be sacre corresponds to 'god'.
You only concentrate on vowels when reconstructing a proto-language.
You would know this if you were a linguist.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: LOL yourself. 1) please quote a linguistics textbook that says that only consonants are important in determining genetic relationships-- you make things up all the time. 2) Even by your standard your methodology is erroneous since you completely ignore the key role that glottal stops CONSONANTS play in Mayan languages and the fact that Mande does not have the CONSONANT glottal stop. Thus no sound correspondence is possible. 3) sound correspondences are not the only thing that is involved in these determinations, there also has to be a corresponding MEANING as in your "feeble example. None of the many meanings of KU is "god"
just more spam
LOL. You don't know anything about comparative linguistics. You look for analogous consonants to determine a relationship.
For example lets look at the word feeble 'weak': (Latin) flabilis > (Fr.)faible > (Eng) Feeble=weak. If you notice these words have different vowels, but they share a similar phonological pattern: f-b-l. The words from these diverse languages shows regular sound correspondences. Thus we can say they are related.
The same thing is true of Mayan Ku/Qu 'god' and Mande Ku 'to be sacre'. To be sacre corresponds to 'god'.
You only concentrate on vowels when reconstructing a proto-language.
You would know this if you were a linguist.
Clyde, you think that repeating the same garbage over and over will somehow make it valid. Your page scan says nothing relevant to the discussion. Here you are not arguing that there have been regular "sound correspondences" between Mande and Mayan, such as the fact that German [v] like in "vater" shifts to [f] as in "father" in English, This can be seen in lots of words but you have not shown that this is so. You usually cite isolated random words. Here you are arguing that [ku] Mande is the same as [k7(usual sign for glottal stop) u]. However, this is impossible since the CONSONANT [glottal stop} does not exist in Mande. The most basic linguistics acknowledges that the glottal stop is a CONSONANT- if you know this , why do you never acknowledge its presence.
Further, please give the exact page number in Delafosse or other recognized mande dictionary where "ku" means "to be sacred".
Delafosse (1955 pp 415-420) has a number of definitions – none of them “god” 1 k/uo/ = “washing, to wash, to bathe” 2. k/uo/ = “yam Dioscorea alata” 3. k/uo/ = “tail, to stand in line, “ 4. k/uo/ = “evil, bad, poor” Four identically sounding words— they must be different tones
5. k/oun nasal vowel/] = “head, summit” 6. k/on nasal vowel/] = “that which should be isolated, to be sacred, adult, respect, etc.”
kuo, koun, kon do not sound like k/glottal stop/u, or k/glottal stop/uul or have the meaning of “god”.
Actually, "to be sacre" is NOT [ku]. Delafosse (1929) p. 616 etre sacre= ko-nya, ku-nya (funny how you conveniently forget that this MANDE WORD HAS TWO SYLLABLES) and definitely does not have sound or consonant correspondence to [kglottalstopu] i.e. [k7u]. Other forms on p. 616 {v. intr.) ta-nto; (v. intr.) etre- (s.)-ko-ma,ku-ma. Again all words with TWO syllables and not sound correspondent to [k7u].
Posted by the lioness (Member # 17353) on :
South and Meso-American Mythology A to Z By Ann Bingham, Jeremy Roberts
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: Actually, "to be sacre" is NOT [ku]. Delafosse (1929) p. 616 etre sacre= ko-nya, ku-nya (funny how you conveniently forget that this MANDE WORD HAS TWO SYLLABLES) and definitely does not have sound or consonant correspondence to [kglottalstopu] i.e. [k7u]. Other forms on p. 616 {v. intr.) ta-nto; (v. intr.) etre- (s.)-ko-ma,ku-ma. Again all words with TWO syllables and not sound correspondent to [k7u].
You don't know what you're talking about as usual. In Mande languages ku= to be sacre.
Above [p.381] you can see that ku='[ etre sacre] to be sacre'.
Clearly you have read Delafosse why do you love to lie.
.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: Actually, "to be sacre" is NOT [ku]. Delafosse (1929) p. 616 etre sacre= ko-nya, ku-nya (funny how you conveniently forget that this MANDE WORD HAS TWO SYLLABLES) and definitely does not have sound or consonant correspondence to [kglottalstopu] i.e. [k7u]. Other forms on p. 616 {v. intr.) ta-nto; (v. intr.) etre- (s.)-ko-ma,ku-ma. Again all words with TWO syllables and not sound correspondent to [k7u].
You don't know what you're talking about as usual. In Mande languages ku= to be sacre.
Above [p.381] you can see that ku='[ etre sacre] to be sacre'.
Clearly you have read Delafosse why do you love to lie.
.
You keep evading the point that the Mayan word is k'u i.e. [k7u] with the presence of a consonant (the glottal stop) that does not exist in Mande. Therefore there is no sound correspondence between the Mande and Mayan words even by your erroneous insistence on focusing on consonants. Have you ever admitted that a glottal stop is a consonant?
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: Actually, "to be sacre" is NOT [ku]. Delafosse (1929) p. 616 etre sacre= ko-nya, ku-nya (funny how you conveniently forget that this MANDE WORD HAS TWO SYLLABLES) and definitely does not have sound or consonant correspondence to [kglottalstopu] i.e. [k7u]. Other forms on p. 616 {v. intr.) ta-nto; (v. intr.) etre- (s.)-ko-ma,ku-ma. Again all words with TWO syllables and not sound correspondent to [k7u].
You don't know what you're talking about as usual. In Mande languages ku= to be sacre.
Above [p.381] you can see that ku='[ etre sacre] to be sacre'.
Clearly you have read Delafosse why do you love to lie.
.
You keep evading the point that the Mayan word is k'u i.e. [k7u] with the presence of a consonant (the glottal stop) that does not exist in Mande. Therefore there is no sound correspondence between the Mande and Mayan words even by your erroneous insistence on focusing on consonants. Have you ever admitted that a glottal stop is a consonant?
Above [p.381] you can see that ku='[ etre sacre] to be sacre'. I have also shown that in relation to comparive linguistic we look for regular correspondence, especially in relation to the consonants.
I have proven throughout this debate you don't know anything about comparative linguistics. as a result , I will leave you in your ignorance.
.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [I have also shown that in relation to comparive linguistic we look for regular correspondence, especially in relation to the consonants.
I have proven throughout this debate you don't know anything about comparative linguistics. as a result , I will leave you in your ignorance.
.
Still avoiding the issue of the non-existing glottal dtop in Mande and its crucial importance in Mayan languages.
A blast from the past 1998. Scott and Carrasquer Vidal are professional linguists
quote:From: scott@math.csuohio.edu (Brian M. Scott) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology Subject: Re: New Olmec Religion Site Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 19:03:13 GMT Organization: Cleveland State University
On 24 Jan 1998 17:37:21 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. Winters) wrote:
[snips]
>Miguel Carrasquer Vidal (mcv@wxs.nl) wrote: >: On 23 Jan 1998 00:08:53 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. >: Winters) wrote:
>: >Moreover, your comments about >: >ka'an and kan does not invalidate any of my arguments. The fact remains that in comparative linguistics we
>: We? I most strongly object!
>: >look for regular correspondence between letters and >: >sounds to prove correspondence.
>: I rest my case. This is so wrong, I don't even know how to begin to >: explain in how many different ways this sentence proves that Mr. >: Winters hasn't got the foggiest notion of comparative linguistics, or >: any kind of linguistics at all. The terms "letters" and "sounds" have >: not been used naively like this since the 19th century. >: "Correspondences between letters and sounds" is most definitely not >: what we're looking for in comparative linguistics. We don't "look for >: correspondences to prove correspondences", that doesn't make any kind >: of rational sense, let alone linguistical sense...
>This is nonsense.
No, it's a simple statement of fact.
> There is a relationship between Mayan and Mande languages >which is proven through the use of comparative and historical methods. > Linguistic evidence is the most convicing data supporting a >Mande relationship with the Maya, and the Mande origin of Olmec >culture.
In that case the theory is in serious trouble.
> A basic objective of the comparative linguist is to isolate >words with common or similar meanings that have systematic >consonantal agreement with little regards for the location and/or >type of vowels.
That's a bit of an overstatement.
> Consonantal agreement is the regular appearance >of consonants at certain locations in words having similar >meanings and representing similar speech sounds.
Not necessarily; what are the 'similar speech sounds' in English <furrow> and Welsh <rhych>, which are cognate?
> An examination of Mayan and Mande homophones indicate >striking similarity. There is a connection between Malinke- >Bambara and Yucatec homonyms for 'high, sky and serpent'. > In Malinke-Bambara the word Ka and Kan means 'serpent, upon >high,and sky'.
Then why do you give these words as <sa> in your table below?
> In Yucatec we find that can/kan and caan/kaan >means ' serpent and heaven'.
Bernard has already pointed out (with documentation) that 'sky' is <ka'an>, which has three consonants, not two.
> Often we find that Mande words beginning with /s/, appear as >/c/ in the Mayan languages. For example, Malinke Bambara, the >word sa means 'sell, to buy and market'. This is related to Mayan >con 'to sell', and can 'serpent'. For example we have
>Mayan Malinke-Bambara >can serpent sa >con to sell sa, san >can heaven, sky sa
At least one entry here, the last on the Maya side, is wrong.
> In these examples we see regular correspondence between the >Mayan /c/ and Malinke-Bambara /s/.
And does this correspondence hold up elsewhere? What in Malinke-Bambara corresponds to the glottal stop in <ka'an>?
Brian M. Scott %%%%%%% From: gkeyes6988@aol.com (GKeyes6988) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 25 Jan 1998 23:33:57 GMT Clyde Winters wrote <snip>
(: Winters claims that the Yucatec Maya word for “mother” is “naal” which : does not exist in Yucatec Maya according to the Cordemex dictionary. The : term for mother is:
: p. 545 na’ or naa’ (glottal stop and strong pronounciation) which is still : quite different from a simple “na”
(Winters) ..This is false there is no difference between na' and na.
This is the equivalent of saying there is no difference between English "to"and "top", "be" and "bet" or "do" and "dog". The glottal stop is a consonant-- not one that's important in English, but which is important indeed in Mayan. Again, it seems that the key to Mr. Winter's comparisons is not knowing much about Mayan or linguistics. %%%%%%% From: Akan@pizlink.net (Akan Ifriqiya) Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 26 Jan 1998 08:27:02 GMT
In article <6agu1n$cuv$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu says... > >Benjamin H. Diebold (benjamin.diebold@yale.edu) wrote: >: In article <6aemlc$qe$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu >: (Clyde A. Winters) wrote: SNIP >: > This is false there is no difference between na' and na. > >: Hello? > >: I don't know much about linguistics, but when I start dropping my glottal >: stops in Arabic, people stop understanding me (even more than usual). >: Winters absolutely has to be wrong here; he's simply imposing his own >: cultural paradigm on this linguistic argument. > > >For comparison purposes we don't have to refer to the pronunciation of >the word unless we are reconstructing the Proto-Language. > >C.A. Winters
What? Sahibi, the glottal stop is an integral part of the word, it is not some mere artefact of pronounciation! In arabic, as in other languages using the glottal, if you don't use the glottal, you have an utterly *different* word! Like na's versus na?s (where ? is the ain and ' is the glottal or hamza). What rubbish statements are you proposing here? Ramira Naka
Twelve years later. Clyde continues to make the same mistakes and demonstrate linguistic ignorance and he never admit errors.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: Actually, "to be sacre" is NOT [ku]. Delafosse (1929) p. 616 etre sacre= ko-nya, ku-nya (funny how you conveniently forget that this MANDE WORD HAS TWO SYLLABLES) and definitely does not have sound or consonant correspondence to [kglottalstopu] i.e. [k7u]. Other forms on p. 616 {v. intr.) ta-nto; (v. intr.) etre- (s.)-ko-ma,ku-ma. Again all words with TWO syllables and not sound correspondent to [k7u].
You don't know what you're talking about as usual. In Mande languages ku= to be sacre.
Above [p.381] you can see that ku='[ etre sacre] to be sacre'.
Clearly you have read Delafosse why do you love to lie.
.
You keep evading the point that the Mayan word is k'u i.e. [k7u] with the presence of a consonant (the glottal stop) that does not exist in Mande. Therefore there is no sound correspondence between the Mande and Mayan words even by your erroneous insistence on focusing on consonants. Have you ever admitted that a glottal stop is a consonant?
Above [p.381] you can see that ku='[ etre sacre] to be sacre'. I have also shown that in relation to comparive linguistic we look for regular correspondence, especially in relation to the consonants.
I have proven throughout this debate you don't know anything about comparative linguistics. as a result , I will leave you in your ignorance.
.
Posted by JujuMan (Member # 6729) on :
I'll have a quick guess, Booker T. Washington!? Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by osirion: Probably the most interesting thing I have read in awhile. Especially considering this mural:
Look at the color of the figures's hands and feet-- not black. They are either pained black or wearing black costumes.
Thought about that too but I see a compelling story. This picure appears to show a meeting of two cultures. One a Iron age culture - the Black African, and the other the Mayan people. If that is the case then the man on the left is wearing a Black leopard suit. The man on the right has faded paint on his feet.
Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
^ note that many of the Brown skinned mayans have lighter skinned feet, are they also painted?
May simply be a way to indicate that the sole of the feet are white.
Basically the man on the left is not a Black African but someone dressed up to meet a Black African. They think this Black person is a Leopard God of some kind and they are greeting him in this manner.
It means a Black African traveler made it to the new world.
Very plausible considering the advancement of West African empires by this time.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
After Neil Steede and I deciphered the ‘Salazer Brick’ from Comalcalco made it clear that you can read the Mayan script based on Olmec—while reading the inscriptions in the Mayan language. To test this theory I deciphered some the Ek-Chuah Black Trader god from the Tro-Crotensiana Codex.
It is interesting to note that the boys drilling are depicted as Blacks in the Dresden and Tro-Cotesianus Codexes.
To read the Mayan inscriptions I break down the Olmec syllabic signs which make up the Mayan hierogyphs. Once these signs are given a phonetic value I read them in Yucatec Maya.
Below we will discuss some of these inscriptions.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
To read the Mayan inscriptions I break down the Olmec syllabic signs which make up the Mayan hierogyphs. Once these signs are given a phonetic value I read them in Yucatec Maya.
As you can see when you look at the syllabic nature of many Mayan hieroglyphs the Codexs tell us much more than dates.
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
The glottal stop is associated with the pronunciation of vowels and consonants. See:
You attempt to make it appear that there is no relationship between the Mayan and Mande languages because of the glottal stop. You claim that you can not determine a relationship between these languages because the glottal stop in Mayan languages represent a consonant. This is not necessarially true. Granted there are five glottalized Mayan consonants ch’, k’, p’, t’ and ts’, but most glottal stops in the Mayan languages is associated with vowel sounds. See:
A Brief Introduction to Yucatec Mayan Copyright D. R. Shreve, 1999 Also see English-Mayan dictionary
To get a great phrase book by the late John Montgomery
Pronunciation Relatively little time has passed between the current way of spelling Mayan words and how they are pronounced. For that reason alone, there has been little opportunity for the oral to diverge from the written, and so, it is usually important to pronounce each letter shown. Commonly contracted word combinations will be spelled as such. Most letters shown here are pronounced as in English, except that the following are always pronounced as follows: a, like the a in father. b, silent if at the end of a plural noun or verb. e, as the a in lake. i, as the ee in feel. o, as the o in bowl. x, the sh as in shoe. Two vowels in a row are longer than a single vowel. In any situation, this tends to give the syllable they are in an emphasis. For example, beetik (to do) has more accent in the first syllable. Two vowels with an accent on the first one slightly emphasize that first vowel. Note that this does not create a second syllable in the word, just a slight shift in emphasis. Some consonants have an accent mark after them and are another matter. These are glottalized letters and are pronounced with a quick expulsion of air, for example: ch’, k’, p’, t’ and ts’ . One way to hear these letters glottalized is to go to your library and get a recording of Stephen Hawking speaking. When his artificial voice pronounces these letters at the end of a word, it glottalizes them. Barring this, the p’ is easiest to describe. Pretend you are disgusted with something, and spit out "Pah." Spit toward the ground and away from the wind. Now be a bit more amiable, and less explosive and try it in the word p’aak, or tomato, which is far different in meaning from paak, a verb meaning to double. With ch’, k’, t’ and ts’, what you need to do is to form the letters in your mouth as you normally would, but at the very beginning, force them out quickly. The k includes a clicking sound. Remember that in Yucatec, as far as pronunciation goes, the only difference between some words, such as kaax (a chicken) and k’aax (jungle) is the way you say the glottalized sound. This may not be a problem, since you are much more likely to refer to fried chicken (kaax tsabil) than to talk about felling some jungle (luubsik k’aax), but it could be confusing if you are trying to say k beetik (or, we do) instead of k’abeetik (it is very necessary to...). Vowels with an apostrophe following them indicate a glottal stop, such as when a person quickly says "oh oh," though the actual stoppage may seem barely noticeable, and may, at other times, be better described as a glottal pause. At the end of a word you cut the vowel in two by shutting it off with your windpipe. In any word of more than one syllable, the stop will tend to emphasize the preceding portion of the word. For example, waye’ (here) pronounced wa-YEAH, though with the glottal stop it is more like wa-YE, because you must cut it short. Once you realize that most Maya place names seem to be heavily accented in the last syllable, it is easy to assume the same for the other words, but that is not the case. One situation is when the word is normally a one syllable word that you have added to, the root word will still be accented. For example, when bel (road) is plural, as in belo'ob or you are referring to that road, as in le belo or even those roads le belo'obo, the accent will normally remain on bel. There will be the slight emphasis caused by a double vowel or a glottal stop, but, other than that, the best bet with a word of more than one syllable is to pronounce them all with equal emphasis.
Given this reality we can see a relationship between Mande Ku ‘sacre’ and Mayan K’u ‘god’ We still have the K sound, eventhough there is the glottal Mayan K’. See:
Bernard you love to make an issue of the glottal stop to make it appear that this would deny the possibility of claiming a relationship between the Mande and Mayan languages this is false.
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: Still avoiding the issue of the non-existing glottal dtop in Mande and its crucial importance in Mayan languages.
A blast from the past 1998. Scott and Carrasquer Vidal are professional linguists
quote:From: scott@math.csuohio.edu (Brian M. Scott) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology Subject: Re: New Olmec Religion Site Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 19:03:13 GMT Organization: Cleveland State University
On 24 Jan 1998 17:37:21 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. Winters) wrote:
[snips]
>Miguel Carrasquer Vidal (mcv@wxs.nl) wrote: >: On 23 Jan 1998 00:08:53 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. >: Winters) wrote:
>: >Moreover, your comments about >: >ka'an and kan does not invalidate any of my arguments. The fact remains that in comparative linguistics we
>: We? I most strongly object!
>: >look for regular correspondence between letters and >: >sounds to prove correspondence.
>: I rest my case. This is so wrong, I don't even know how to begin to >: explain in how many different ways this sentence proves that Mr. >: Winters hasn't got the foggiest notion of comparative linguistics, or >: any kind of linguistics at all. The terms "letters" and "sounds" have >: not been used naively like this since the 19th century. >: "Correspondences between letters and sounds" is most definitely not >: what we're looking for in comparative linguistics. We don't "look for >: correspondences to prove correspondences", that doesn't make any kind >: of rational sense, let alone linguistical sense...
>This is nonsense.
No, it's a simple statement of fact.
> There is a relationship between Mayan and Mande languages >which is proven through the use of comparative and historical methods. > Linguistic evidence is the most convicing data supporting a >Mande relationship with the Maya, and the Mande origin of Olmec >culture.
In that case the theory is in serious trouble.
> A basic objective of the comparative linguist is to isolate >words with common or similar meanings that have systematic >consonantal agreement with little regards for the location and/or >type of vowels.
That's a bit of an overstatement.
> Consonantal agreement is the regular appearance >of consonants at certain locations in words having similar >meanings and representing similar speech sounds.
Not necessarily; what are the 'similar speech sounds' in English <furrow> and Welsh <rhych>, which are cognate?
> An examination of Mayan and Mande homophones indicate >striking similarity. There is a connection between Malinke- >Bambara and Yucatec homonyms for 'high, sky and serpent'. > In Malinke-Bambara the word Ka and Kan means 'serpent, upon >high,and sky'.
Then why do you give these words as <sa> in your table below?
> In Yucatec we find that can/kan and caan/kaan >means ' serpent and heaven'.
Bernard has already pointed out (with documentation) that 'sky' is <ka'an>, which has three consonants, not two.
> Often we find that Mande words beginning with /s/, appear as >/c/ in the Mayan languages. For example, Malinke Bambara, the >word sa means 'sell, to buy and market'. This is related to Mayan >con 'to sell', and can 'serpent'. For example we have
>Mayan Malinke-Bambara >can serpent sa >con to sell sa, san >can heaven, sky sa
At least one entry here, the last on the Maya side, is wrong.
> In these examples we see regular correspondence between the >Mayan /c/ and Malinke-Bambara /s/.
And does this correspondence hold up elsewhere? What in Malinke-Bambara corresponds to the glottal stop in <ka'an>?
Brian M. Scott %%%%%%% From: gkeyes6988@aol.com (GKeyes6988) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 25 Jan 1998 23:33:57 GMT Clyde Winters wrote <snip>
(: Winters claims that the Yucatec Maya word for “mother” is “naal” which : does not exist in Yucatec Maya according to the Cordemex dictionary. The : term for mother is:
: p. 545 na’ or naa’ (glottal stop and strong pronounciation) which is still : quite different from a simple “na”
(Winters) ..This is false there is no difference between na' and na.
This is the equivalent of saying there is no difference between English "to"and "top", "be" and "bet" or "do" and "dog". The glottal stop is a consonant-- not one that's important in English, but which is important indeed in Mayan. Again, it seems that the key to Mr. Winter's comparisons is not knowing much about Mayan or linguistics. %%%%%%% From: Akan@pizlink.net (Akan Ifriqiya) Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 26 Jan 1998 08:27:02 GMT
In article <6agu1n$cuv$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu says... > >Benjamin H. Diebold (benjamin.diebold@yale.edu) wrote: >: In article <6aemlc$qe$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu >: (Clyde A. Winters) wrote: SNIP >: > This is false there is no difference between na' and na. > >: Hello? > >: I don't know much about linguistics, but when I start dropping my glottal >: stops in Arabic, people stop understanding me (even more than usual). >: Winters absolutely has to be wrong here; he's simply imposing his own >: cultural paradigm on this linguistic argument. > > >For comparison purposes we don't have to refer to the pronunciation of >the word unless we are reconstructing the Proto-Language. > >C.A. Winters
What? Sahibi, the glottal stop is an integral part of the word, it is not some mere artefact of pronounciation! In arabic, as in other languages using the glottal, if you don't use the glottal, you have an utterly *different* word! Like na's versus na?s (where ? is the ain and ' is the glottal or hamza). What rubbish statements are you proposing here? Ramira Naka
Twelve years later. Clyde continues to make the same mistakes and demonstrate linguistic ignorance and he never admit errors.
Oh yes I remember this discussion. I used to post to sci.archaeology. This was a biased site. To make it appear I lost debates Doug Weller who was the moderator of the site would ban me from the site long enough to make sure the readers thought I had lost the debate.
What I like about ES is that you can make a statement, to get your point across.
As I have always made clear in all of my post in comparative linguistic you look at words to determine regular correspondence in relation to the consonants. Due to tone the same words can be pronunced with a slight differce, but this difference will not take away the fact two words are cognate terms.
The pronunciation of the Mayan /a’/ would not make the Mande pronunciation of /a/ that much different. As you can hear from the video the /a’/ is not a consonant.
You dispute my comparison of Mande Kan and Mayan kan/Kaan ‘sky’. Here is the pronunciation of Mayan term for ‘sky’. See
Finally, you are not a linguist. The discussants in the sci-archaeology post were just showing bias. They could get away with this because Doug Weller, wanted it to appear I was wrong.
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: [QB] Still avoiding the issue of the non-existing glottal dtop in Mande and its crucial importance in Mayan languages.
A blast from the past 1998. Scott and Carrasquer Vidal are professional linguists
[QUOTE]From: scott@math.csuohio.edu (Brian M. Scott) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology Subject: Re: New Olmec Religion Site Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 19:03:13 GMT Organization: Cleveland State University
On 24 Jan 1998 17:37:21 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. Winters) wrote:
[snips]
>Miguel Carrasquer Vidal (mcv@wxs.nl) wrote: >: On 23 Jan 1998 00:08:53 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. >: Winters) wrote:
>: >Moreover, your comments about >: >ka'an and kan does not invalidate any of my arguments. The fact remains that in comparative linguistics we
>: We? I most strongly object!
>: >look for regular correspondence between letters and >: >sounds to prove correspondence.
>: I rest my case. This is so wrong, I don't even know how to begin to >: explain in how many different ways this sentence proves that Mr. >: Winters hasn't got the foggiest notion of comparative linguistics, or >: any kind of linguistics at all. The terms "letters" and "sounds" have >: not been used naively like this since the 19th century. >: "Correspondences between letters and sounds" is most definitely not >: what we're looking for in comparative linguistics. We don't "look for >: correspondences to prove correspondences", that doesn't make any kind >: of rational sense, let alone linguistical sense...
>This is nonsense.
No, it's a simple statement of fact.
> There is a relationship between Mayan and Mande languages >which is proven through the use of comparative and historical methods. > Linguistic evidence is the most convicing data supporting a >Mande relationship with the Maya, and the Mande origin of Olmec >culture.
In that case the theory is in serious trouble.
> A basic objective of the comparative linguist is to isolate >words with common or similar meanings that have systematic >consonantal agreement with little regards for the location and/or >type of vowels.
That's a bit of an overstatement.
> Consonantal agreement is the regular appearance >of consonants at certain locations in words having similar >meanings and representing similar speech sounds.
Not necessarily; what are the 'similar speech sounds' in English <furrow> and Welsh <rhych>, which are cognate?
> An examination of Mayan and Mande homophones indicate >striking similarity. There is a connection between Malinke- >Bambara and Yucatec homonyms for 'high, sky and serpent'. > In Malinke-Bambara the word Ka and Kan means 'serpent, upon >high,and sky'.
Then why do you give these words as <sa> in your table below?
> In Yucatec we find that can/kan and caan/kaan >means ' serpent and heaven'.
Bernard has already pointed out (with documentation) that 'sky' is <ka'an>, which has three consonants, not two.
> Often we find that Mande words beginning with /s/, appear as >/c/ in the Mayan languages. For example, Malinke Bambara, the >word sa means 'sell, to buy and market'. This is related to Mayan >con 'to sell', and can 'serpent'. For example we have
>Mayan Malinke-Bambara >can serpent sa >con to sell sa, san >can heaven, sky sa
At least one entry here, the last on the Maya side, is wrong.
> In these examples we see regular correspondence between the >Mayan /c/ and Malinke-Bambara /s/.
And does this correspondence hold up elsewhere? What in Malinke-Bambara corresponds to the glottal stop in <ka'an>?
Brian M. Scott %%%%%%% From: gkeyes6988@aol.com (GKeyes6988) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 25 Jan 1998 23:33:57 GMT Clyde Winters wrote <snip>
(: Winters claims that the Yucatec Maya word for “mother” is “naal” which : does not exist in Yucatec Maya according to the Cordemex dictionary. The : term for mother is:
: p. 545 na’ or naa’ (glottal stop and strong pronounciation) which is still : quite different from a simple “na”
(Winters) ..This is false there is no difference between na' and na.
This is the equivalent of saying there is no difference between English "to"and "top", "be" and "bet" or "do" and "dog". The glottal stop is a consonant-- not one that's important in English, but which is important indeed in Mayan. Again, it seems that the key to Mr. Winter's comparisons is not knowing much about Mayan or linguistics. %%%%%%% From: Akan@pizlink.net (Akan Ifriqiya) Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 26 Jan 1998 08:27:02 GMT
In article <6agu1n$cuv$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu says... > >Benjamin H. Diebold (benjamin.diebold@yale.edu) wrote: >: In article <6aemlc$qe$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu >: (Clyde A. Winters) wrote: SNIP >: > This is false there is no difference between na' and na. > >: Hello? > >: I don't know much about linguistics, but when I start dropping my glottal >: stops in Arabic, people stop understanding me (even more than usual). >: Winters absolutely has to be wrong here; he's simply imposing his own >: cultural paradigm on this linguistic argument. > > >For comparison purposes we don't have to refer to the pronunciation of >the word unless we are reconstructing the Proto-Language. > >C.A. Winters
What? Sahibi, the glottal stop is an integral part of the word, it is not some mere artefact of pronounciation! In arabic, as in other languages using the glottal, if you don't use the glottal, you have an utterly *different* word! Like na's versus na?s (where ? is the ain and ' is the glottal or hamza). What rubbish statements are you proposing here? Ramira Naka
The statements in this post are false. They claim that <ka’an> has three consonants. This was false . It only has two consonants <k-n>, /a’/ is just a glottalized vowel . See:
This shows that I was not wrong in finding a relationship between the Mayan and Mande terms for sky.
.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by osirion:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by osirion: Probably the most interesting thing I have read in awhile. Especially considering this mural:
Look at the color of the figures's hands and feet-- not black. They are either pained black or wearing black costumes.
Thought about that too but I see a compelling story. This picure appears to show a meeting of two cultures. One a Iron age culture - the Black African, and the other the Mayan people. If that is the case then the man on the left is wearing a Black leopard suit. The man on the right has faded paint on his feet.
Actually this represents a meeting in the underworld not a meeting on earth. Further, there never was any iron in the New World in pre-columbian times. But it is a nice imaginative rendition that accounts for the red coloring of the flesh.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
After Neil Steede and I deciphered the ‘Salazer Brick’ from Comalcalco made it clear that you can read the Mayan script based on Olmec—while reading the inscriptions in the Mayan language. To test this theory I deciphered some the Ek-Chuah Black Trader god from the Tro-Crotensiana Codex.
It is interesting to note that the boys drilling are depicted as Blacks in the Dresden and Tro-Cotesianus Codexes.
To read the Mayan inscriptions I break down the Olmec syllabic signs which make up the Mayan hierogyphs. Once these signs are given a phonetic value I read them in Yucatec Maya.
Below we will discuss some of these inscriptions.
This is so much baloney. You can get away with interpreting little pieces of Olmec images in your idiosyncratic method because decipherment of Olmec and epi-Olmec writing is still in flux. However, Maya writing is now in the 80-90% stage of decipherment due to very rapid advances. As an experiment, why don't some of the other participants send these supposed translations to people like David Stuart at the University of Texas, or Stephen Houston at Brigham Young University. If they even consider it worth the time, they will roll around in the floor laughing at it.
For starters, translating the dots and lines of dates in maya calendar as if they were words is totally ridiculous.3 We went through this previously when you claimed that the Long Count dates on the Mojarra Stela and the Tuxtla statuette were also writing. You finally admitted that these were calendar dates. see http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=000348;p=4. but, as usual, you backslide and ignore previous proofs or your mistakes.
BTW when Clyde gets in trouble, he fills the airwaves with spam. Notice this flurry of posts. LOL
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
The beginning of a lot of spam as I predicted. Clyde . why do you persist in posting things that only contradict you and support the opposition? We see this on the thread on Tuareg. LOL
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: The glottal stop is associated with the pronunciation of vowels and consonants. See:
A nice demonstration about how to make the glottal stop, but irrelevant here because the glottal stop in English does not change the meaning of the word as it does in Mayan and Arabic
quote:You attempt to make it appear that there is no relationship between the Mayan and Mande languages because of the glottal stop. You claim that you can not determine a relationship between these languages because the glottal stop in Mayan languages represent a consonant. This is not necessarially true. Granted there are five glottalized Mayan consonants ch’, k’, p’, t’ and ts’, but most glottal stops in the Mayan languages is associated with vowel sounds. See:
again, this does not support your point because the video is teaching the sounds of a vowel [a]. I'll use 7 as a sign for the glottal stop. In fact there are a number of glottal stops a7,e7,o7,i7,and u7 -- these are associated with vowels such as in the video below (which illustrates where you are wrong) ka7an =sky. There are also glottal stops that represent double consonants k7,p7,t7 , ts7,ch7,q7, and tz7. again from the video below k7aan =hammmock and k7an sky.
You can't even copy the number of glottal stops in Maya correctly
A Brief Introduction to Yucatec Mayan Copyright D. R. Shreve, 1999 Also see English-Mayan dictionary
To get a great phrase book by the late John Montgomery
Pronunciation Relatively little time has passed between the current way of spelling Mayan words and how they are pronounced. For that reason alone, there has been little opportunity for the oral to diverge from the written, and so, it is usually important to pronounce each letter shown. Commonly contracted word combinations will be spelled as such. Most letters shown here are pronounced as in English, except that the following are always pronounced as follows: a, like the a in father. b, silent if at the end of a plural noun or verb. e, as the a in lake. i, as the ee in feel. o, as the o in bowl. x, the sh as in shoe. Two vowels in a row are longer than a single vowel. In any situation, this tends to give the syllable they are in an emphasis. For example, beetik (to do) has more accent in the first syllable. Two vowels with an accent on the first one slightly emphasize that first vowel. Note that this does not create a second syllable in the word, just a slight shift in emphasis. Some consonants have an accent mark after them and are another matter. These are glottalized letters and are pronounced with a quick expulsion of air, for example: ch’, k’, p’, t’ and ts’ . One way to hear these letters glottalized is to go to your library and get a recording of Stephen Hawking speaking. When his artificial voice pronounces these letters at the end of a word, it glottalizes them. Barring this, the p’ is easiest to describe. Pretend you are disgusted with something, and spit out "Pah." Spit toward the ground and away from the wind. Now be a bit more amiable, and less explosive and try it in the word p’aak, or tomato, which is far different in meaning from paak, a verb meaning to double. With ch’, k’, t’ and ts’, what you need to do is to form the letters in your mouth as you normally would, but at the very beginning, force them out quickly. The k includes a clicking sound. Remember that in Yucatec, as far as pronunciation goes, the only difference between some words, such as kaax (a chicken) and k’aax (jungle) is the way you say the glottalized sound. This may not be a problem, since you are much more likely to refer to fried chicken (kaax tsabil) than to talk about felling some jungle (luubsik k’aax), but it could be confusing if you are trying to say k beetik (or, we do) instead of k’abeetik (it is very necessary to...). Vowels with an apostrophe following them indicate a glottal stop, such as when a person quickly says "oh oh," though the actual stoppage may seem barely noticeable, and may, at other times, be better described as a glottal pause. At the end of a word you cut the vowel in two by shutting it off with your windpipe. In any word of more than one syllable, the stop will tend to emphasize the preceding portion of the word. For example, waye’ (here) pronounced wa-YEAH, though with the glottal stop it is more like wa-YE, because you must cut it short. Once you realize that most Maya place names seem to be heavily accented in the last syllable, it is easy to assume the same for the other words, but that is not the case. One situation is when the word is normally a one syllable word that you have added to, the root word will still be accented. For example, when bel (road) is plural, as in belo'ob or you are referring to that road, as in le belo or even those roads le belo'obo, the accent will normally remain on bel. There will be the slight emphasis caused by a double vowel or a glottal stop, but, other than that, the best bet with a word of more than one syllable is to pronounce them all with equal emphasis.
Given this reality we can see a relationship between Mande Ku ‘sacre’ and Mayan K’u ‘god’ We still have the K sound, eventhough there is the glottal Mayan K’. See
Henderson completely contradicts you. There are glottal stops associated with consonants (i.e you get two consonants) and there are glottal stops associated with vowels. It's not true what you say that glottal stops are only associated with vowels. Notice that you are again trying to shift the goal posts because you have been adamant, in the past, that in your method we had to concentrate on consonants. LOL. Both Henderson and the video support my contention that apart from making the sound correspondence different glottal stops in Maya (unlike English) change the meaning of words. Even worse for your feeble attempts to make Maya and Mande similar is the fact that long and short vowels and tone ALSO change the meaning of words.
From your own video k7an =yellow;ka7an=sky; k7aan= hammock and kaan =snake
Lets play ( this from the Maya Cordemex dictionary) Since Mande [ku] has no glottal stop, if you were honest and a real linguist, the proper comparison would be the Maya [ku], not Maya [k7u]
ku=owl ku= expression meaning pain equivalent to oh!
k'u = god k'u= temple k'u =bird nest
All of your Maya Mande claims suffer from this same defect of ignoring the fact that the glottal stop changes both the sound and the meaning. Its like my saying that in Mande [n], [ng] and [ny] make no difference because they all have [n] in them.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: Bernard you love to make an issue of the glottal stop to make it appear that this would deny the possibility of claiming a relationship between the Mande and Mayan languages this is false.
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: Still avoiding the issue of the non-existing glottal dtop in Mande and its crucial importance in Mayan languages.
A blast from the past 1998. Scott and Carrasquer Vidal are professional linguists
[QUOTE]From: scott@math.csuohio.edu (Brian M. Scott) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology Subject: Re: New Olmec Religion Site Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 19:03:13 GMT Organization: Cleveland State University
On 24 Jan 1998 17:37:21 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. Winters) wrote:
[snips]
>Miguel Carrasquer Vidal (mcv@wxs.nl) wrote: >: On 23 Jan 1998 00:08:53 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. >: Winters) wrote:
>: >Moreover, your comments about >: >ka'an and kan does not invalidate any of my arguments. The fact remains that in comparative linguistics we
>: We? I most strongly object!
>: >look for regular correspondence between letters and >: >sounds to prove correspondence.
>: I rest my case. This is so wrong, I don't even know how to begin to >: explain in how many different ways this sentence proves that Mr. >: Winters hasn't got the foggiest notion of comparative linguistics, or >: any kind of linguistics at all. The terms "letters" and "sounds" have >: not been used naively like this since the 19th century. >: "Correspondences between letters and sounds" is most definitely not >: what we're looking for in comparative linguistics. We don't "look for >: correspondences to prove correspondences", that doesn't make any kind >: of rational sense, let alone linguistical sense...
>This is nonsense.
No, it's a simple statement of fact.
> There is a relationship between Mayan and Mande languages >which is proven through the use of comparative and historical methods. > Linguistic evidence is the most convicing data supporting a >Mande relationship with the Maya, and the Mande origin of Olmec >culture.
In that case the theory is in serious trouble.
> A basic objective of the comparative linguist is to isolate >words with common or similar meanings that have systematic >consonantal agreement with little regards for the location and/or >type of vowels.
That's a bit of an overstatement.
> Consonantal agreement is the regular appearance >of consonants at certain locations in words having similar >meanings and representing similar speech sounds.
Not necessarily; what are the 'similar speech sounds' in English <furrow> and Welsh <rhych>, which are cognate?
> An examination of Mayan and Mande homophones indicate >striking similarity. There is a connection between Malinke- >Bambara and Yucatec homonyms for 'high, sky and serpent'. > In Malinke-Bambara the word Ka and Kan means 'serpent, upon >high,and sky'.
Then why do you give these words as <sa> in your table below?
> In Yucatec we find that can/kan and caan/kaan >means ' serpent and heaven'.
Bernard has already pointed out (with documentation) that 'sky' is <ka'an>, which has three consonants, not two.
> Often we find that Mande words beginning with /s/, appear as >/c/ in the Mayan languages. For example, Malinke Bambara, the >word sa means 'sell, to buy and market'. This is related to Mayan >con 'to sell', and can 'serpent'. For example we have
>Mayan Malinke-Bambara >can serpent sa >con to sell sa, san >can heaven, sky sa
At least one entry here, the last on the Maya side, is wrong.
> In these examples we see regular correspondence between the >Mayan /c/ and Malinke-Bambara /s/.
And does this correspondence hold up elsewhere? What in Malinke-Bambara corresponds to the glottal stop in <ka'an>?
Brian M. Scott %%%%%%% From: gkeyes6988@aol.com (GKeyes6988) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 25 Jan 1998 23:33:57 GMT Clyde Winters wrote <snip>
(: Winters claims that the Yucatec Maya word for “mother” is “naal” which : does not exist in Yucatec Maya according to the Cordemex dictionary. The : term for mother is:
: p. 545 na’ or naa’ (glottal stop and strong pronounciation) which is still : quite different from a simple “na”
(Winters) ..This is false there is no difference between na' and na.
This is the equivalent of saying there is no difference between English "to"and "top", "be" and "bet" or "do" and "dog". The glottal stop is a consonant-- not one that's important in English, but which is important indeed in Mayan. Again, it seems that the key to Mr. Winter's comparisons is not knowing much about Mayan or linguistics. %%%%%%% From: Akan@pizlink.net (Akan Ifriqiya) Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 26 Jan 1998 08:27:02 GMT
In article <6agu1n$cuv$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu says... > >Benjamin H. Diebold (benjamin.diebold@yale.edu) wrote: >: In article <6aemlc$qe$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu >: (Clyde A. Winters) wrote: SNIP >: > This is false there is no difference between na' and na. > >: Hello? > >: I don't know much about linguistics, but when I start dropping my glottal >: stops in Arabic, people stop understanding me (even more than usual). >: Winters absolutely has to be wrong here; he's simply imposing his own >: cultural paradigm on this linguistic argument. > > >For comparison purposes we don't have to refer to the pronunciation of >the word unless we are reconstructing the Proto-Language. > >C.A. Winters
What? Sahibi, the glottal stop is an integral part of the word, it is not some mere artefact of pronounciation! In arabic, as in other languages using the glottal, if you don't use the glottal, you have an utterly *different* word! Like na's versus na?s (where ? is the ain and ' is the glottal or hamza). What rubbish statements are you proposing here? Ramira Naka
Twelve years later. Clyde continues to make the same mistakes and demonstrate linguistic ignorance and he never admit errors. [/QUOTE
]Oh yes I remember this discussion. I used to post to sci.archaeology. This was a biased site. To make it appear I lost debates Doug Weller who was the moderator of the site would ban me from the site long enough to make sure the readers thought I had lost the debate. ---- . The discussants in the sci-archaeology post were just showing bias. They could get away with this because Doug Weller, wanted it to appear I was wrong.
.
Poor you, you posted megabytes in the science archeology list. If you think linguists in this list were mean -- how about the linguistics scholars in the "Ancient Near East list" about your claims of Mande and Dravidian. Perhaps you only shine in Afrocentric lists where your critics can be tarred as "racist." Has any mainstream linguist ever cited your work seriously? enjoy:
From: Jose Rubio Pardo <gonzalor@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:50:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Sumerian Related to African/Darvidian?
On Mon, 29 Apr 1996, Clyde A. Winters wrote:
>The appears to be close relationship between Dravidian, Manding (an African language) and the Sumerian languages. Although these people are separated in time and geographical space they show considerable anology.
When you say "Manding", I think you may mean "Mandingo". "Mandenga", "Mandingo" have been some of the names previously used to refer to a whole group of languages called nowadays (by most scholars) just "Mande". It includes many languages: Bambara, Beng, Mende, etc. Otherwise, you may be referring to just one Mande language called "Manding" or "Mandekan". Actually, the problems of dialectalization in Mande are so complex that what is regarded by some scholars as a language, according to others it's a whole family. Anyways, you might find interesting to read D. J. DWYER's paper in J. Bendor-Samuel (ed) _The Niger-Congo Languages_ (Lanham MD: University Press, 1989_, pp. 47 ff.
>There are similar place names found were these people live according to the research of Alain Anselin <Le Methe d'Europe>, Nayar <The Problem of Dravidian Origins>, and Vamos Toth Bator <Tamana>. Vamos Toth, has proven beyond a doubt that these people shared cultural items and placenames. >The ancestors of the speakers of these languages probably lived in middle Africa, in the highland regions 6000 years ago.(6) The practiced a sedentary-pastoral lifestyle:
I'm sure everybody could find similar coincidences between Basque and Tagalog, for instance, but that would be statistically irrelevant and methodologically pointless. Regarding the date, well, if one has enough imagination, 6000 years wouldn't be enough time (I mean, Sumerian was probably a spoken language 5000 years ago, so you should choose an earlier date).
Seriously, and very respectfully, just focussed on the Sumerian material you quote, well, some words seem not to exist (manus = lord ?) or they have different meanings (pap means, sometimes, brother [Akk. ahu], but not father; kalam means land, not boat --I take this as a lapsus because of the ancient Greek metaphor for state, or you are reading that sign as UN [Akk. ni:$u], people, the same sign but a different word--; etc.). Along with serious scholarship (like the wonderful PSD), you seem to rely on Gostony's dictionary (Paris 1975) which is a nice piece of "imaginative" writing. I think I already gave this reference in this kind of never-ending discussion, but please read Edzard's (_BSOAS_ 39 [1976]: 637 f) and Hru$ka's (_OLZ_ 74 [1979]: 337 ff.) reviews. Sincerely, I don't think scholars like those working on PSD or Emeneau deserve to share quotation with Gostony (who, I'm sure, is/was a nice or even fun person, but whose book has as many mistakes as pages).
Regarding |idian and the like. I understand some people have worked on that possible connection (I think Boisson has written something about that, although he has never published that stuff). However, the Mohenjo-daro/Harappa link is not clear at all, I'm afraid, in spite of Wilson's well-meaning attempt. Probably the most interesting book to read on that topic is Asko PARPOLA's _Deciphering the Indus Script_ (Cambridge 1994). He and his team seem to have identified just one possible Dravidian word (Tamil mi:n_ "fish"). However, one word is not enough (although there exist other arguments to point to a "Dravidian" hypothesis), we don't know too much on Dravidian in ancient times (even the Elamo-Dravidian hypothesis is just that, a hypothesis --although McAlpin's work is quite interesting), and we are still at the beginning: lack of enough evidence.
For further discussion I dare suggest we should move this to the HISTLING list (I take my friend Andrew's good suggestion). Anyways, thanks. Gonzalo Rubio Near Eastern Studies Johns Hopkins University
From: Alexis Manaster Ramer <amr@CS.Wayne.EDU> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 08:50:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Sumerian Related to African/Darvidian?
Before we could even discuss such a claim, we would have to do a number of things which have not been done. The main one is that since Mande is part of a much larger language family, we would have to compare not Mande but the whole family to Dravidian and Sumerian. Without this, there is simply nothing to discuss: you are doing the equivalent of comparing Polish to Hebrew or a giraffe to an amoeba. There are other things, but they pale in comparison. These include the fact that you have get the forms and meanings right, which is a particular problem in the case of Dravidian whose reconstruction is in a very parlous state; you have to find parallels other than place names (which are to be ignored at an early stage like this because we know little about their original meanings) and names of domestic animals (which are notorious Wanderworter; compare English kangaroo, giraffe, okapi, etc.); and you have make at least a stab at saying something about the supposed correspondences, the morphology, etc., etc.
There is no need to ask, as Jim does, about historical or archeological evidence. There is NO LINGUISTIC evidence here at all.
Alexis MR
From: "Clyde A. Winters" <cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 19:14:16 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Sumerian Related to African/Darvidian?
On Tue, 30 Apr 1996, Alexis Manaster Ramer wrote:
>Before we could even discuss such a claim, we would have to do a number of things which have not been done. The main one is that since Mande is part of a much larger language family, we would have to compare not Mande but the whole family to Dravidian and Sumerian. Without this, there is simply nothing to discuss: you are doing the equivalent of comparing Polish to Hebrew or a giraffe to an amoeba. There are other things, but they pale in comparison. These include the fact that you have get the forms and meanings right, which is a particular problem in the case of Dravidian whose reconstruction is in a very parlous state; you have to find parallels other than place names (which are to be ignored at an early stage like this because we know little about their original meanings) and names of domestic animals (which are notorious Wanderworter; compare English kangaroo, giraffe, okapi, etc.); and you have make at least a stab at saying something about the supposed correspondences, the morphology, etc., etc.
>There is no need to ask, as Jim does, about historical or archeological evidence. There is NO LINGUISTIC evidence here at all.
>Alexis MR
From: "Clyde A. Winters" <cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 19:40:43 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re:Sumerian related to African/Dravidian
Alexis in his comments concerning my posting suggested that there was little to no linguistics in the piece. Granted, Manding is the French term used to refer to the Mandikan/Bambara group of Northern Mande languages (if you are interested in learning more about Proto-Mande please refer to my 1986 article in <Mankind>, footnoted in my original posting), but we can compare one language to another without referring to their proto-forms. This reality of linguistic comparison helped scholars discover the Indo-European group of languages. Any first year linguistics major knows that the people who discovered the Indo-European family did not compare proto-forms to determine the unity of this group.
As a result I beg to differ, this is linguistic evidence of a link between Sumerian and African/Dravidian languages. If you dispute my findings please use linguistic examples, rhetorical flair has little to do with scientific debate.
Concerning the Indus Valley writing i believe that more of this writing can be read than the word "Min" 'fish, illumination, etc". Parpola has failed to go farther in his decipherment because he is (1) not a linguist and totally unfamiliar with linguistic methods and (2) he is only familiar with Indo-Aryan culture, so he can not really understand much about Dravidian culture. If you wish to see a different view on this subject please refer to the following articles:
C.A. Winters,"The Harappan script", <Journa;l of Tamil Studies>, no.30 (1987) pp.89-111. C.A. Winters, "The inspiration of the Harappan Talismanic seals", <Tamil Civilization>, 2(1), (1984) pp.1-8. C.A. Winters, "The Dravido-Harappan Colonization of Central Asia", <Central Asiatic Journal>, 34 (1-2), (1990). C.A. Winters, "The Dravidian language and the Harappan Script", <Archiv Orientalni>, (1989/1990).
This articles will help you discover a more realistic way of raeding the Indus-Valley writing.
C.A.Winters
-----------------------------
From: Jose Rubio Pardo <gonzalor@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu> Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 18:51:38 -0400 Subject: Re: Sumerian Related to African/Darvidian?
On Tue, 30 Apr 1996, Clyde A. Winters wrote:
>large classifications of language families. If you dispute my finding please use linguistic evidence, rhetorical flair has little consequence in scientific debate.
Regarding linguistic evidence, and with my deepest respect for you and your scholarship, I explained you that most of your alleged Sumerian evidence do not exist at all. I dare say, you are misunderstanding the complexities of cuneiform (for instance, reading kalam but with the meaning of un --as I told you: the same sign, but two words), which is perfectly normal. Also you seem to rely on some outdated or quite idiosyncratic works (like Gostony's). Unfortunately, my e-mail was down for some hours, so I'm not sure if you presented further evidence. However, I'd guess we should eliminate Sumerian form that hypothetical "Mandingo-Dravidian" group. Please, be sure most Sumeriologists would be quite happy if someone could establish a genetical relation between Sumerian and, let's say, Dravidian, or Munda, or whatever. It's a pity we seem not to have that evidence (at least now).
>You also mentioned Parpola as an expert on the Indus Valley writing. He is a fine Indo-Europeanist, but he is not a linguist and he knows very little about the Dravidian languages. He does admit that the Indus Valley writing may be Dravidian, but his total lack of linguistic methods and Dravidian languages has hindered his researches. If you are interested in seeing a more objective view of the Indus Valley script and its decipherment please refer to the following articles:
Well, Asko Parpola (I'd avoid to use just his last name, since his brother Simo is a very important and brilliant Assyriologist) is a very well known Indologist, and along with his Harappan project (in which a good team of scholars is working) he has published articles which do prove his expertise as a linguist ("India's names in early foreign sources", _Sri Venkateswara Univ. Ori. Jour._ 18 [1978], and his several and deep articles on Vedic and post-Vedic rituals you probably know very well --in most of them one finds always a clear respect for the core of the Neogrammarian approach, which is in essence the methodological framework most people doing Historical linguistics work within).
I try to follow what is going on regarding the Mohenjo-daro/Harappa studies, and I must say Asko Parpola's book is a good and very prudent status qaestionis, and many other people may agree with me. From my very humble point of view, that book represents a real advance from previous attempts by both Russian and Indian scholars.
Finally, on methodology. Although the "massive/intuitive" comparative method seems to be coming back (well, at least one quite brilliant scholar is using that, let's say, "anti-method" [the last Heidegger Derrida would write "method" under erasure here]), I must say, very respectfully, that, when I read your first message, it reminded me of the book the Chevalier de Paravey published in 1885, _Memoire sur l'origine japonaise, arabe et basque de la civilisation des peuples du plateau de Bogota_. I'm sure a conversation with that French gentleman (I guess) would have been more enjoyable and fun than hours of deep and serious discussion with Brugmann, Delbrueck, Osthoff, or Behagel. However, when I attempt to find methodologically sound answers to some questions, I must turn to them, to those "boring" Neogrammarians. Of course, their methodology has been enriched by many other approaches. For that, I would dare recommend you to read (I apologize if you are already familiar with them) at least two things: Raimo Anttila's wonderful _Historical and Comparative Linguistics_ (New York, 1972 & 1989), and the collective vol. Edgard Polome published in 1990 (NY), _Research Guide on Language Change_. Thanks a lot.
Gonzalo Rubio Near Eastern Studies Johns Hopkins University
-----------------------------
From: Peter Daniels <pdaniels@press-gopher.uchicago.edu> Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 00:04:21 -0500 Subject: Phantasy in language relations
I know nothing of the lexica of Dravidian, Niger-Congo, or Sumerian, some alleged items of which are placed in parallel rows and columns by Clyde A. Winters. I do know that the assertion that the three languages "used a similar writing system" is utter nonsense. I have not heard of this alleged "ancient Manding script", but until more is understood of the Indus Valley script than that it seems to have been logosyllabic and that Dravidian is the most likely language family for it to have recorded, it cannot be stated that it is "similar" to the (rather well understood) Sumerian.
From: Peter Daniels <pdaniels@press-gopher.uchicago.edu> Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 01:14:12 -0500 Subject: Rawlinson
Where does Clyde A. Winters get the nonsense he is putting out on the ANE List? I refer only to that of which I have certain knowledge. Rawlinson did not decipher "the cuneiform writing"; there is no such person as "C. B. Rawlinson" (this is proof enough that C.A.W. has not consiulted the material he cites!); and the person who did decipher Mesopotamian cuneiform, Edward Hincks, did not use "two African languages: one Semitic and the other Cushitic to decipher the cuneiform writing." He was fully conversant with all the known Semitic languages (i.e. Hebrew, Arabic, and Syriac), and his understanding of Semitic grammar was vital in his work; the principal article presenting the decipherment concerns the Urartian texts discovered by Schulz in the 1820s but published only in 1840; and Major, then Colonel, then Sir Henry Crswicke Rawlinson incorporated Hincks's work into his own publications without acknowledgment.
See Peter T. Daniels, "Edward Hincks's Decipherment of Mesopotamian Cunei- form," in *The Edward Hincks Bicentenary Lectures*, edited by Kevin Cathcart (Dublin: Near Eastern Studies Dept., University College Dublin, 1994); summary in my article in the first volume of *Civilizations of the Ancient Near East*.
-----------------------------
From: Alexis Manaster Ramer <amr@CS.Wayne.EDU> Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 08:26:08 -0400 Subject: Claimed Linguistic Relationships, Sumerian et al.
Since I have been challenged to provide substance and not merely rhetoric to back up my statement that the recently posted arguments do NOT constitute even the most elementary kind of linguistic evidence of kindship between Sumerian, Dravidian, and Mande, I thought I would supply a few basic references and a brief explanation.
Aside from the fact (noted by Gonzalo) that many of the Sumerian forms cited are mistakes (I have not seen anybody check the ones from the other languages, but I would still like to first be told what "Dravidian" means in this context, since there is no reconstruction of Proto-Dravidian to speak of as yet), the main objection is this: between any pair of languages you can find some startling resemblences: Aztec has at least the following accidental resemblances to one or another IE language: 1st person sg. is neh, the word for 'good' is huel (i.e., wel), the word for 'god' is teo-tl (-tl is the almost universal noun suffix), etc. etc. So, we have to have some way of distinguishing accidental resemblances from those which are significant in that they point to a common origin of the words in question (whether through borrowing of thee words or because the languages are related). The studies by Callaghan and Miller and by Campbell showed that it is all too easy to come up with long long lists of accidental resemblances between a single language (English or Finnish, as it happened) and a big family (Mixtecan or Amerind, as it happened). One of the things that helps us eliminate such spurious comparisons is the fact that we do not try to find distant cousins for English or Finnish, but rather place English within its IE context, Finnish within its Uralic context, and lo, most of the spurious comparisons between English (or Finnish) and various Amerindian groupings suddenly dissolve into nothingness. This is why I said there is no point even discussing a proposal for relating Sumerian to Mande without knowing the whole family Mande belongs to or to Dravidian without having a solid grasp of what is likely to have been Proto-Dravidian. I of course think that the proposed comparisons will then be discredited. BUT on the other hand, if they stood up to that test and if in fact more comparisons were then evident, then that would be an argument for at least looking at the proposal with some degree of interest, so those who support such proposals should be EAGER to subject their views to this kind of test. And if they are not, then the rest of us have reason to be suspicious.
Now, in addition, given that Sumerian itself has no close relatives, in this case we cannot talk of a protolanguage or a family of languages, and so we have no control. Thus, as discussed at some length in my forthcoming paper, languages without reasonably close relatives are a particular problem for classification because it is all too easy to find spurious resemblances between them and something else and there is no way to refute these (as there is in the case of English or Finnish, which do have large families). Thus, what I show is that two Amerindian languages Tonkawa and Zuni can equally easily be seen as being distantly related to different (and mutually exclusive) groupings, precisely because they have no close relatives. This does not mean that such languages as Sumerian, Tonkawa, Zuni (also Basque, Tarascan, Burushaski, and a few others) cannot be successfully related to other languages. But it does mean that, because it is relatively easier to come up with spurious comparisons for them, we must also demand a higher standard proof here. I think that this is all borne out by our experience: various crazy and sometimes even noncrazy people have tried to compare Sumerian to everything from Hungarian to Basque to whatever else is available (because such spurious comparisons are easy), whereas people usually do not try to do the same with a language that is firmly embedded within a large family (e.g., no one tries to separate Akkadian from the rest of Semitic and connect it to Hungarian or Dravidian, etc.). And so I think the skepticism which most experts in languages of the Near East now feel for ANY proposal linking Sumerian to anything else is very largely justified, and the standard of proof ought to be high. If Sumerian is related to anything else, this will not be as easy as to show as was the discovery that Armenian is Indo-European or some such. And while we are on the topic of IE, I guess I should have said this earlier: it may be that the discovery of the connection between Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin was rather painless(and the addition of Gothic, Lithuanian, and Slavic as well) but it took a very long time for people to accept that Hittite was IE (long time and very strong evidence) and even longer for the acceptance of other Anatolian languages, notably Lycian. Armenian and Albanian did not take as long but they also required some time and serious work.
Alexis MR
Callaghan, Catherine A. and Wick R. Miller. 1962. Swadesh's Macro Mixtecan hypothesis and English. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 28:278-285.
Campbell, Lyle. 1988. Review of Greenberg (1987). Language 64:591-615.
Manaster Ramer, Alexis. In press. Tonkawa and Zuni: Two Test Cases for the Greenberg Classification. International Journal of American Ling (sometime this summer or fall).
-----------------------------
From: "Robert Whiting; Tel +358-0-191-23289" <WHITING@cc.helsinki.fi> Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 16:16:41 +0300 Subject: Re: Sumerian Related to African/Darvidian?
I find this to be more on the line of a form of entertainment, like double-crostics, than any sort of research that anyone with any linguistic training could take seriously. In this spirit I have added a column for English to the categories orignally given so everyone can see how the game is played. Perhaps someone can fill in the two slots left blank or come up with some better "cognates". Others may wish to join in by adding a column for their own language. Finnish karitsa, "lamb," and koira, "dog," come to mind immediately for the first category, but I shouldn't jump the gun.
lamb/ sheep cattle horse/mule dog Dravidian kuri, kori naaku pari oori Manding sara gunga bari wuru Sumerian sar,zar gud, gu paru ur English kine foal cur
There is full correspondence between Dravidian, Manding and Sumerian lexical items in the initial consonants d, l,m,n,t, and s. Other phonetic correspondences include assimilation of k--g, p--f, b--p, s--c and l--r are interchangeable. For example: English Sumerian Manding Tamil English chief kal kele-tigi gaasa great, gross boat kalam kulu Kalam galley man tin tye kenten gander father pap pa appan pa, pappy lord manus mansa mannan man person uku moko uk moke, guy road sila sila caalai circuit body ni ni niram flesh uzu subu uu soup, sup child iti di kuttam kid container bar bara pai pail to send bala para bila bail to take dug du tekku take to cut tar teg tege
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: [QB] Still avoiding the issue of the non-existing glottal dtop in Mande and its crucial importance in Mayan languages.
A blast from the past 1998. Scott and Carrasquer Vidal are professional linguists
[QUOTE]From: scott@math.csuohio.edu (Brian M. Scott) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology Subject: Re: New Olmec Religion Site Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 19:03:13 GMT Organization: Cleveland State University
On 24 Jan 1998 17:37:21 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. Winters) wrote:
[snips]
>Miguel Carrasquer Vidal (mcv@wxs.nl) wrote: >: On 23 Jan 1998 00:08:53 GMT, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu (Clyde A. >: Winters) wrote:
>: >Moreover, your comments about >: >ka'an and kan does not invalidate any of my arguments. The fact remains that in comparative linguistics we
>: We? I most strongly object!
>: >look for regular correspondence between letters and >: >sounds to prove correspondence.
>: I rest my case. This is so wrong, I don't even know how to begin to >: explain in how many different ways this sentence proves that Mr. >: Winters hasn't got the foggiest notion of comparative linguistics, or >: any kind of linguistics at all. The terms "letters" and "sounds" have >: not been used naively like this since the 19th century. >: "Correspondences between letters and sounds" is most definitely not >: what we're looking for in comparative linguistics. We don't "look for >: correspondences to prove correspondences", that doesn't make any kind >: of rational sense, let alone linguistical sense...
>This is nonsense.
No, it's a simple statement of fact.
> There is a relationship between Mayan and Mande languages >which is proven through the use of comparative and historical methods. > Linguistic evidence is the most convicing data supporting a >Mande relationship with the Maya, and the Mande origin of Olmec >culture.
In that case the theory is in serious trouble.
> A basic objective of the comparative linguist is to isolate >words with common or similar meanings that have systematic >consonantal agreement with little regards for the location and/or >type of vowels.
That's a bit of an overstatement.
> Consonantal agreement is the regular appearance >of consonants at certain locations in words having similar >meanings and representing similar speech sounds.
Not necessarily; what are the 'similar speech sounds' in English <furrow> and Welsh <rhych>, which are cognate?
> An examination of Mayan and Mande homophones indicate >striking similarity. There is a connection between Malinke- >Bambara and Yucatec homonyms for 'high, sky and serpent'. > In Malinke-Bambara the word Ka and Kan means 'serpent, upon >high,and sky'.
Then why do you give these words as <sa> in your table below?
> In Yucatec we find that can/kan and caan/kaan >means ' serpent and heaven'.
Bernard has already pointed out (with documentation) that 'sky' is <ka'an>, which has three consonants, not two.
> Often we find that Mande words beginning with /s/, appear as >/c/ in the Mayan languages. For example, Malinke Bambara, the >word sa means 'sell, to buy and market'. This is related to Mayan >con 'to sell', and can 'serpent'. For example we have
>Mayan Malinke-Bambara >can serpent sa >con to sell sa, san >can heaven, sky sa
At least one entry here, the last on the Maya side, is wrong.
> In these examples we see regular correspondence between the >Mayan /c/ and Malinke-Bambara /s/.
And does this correspondence hold up elsewhere? What in Malinke-Bambara corresponds to the glottal stop in <ka'an>?
Brian M. Scott %%%%%%% From: gkeyes6988@aol.com (GKeyes6988) Newsgroups: sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 25 Jan 1998 23:33:57 GMT Clyde Winters wrote <snip>
(: Winters claims that the Yucatec Maya word for “mother” is “naal” which : does not exist in Yucatec Maya according to the Cordemex dictionary. The : term for mother is:
: p. 545 na’ or naa’ (glottal stop and strong pronounciation) which is still : quite different from a simple “na”
(Winters) ..This is false there is no difference between na' and na.
This is the equivalent of saying there is no difference between English "to"and "top", "be" and "bet" or "do" and "dog". The glottal stop is a consonant-- not one that's important in English, but which is important indeed in Mayan. Again, it seems that the key to Mr. Winter's comparisons is not knowing much about Mayan or linguistics. %%%%%%% From: Akan@pizlink.net (Akan Ifriqiya) Newsgroups: sci.anthropology,sci.archaeology Subject: Re: Mande and Mayan Connections Date: 26 Jan 1998 08:27:02 GMT
In article <6agu1n$cuv$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu says... > >Benjamin H. Diebold (benjamin.diebold@yale.edu) wrote: >: In article <6aemlc$qe$1@artemis.it.luc.edu>, cwinter@orion.it.luc.edu >: (Clyde A. Winters) wrote: SNIP >: > This is false there is no difference between na' and na. > >: Hello? > >: I don't know much about linguistics, but when I start dropping my glottal >: stops in Arabic, people stop understanding me (even more than usual). >: Winters absolutely has to be wrong here; he's simply imposing his own >: cultural paradigm on this linguistic argument. > > >For comparison purposes we don't have to refer to the pronunciation of >the word unless we are reconstructing the Proto-Language. > >C.A. Winters
What? Sahibi, the glottal stop is an integral part of the word, it is not some mere artefact of pronounciation! In arabic, as in other languages using the glottal, if you don't use the glottal, you have an utterly *different* word! Like na's versus na?s (where ? is the ain and ' is the glottal or hamza). What rubbish statements are you proposing here? Ramira Naka
The statements in this post are false. They claim that <ka’an> has three consonants. This was false . It only has two consonants <k-n>, /a’/ is just a glottalized vowel . See:
This shows that I was not wrong in finding a relationship between the Mayan and Mande terms for sky.
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote: Bernardo/Quetzalcoatl
again, this does not support your point because the video is teaching the sounds of a vowel [a]. I'll use 7 as a sign for the glottal stop. In fact there are a number of glottal stops a7,e7,o7,i7,and u7 -- these are associated with vowels such as in the video below (which illustrates where you are wrong) ka7an =sky. There are also glottal stops that represent double consonants k7,p7,t7 , ts7,ch7,q7, and tz7. again from the video below k7aan =hammmock and k7an sky.
You can't even copy the number of glottal stops in Maya correctly
You are such a liar. In the video sky <kaan> did not have a glottal stop . See:
The informant even spelled out the word <kaan> in the video yet you claim a glottal stop is associated with the word. In fact you claim the <k>. in sky is glottal consonant this is false as illustrated by the video.
And even when he pronounced the Mayan terms for hammock the <k> sound did not disappear.
Moreover, there is no consonant after the Mayan vowels, there was just a stop which changed the sound of the vowel.
quote: Quetzalcoatl
Henderson completely contradicts you. There are glottal stops associated with consonants (i.e you get two consonants) and there are glottal stops associated with vowels. It's not true what you say that glottal stops are only associated with vowels. Notice that you are again trying to shift the goal posts because you have been adamant, in the past, that in your method we had to concentrate on consonants. LOL. Both Henderson and the video support my contention that apart from making the sound correspondence different glottal stops in Maya (unlike English) change the meaning of words. Even worse for your feeble attempts to make Maya and Mande similar is the fact that long and short vowels and tone ALSO change the meaning of words.
From your own video k7an =yellow;ka7an=sky; k7aan= hammock and kaan =snake
Lets play ( this from the Maya Cordemex dictionary) Since Mande [ku] has no glottal stop, if you were honest and a real linguist, the proper comparison would be the Maya [ku], not Maya [k7u]
ku=owl ku= expression meaning pain equivalent to oh!
k'u = god k'u= temple k'u =bird nest
All of your Maya Mande claims suffer from this same defect of ignoring the fact that the glottal stop changes both the sound and the meaning. Its like my saying that in Mande [n], [ng] and [ny] make no difference because they all have [n] in them.
LOL. It may change the meaning of the word but the structure of the word remains and we still have a <k> sound even if it has glottal stop.
The fact that Mande <ku> means sacre, and Mayan <k’u> = god show the terms are related.
You don’t know anything about comparative linguistics.
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: This is so much baloney. You can get away with interpreting little pieces of Olmec images in your idiosyncratic method because decipherment of Olmec and epi-Olmec writing is still in flux. However, Maya writing is now in the 80-90% stage of decipherment due to very rapid advances. As an experiment, why don't some of the other participants send these supposed translations to people like David Stuart at the University of Texas, or Stephen Houston at Brigham Young University. If they even consider it worth the time, they will roll around in the floor laughing at it.
For starters, translating the dots and lines of dates in maya calendar as if they were words is totally ridiculous.3 We went through this previously when you claimed that the Long Count dates on the Mojarra Stela and the Tuxtla statuette were also writing. You finally admitted that these were calendar dates. see http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=000348;p=4 . but, as usual, you backslide and ignore previous proofs or your mistakes.
BTW when Clyde gets in trouble, he fills the airwaves with spam. Notice this flurry of posts. LOL
You're just jealous that I can read the writing and get detailed meaning while others find little meaning. I said that some times the dots and lines can have calendric import. These dots and dashes also have meaning as words as I discuss my video on the tuxtla statuette.
again, this does not support your point because the video is teaching the sounds of a vowel [a]. I'll use 7 as a sign for the glottal stop. In fact there are a number of glottal stops a7,e7,o7,i7,and u7 -- these are associated with vowels such as in the video below (which illustrates where you are wrong) ka7an =sky. There are also glottal stops that represent double consonants k7,p7,t7 , ts7,ch7,q7, and tz7. again from the video below k7aan =hammmock and k7an sky.
You can't even copy the number of glottal stops in Maya correctly
You are such a liar. In the video sky <kaan> did not have a glottal stop . See:
The informant even spelled out the word <kaan> in the video yet you claim a glottal stop is associated with the word. In fact you claim the <k>. in sky is glottal consonant this is false as illustrated by the video.
And even when he pronounced the Mayan terms for hammock the <k> sound did not disappear.
Moreover, there is no consonant after the Mayan vowels, there was just a stop which changed the sound of the vowel.
lurkers can see and hear for themselves. If you scroll down to the comments you see:
quote:Faltaron unos acentos para poder reconocer la pronunciación escrita: k'áan - hamaca k'an - amarillo ka'an - cielo kaan - culebra
Additionally the Diccionario Maya Cordemex, the most complete Maya dictionary has the following k'aan= hammock p. 375 ka'an = sky p. 291 kan = snake p. 291 k'an = yellow p. 375
It's a tipoff, whenever you resort to insults ("you are a liar") its an indication that you are losing the argument. The multiplication of long posts is also a tipoff. This is obvious not only in my interactions with you but in al your interactions with other posters on ES.
Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
^ I normally agree with you but in this case I see a Black African on the right carrying a spear with a copper head. The lack of paint on the feet doesn't convince me. The beard is also compelling along with the Yoruban style neklace.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote: Bernardo/Quetzalcoatl
again, this does not support your point because the video is teaching the sounds of a vowel [a]. I'll use 7 as a sign for the glottal stop. In fact there are a number of glottal stops a7,e7,o7,i7,and u7 -- these are associated with vowels such as in the video below (which illustrates where you are wrong) ka7an =sky. There are also glottal stops that represent double consonants k7,p7,t7 , ts7,ch7,q7, and tz7. again from the video below k7aan =hammmock and k7an sky.
You can't even copy the number of glottal stops in Maya correctly
You are such a liar. In the video sky <kaan> did not have a glottal stop . See:
The informant even spelled out the word <kaan> in the video yet you claim a glottal stop is associated with the word. In fact you claim the <k>. in sky is glottal consonant this is false as illustrated by the video.
And even when he pronounced the Mayan terms for hammock the <k> sound did not disappear.
Moreover, there is no consonant after the Mayan vowels, there was just a stop which changed the sound of the vowel.
lurkers can see and hear for themselves. If you scroll down to the comments you see:
quote:Faltaron unos acentos para poder reconocer la pronunciación escrita: k'áan - hamaca k'an - amarillo ka'an - cielo kaan - culebra
Additionally the Diccionario Maya Cordemex, the most complete Maya dictionary has the following k'aan= hammock p. 375 ka'an = sky p. 291 kan = snake p. 291 k'an = yellow p. 375
It's a tipoff, whenever you resort to insults ("you are a liar") its an indication that you are losing the argument. The multiplication of long posts is also a tipoff. This is obvious not only in my interactions with you but in al your interactions with other posters on ES.
It is not an insult it is fact. In the video the informant makes it clear that sky is pronounced <kaan> and the same is documented in the video in writing posted on the screen.See:
If a person pronounces a word and the spelling of the word is posted on the screen, and someone claims that the word is spelt and pronounced differently that person is making a false statement. When you make a false statement you are a liar. If the shoe fits, wear it.
Moreover you say check the comments, the comments were written by someone who looked at the video.
You failed to provide the entire quote. The author wrote:" Los mas dificiles de diferenciar son k'áan y k'aan, pero bueno, es interesante y cultural". The author makes it clear in this statement that the cultural background of the speaker may influence the pronunciation of specific Mayan lexical items.
In this video the Mayan term for sky is <kaan>.
.
Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
[/QB][/QUOTE]
So let me be clear. The man on the left is wearing a Leopard suit and is a Native American. The man on the right, however, is clearly a Black African man with a beard and carrying a copper headed spear.
This is clearly obvious evidence of a contact event ever recorded and it is one of the most remarkable pieces of history but only Black people are interested in it or will even admit of its existence because of the social brainwashing done by the media.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by osirion:
So let me be clear. The man on the left is wearing a Leopard suit and is a Native American. The man on the right, however, is clearly a Black African man with a beard and carrying a copper headed spear.
This is clearly obvious evidence of a contact event ever recorded and it is one of the most remarkable pieces of history but only Black people are interested in it or will even admit of its existence because of the social brainwashing done by the media. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Just a question. Since Africans had iron, why would they make copper spears?
Posted by mena7 (Member # 20555) on :
There was the Mauritanian kingdom of exiled king Juba and King Alexander Helios in Illinois USA .Their kingdom was conquered by the Roman Emperor Caligula who wanted to steal king Juba ii huge treasure .The Mauritanian court,army and other people fled to south Morocco then to the modern Ghana area and build a fleet to travel to North America .The tomb of the Mauritanian was found in South Illinois by a gentleman call Burrows .The tomb was name burrows cave .7000 tablets found in the tomb show the different people of the mediteranean world like Maurs,Egyptian,West African,Phoenician,Roman,Hebrew,Spanish etc.The tablets showed different script lie Ogam,Medu Neter,Latin,Hebrew,Phoenicianetc. A large amount of gold coin and bars was found . USA academia stated that the Burrows cave was a fraud .But critics of academia stated how can one man fake 7000 tablets with different people of the ancient world picture,different script occult ritual picture and gold coin and bars .Some of the Burrows cave artifact are similar to Phoenician/Egyptian artifact collected by father Crespi in Ecuador from the Native people . There are report from the Newspaper Gazette of a Egyptian/Indian temple find in the Grand Canyon Colorado .The Smithsonian cover up the discovery .The temple section of the grand canyon was close to the public . Most of the USA states have Egyptian/Phoenician names example Mesu Ra,Mi issi cipi,Ala bama,Al Aska,Ari zona,Min Aten,Neb Ra Ka,Ka Nut ticut etc . Other countries name in the American continent that sound Afrigypt are Per u,Kuba,Ka nada etc . Internet reference Alexander Helios king or emperor of America .
p
Posted by IronLion (Member # 16412) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by osirion:
So let me be clear. The man on the left is wearing a Leopard suit and is a Native American. The man on the right, however, is clearly a Black African man with a beard and carrying a copper headed spear.
This is clearly obvious evidence of a contact event ever recorded and it is one of the most remarkable pieces of history but only Black people are interested in it or will even admit of its existence because of the social brainwashing done by the media.
quote:Just a question. Since Africans had iron, why would they make copper spears? [/QB]
Because Africans had iron, copper, bronze, brass, and steel making technology.
Egyptians used mostly copper and bronze by the way.
Here is an Egyptian Cooper Spear between dated 2700 - 1700 BC:
Stop asking foolish and irrelevant questions.
Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
^ copper may have been more impressive to show than iron.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by osirion: ^ copper may have been more impressive to show than iron.
Not to Mesoamericans who never had iron. Copper makes very inferior weapons. Mesoamericans used obsidian blades imbedded in wood in battle. People who chide me about knowledge of Egypt should learn a little bit about Mesoamerica instead of pontificating.
Posted by osirion (Member # 7644) on :
^ yes but copper would have been impressive at first.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
The tip of this spear point was probably not copper, even though copper was frequently used by Pre-Columbian Blacks to make tools and other artifacts.
The spear point was probably quanin.. Blacks usually sold this metal to Amerindians.
The Spanish mention Blacks coming to Espanola with spear points made of quanin. According to Las Casas quanin was made up of 18 parts gold, 6 parts of silver and 8 parts of copper.
The tip of this spear point was probably not copper, even though copper was frequently used by Pre-Columbian Blacks to make tools and other artifacts.
The spear point was probably quanin.. Blacks usually sold this metal to Amerindians.
The Spanish mention Blacks coming to Espanola with spear points made of quanin. According to Las Casas quanin was made up of 18 parts gold, 6 parts of silver and 8 parts of copper.
Both Van Sertima and you are wrong. Guain is an Arawak word and tertiary gold-silver-copper allows had been made in South America a thousand years before Columbus.
quote:In any case alloys in Africa were not the same as Columbus’ guanín. Lawrence, Van Sertima’s source, cites Bosman (1967) for the composition of gold alloy objects (though not spear heads). For comparison, Moche tumbagas are also provided (Lechtman 1988). The composition is given in percentages to facilitate comparison. gold copper silver Columbus-guanin 56% 25% 19% Guinea 50% 25% 25% Guinea 65% 17.2% 17.2% Mochica 31% 60% 10% Moche 68% 13% 19% Moche 67% 11% 22% The proportions of this ternary alloy vary so widely that a particular composition is not an identifying marker.(9) Columbus found natives trading all kinds of objects (not just spear points) made from guanín in the whole region of Central America and Venezuela (Morison 1942: 265, 589). This was to be expected, because copper/gold and copper/silver/gold alloys were first made by the Moche culture of Peru about A.D. 100 (Lechtman, Erlij, and Barry 1982) and eventually diffused through the New World reaching Western Mexico about A.D. 1200 (Hosler 1994: 127). There is no need to posit diffusion of this alloy to the circum-Caribbean region from Africa because gold/copper/silver alloys were being made in neighboring South America 1400 years before Columbus’ journey.
The tip of this spear point was probably not copper, even though copper was frequently used by Pre-Columbian Blacks to make tools and other artifacts.
The spear point was probably quanin.. Blacks usually sold this metal to Amerindians.
The Spanish mention Blacks coming to Espanola with spear points made of quanin. According to Las Casas quanin was made up of 18 parts gold, 6 parts of silver and 8 parts of copper.
Both Van Sertima and you are wrong. Guain is an Arawak word and tertiary gold-silver-copper allows had been made in South America a thousand years before Columbus.
quote:In any case alloys in Africa were not the same as Columbus’ guanín. Lawrence, Van Sertima’s source, cites Bosman (1967) for the composition of gold alloy objects (though not spear heads). For comparison, Moche tumbagas are also provided (Lechtman 1988). The composition is given in percentages to facilitate comparison. gold copper silver Columbus-guanin 56% 25% 19% Guinea 50% 25% 25% Guinea 65% 17.2% 17.2% Mochica 31% 60% 10% Moche 68% 13% 19% Moche 67% 11% 22% The proportions of this ternary alloy vary so widely that a particular composition is not an identifying marker.(9) Columbus found natives trading all kinds of objects (not just spear points) made from guanín in the whole region of Central America and Venezuela (Morison 1942: 265, 589). This was to be expected, because copper/gold and copper/silver/gold alloys were first made by the Moche culture of Peru about A.D. 100 (Lechtman, Erlij, and Barry 1982) and eventually diffused through the New World reaching Western Mexico about A.D. 1200 (Hosler 1994: 127). There is no need to posit diffusion of this alloy to the circum-Caribbean region from Africa because gold/copper/silver alloys were being made in neighboring South America 1400 years before Columbus’ journey.
LOL. The Chama vase proves that you were wrong in claiming that Blacks did not possess quanin spearpoints .
Bernardo, Nobody cares what you say or think. You were not in America back in the 16th Century. Las Casas was. This is what he wrote:
“[Columbus] thought to investigate the report of the Indians of this Españla who said that there had come to Española from the south and southeast, a black people who have the tops of their spears made of a metal they call quanin of which he had sent samples to the Sovereigns to have them assayed when it was found that of 32 parts, 18 were gold, 6 of silver and 8 of copper.”[1]
What do we learn from this passage. First we learn that the Indians traded with ‘black people’. These Black people had spears made of gold, copper and silver. And finally these people called this metal quanin. .
.
Now what do we see in the picture above. First we find a Black man depicted as the trader god of the Maya at the court of a Mayan dignitary. This Black man has a reddish/orange-yellowish spear point [which would have been the color of a spear point made from copper and gold]. This vase supports the Indian tradition that Blacks introduced, and manufactured the spear point of the Black man on this vase.
This vase proves that Blacks carried reddish/orange-yellowish spear points on the tip of their spears which would have resembled the spear point depicted on this vase. This is further proof of the Pre-Columbian presence of Blacks in the Americas.
Reference
John Boyd Thacher, Christopher Columbus,(New York, 1903) Vol. 2, p.380.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing yoiu ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters.
The African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Hahahahaha!!!!! I can see why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and why Dr Vanserima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertimad then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL lyde winters actually worked with Dr Ivan Van Sertima, this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 has stolen his name! Read the link below for the full scoop yall!
Now what do we see in the picture above. First we find a Black man depicted as the trader god of the Maya at the court of a Mayan dignitary. This Black man has a reddish/orange-yellowish spear point [which would have been the color of a spear point made from copper and gold]. This vase supports the Indian tradition that Blacks introduced, and manufactured the spear point of the Black man on this vase.
This vase proves that Blacks carried reddish/orange-yellowish spear points on the tip of their spears which would have resembled the spear point depicted on this vase. This is further proof of the Pre-Columbian presence of Blacks in the Americas.
Reference
John Boyd Thacher, Christopher Columbus,(New York, 1903) Vol. 2, p.380.
Unfortunately for you, Clyde ,people can really read Maya glyphs (and not by pulling out little bits and pieces by your own mysterious system, interpreting them through a 19th century invented script, and finally providing a reading that no one else can replicate. The interpretation above is purely your imagination and need to support a preconceived idea. BTW BOTH central figures have red feet and hands and are painted black. These Maya vases are funerary goods and this one represents the burial (going into the earth) of a Maya ruler.
A REINTERPRETATION OF THE CHAMÁ VASE Elin C. Danien
quote:Now, through an examination of the Chamá Vase from the Penn Museum collection, I can give a name to two of their rulers. The scene on the vessel (figure 3) shows two groups of figures facing each other across a kneeling figure flanked by two black painted individuals.
The interwoven mat design on the arms and legs of the kneeling figure is a symbol of royalty and identifies him as a member of the elite, perhaps a ruler of a small polity, although he wears nothing to announce such an exalted position. Judging from the combination of jaguar skin cape, elaborate jewelry, and fierce expression, the black-painted man holding the spear is the most important figure in the scene.
It had been generally accepted that the glyphs stood for the names of the actors, but they defied interpretation or sense in any of the highland idioms. However, in Eastern Cholan, the family of languages spoken in the Maya lowlands, they become clear. Thanks to the invaluable work of linguist Judith Storniolo of the University of Pennsylvania, a tentative interpretation of the inscription provides names for the figures, and conveys political and social information, including a previously unknown title for a religious office (Storniolo 2000: personal communication).
Reading the scene from left to right, the first two figures, K’an Chubi, Yellow, or Precious Turkey, and Holtab Balam, Forehead or Headband Jaguar, have no central role in the proceedings. The name of the third figure is Bas Ch’am, which can be read as “Wrapper of the Harvest.” The black painted figure next to Bas Ch’am is K’an ti Pop: Lord Fer de Lance.
The glyphs accompanying the kneeling figure have a more enigmatic meaning. Ch’o Tz’apah Ah Waxak Haab Sus can be understood as “Lord Puma, he who has ruled for eight years, set him or it in place, ” with the final glyph meaning blood, or purifying.
The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth. The final figure is K’an Moo Ch’ok Ajaw, Young Lord Yellow Macaw.
This vessel has been the object of differing interpretations, with its actors identified variously as supernaturals, underworld figures, and merchants. I argue that it commemorates a real event, and carries cultural information of importance in our understanding of the time, the place and the people.
The important event being commemorated is the funeral, or the entering the earth, of Lord Muwan. His heir, the young lord, is behind him, on the viewer’s right, observing the ceremonies. The phrase ch’ok ahaw, literally, young sprout, is frequently used to identify the heir apparent. Similar scenes with both the dead king and the living heir are known from Palenque, where the dead ruler Pacal and his living successor, Chan Bahlum face each other. Among the attendants on the vase is the person who dresses the dead, Bas Ch’am, the “Wrapper of the Harvest.” Such a description of his function reinforces the argument made by Marshall Becker (1992), that interment of the dead for the Lowland Maya was not burial, but rather, an offering to the Earth Lord. K’an ti P’op, Lord Fer de Lance, is a central participant in the ceremonies surrounding this offering.
The kneeling figure, Lord Puma is about to be sacrificed as part of the purification ritual in connection with Lord Muwan’s funerary ceremonies. The ‘sacrificial’ paper earrings he wears, his lack of other ornament, his position under the blade, all point to his imminent sacrifice (Schele and Miller 1986). The mat design on his thigh and arm identify him as a member of the elite class. When captives are shown on Lowland monuments, they are usually identified by their name glyphs on their bodies.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: LOL.
.
Now what do we see in the picture above. First we find a Black man depicted as the trader god of the Maya at the court of a Mayan dignitary. This Black man has a reddish/orange-yellowish spear point [which would have been the color of a spear point made from copper and gold]. This vase supports the Indian tradition that Blacks introduced, and manufactured the spear point of the Black man on this vase.
This vase proves that Blacks carried reddish/orange-yellowish spear points on the tip of their spears which would have resembled the spear point depicted on this vase. This is further proof of the Pre-Columbian presence of Blacks in the Americas.
Reference
John Boyd Thacher, Christopher Columbus,(New York, 1903) Vol. 2, p.380.
Unfortunately for you, Clyde ,people can really read Maya glyphs (and not by pulling out little bits and pieces by your own mysterious system, interpreting them through a 19th century invented script, and finally providing a reading that no one else can replicate. The interpretation above is purely your imagination and need to support a preconceived idea. BTW BOTH central figures have red feet and hands and are painted black. These Maya vases are funerary goods and this one represents the burial (going into the earth) of a Maya ruler.
A REINTERPRETATION OF THE CHAMÁ VASE Elin C. Danien
quote:Now, through an examination of the Chamá Vase from the Penn Museum collection, I can give a name to two of their rulers. The scene on the vessel (figure 3) shows two groups of figures facing each other across a kneeling figure flanked by two black painted individuals.
The interwoven mat design on the arms and legs of the kneeling figure is a symbol of royalty and identifies him as a member of the elite, perhaps a ruler of a small polity, although he wears nothing to announce such an exalted position. Judging from the combination of jaguar skin cape, elaborate jewelry, and fierce expression, the black-painted man holding the spear is the most important figure in the scene.
It had been generally accepted that the glyphs stood for the names of the actors, but they defied interpretation or sense in any of the highland idioms. However, in Eastern Cholan, the family of languages spoken in the Maya lowlands, they become clear. Thanks to the invaluable work of linguist Judith Storniolo of the University of Pennsylvania, a tentative interpretation of the inscription provides names for the figures, and conveys political and social information, including a previously unknown title for a religious office (Storniolo 2000: personal communication).
Reading the scene from left to right, the first two figures, K’an Chubi, Yellow, or Precious Turkey, and Holtab Balam, Forehead or Headband Jaguar, have no central role in the proceedings. The name of the third figure is Bas Ch’am, which can be read as “Wrapper of the Harvest.” The black painted figure next to Bas Ch’am is K’an ti Pop: Lord Fer de Lance.
The glyphs accompanying the kneeling figure have a more enigmatic meaning. Ch’o Tz’apah Ah Waxak Haab Sus can be understood as “Lord Puma, he who has ruled for eight years, set him or it in place, ” with the final glyph meaning blood, or purifying.
The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth. The final figure is K’an Moo Ch’ok Ajaw, Young Lord Yellow Macaw.
This vessel has been the object of differing interpretations, with its actors identified variously as supernaturals, underworld figures, and merchants. I argue that it commemorates a real event, and carries cultural information of importance in our understanding of the time, the place and the people.
The important event being commemorated is the funeral, or the entering the earth, of Lord Muwan. His heir, the young lord, is behind him, on the viewer’s right, observing the ceremonies. The phrase ch’ok ahaw, literally, young sprout, is frequently used to identify the heir apparent. Similar scenes with both the dead king and the living heir are known from Palenque, where the dead ruler Pacal and his living successor, Chan Bahlum face each other. Among the attendants on the vase is the person who dresses the dead, Bas Ch’am, the “Wrapper of the Harvest.” Such a description of his function reinforces the argument made by Marshall Becker (1992), that interment of the dead for the Lowland Maya was not burial, but rather, an offering to the Earth Lord. K’an ti P’op, Lord Fer de Lance, is a central participant in the ceremonies surrounding this offering.
The kneeling figure, Lord Puma is about to be sacrificed as part of the purification ritual in connection with Lord Muwan’s funerary ceremonies. The ‘sacrificial’ paper earrings he wears, his lack of other ornament, his position under the blade, all point to his imminent sacrifice (Schele and Miller 1986). The mat design on his thigh and arm identify him as a member of the elite class. When captives are shown on Lowland monuments, they are usually identified by their name glyphs on their bodies.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
The feet of the Mayan and Black man are different colors. you can clearly see above that the feet of the Negro is much darker.
Look at the photo below
You can see that the chin of the Mayan figure is the same color as his feet. The chin of the Negro is black.
LOL. you are such a great deciever.
.
.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
The feet of the Mayan and Black man are different colors. you can clearly see above that the feet of the Negro is much darker.
Look at the photo below
You can see that the chin of the Mayan figure is the same color as his feet. The chin of the Negro is black.
LOL. you are such a great deciever.
.
.
As usual, when losing you resort to spam and insults. The fact that the Maya vase has the names of all the participants is game set and match to this whole discussion. You can spin you whirl like dervish but the central figures are painted black with red hands and feet protruding. I'll get back to you about guanin-- which is not an african word but Arawak-- Please post a credible source (not self quoting) for it being an African word
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
The feet of the Mayan and Black man are different colors. you can clearly see above that the feet of the Negro is much darker.
Look at the photo below
You can see that the chin of the Mayan figure is the same color as his feet. The chin of the Negro is black.
LOL. you are such a great deciever.
.
.
As usual, when losing you resort to spam and insults. The fact that the Maya vase has the names of all the participants is game set and match to this whole discussion. You can spin you whirl like dervish but the central figures are painted black with red hands and feet protruding. I'll get back to you about guanin-- which is not an african word but Arawak-- Please post a credible source (not self quoting) for it being an African word
This debate is not about quanin it is about the ethnicity of the central figure in the chama vase.
You claim i am insulting you by calling you a Great Deciever. You can only insult someone when you are using false hood to describe that person. In the case of the chama vase you claim both personages have read feet. This is untrue.
In the picture above you can see the feet of the Mayan and Negro are totally different. Since the differences in color are evident I have to assume you are trying to decieve the readers of the forum. This dishonest behavior betrys you to be a great deciever.
.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
The feet of the Mayan and Black man are different colors. you can clearly see above that the feet of the Negro is much darker.
Look at the photo below
You can see that the chin of the Mayan figure is the same color as his feet. The chin of the Negro is black.
LOL. you are such a great deciever.
.
.
As usual, when losing you resort to spam and insults. The fact that the Maya vase has the names of all the participants is game set and match to this whole discussion. You can spin you whirl like dervish but the central figures are painted black with red hands and feet protruding. I'll get back to you about guanin-- which is not an african word but Arawak-- Please post a credible source (not self quoting) for it being an African word
This debate is not about quanin it is about the ethnicity of the central figure in the chama vase.
You claim i am insulting you by calling you a Great Deciever. You can only insult someone when you are using false hood to describe that person. In the case of the chama vase you claim both personages have read feet. This is untrue.
In the picture above you can see the feet of the Mayan and Negro are totally different. Since the differences in color are evident I have to assume you are trying to decieve the readers of the forum. This dishonest behavior betrys you to be a great deciever.
.
The only one trying to deceive is you. The figure you call "negro" is a Maya ruler, and we know what his name was:
quote: The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth.
. You can dance and twist but there is no African here. Secondly the foot of Ochma Kab Pop Muwan is NOT black. Its different from the black painted leg. Just as there are variations in skin tone in Africans, there are variations in skin color in Indians, thus the small difference in redness between the two Mayans Lord Muwan and Bas Ch'am is meaningless.
You, as usual when losing, want to shift the goal posts. One of the big supporting pieces for the claim of Africans visiting is the supposed African origin of the supposedly (no evidence for this at all) spear made of guanin.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing yu ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing yu ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing yu ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: The only one trying to deceive is you. The figure you call "negro" is a Maya ruler, and we know what his name was:
quote: The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth.
. You can dance and twist but there is no African here. Secondly the foot of Ochma Kab Pop Muwan is NOT black. Its different from the black painted leg. Just as there are variations in skin tone in Africans, there are variations in skin color in Indians, thus the small difference in redness between the two Mayans Lord Muwan and Bas Ch'am is meaningless.
You, as usual when losing, want to shift the goal posts. One of the big supporting pieces for the claim of Africans visiting is the supposed African origin of the supposedly (no evidence for this at all) spear made of guanin.
LOL. First you claimed the feet were red. Now you talk about variations in Indian skin color. You are really a great deciever.
My proof is that Amerindians talked about Blacks carry spear points made of copper-gold-silver. In the picture we see such a figure.
The feet of the Mayan and Black man are different colors. you can clearly see above that the feet of the Negro is much darker.
Look at the photo below
You can see that the chin of the Mayan figure is the same color as his feet. The chin of the Negro is black.
LOL. you are such a great deciever.
.
Posted by Quetzalcoatl (Member # 12742) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: The only one trying to deceive is you. The figure you call "negro" is a Maya ruler, and we know what his name was:
quote: The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth.
. You can dance and twist but there is no African here. Secondly the foot of Ochma Kab Pop Muwan is NOT black. Its different from the black painted leg. Just as there are variations in skin tone in Africans, there are variations in skin color in Indians, thus the small difference in redness between the two Mayans Lord Muwan and Bas Ch'am is meaningless.
You, as usual when losing, want to shift the goal posts. One of the big supporting pieces for the claim of Africans visiting is the supposed African origin of the supposedly (no evidence for this at all) spear made of guanin.
LOL. First you claimed the feet were red. Now you talk about variations in Indian skin color. You are really a great deciever.
My proof is that Amerindians talked about Blacks carry spear points made of copper-gold-silver. In the picture we see such a figure.
The feet of the Mayan and Black man are different colors. you can clearly see above that the feet of the Negro is much darker.
Look at the photo below
You can see that the chin of the Mayan figure is the same color as his feet. The chin of the Negro is black.
LOL. you are such a great deciever.
.
Spinnning and spining LOL The figure you call "negro" is a Maya ruler, and we know what his name was:
quote:The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth.
. You can dance and twist but there is no African here.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
The Black man holding the spear is not named "Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth".
You can look at the vase and the top two glyphs next to the spear held by Black man is the Jaguar and Ahau glyphs. They would read Balam Ahau 'Jaguar Lord'.
You knew that the glyphs were jaguar and Ahau. Yet you wanted to pass on the fake name 'Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth..
The inscriptions in front of the Black man holding the spear read: Balam Ahau. Yu ta te ma se. Ta po be i. The translation reads: " Jaguar Lord. The vital spirit arives today. Pure and sacre (is here). Thou [Balam Ahau] exist as a sacre object".
.
Posted by the lioness (Member # 17353) on :
Clyde:
1) black people don't have feet that are much lighter than the rest of their bodies so what's going on here?
.
, 2) In light of the fact that Mayan males painted themselves black who's to say the figure here is not supposed to be a person or deity who painted themsleves black as is implied by their hands and feet which are not black?
3) Africans don't typically have long stiff curving non coiling beards like that, what's going on here?
4) why would an African be represented by a jaguar, an animal indigenous to Central America not Africa?
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing yu ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
1.Balam [Jaguar] Lord was painted black as was the Mayan tradition in representing elites in ceremonies, while the feet were represented in the natural dark color of Jaguar Lord.
2.It is clear that the figure painted black on the Chama vase, holding the spear was a dignitary—not a god--, since the hieroglyphic text in front of the figure, says he was named Balam Ahau. The dark color of Balam Ahau feet and hands show that he was negro.
3.The beard on Balam Ahau was a style favored by this elite. LOL. There is no such as an African type of beard.
4. The spotted feline is associated with African religious / political tradition it was transferred from Africa to Mexico . In Africa the spotted feline is the leopard, in the Americas it is the jaguar.
The Jaguar,
The Leopard
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
Balam [Jaguar] Lord was painted black as was the Mayan tradition in representing elites in ceremonies, while the feet were represented in the natural dark color of Jaguar Lord.
2.It is clear that the figure painted black on the Chama vase, holding the spear was a dignitary—not a god--, since the hieroglyphic text in front of the figure, says he was named Balam Ahau. The dark color of Balam Ahau feet and hands show that he was negro.
The elongated head of Balam Ahaun was formerly popular in Africa.
.
Posted by the lioness (Member # 17353) on :
.
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: 2.It is clear that the figure painted black on the Chama vase, holding the spear was a dignitary—not a god--, since the hieroglyphic text in front of the figure, says he was named Balam Ahau. The dark color of Balam Ahau feet and hands show that he was negro.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
quote:Originally posted by Quetzalcoatl: The only one trying to deceive is you. The figure you call "negro" is a Maya ruler, and we know what his name was:
quote: The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth.
. You can dance and twist but there is no African here. Secondly the foot of Ochma Kab Pop Muwan is NOT black. Its different from the black painted leg. Just as there are variations in skin tone in Africans, there are variations in skin color in Indians, thus the small difference in redness between the two Mayans Lord Muwan and Bas Ch'am is meaningless.
You, as usual when losing, want to shift the goal posts. One of the big supporting pieces for the claim of Africans visiting is the supposed African origin of the supposedly (no evidence for this at all) spear made of guanin.
LOL. First you claimed the feet were red. Now you talk about variations in Indian skin color. You are really a great deciever.
My proof is that Amerindians talked about Blacks carry spear points made of copper-gold-silver. In the picture we see such a figure.
The feet of the Mayan and Black man are different colors. you can clearly see above that the feet of the Negro is much darker.
Look at the photo below
You can see that the chin of the Mayan figure is the same color as his feet. The chin of the Negro is black.
LOL. you are such a great deciever.
.
Spinnning and spining LOL The figure you call "negro" is a Maya ruler, and we know what his name was:
quote:The glyphs before the commanding figure of the black-painted man holding the spear are read Ochma Kab Pop Muwan....Lord Owl, or Lord Muwan, entered the earth.
. You can dance and twist but there is no African here.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
quote:Originally posted by Vansertimavindicated: [QB] The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas
the only problem with that is that African skeletal remains that exist have not been found at any sites in Central America
Feel free to link any discoveries of African remains in Central America merely stating it won't convince anybody chump
also you are anonymous nobody jelous wannabe Dr. Clyde Winters
Posted by the lioness (Member # 17353) on :
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy.
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF OCEAN SAILING SHIPS IN CENTRAL AMERICA WEST AFRICAN CULTURE AND ARTIFACTS ARE VERY DISSIMILAR TO OLMEC, NOTHING REMOTELY SIMILAR TO OLMEC TEMPLES ARE FOUND IN AFRICA, NOR MULTIPLE COLOSSAL SIZED HEADS, NO ARCHITECTURAL SIMILARITY NO CONNECTION, stop beong ridiculous ANCIENT MESOAMEICAN ARCHITECTURE AND CULTURE WHILE IMPRESSIVE HAS LITTLE IF ANY INFLUENCE ON MODERN DAY SOCIETY SO THE BUNCHING UP OF PANTIES IS UNECESSARY
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy.
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
quote:Originally posted by Vansertimavindicated: 3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras
always verify what Vansertimavindicated say. Vansertimavindicated is a compulsive and pathological liar by nature.
ancient skeletal remains were found in Honduras in 2003.
However those remains wre not identified as African
Vansertimavindicated is a compulsive and pathological liar by nature. The fact that his lies are so easy to comfirm is an insult to the intelligence of the egypytsearch community led by Dr. Clyde Winters This retard is asked to step his game up with references
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
LOL the low IQ incompetant monkey is seeking to vampire inFormation yall! Just as I told you! NEVER DOUBT ME PEOPLE! I know how these filthy reprobates think! hehehehe
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy.
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan Van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy.
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
quote:Originally posted by Vansertimavindicated: 3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras
Vansertimavindicated believes that if you tell a lie over and over again it becomes truth,
this retard has been exposed numerous times
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
We only deal in facts here chimpboy! we dont have to make things up you reprehensible sub species! However if you can show me where the DNA analysis conducted on the 3600 year old African skeletal remains were not African... please do show us! Otherwise shut the fuckk up you congenital lying beast! Hahahahaha
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
The Olmec people and other members of ancient Mexico did not look like modern day Mexican Indians. The Olmec were Blacks from Africa. They spoke the Mande language.
[/QB][/QUOTE]
Many Mayan Indians look like Africans due to admixture with African Olmecs and later African slaves.
Most Mexicans are Mestizos--mixed bloods.Maybe as many as 75% of Mexicans have African admixture.
Underhill, et al (1996) noted that:" One Mayan male, previously [has been] shown to have an African Y chromosome." This is very interesting because the Maya language illustrates a Mande substratum, in addition to African genetic markers. James l. Gutherie (2000) in a study of the HLAs in indigenous American populations, found that the Vantigen of the Rhesus system, considered to be an indication of African ancestry, among Indians in Belize and Mexico centers of Mayan civilization. Dr. Gutherie also noted that A*28 common among Africans has high frequencies among Eastern Maya. It is interesting to note that the Otomi, a Mexican group identified as being of African origin and six Mayan groups show the B Allele of the ABO system that is considered to be of African origin.
Some researchers claim that as many as seventy-five percent of the Mexicans have an African heritage (Green et al, 2000). Although this may be the case Cuevas (2004) says these Africans have been erased from history.
The admixture of Africans and Mexicans make it impossible to compare pictures of contemporary Mexicans and the Olmec. Due to the fact that 75% of the contemporary Mexicans have African genes you find that many of them look similar to the Olmecs whereas the ancient Maya did not.
In a discussion of the Mexican and African admixture in Mexico Lisker et al (1996) noted that the East Coast of Mexico had extensive admixture. The following percentages of African ancestry were found among East coast populations: Paraiso - 21.7%; El Carmen - 28.4% ;Veracruz - 25.6%; Saladero - 30.2%; and Tamiahua - 40.5%. Among Indian groups, Lisker et al (1996) found among the Chontal have 5% and the Cora .8% African admixture. The Chontal speak a Mayan language. According to Crawford et al. (1974), the mestizo population of Saltillo has 15.8% African ancestry, while Tlaxcala has 8% and Cuanalan 18.1%.
The Olmecs built their civilization in the region of the current states of Veracruz and Tabasco. Now here again are the percentages of African ancestry according to Lisker et al (1996): Paraiso - 21.7% ; El Carmen - 28.4% ; Veracruz - 25.6% ; Saladero - 30.2% ; Tamiahua - 40.5%. Paraiso is in Tabasco and Veracruz is, of course, in the state of Veracruz. Tamiahua is in northern Veracruz. These areas were the first places in Mexico settled by the Olmecs. I'm not sure about Saladero and El Carmen.
But a comparison of Olmec figures with ancient Mayan figures , made before the importation of hundreds of thousands of slaves Mexico during the Atlantic Slave Trade show no resemblance at all to the Olmec figures.
This does not mean that the Maya had no contact with the Africans. This results from the fact that we know the Maya obtained much of their culture, arts and writings from the Olmecs. And many of their gods, especially those associated with trade are of Africans. We also find some images of Blacks among Mayan art.
African ancestry has been found among indigenous groups that have had no historical contact with African slaves and thus support an African presence in America, already indicated by African skeletons among the Olmec people. Lisker et al, noted that “The variation of Indian ancestry among the studied Indians shows in general a higher proportion in the more isolated groups, except for the Cora, who are as isolated as the Huichol and have not only a lower frequency but also a certain degree of black admixture. The black admixture is difficult to explain because the Cora reside in a mountainous region away from the west coast”.
Green et al (2000) also found Indians with African genes in North Central Mexico, including the L1 and L2 clusters. Green et al (2000) observed that the discovery of a proportion of African haplotypes roughly equivalent to the proportion of European haplotypes [among North Central Mexican Indians] cannot be explained by recent admixture of African Americans for the United States. This is especially the case for the Ojinaga area, which presently is, and historically has been largely isolated from U.S. African Americans. In the Ojinaga sample set, the frequency of African haplotypes was higher that that of European hyplotypes”.
M.H. Crawford et al (1974).Human biology in Mexico II. A comparison of blood group, serum, and red cell enzyme frequencies and genetic distances of the Indian population of Mexico. Am. Phys. Anthropol, 41: 251-268.
Marco P. Hernadez Cuevas.(2004). African Mexicans and the discourse on Modern Mexico.Oxford: University Press.
James L. Guthrie, Human lymphocyte antigens:Apparent Afro-Asiatic, southern Asian and European HLAs in indigenous American populations. Retrieved 3/3/2006 at: http://www.neara.org/Guthrie/lymphocyteantigens02.htm
R. Lisker et al.(1996). Genetic structure of autochthonous populations of Meso-america:Mexico. Am. J. Hum Biol 68:395-404.
Diehl, R. A., & Coe, M.D. (1995). "Olmec archaeology". In In Jill Guthrie (Ed.), Ritual and Rulership, (pp.11-25). The Art Museum: Princeton University Press.
Underhill,P.A.,Jin,L., Zemans,R., Oefner,J and Cavalli-Sforza,L.L.(1996, January). A pre-Columbian Y chromosome-specific transition and its implications for human evolutionary history, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA,93, 196-200.
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
We only deal in facts here chimpboy! we dont have to make things up you reprehensible sub species! However if you can show me where the DNA analysis conducted on the 3600 year old African skeletal remains were not African... please do show us! Otherwise shut the fuckk up you congenital lying beast! Hahahahaha
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
We only deal in facts here chimpboy! we dont have to make things up you reprehensible sub species! However if you can show me where the DNA analysis conducted on the 3600 year old African skeletal remains were not African... please do show us! Otherwise shut the fuckk up you congenital lying beast! Hahahahaha
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
We only deal in facts here chimpboy! we dont have to make things up you reprehensible sub species! However if you can show me where the DNA analysis conducted on the 3600 year old African skeletal remains were not African... please do show us! Otherwise shut the fuckk up you congenital lying beast! Hahahahaha
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
We only deal in facts here chimpboy! we dont have to make things up you reprehensible sub species! However if you can show me where the DNA analysis conducted on the 3600 year old African skeletal remains were not African... please do show us! Otherwise shut the fuckk up you congenital lying beast! Hahahahaha
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
"...DNA could not pinpoint the exact age of the shrunken head."
Posted by the lioness (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness:
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
We only deal in facts here chimpboy! we dont have to make things up you reprehensible sub species! However if you can show me where the DNA analysis conducted on the 3600 year old African skeletal remains were not African... please do show us! Otherwise shut the fuckk up you congenital lying beast! Hahahahaha
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Clyde all people in rural regions of Mexico cannot be assumed to be as mixed as average mexicans.
. _____________________^^^^^^^^CLYDE. QUESTION: WHO DO YOU GUESS THESE PEOPLE TO BE MIXED WITH AND IN WHAT APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE? (I'm not talking about general population data for the whole country) And Clyde, why do some of them resemble Olmec sculpture?
I'm not talking about people like Vicente Fox who have a lot of European blood
Why are you bringing up blacks of Costa chica?
During the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire, Pedro de Alvarado conquered the area in 1522, founding the town of Acatlán the same year. In 1531, a Tlapanec uprising forced most of the residents to flee and during the rest of the 16th century much of the indigenous population disappeared due to disease, war and overwork.In Xochistlahuaca there were about 20,000 indigenous in 1522 but by 1582, there were only 200. The area became important starting in the 16th century for ranching, exporting meat, hides and wool. Soon after, the area became inhabited by Africans and Afro-Mexicans. During the colonial period, the Spanish brought about 20 million African slaves to Mexico over three centuries. Most landed in Veracruz. However, escaped slaves began to make their way to the then isolated Costa Chica region where they found refuge. Spanish landholders gave them protection in return for cheap labor, mostly tending cattle and curing leather. Over time, there was significant interracial mixing among Europeans, indigenous and Africans. There is very little social interaction between Blacks and indigenous people. Part of this is the issue of the language barrier, but I believe the issue is much more complex than that. There has been a long history of hostility between the two groups, and while today there is no open hostility, negative stereotypes abound on both parts. I would hope to explore these inter-ethnic relations further, and that would likely require my learning one of their languagesOne of the earliest Africans brought to Mexico is said to be Juan Garrido, a free man who probably took part in the “Conquest” led by Hernán Cortés in 1519. Another of these early arrivals was Estebanico, a slave who took part in various expeditions in the 1520s and 1530s, including treks through what is now Florida, Texas, and New Mexico. These early blacks (slave or free) were essentially personal servants of their Spanish masters. They were most likely taken from Africa, then transported to Seville, where they were Christianized and they probably spoke Spanish by the time they reached the New World. These slaves didn’t come over on slave ships as part of an overt slave trade.
The slave trade that changed the demographic face of Mexico began when KIng Charles V (King Carlos V) (aka the Hapsburg that Marc and Mike love) began issuing more and more asientos, or contracts between the Crown and private slavers, in order to expedite the trans-atlantic trade. At this point, after 1519, the New World received bozales, or slaves brought directly from Africa without being Christianized. The Spanish Crown would issue these contracts to foreign slavers, who would then make deals with the Portuguese, for they controlled the slave posts on the West African coast. In addition, the Crown would grant slaving licenses to merchants, government officials, conquistadores, and settlers who requested the privilege of importing slaves to the Americas.
Afro-Mexicans — both slave and free — participated in a various kinds of labor in Mexico. The majority worked in the silver mine centers and large numbers worked in urban centers largely as domestic workers (having a black servant or maid was quite the status symbol for elites). Also in urban centers, blacks – both slave and free — worked as artisans, peddlers, and craftsmen. Africans were also deployed to rural coastal areas, such as Veracruz on the Gulf of Mexico, and what are now the states of Guerrero and Oaxaca on the Pacific Coast. Interestingly, free blacks also participated in large numbers in military service during the colonial period.
In Veracruz, black slaves were used primarily in the labor-intensive sugar industry of Xalapa in the late 16th, and early and mid-17th century. In these sugar-processing mills, and cane fields, African slaves were imported specifically to replace Indian laborers. On the Pacific coastal plains, blacks worked mainly as ranchers and cowboys. Livestock was the primary economic activity of that region in the colonial period, and continues to be important to this day. So the point here is that historically Afro-Mexicans were found throughout the country, and not only in the coastal areas where their descendents live today.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: .
Clyde all people in rural regions of Mexico cannot be assumed to be as mixed as average mexicans.
. _____________________^^^^^^^^CLYDE. QUESTION: WHO DO YOU GUESS THESE PEOPLE TO BE MIXED WITH AND IN WHAT APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE? (I'm not talking about general population data for the whole country) And Clyde, why do some of them resemble Olmec sculpture?
I'm not talking about people like Vicente Fox who have a lot of European blood
Why are you bringing up blacks of Costa chica?
During the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire, Pedro de Alvarado conquered the area in 1522, founding the town of Acatlán the same year. In 1531, a Tlapanec uprising forced most of the residents to flee and during the rest of the 16th century much of the indigenous population disappeared due to disease, war and overwork.In Xochistlahuaca there were about 20,000 indigenous in 1522 but by 1582, there were only 200. The area became important starting in the 16th century for ranching, exporting meat, hides and wool. Soon after, the area became inhabited by Africans and Afro-Mexicans. During the colonial period, the Spanish brought about 20 million African slaves to Mexico over three centuries. Most landed in Veracruz. However, escaped slaves began to make their way to the then isolated Costa Chica region where they found refuge. Spanish landholders gave them protection in return for cheap labor, mostly tending cattle and curing leather. Over time, there was significant interracial mixing among Europeans, indigenous and Africans. There is very little social interaction between Blacks and indigenous people. Part of this is the issue of the language barrier, but I believe the issue is much more complex than that. There has been a long history of hostility between the two groups, and while today there is no open hostility, negative stereotypes abound on both parts. I would hope to explore these inter-ethnic relations further, and that would likely require my learning one of their languagesOne of the earliest Africans brought to Mexico is said to be Juan Garrido, a free man who probably took part in the “Conquest” led by Hernán Cortés in 1519. Another of these early arrivals was Estebanico, a slave who took part in various expeditions in the 1520s and 1530s, including treks through what is now Florida, Texas, and New Mexico. These early blacks (slave or free) were essentially personal servants of their Spanish masters. They were most likely taken from Africa, then transported to Seville, where they were Christianized and they probably spoke Spanish by the time they reached the New World. These slaves didn’t come over on slave ships as part of an overt slave trade.
The slave trade that changed the demographic face of Mexico began when KIng Charles V (King Carlos V) (aka the Hapsburg that Marc and Mike love) began issuing more and more asientos, or contracts between the Crown and private slavers, in order to expedite the trans-atlantic trade. At this point, after 1519, the New World received bozales, or slaves brought directly from Africa without being Christianized. The Spanish Crown would issue these contracts to foreign slavers, who would then make deals with the Portuguese, for they controlled the slave posts on the West African coast. In addition, the Crown would grant slaving licenses to merchants, government officials, conquistadores, and settlers who requested the privilege of importing slaves to the Americas.
Afro-Mexicans — both slave and free — participated in a various kinds of labor in Mexico. The majority worked in the silver mine centers and large numbers worked in urban centers largely as domestic workers (having a black servant or maid was quite the status symbol for elites). Also in urban centers, blacks – both slave and free — worked as artisans, peddlers, and craftsmen. Africans were also deployed to rural coastal areas, such as Veracruz on the Gulf of Mexico, and what are now the states of Guerrero and Oaxaca on the Pacific Coast. Interestingly, free blacks also participated in large numbers in military service during the colonial period.
In Veracruz, black slaves were used primarily in the labor-intensive sugar industry of Xalapa in the late 16th, and early and mid-17th century. In these sugar-processing mills, and cane fields, African slaves were imported specifically to replace Indian laborers. On the Pacific coastal plains, blacks worked mainly as ranchers and cowboys. Livestock was the primary economic activity of that region in the colonial period, and continues to be important to this day. So the point here is that historically Afro-Mexicans were found throughout the country, and not only in the coastal areas where their descendents live today.
.
Check out my videos on the Blacks of Costachicaos and their role in Mexican history
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness: [qb] .
Clyde all people in rural regions of Mexico cannot be assumed to be as mixed as average mexicans.
. _____________________^^^^^^^^CLYDE. QUESTION: WHO DO YOU GUESS THESE PEOPLE TO BE MIXED WITH AND IN WHAT APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE? (I'm not talking about general population data for the whole country) And Clyde, why do some of them resemble Olmec sculpture?
I'm not talking about people like Vicente Fox who have a lot of European blood
Clyde you seem afraid to answer the above questions.
The blacks of Costa chica don't apply to the above people and their similarity in appearance to Olmec sculpture.
Also the Olmec heads are extremely broad, not typical of Africans
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: .
Clyde all people in rural regions of Mexico cannot be assumed to be as mixed as average mexicans.
LOL. You have already pointed out that Blacks were in every part of Mexico. This means that many 'average mexicans'can have African acenstry.
.
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness: Clyde you seem afraid to answer the above questions.
The blacks of Costa chica don't apply to the above people and their similarity in appearance to Olmec sculpture.
Also the Olmec heads are extremely broad, not typical of Africans
.
LOL. All the Olmec heads represent Africans. There is no one type African.
Also, you keep forgetting that the Olmec lived mainly along the Gulf coast. Other Mexicans adopted Olmec culture including the Blacks in Costachica who were originally represented as the Ocos.
The origins of the Maya go back to the Ocos who as represented by their art were negroes or Blacks.
Ocos female of the Mokaya tradition.
The Ocos were taught the art of building pyramids by the Olmecs. As a result, umder the earlist Mayan pyramids we find Olmec structures.
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
The origins of the Maya go back to the Ocos who as represented by their art were negroes or Blacks.
Ocos female of the Mokaya tradition.
______
_______^^^ this man matches the features of the above illustration of Ocos sculpture. You saying that Ocos "represented by their art were negroes or Blacks" is just soemthing you made up, pulled out of a hat with no evidence
here is a photo of an Ocos artifact: Ocos Figural Vessel — Pacific Coast, Mexico 1500 BC - 1200 BC Pre-Mayan vessel from the Ocos ceramic complex of Mexico's Pacific coast.
^^^^
There is nothing In West Africa at the same time period (or later) as Mesoamerican stone temple architecture that is remotely similar to it or made with similar technology
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
There is nothing In West Africa at the same time period (or later) as Mesoamerican stone temple architecture that is remotely similar to it or made with similar technology
Why should this temple be present in Africa at this time?
Blacks were living in Mexico thousands of years before the Mande speaking Olmecs arrived in 1200BC. It is only natural that these First Nation Blacks in Mexico would make their own innovations in architectural form as time past.
But the basic pyramidal idea remained constant in West Africa as indicated by the tomb of Askia.
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
A good example of the Architectural skill and innovations of the First Nation Blacks is the pyramidal complex at Xultun. These Blacks left evidence of their identity in the architectural workroom.
The Xultun pyramidal complex shows a variety of architectural styles and buildings
The First Nation Blacks in Mexico had a right to create their own architectural style just like other Blacks in Africa who developed different pyramidial styles:
Egypt
Fezzan/Garamante
Kushite
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
There is nothing In West Africa at the same time period (or later) as Mesoamerican stone temple architecture that is remotely similar to it or made with similar technology
Why should this temple be present in Africa at this time?
Blacks were living in Mexico thousands of years before the Mande speaking Olmecs arrived in 1200BC.
you made that up. pulled out of a hat Ocos Figural Vessel — Pacific Coast, Mexico 1500 BC - 1200 BC Photograph of Pre-Mayan vessel from the Ocos ceramic complex in Mexico's Pacific coast. Crickets heard chirping
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
It is only natural that these First Nation Blacks in Mexico would make their own innovations in architectural form as time past.
But the basic pyramidal idea remained constant in West Africa as indicated by the tomb of Askia.
No comparison, a fifteenth century AD Islamic mosque made of mud
compared to Olmec stone temples, Olmecs 1500 to 400 BC
no ancient ocean worthy ships found in Central America
no evidence only theory
Egypt, Meroe are irrelevant we are talking about West Africa, Mande speakers. It doesn't matter the style, the monumental stone technology is not there. If you theorized that Egyptians sailed to Central America at least there would be some similarity in the architecture and type of colossal stone moving technology used to produce it
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
The origins of the Maya go back to the Ocos who as represented by their art were negroes or Blacks.
Ocos female of the Mokaya tradition (1600-800 BC).
quote:Originally posted by the lioness:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness:
There is nothing In West Africa at the same time period (or later) as Mesoamerican stone temple architecture that is remotely similar to it or made with similar technology
Why should this temple be present in Africa at this time?
Blacks were living in Mexico thousands of years before the Mande speaking Olmecs arrived in 1200BC.
you made that up. pulled out of a hat Ocos Figural Vessel — Pacific Coast, Mexico 1500 BC - 1200 BC Photograph of Pre-Mayan vessel from the Ocos ceramic complex in Mexico's Pacific coast. Crickets heard chirping
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
It is only natural that these First Nation Blacks in Mexico would make their own innovations in architectural form as time past.
But the basic pyramidal idea remained constant in West Africa as indicated by the tomb of Askia.
No comparison, a fifteenth century AD Islamic mosque made of mud
compared to Olmec stone temples, Olmecs 1500 to 400 BC
no ancient ocean worthy ships found in Central America
no evidence only theory
Egypt, Meroe are irrelevant we are talking about West Africa, Mande speakers. It doesn't matter the style, the monumental stone technology is not there. If you theorized that Egyptians sailed to Central America at least there would be some similarity in the architecture and type of colossal stone moving technology used to produce it
1. Nubian, Garamante and Egyptian pyramids are relevant because they show that African people have been creative in pyramid building and at different times in different places Africans built pyramids.
2.I have never said the Olmec came from West Africa. I said they came from the Sahara or the sahel near one of the ancient tributaries of the Niger river.
3. The Mande speaking people had not reached the Niger Valley when the Olmec founded civilization in 1200 BC they were at this time spread from the Fezzan in Libya to Dar Tichitt in Mauretania.
I have never claimed Egyptians sailed to the Americas, this was a theory of the Cocaine mummy researchers.
LaVenta Pyramid
What Olmec stone pyramid?
Posted by the lioness (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
1. Nubian, Garamante and Egyptian pyramids are relevant because they show that African people have been creative in pyramid building and at different times in different places Africans built pyramids.
2.I have never said the Olmec came from West Africa. I said they came from the Sahara or the sahel near one of the ancient tributaries of the Niger river.
3. The Mande speaking people had not reached the Niger Valley when the Olmec founded civilization in 1200 BC they were at this time spread from the Fezzan in Libya to Dar Tichitt in Mauretania.
So you are saying that the Olmecs came from Mande in North Africa, spread from the Fezzan in Libya to Dar Tichitt in Mauretania?
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness:
quote:Originally posted by Clyde Winters:
1. Nubian, Garamante and Egyptian pyramids are relevant because they show that African people have been creative in pyramid building and at different times in different places Africans built pyramids.
2.I have never said the Olmec came from West Africa. I said they came from the Sahara or the sahel near one of the ancient tributaries of the Niger river.
3. The Mande speaking people had not reached the Niger Valley when the Olmec founded civilization in 1200 BC they were at this time spread from the Fezzan in Libya to Dar Tichitt in Mauretania.
So you are saying that the Olmecs came from Mande in North Africa, spread from the Fezzan in Libya to Dar Tichitt in Mauretania?
Of course there were no Mande in West Africa in 1200BC. The Olmec came from North Africa and the Saharan zone.
See:
Clyde Winters, Olmec (Mande) Loan Words in the Mayan, Mixe-Zoque and Taino Languages, Current Research Journal of Social Sciences 3(3): 152-179, 2011 http://maxwellsci.com/print/crjss/v3-152-179.pdf
People did not begin to settle the Niger Delta until after 300BC .
The Garamante were Mande speakers so the Mande had experience building pyramids.
McIntosh,S.K. & McIntosh,R.J. 1979. "Initial Perspectives on Pre-historic subsistence in the Inland Niger Delta (Mali)". World Archaeology, 2(2):240-45.
______________1981. "West African Prehistory". American Scientist,69:602-613.
Clyde Winters,1986."The Migration Routes of the Proto-Mande". The Mankind Quarterly, 27(1):77-96.
.
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
The Garamante were Mande speakers so the Mande had experience building pyramids.
do you have a link to any books or articles other than your own that say the Garamante were Mande speakers?
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
This enitire site except for myself is comprised of one person who has created fake names where he holds conversations with itself! There are too many of these fake names to list, because the fake names are EVERYone THAT posts here, and that includes EVERYONE except for myself of course! Some of the more prominent the fake names are 1) Mike111 2) The Lioness 3) clyde winters 4) Amun-Ra The Ultimate 5) Swenet 6) alTakruri 7) Charlie Bass 8) Doug M 9) Oshun 10) Egmond Codfried 11) Djehuti 12) Zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
This enitire site except for myself is comprised of one person who has created fake names where he holds conversations with itself! There are too many of these fake names to list, because the fake names are EVERYone THAT posts here, and that includes EVERYONE except for myself of course! Some of the more prominent the fake names are 1) Mike111 2) The Lioness 3) clyde winters 4) Amun-Ra The Ultimate 5) Swenet 6) alTakruri 7) Charlie Bass 8) Doug M 9) Oshun 10) Egmond Codfried 11) Djehuti 12) Zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova
Posted by Vansertimavindicated (Member # 20281) on :
Be the person that comes up with the idea! The key to destroying the caucasoid may be found in continued study of sickel cell and the west Nile virus. We need to become better educated and use the science that these monsters have stolen from us to destroy them!
A mutation of the gene CCR5 is the key to destroying these monkeys and I know for a fact people are working on this plan! We need more scientists to get the job done!
3600 year old African skeletal remains have been found in Honduras Chimpboy. They have also been found in Puebla Mexico in 2011 you stringy haired pink assed degenerate!
The chama vase proves absolutely nothing you ignorant fake ass pink ased fake ass Clyde Winters. What proves that Africans were in the Americas prior to Columbus are the African skeletal remains that exist all over the Americas, which are irrefutable proof that Africans sailed to the Americas prior to Columbus
Dr. Ivan van Sertima thought that the REAL Clyde Winters was a nut job and it is the reason why Dr Vansertima regreted ever dealing with him! I can understand why Dr. Ivan Van Sertima then disowned the REAL Clyde winters! But since the REAL Clyde winters actually did work with Dr Ivan Van Sertima....That is the reason that this FAKE Clyde Winters Member # 10129 was created. this FAKE Clyde Winters has stolen the REAL Clyde Winters name and uses his work from the 1970's and 80's while creating recent work and combining the two and attributing it to the REAL Clyde Winters! It is highly illegal
This pink assed stringy haired, fake ass clyde winters mutha fuckka wants to talk about the Chama vase! This is the same faggot ass mutha fuccka that tried to tell us that Neanderthal originated and lived in Africa, in order to hide the fact that the cracker is the offspring of a 48 chromosome ape! He wants to hide that these devils are ape hybrids and a sub species of Homo Sapien. Now this faggot is talking about the Chama Vase, which was created about 1200 years ago which is well after after the first mongoloid entered North America. It is even after the mogoloid settled Hawaii and right about the same rime that a wave of these murderous cannibalistic, illiterate mongoloids settled New Zealand. What kind of game is this faggot playing by talking about the Chama Vase, which was created during a time when mongoloids had already invaded, North Central and South America. the best prrof of Africans in the americas are the skeletal remains that show ZERO% Neanderthal and denisovan DNA The bast evidence of the OLMEC civilzatio. but this faggot wants to talk about a Chama vase that was made in 800 AD Whether there were blacks in the americas is not the issue! we already know that blacks were in the americas TENS OF THOUSANDS of years before the first cracker or monmgolid left their caves in their ancestral homelands in Central Asia
This enitire site except for myself is comprised of one person who has created fake names where he holds conversations with itself! There are too many of these fake names to list, because the fake names are EVERYone THAT posts here, and that includes EVERYONE except for myself of course! Some of the more prominent the fake names are 1) Mike111 2) The Lioness 3) clyde winters 4) Amun-Ra The Ultimate 5) Swenet 6) alTakruri 7) Charlie Bass 8) Doug M 9) Oshun 10) Egmond Codfried 11) Djehuti 12) Zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova
Posted by claus3600 (Member # 19584) on :
For what it's worth, this from Lonely Planet, the most widely used travel guide in the world...
"...King Abubakari II sent an expedition across the Atlantic in an attempt to discover the Americas almost two centuries before Christopher Columbus. Only one ship returned, with stories of a great river running through the ocean's heart. Abubakari himself led an expedition of 200 ships. Not a single ship returned."
Posted by Clyde Winters (Member # 10129) on :
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
[/QB][/QUOTE]
