Why I have so little patience with Negroes: Note the following, taken word for word from the Albinos, as if they were the Black mans friend, and could be depended on to give truthful history, instead of incessant lies.
QUOTE: Many Afro-Iranians are descendants of the Portuguese/Arab/Middle Eastern slave trade along eastern Africa. Others descend from ancient east African traders who interacted with Persia (now Iran). In 2007, a documentary was done about Afro-Iranians.
Note the following, taken word for word from the Albinos, as if they were the Black mans friend, and could be depended on to give truthful history, instead of incessant lies.
QUOTE: Many Afro-Iranians are descendants of the Portuguese/Arab/Middle Eastern slave trade along eastern Africa. Others descend from ancient east African traders who interacted with Persia (now Iran). In 2007, a documentary was done about Afro-Iranians.
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Iranian Air Force
Darius, King of Persia Persepolis, Iran
Mike the features are different Find a black guy in the Iranian military with thinner features, there's probably some but it might take some digging
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
Note the following, taken word for word from the Albinos, as if they were the Black mans friend, and could be depended on to give truthful history, instead of incessant lies.
QUOTE: Many Afro-Iranians are descendants of the Portuguese/Arab/Middle Eastern slave trade along eastern Africa. Others descend from ancient east African traders who interacted with Persia (now Iran). In 2007, a documentary was done about Afro-Iranians.
You stupid degenerate bitch, right away you had to start with false editing.
THE CORRECT QUOTE IS:
Why I have so little patience with Negroes: Note the following, taken word for word from the Albinos, as if they were the Black mans friend, and could be depended on to give truthful history, instead of incessant lies.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
Mike I edited out your stupid remark > "Why I have so little patience with Negroes" Which is irrelevant and pointless.
You said "Note the following, taken word for word from the Albinos" It's a LIE and now you're mad. The 'word for word' quote was a black dude's post on a black webisite, stop deceiving the people
now who's negro ? Posted by mena7 (Member # 20555) on :
Mike great job of finding black Iranian pictures. There is a conspiracy in Western media and proxy western media like Aljazeera to not show black people in West Asia and North Africa. When they rarely show them they lie saying they are descendant of African slaves.
Black people was always part of the North African and West Asian elite until the British and French colonization of those area and introduction of European anti black racism in the 19 cent CE.
There is a subtle white European conspiracy to erase the original man aka the black man from world history. Indigenous black population are misclassified as African slave to steal their legacy.
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Iranian Air Force
Darius, King of Persia Persepolis, Iran
Mike the features are different Find a black guy in the Iranian military with thinner features, there's probably some but it might take some digging
So you like big Black noses eh?
Posted by malibudusul (Member # 19346) on :
Ok , Mike, you put photos of ancient black iran and today black iran but they are the same? prove it!
Posted by typeZeiss (Member # 18859) on :
quote:Originally posted by malibudusul: Ok , Mike, you put photos of ancient black iran and today black iran but they are the same? prove it!
You don't want to open that door because that is a two way street. Someone can show pictures of whites in Iran today and try and say it is the same people as yesteryear to which one cay say "prove it". Herodotus and many others who saw the ancient people in Iran described them as ethiops, especially along the southern seaboard. So where did all the whites come from then?
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
quote:Originally posted by malibudusul: Ok , Mike, you put photos of ancient black iran and today black iran but they are the same? prove it!
thanks, mike. and ancient black european was all exterminate today have only blacks from africa
black iranians they are invisible The racist media not show black people. the iran people is racist and nazi.
Mike look this! Hāji Piruz or Hajji Piruz,is the traditional herald of Nowruz, the Persian New Year. He oversees celebrations for the new year perhaps as a remnant of the ancient Zoroastrian fire-keeper.
Thanks Mike, the extreme Eurocentric lioness has been bedunked.
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111: Iranian Air Force
Darius, King of Persia Persepolis, Iran
Mike the features are different Find a black guy in the Iranian military with thinner features, there's probably some but it might take some digging
You should use your pencil tool, to measure King Darius his prognathism.
Take the image up close, and you'll see that his lips are relatively full.
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
Note the following, taken word for word from the Albinos, as if they were the Black mans friend, and could be depended on to give truthful history, instead of incessant lies.
QUOTE: Many Afro-Iranians are descendants of the Portuguese/Arab/Middle Eastern slave trade along eastern Africa. Others descend from ancient east African traders who interacted with Persia (now Iran). In 2007, a documentary was done about Afro-Iranians.
^My point was that when a Black person routinely quotes Albinos on racial issues: not only is it a sign of abject stupidity, but it also adds credence to the original Albino lie.
If the idiot Shay Riley had done even the slightest research, he would have found that Persians were Black people.
If he had used just the slightest amount of common sense, he would have realized that Albino people could not be native to those lands.
But instead, he blindly accepted everything the Albino people told him, and then passed it off to innocent Black people, who probably thought that he had checked and verified the information.
So in that way, the ignorant and stupid Negro becomes the agent of the lying Albino man.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
I'm getting it now, key to this is
>> any person who looks Afican like the man above is not really an African. They are descended from the original inhabitants of of wherever they may be, in this case the man above is descended from the original Persians. He's Persian
In other words, go to any country, the first black person you see that was born in that country, that probably means they are descended from the original inhabitants of that country.
I'm sorry it took me so long to get it.
^^^^ He's not African.
He's either original black European / original American or original Arab But not African in the least, what a relief
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
I'm getting it now, key to this is
>> any person who looks Afican like the man above is not really an African.
Ignorant Albino Cow, please indicate how he looks African?
Instead of say:
A Mani from Thailand:
From the Andaman Islands:
From Indonesia or Papua:
From Australia or Tasmania:
From the Philippines:
From Hawaii or other Pacific Island.
Or a Native American:
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
^Ignorant Albino degenerate, a reminder for you and all the other ignoramuses:
These people left Africa:
LONG "BEFORE" THESE PEOPLE DID:
Logically then, the Albino "IS" more African, and thus "LOOKS" more African, than the Australian/Tasmanian. Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
^How about it lamin, do you see any flaw in that logic? Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
I'm getting it now, key to this is
>> any person who looks Afican like the man above is not really an African.
please indicate how he looks African?
Instead of say:
A Mani from Thailand:
From the Andaman Islands:
From Indonesia or Papua:
From Australia or Tasmania:
From the Philippines:
From Hawaii or other Pacific Island.
Or a Native American:
So he might not be Persian ??
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
Mongrel Albino, please stop wasting thread space with your nonsensical comments. The stupidness of your comments serve only to stretch out the threads, not inform anybody. There are already enough trolls on the forum, the nonsense that you add, is not needed.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
Shay Riley said this
QUOTE: Many Afro-Iranians are descendants of the Portuguese/Arab/Middle Eastern slave trade along eastern Africa. Others descend from ancient east African traders who interacted with Persia (now Iran). In 2007, a documentary was done about Afro-Iranians.
Your comment about brother Shay Riley was "Why I have so little patience with Negroes:"
and following that you made three separate posts of black people in the Iranian military.
What was the point of that? Those pictures of black people in the Iranian military in no was condtradicts brother Rileys statements
That's bluffing Mike, and I'm calling you it
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
Native American:
[/qb]
The first African Peruvians arrived with the conquistadors in 1521, to return permanently in 1525. One of the biggest imports of African slaves occurred between 1529 and 1537 when Francisco Pizarro was granted permits to import 363 slaves to colonial Peru for public construction, building bridges and road systems. They fought alongside the conquistadors as soldiers and worked like personal servants and bodyguards. In 1533 Afro-Peruvian slaves accompanied Spaniards in the conquest of Cuzco.
Over the course of the slave trade, approximately 95,000 slaves were brought into Peru, with the last group arriving in 1850. They were initially transferred to Cuba and Hispaniola but continued to Panama, where they were brought to the Viceroyalty of Peru. Slave owners also purchased their slaves in Cartagena, Colombia or Veracruz, Mexico, at trade fairs, and they took back to Peru whatever the slave ships had brought over. Slaves were distributed between encomiendas as a result of the "New laws" of 1548 and due to the influence of the denunciation of the abuses against Native Americans by Friar Bartolomé de las Casas.
Therefore there is no way of knowing which of these Peruvians groups are the descendants of the Inca
Mike how come you say on your webisite "there is no way of knowing which of these Peruvians groups are the descendants of the Inca" but here you label the people picking cotton as "native", you witless bufoon
Mike stop lying, if there is "no way of telling" than there is "no way of telling" -according to your poor observational skills
thanks lioness
Also that picture looks staged, for some historical reenactment, I could be wrong but we could always go to the source of the picture
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
^Initially there was confusion caused by the "FAKE" Inca kings portrait at the Brooklyn Museum.
Discovery of the "REAL" Inca kings portraits settled the matter.
Posted by mena7 (Member # 20555) on :
In the Inca kings portrait showing Inca and Spanish kings you can see the bleaching out of the European or Spanish nobility and monarch. Habsburg Emperor Charles V was black. Charles V son Philippe was a mulato. The last two Spanish kings Charle III and Charle IIII are white. I always believe many European were bleach black or black people who mixed with white Slav and Turk from central Asia. This painting prove the bleach out of the European nobility.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by mena7: Charles V was black.
yes, light skinned black
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by malibudusul: [QB] thanks, mike. and ancient black european was all exterminate today have only blacks from africa
WRONG, Mike says the ancient Black Europeans were sent to America. He says that most black people in Ameica today were Black European nobles and they are not African. But albinos and negroes like to pretend they are African
BLACK EUROPEAN /ILLUMINATI/KNIGHTS OF TEMPLAR/MASON
WATCH THE THRONE
malibudisul, favorite bands list, facebook
Posted by malibudusul (Member # 19346) on :
Lioness, search for a Lion to you.
Posted by jantavanta (Member # 20328) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by mena7: Charles V was black.
That is a fake painting. A product of over 100 years of faking paintings of indigenous Black Europeans. Europe is only 7 miles from Africa. Compare it with Charles V in this coin: http://www.coingallery.de/KarlV/Ulrich_4.jpg Posted by malibudusul (Member # 19346) on :
That is a fake painting. A product of over 100 years of faking paintings of indigenous Black Europeans. Europe is only 7 miles from Africa. Compare it with Charles V in this coin: http://www.coingallery.de/KarlV/Ulrich_4.jpg
__________^^^ FAKE COIN
. ___________________________100% REAL painting
Charles V gave the first authorization for the Portugese to trade slaves from Africa.
And you want to be these assholes ?
that's a form of PTSS
Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome
Posted by mena7 (Member # 20555) on :
Nice pictures of Malik Ambar, Bodhidarma, Rimpoche, Siddi people and black Asian in black improvement blog.
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by malibudusul: [QB] thanks, mike. and ancient black european was all exterminate today have only blacks from africa
WRONG, Mike says the ancient Black Europeans were sent to America. He says that most black people in Ameica today were Black European nobles and they are not African. But albinos and negroes like to pretend they are African
BLACK EUROPEAN /ILLUMINATI/KNIGHTS OF TEMPLAR/MASON
WATCH THE THRONE
malibudisul, favorite bands list, facebook
33
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by jantavanta:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by mena7: Charles V was black.
That is a fake painting. A product of over 100 years of faking paintings of indigenous Black Europeans. Europe is only 7 miles from Africa. Compare it with Charles V in this coin: http://www.coingallery.de/KarlV/Ulrich_4.jpg
__________^^^ FAKE COIN
. ___________________________100% REAL painting
Charles V gave the first authorization for the Portugese to trade slaves from Africa.
And you want to be these assholes ?
that's a form of PTSS
Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome
Can you prove the coin is fake?
Ps, the syndrome you refer at is called the Stockholm Syndrome. You think your a free thinker, but it's you who suffers from the Stockholm Syndrome mostly.
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: Mike I edited out your stupid remark > "Why I have so little patience with Negroes" Which is irrelevant and pointless.
You said "Note the following, taken word for word from the Albinos" It's a LIE and now you're mad. The 'word for word' quote was a black dude's post on a black webisite, stop deceiving the people
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: ........................
Charles V gave the first authorization for the Portugese to trade slaves from Africa.
And you want to be these assholes ?
that's a form of PTSS
Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome
Your have a syndrome in which you are not clear about who you want to be. Why should somebody be whitened out of history to answer a charge?
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
The Albino man, in order to pump himself up, and make himself seem as fierce and indomitable as possible, had even taken the blame for atrocities that he did not commit. For many years he cultivated the notion that he had barged into Africa, and taken slaves at will. Only later, with the apologies of descendants of the former Slave Empires of Africa, do we find out that the Albinos simply bought Slaves from them.
Blacks, to their shame, invented slavery, so then the only purpose of lioness comment is to imply that Blacks were always just the powerless "Victims" of slavery - a common Albino ruse to imply that they are all-powerful.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by jantavanta:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: ........................
Charles V gave the first authorization for the Portugese to trade slaves from Africa.
And you want to be these assholes ?
that's a form of PTSS
Post Traumatic Slave Syndrome
Your have a syndrome in which you are not clear about who you want to be. Why should somebody be whitened out of history to answer a charge?
1502: Juan de Córdoba of Seville becomes the first merchant we can identify to send an African slave to the New World. Córdoba, like other merchants, is permitted by the Spanish authorities to send only one slave. Others send two or three. 1504 1504: a small group of Africans - probably slaves captured from a Portuguese vessel - are brought to the court of King James IV of Scotland. 1505 1505: first record of sugar cane being grown in the New World, in Santo Domingo (modern Dominican Republic). 1509 1509: Columbus's son, Diego Cólon, becomes governor of the new Spanish empire in the Carribean. He soon complains that Native American slaves do not work hard enough. 1510 22 January 1510: the start of the systematic transportation of African slaves to the New World: King Ferdinand of Spain authorises a shipment of 50 African slaves to be sent to Santo Domingo. 1513 2 April 1513: Juan Ponce de Leon becomes the first European to reach the coast of what is now the United States of America (modern Florida). 1516 1516: the governor of Cuba, Diego Velázquez, authorises slave-raiding expeditions to Central America. One group of slaves aboard a Spanish caravel rebel and kill the Spanish crew before sailing home - the first successful slave rebellion recorded in the New World. 1516: in his book Utopia, Sir Thomas More argues that his ideal society would have slaves but they would not be 'non-combatant prisoners-of-war, slaves by birth, or purchases from foreign slave markets.' Rather, they would be local convicts or 'condemned criminals from other countries, who are acquired in large numbers, sometimes for a small payment, but usually for nothing.' (Trans. Paul Turner, Penguin, 1965) 1518
18 August 1518: in a significant escalation of the slave trade, Charles V grants his Flemish courtier Lorenzo de Gorrevod permission to import 4000 African slaves into New Spain. From this point onwards thousands of slaves are sent to the New World each year.
^^^ question
given that Charles V and the nobility of Europe was black at the time, did white people ever get involved in this slave trading of Africans?
Posted by DHDoxies (Member # 19701) on :
Good question Lioness, care to answer it Mike?
I have a question too if Whites were no more than serfs (slaves basically) & Blacks were the nobles/royalty then how the heck did Whites get to the Americas? Seeming as how serfs were not allowed to leave their lords' land without permission & what kind of lord would be stupid enough to allow their slaves to leave their land for a land hundreds or thousands of miles away that they would have no control over them LOL?
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: ^^^ question
given that Charles V and the nobility of Europe was black at the time, did white people ever get involved in this slave trading of Africans?
Yes.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: ^^^ question
given that Charles V and the nobility of Europe was black at the time, did white people ever get involved in this slave trading of Africans?
Yes.
well when did whites take over the Transatlantic slave trade from the European Blacks who started it ?
Also the problem is if one is black how do we know if our ancestors were African or if we were Black European slave masters?
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
^Some people have kept their family histories in Bibles and the like, but most haven't. Some know instinctively, some don't. All that is known is that the majority were slaves or indentures, not masters. The Albino peoples falsifications make precise statements almost impossible. Currently working on a video about Barbados, the first super successful English colony in the Americas, will post when done.
Posted by DHDoxies (Member # 19701) on :
Hey Mike, where's the answer to my question & my explanation hmmm??? Can't answer can you hehehehe?
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
he he he
Mike, have you ever gone an entire day without saying or thinking the word "albino" ?
I was just wondering
ha ha ha ha (he he)
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
quote:Originally posted by DHDoxies: Good question Lioness, care to answer it Mike?
I have a question too if Whites were no more than serfs (slaves basically) & Blacks were the nobles/royalty then how the heck did Whites get to the Americas? Seeming as how serfs were not allowed to leave their lords' land without permission & what kind of lord would be stupid enough to allow their slaves to leave their land for a land hundreds or thousands of miles away that they would have no control over them LOL?
by the time the Albinos had acquired enough Melanin to venture out into the world, via admixture with Blacks in Eastern Europe, and The Dravidians of India, history had passed them by. The great civilizations had already been founded by Blacks, and all that was left to the Albinos was to learn as much as they could, and fit in. But as we now know, when people are in such a weak and inferior position, it makes them desperate for security, and capable of any atrocity in order to secure that which they consider to be safety.
Blacks, having no knowledge of Racism: that is, alliances based on "Skin Color" rather than alliances based on Common State interests: And unaware of the Albinos "Self-conscious/Paranoid" sense of vulnerability, were completely unprepared for what was to come. As we know, the Albinos usurped Black rule all over the world, committed many expulsions and genocides against Blacks, and now claim to have been the people of Every Important Civilization on Earth - even civilizations where the Albinos in their "Purer State" could not survive.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE WARS THE ALBINOS USED TO WEAKEN AND FINALLY USURP BLACKS.
European Wars
1066 Norman Conquest 1096 - 1291 Crusades 1096 - 1099 First Crusade 1101 Crusade of 1101 1147 - 1149 Second Crusade 1187 - 1191 Third Crusade 1202 - 1204 Fourth Crusade 1209 - 1229 Albigensian Crusade 1212 Children's Crusade (Often believed to be just a story) 1217 - 1221 Fifth Crusade 1228 Sixth Crusade 1248 - 1254 Seventh Crusade 1270 Eighth Crusade 1271 - 1291 Ninth Crusade 1293 - 1323 War between Sweden and Novgorod ended up with Treaty of Nöteborg 1296 - 1328 First War of Scottish Independence 1332 - 1333 Second War of Scottish Independence 1337 - 1453 Hundred Years' War 1341 - 1364 Breton War of Succession 1420 - 1436 Hussite Wars 1454 - 1466 Thirteen Years' War. Between Poland and Teutonic Knights, which finally broke the power of the latter. 1455 - 1485 Wars of the Roses 1474 - 1477 War between the Duchy of Burgundy and the Swiss Confederation 1478 - War between the Principality of Moscow and the Republic of Novgorod. The latter was conquered. 1494 - 1559 Italian Wars 1494 - 1498 Charles VIII's Italian War 1499 - 1500 Louis XII's war with Milan 1500 - 1502 Franco-Spanish Conquest of Naples 1502 - 1505 Franco-Spanish War over Naples 1508 - 1510 War of the League of Cambrai 1510 - 1513 War of the Holy League 1511 - 1514 Anglo-French War 1513 Anglo-Scottish War (Battle of Flodden) 1515 - 1516 Francis I's first Italian war 1521 - 1525 First war of Francis and Charles V 1521-1525 Anglo-French War 1526 - 1529 War of the League of Cognac 1536 - 1538 Third War of Francis and Charles 1542 - 1544 Last War of Francis and Charles 1542 - 1546 Anglo-French War 1542 - 1550 Anglo-Scottish War 1549 - 1550 Anglo-French War 1552 - 1559 Last Italian War 1557 - 1559 Anglo-French War 1495 - 1497 Russo-Swedish War 1499 - 1503 Turkish-Venetian War1509 - 1513 Ottoman Civil War 1514 - 1516 Ottoman-Safavid War 1515 - 1523 Rebellion of the Frisians 1516 - 1517 Ottoman-Mamluk War 1521 - 1523 The Swedish War of Liberation 1521 - 1523 Uprising of the Comuneros in Castile 1521 - 1526 Ottoman-Hungarian War 1522 Ottoman Conquest of Rhodes 1522 The Knights' War in Germany 1524 - 1525 The Peasants' War in Germany 1526 - 1528 Hungarian Civil War 1526 - 1555 Ottoman-Safavid War 1528 - 1533 Ottoman-Habsburg War in Hungary 1531 Swiss Civil War between Zürich and the Catholic cantons 1532 - 1546 Ottoman-Habsburg War in the Mediterranean 1533 - 1536 The Counts' War in Denmark 1537 - 1544 Renewed Ottoman-Habsburg War in Hungary 1546 - 1547 Schmalkaldic War 1551 - 1562 Ottoman-Habsburg War in Hungary 1551 - 1581 Ottoman-Habsburg War in the Mediterranean (Battle of Lepanto (1571)) 1552 - 1555 Charles V's war with Maurice of Saxony 1554 - 1557 Great Russian War 1557 - 1571 Livonian War 1559 - 1560 Scottish Rebellion against the French 1562 - 1598 Wars of Religion in France, also called War of the Three Henries or Huguenot Wars
1562 - 1563 First War of Religion 1567 - 1568 Second War of Religion 1568 - 1570 Third War of Religion 1572 - 1573 Fourth War of Religion 1575 - 1576 Fifth War of Religion 1576 - 1577 Sixth War of Religion 1580 Seventh War of Religion (Lovers' War) 1585 - 1598 Eighth War of Religion 1589 - 1598 Franco-Spanish War 1562 - 1568 Ottoman-Habsburg War in Hungary 1563 - 1570 Northern Seven Years' War also known as Dano-Swedish War 1566 (or 1568) - 1648 Eighty Years' War (war of Dutch independence) 1566(or 1568) - 1609 First Phase 1621 - 1648 Second Phase 1567 - 1573 Scottish Civil War 1568 - 1571 Morisco Revolt in Spain 1570 - 1595 Twenty-five Years' War between Sweden and Russia 1577 - 1582 Livonian War (Poland vs. Russia) 1577 - 1590 Turkish-Persian War 1580 - 1583 Portuguese Civil War 1585 - 1604 Anglo-Spanish War (Spanish Armada, 1588) 1590 - 1606 "Long War" between the Empire and the Turks 1594 - 1603 Tyrone Rebellion in Ireland 1596 - 1597 The Cudgel War in Finland 1600 - 1611 Polish-Swedish War
1602 - 1612 Turkish-Persian War 1609 - 1618 Russo-Polish War 1610 - 1617 Ingrian War between Sweden and Russia 1611 - 1613 War of Kalmar between Sweden and Denmark 1613 - 1617 Russo-Swedish War 1614 - 1621 Polish-Turkish War 1616 - 1618 Turkish-Persian War 1617 - 1629 Polish-Swedish War 1618 - 1648 Thirty Years' War across Europe, ends with the Peace of Westphalia. 1618 - 1625 Bohemian/Palatine Phase 1618 - 1629 Austro-Transylvanian War 1625 - 1629 Danish Phase 1625 - 1630 Anglo-Spanish War 1626 - 1630 Anglo-French War 1627 - 1631 War of the Mantuan Succession 1630 - 1635 Swedish Phase 1635 - 1648 French Phase 1635 - 1659 Franco-Spanish War (ending with the Treaty of the Pyrenees) 1645 Renewed Austro-Transylvanian War 1623 - 1638 Turkish-Persian War 1625 - 1629 Huguenot Uprising in France 1632 - 1634 Russo-Polish War 1634 Polish-Swedish War 1637 Pequot War 1639 - 1652 English Civil War
1639 First Bishops' War 1640 Second Bishops' War 1641 - 1650 Irish War 1642 - 1646 First Civil War 1648 Second Civil War 1650 - 1652 Scottish Uprising 1640 - 1656 Catalan Revolt 1640 - 1668 Portuguese War of Independence 1645 - 1670 Turkish-Venetian War 1648 - 1653 The Fronde 1648 - 1649 First Fronde 1650 - 1653 Second Fronde 1648 - 1660 The Deluge/Northern Wars, A series of wars involving Poland, Sweden, Brandenburg, Russia and Transylvania and Denmark 1648 - 1654 Cossack Revolt against Poland 1654 - 1656 Russo-Polish War 1655 - 1656 Swedish-Brandenburg War 1655 - 1660 Polish-Swedish War 1656 - 1658 Russo-Swedish War 1656 - 1660 Danish-Swedish War 1657 - 1660 Dutch-Swedish War 1658 - 1667 Russo-Polish War 1652 - 1654 First Anglo-Dutch War 1656 - 1659 Anglo-Spanish War 1657 - 1662 Turkish-Transylvanian War 1662 - 1664 Austro-Turkish War
1665 - 1667 Second Anglo-Dutch War preceded by the capture of New Amsterdam, renamed New York City 1667 - 1668 War of Devolution 1671 - 1676 Polish-Turkish War 1672 - 1678 Dutch War 1672 - 1674 Third Anglo-Dutch War 1672 - 1679 War between Brandenburg and Sweden 1675 - 1679 Scanian War between Sweden and Denmark 1675 - 1676 King Philip's War 1678 - 1681 Russo-Turkish War 1682 - 1699 War of the Holy League (Austria, Venice, and Poland vs. Ottomans 1685 Monmouth's Rebellion 1688 - 1697 War of the Grand Alliance 1689 - 1691 Irish Jacobite Uprising 1695 - 1700 Russo-Turkish War 1700 - 1721 Great Northern War between a coalition of Denmark/Norway, Russia and Saxony/Poland on one side and Sweden on the other side 1710 - 1711 Russo-Turkish War, 1710-11, a part of the Great Northern War 1715 - 1717 Polish revolt against King Augustus II 1701 - 1714 War of Spanish Succession 1702 - 1713 Queen Anne's War The North American part of the War of Spanish Succession 1703 - 1711 Hungarian Revolt 1714 - 1718 Turko-Venetian War 1715 - 1716 Jacobite Rebellion also known as "The Fifteen" 1716 - 1718 Austro-Turkish War 1718 - 1720 War of the Quadruple Alliance
1722 - 1723 Russo-Persian War 1722-1723 1722 - 1727 Turco-Persian War 1727 - 1729 largely bloodless Spanish war with England and France 1730 - 1736 Turco-Persian War 1733 - 1738 War of the Polish Succession 1736 - 1739 Russo-Turkish War 1737 - 1739 Austro-Turkish War 1740 - 1748 War of the Austrian Succession 1739 - 1748 War of Jenkins' Ear 1740 - 1742 1st Silesian War 1741 - 1743 Hats' Russian War between Sweden and Russia 1744 - 1748 King George's War The North American part of the War of Austrian Succession 1744 - 1745 2nd Silesian War 1744 - 1748 First Carnatic War 1745 - 1746 "The Forty-five" 1743 - 1747 Turco-Persian War 1749 - 1754 Second Carnatic War 1756 - 1763 Seven Years' War, known as the French and Indian War in the United States, and also 3rd Silesian War 1761 - 1763 Spanish-Portuguese War 1763 - 1766 Pontiac's Rebellion 1768 - 1774 Russo-Turkish War 1768 - 1776 War of the Confederation of Bar in Poland 1773 - 1774 Pugachev's Rebellion 1774 - 1783 First Anglo-Maratha War 1775 - 1783 American Revolutionary War
1778 - 1783 Anglo-French War 1779 - 1783 Anglo-Spanish War 1780 - 1784 Anglo-Dutch War 1777 - 1779 War of the Bavarian Succession 1785 - 1787 Dutch Civil War 1787 - 1791 Austro-Turkish War 1787 - 1792 Russo-Turkish War 1788 - 1790 Gustav III's Russian War also known as Russo-Swedish War 1791 - 1804 Haiti Revolutionary War 1792 War in defence of the constitution in Poland 1792 - 1802 French Revolutionary Wars 1792 - 1797 War of the First Coalition 1792 - 1795 Franco-Prussian War 1792 - 1797 Franco-Austrian War 1793 - 1795 Franco-Spanish War 1793 - 1795 Franco-Dutch War 1793 - 1802 Franco-British War 1798 - 1801 War of the Second Coalition 1798 - 1799 Franco-Russian War 1799 - 1801 Franco-Austrian War 1798 - 1801 Quasi War 1794 Kosciuszko Uprising in Poland 1795 - 1798 United Irishmen Revolt
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
when people are in such a weak and inferior position, it makes them desperate for security.
who's in that position currently?
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
Blacks, having no knowledge of Racism: that is, alliances based on "Skin Color" rather than alliances based on Common State interests: And unaware of the Albinos "Self-conscious/Paranoid" sense of vulnerability, were completely unprepared for what was to come.
what about all that chopping albinos limbs off stuff for good luck charms ?
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
HERE ARE SOME OF THE WARS THE ALBINOS USED TO WEAKEN AND FINALLY USURP BLACKS.
European Wars
1066 Norman Conquest 1096 - 1291 Crusades
can we have something more complete here, what about the Greek, Roman and Germanic tribe invasions of North Africa/Egypt ?
That's quite a while before the Norman conquest
Also if the albinos were able to star all these wars such as the Norman conquest that must means Europe was at least half white in order to be able to cause a war
You think it was due to an inferiority complex? Why get into psycho-babble it's pure resource acquisition?
You think every war in Europe was based on racial hate?
Posted by DHDoxies (Member # 19701) on :
WOW Mike you actually admitted you are a White people hating Black supremacist racist bigot LOL, I'm so proud of you, good boy LOL. Seems to me Mike, that it is YOU who is trying to claim everyone of any importance, or any peoples who were known to be great warriors, great seafarers, or who were known to achieved great things as Black. You do this because you hate Whites, out of your hatred for us you want us to think that we are inferior to you, you want us to think that we have no history, no heritage, no identity, no homeland to call our own, you want us to think we have achieved nothing, built nothing, done nothing. Funny how you conveniently don't claim the European tribes who never really achieved anything & weren't known as great warriors or anything like that LOL. Now why would that be Mike? Sorry Whitey killer but if you want to steal our stuff you gotta take it all including the bad people & the ones who never really did anything & weren't known as great warriors, etc. Now where are those Black Goths, Vandals, Suevi, Slavs, Alans, etc LOL. Now how are we gonna explain to the Amerindians that they should stop hating on Whitey because it wasn't him who committed all those atrocities on them it was the Black man because Columbus, Pizarro & Cortez, etc were Black LOL ROTFLMBO. BTW you did NOT answer my question Mike. BTW Mike if we weren't already out in the world then where the heck were we? Your racist ass makes no dang sense boy. Stop with the Anti-White & Anti-Black/self hatred Mike & claim your own history & stop trying to Black my people out of history like we didn't/don't exist. Stop using racist epithets & demeaning, degrading, & dehumanizing my people. Claim your own dang history in Africa and leave my people's stuff alone. Wait that's right you HATE Africa & Africans almost as much as you hate Whites ROTFLMBO.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
Doxies you might want to check out the black supremacist "King Noble" on youtube
The 1500s was a period when the population was mixed as in India, with Black Europeans ruling. White people began to take over the rule of europe through inter-marriage with Black rulers . The purpose of establishing New World colonies was a business venture to solve economic problems in Europe. So, it is a wise decision to send whites to a land thousands of miles away, far from daily control, but reachable for interventions to prevent any thought of secession or independence.
The 1500s was a period when the population of europe was mixed as in India. There is no historical document that describes Europe as a land of white people. With Black Europeans ruling, White people began to take over the rule of europe through inter-marriage with Black Rulers: Black people were invaded via the bedroom. Racism was a philosophy of necessity in the 1700s (read Black Athena)to (by my own analysis) justify the decision to partition Africa and share it among the new all-white ruled europe. The period of philosophy formulation was during the mulatto phase of european rule. Princess Charlotte, the mulatto wife of Black King George III most likely gave her backing to the Gottingen Institute because the development of the racial philosophy to justify the dispossession of Africa accelerated after his death.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
^^^ imagine if this stuff was taught in schools
Posted by mena7 (Member # 20555) on :
I agree with Jantavanta in the 1500 Europe was a mixed continent like the Indian subcontinent, with a black European ruling elite. It is geographicaly impossible for Europe to have been all white from the classical era to the 18 Cent CE colonial era. Europe is next door to black and mulato North Africa.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by mena7: It is geographicaly impossible for Europe to have been all white from the classical era to the 18 Cent CE colonial era. Europe is next door to black and mulato North Africa. [/QB]
Europe is not all white currently
Posted by jantavanta (Member # 20328) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by mena7: It is geographicaly impossible for Europe to have been all white from the classical era to the 18 Cent CE colonial era. Europe is next door to black and mulato North Africa.
Europe is not all white currently
As mike111 explained, wars and shipping-off to the USA and Caribbean has depopulated Europe of its indigenous Black population. But the traces still exist in the Black hair and Black eyes of all the european aristocrats uptill the 1900s.
Here is an 1899 photo of Alexandra of Denmark Princess Alexandra of Denmark (b1844, d1920), a quadroon or octoroon from the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg she became the wife of Edward VII of the U.K
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by mena7: It is geographicaly impossible for Europe to have been all white from the classical era to the 18 Cent CE colonial era. Europe is next door to black and mulato North Africa.
Europe is not all white currently [/QB]
LOL no kidding, stop lying LOL
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by jantavanta:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb]
quote:Originally posted by mena7: It is geographicaly impossible for Europe to have been all white from the classical era to the 18 Cent CE colonial era. Europe is next door to black and mulato North Africa.
Europe is not all white currently
As mike111 explained, wars and shipping-off to the USA and Caribbean has depopulated Europe of its indigenous Black population.
If there is a black population of multi millions currently living in Europe how is it that they are not the descendants of the indigenous Black population of Europe but Black people from America are?
That just seems like a theory made up by jealous blacks in America who are in such denial of their Africaness that they will even rob other blacks who actually live in Europe the chances that they are descendants of the indigenous Black population of Europe in a mad quest for the oreo cookie
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
African immigration to Europe:
Wiki
African immigrants to Europe include European citizens and residents born in or with ancestors from Africa. Though it has increased massively in recent decades, immigration from Africa to Europe is not a recent phenomenon, with Africa and Asia traditionally being the largest sources of migration to the continent.
With over one million migrants a year and 299,000 asylum applications in 2006 alone, Europe is the primary destination for African migrants worldwide. Migratory flows from Africa currently make up the largest share of migration into Europe. The majority of African migrants living overseas are in Europe, approximately 4.6 million, according to the International Organization for Migration. But the Migration Policy Institute believes there are between seven and eight million irregular African immigrants living in the EU - the actual number changing depending on regularisation schemes in the member states. About two-thirds of Africans in Europe are from North Africa (particularly Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia). An increasing number of immigrants are from Western Africa (mainly Ghana, Nigeria, and Senegal).
The Council of Europe records people according to their birthplace and their self-described ancestry, although aggregated data for Africa is split between "Sub-Saharan" and "North Africa". The number of migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa in Europe are between 3,5 and 8 million, concentrated mainly in Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom.
Not to mention migrants from the Caribbean and Latin America.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
^^^^ here somebody who claims that whites lie about blacks in America, that in their encyclopedias they covered up the fact that blacks in America are primarily descended from indigenous black Europeans who were deported to America> and are not primarily of African descent
> now he puts up an entry from a white enclyclopedia and says it's true about European blacks what complete hypocrisy
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
^He,he,he,he:
It's getting harder and harder for you to lie, isn't it! That's because when you lie, I try to put my foot as far up your butt as I can.
Well, the same thing is happening to all Albino liars, that's why Wiki said it like that - to cover their asses.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
let's see what wikipedia, the source Mike used says about Black People
Wiki
Black people
The term black people is an everyday English-language phrase, often used in North America to refer to Americans and Canadians of Sub-Saharan African descent In the first 200 years that black people were in the United States, they commonly referred to themselves as Africans. In Africa, people primarily identified themselves by ethnic group (closely allied to language) and not by skin color. Individuals identified as Ashanti, Igbo, Bakongo, or Wolof. But when Africans were brought to the Americas, they were often combined with other groups from Africa, and individual ethnic affiliations were not generally acknowledged by English colonists. In areas of the Upper South, different ethnic groups were brought together. This is significant as Africans came from a vast geographic region: the West African coastline stretching from Senegal to Angola and in some cases from the south-east coast such as Mozambique. A new identity and culture was born that incorporated elements of the various ethnic groups and of European cultural heritage, resulting in fusions such as the Black church and Black English. This new identity was based on African ancestry and slave status rather than membership in any one ethnic group
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
^Whoever wrote those chapters is narrowmind and subjective not objective on African history.
Then again, it's wiki.
Posted by Mike111 (Member # 9361) on :
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^Whoever wrote those chapters is narrowmind and subjective not objective on African history.
Then again, it's wiki.
Ha,ha,ha,ha:
Lioness is so stupid, all she did was to prove our point.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^Whoever wrote those chapters is narrowmind and subjective not objective on African history.
Then again, it's wiki.
Ha,ha,ha,ha:
Lioness is so stupid, all she did was to prove our point.
what point?
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^Whoever wrote those chapters is narrowmind and subjective not objective on African history.
Then again, it's wiki.
Ha,ha,ha,ha:
Lioness is so stupid, all she did was to prove our point.
what point?
That the author of that Wikipedia page isn't objective but rather subjective on African history.LOL
You know, the history you know so little about as well.
Posted by the lioness, (Member # 17353) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^Whoever wrote those chapters is narrowmind and subjective not objective on African history.
Then again, it's wiki.
Ha,ha,ha,ha:
Lioness is so stupid, all she did was to prove our point.
what point?
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: the term black is a definition to refer to ethnic groups of Africa or African descent.
oh, this point
Posted by Troll Patrol (Member # 18264) on :
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by the lioness,:
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: ^Whoever wrote those chapters is narrowmind and subjective not objective on African history.
Then again, it's wiki.
Ha,ha,ha,ha:
Lioness is so stupid, all she did was to prove our point.
what point?
quote:Originally posted by Troll Patrol: the term black is a definition to refer to ethnic groups of Africa or African descent.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
