...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Religion
»
Female circumcison in Islam
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
UBB Code™ Images not permitted.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GetYourFilthyHandsOffMyDesert: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by sultan.org(In Makka ): [qb] Urinary tract infections. Urinary tract infections. Circumcision decreases the risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) tenfold in the first year of life, and the decreased risk continues for the first five years of life. Ginsberg and McCracken first reported a relationship between circumcision and UTI in 1982. Of 62 male infants admitted to the hospital with UTI, they found that 95% were uncircumcised. Wiswell's 1985 hospital-based study reported fewer UTIs during the first year of life in circumcised males. A much larger, two-part study by Wiswell and Roscelli the following year confirmed these initial findings. In the first part of the larger study, which included 3,924 infants born at Brooke Army Medical Center, the frequency of UTI in uncircumcised males was 1.1%, ten times the frequency found in circumcised males (0.1%). in the second part of the study, of 422,328 infants born over a 10-year period, uncircumcised males made up only 19.3% of the study population but accounted for 70.8% of the UTIs. Even more significant, as the rate of circumcision decreased over the years, the number of UTIs increased. Data from 100,000 Swedish children confirmed Wiswell's findings, revealing a risk of 1.1% for uncircumcised males in the first year of life. More recently, several reports have demonstrated that the risk of UTI is lower for circumcised than uncircumcised males beyond the first year, at least through 5 years of age. A study published in December by To and colleagues supports the findings of decreased risk of UTI for circumcised males but notes that the protective effect of circumcision may be less than previously thought. http://www.rogerknapp.com/medical/circum.htm [/qb][/QUOTE]Garbage. And how easy it is to get you change your argument. You argued that circumcision should be done to increase pleasure for women. But the problem there is not every woman suffers from that closed hood thing and there's no way of knowing if a baby girl would develop such a problem later in life. Which makes your argument for routine circumcision mute. Now you pulling this UTI crap. How many people do you know who are uncircumcised and have/had UTI? How many people are uncircumcised period? You can't get any more delusional than this. It's not rocket science, all you have to do is look around you. If UTI is really that much of a risk why aren't there hundreds of millions of people in hospitals or being treated right now? Why are children dying from hunger and diseases resulting from unclean water and not UTI (at least not that I've heard of) ? If you really care that much of the subject, drop everything you're doing and go down to the nearest clinic near you. Ask them how many patients came today to be treated for UTI. I bet if you research tonsil infection you will find more cases than those with UTI. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3