...
EgyptSearch Forums Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» EgyptSearch Forums » Politics » "neutral effect" or "neutral and positive effect": Which is it? » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
UBB Code™ Images not permitted.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™  

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
The Explorer
Member # 14778
 - posted
That's what elements of the American media and business bourgeoisie are saying. Really?


Juan Williams for instance, says that Obama's policies has either been "neutral" on the economy, or "positive" on the economy. It cannot be said that it is anything else other than one or two of these descriptions. Economist Ben Stein seems to be leaning in this direction as well, on opinion.

...while investor Wayne Rogers says that Obama has had no impact whatsoever, i.e. basically "irrelevant", on the economy. He pointed to the Congress and the Senate as the real players in the economy.

As one might have guessed, these personalities were all fox news guests last night.
 



Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3