...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Hetheru's Corner
»
TITLE: Portrait of an Ibero-Maurusian
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TRPL_DRKNSS: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Antalas: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [qb] And like I said modern arabs can score as much as 70% natufian ancestry yet are far from looking black [/qb][/QUOTE]Bruh, you cant be this dull. The study is not Debunked nor "Outdated". Its a study on cranial variables. The study you posted i believe deals with limb proportions. There are populations both ancient and modern from the Levant, Southern Arabia, India, Oceania, East Asia and the surrounding islands as well as the Americas that LOOK like Sub Saharan Africans without having a close relations to them. I have tried to drive this through your thick skull but you keep letting it leak out. You CANT do a PHYSICAL reconstruction based on a GENETIC variant found in modern people because that genetic variation PRECEDES that modern phenotype and originated among a different phenotype. This has been proved time and time again by looking at the cranial affinities of the earliest Genetically sampled individuals. Thus Natufian can look "Black" and have cranial affinities grouping them with Niger Congo Speakers while having NO Niger Congo Ancestry.......similar to Papuans, Similar to Melanesians, Similar to Early Americans, similar to nearly every upper paleolithic skeleton. [/qb][/QUOTE]If I may add: South African populations from the Middle Pleistocene‚ represented by the 259‚000 year-old Florisbad partial cranium‚ show Australasian affinities according to [URL=https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11213-w]Aurélien Mounier[/URL] ; and probably even had straight hair according [URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440309000399]Lucinda Backwell[/URL]. Even Late Pleistocene South Africans‚ represented by the 36,000-year-old Hofmeyr cranium‚ share "strongest morphometric affnities with Upper Paleolithic Eurasians" but are "more distant from recent sub-Saharan African populations‚" according to [URL=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1136294]F. E. Grine[/URL] [IMG]https://i.ibb.co/dbbPT3N/Late-Pleistocene-Human-Skull-from-Hofmeyr-South-Africa-and-Modern-Human-Origins.jpg[/IMG] According to [URL=https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0024024]Katerina Harvati[/URL]‚ the 35‚000 year-old Iwo Eleru specimens from West Africa (which exhbit a mosaic of archaic/plesiomorphic/basal and modern/derived traits — like their contemporaries in [URL=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.016]Southwest China[/URL])‚ most closely resemble an Australian female‚ when compared with living populations. [IMG]https://i.ibb.co/ftWmBSf/Screenshot-2022-08-13-at-17-53-29.png[/IMG] [URL=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.04.003]Crevecoeur[/URL] also observes some osteological resemblances between Late Pleistocene Ishango specimens from Central Africa and Andamanese Islanders‚ and some "stronger affinities with Middle Paleolithic specimens from Qafzeh and Skhul rather than with recent, chronologically and geographically closer modern human populations." [IMG]https://i.ibb.co/Tw7tPgp/Screenshot-2022-08-13-at-17-47-30.png[/IMG] Lastly‚ [URL=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8850181/]Tsuneiko Hanihara[/URL] points out that Early Iranians share craniofacial features with modern Black South Africans‚ and cautions that "morphological traits do not necessarily reflect the genetic background." [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3