...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
THE BLACK PHAROAHS
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Nebsen: [qb] I think this February issue of National Geographic should be swamped by emails & letters from members of Egyptseach. I would love to see Doug M. & Djehuti give natinal Geographic a Real History Lession on Kush & Egypt ! In fact I will write one myself ! :D [/qb][/QUOTE]They would never publish their letters, you have to give your real name. The troll Clarence (aka Djehuti) is too cowardly to do this. . [/qb][/QUOTE]And I guess Mr. Clyde, Mr. Afrocentric, that you SUPPORT this nonsense from National Geographic? Hmmm...... It sure sounds like you do. [/qb][/QUOTE]I look forward to reading the article. I am excited that such a piece is being published in Nat Geo. It's just an article. We all know that Egypt is presented as a "white" civilization. Granted all the rulers of Egypt were Blacks--the fact that they even discuss Kush is welcome because it will allow people less informed then yourself, to learn that another great civilization existed along the Nile in addition to Egypt. Moreover it lends credibility to you guys. You see many Blacks like yourself, don't believe something is true unless it is validated by Europeans, for example Kittle and Keita are right because some journal published by Europeans published their article--while Diop and others "may" be wrong because many Europeans dispute their scholarship. As a result, once some Blacks see something supported by the status quo, they feel that when Blacks say the same thing they must be right cause the European said it first. I see nothing wrong with this article. I live in the hood and I have taught in the hood for years. The average Afro-American believes the Egyptians were Blacks. It's only people like us , College trained who don't interact with the average AA, who feel we have to argue the fact. I have known this reality since I was 10 years old when the Moorish Scientists and Black Muslims spread the word on 47th street. Moreover, a guy now dead, named Hamurabi, made some great newspapers discussing ancient Black History themes. The article is great news. Thank's again Seeking for giving us this piece. . [/qb][/QUOTE]Well, thanks for showing us how some of the so-called defenders of Afrocentrism are selling out the cause that they created. If you think for one second this is the first time Nat. Geo. has discussed Kush, you are sadly mistaken. It isn't and it certainly isn't as if nobody knows who the Kushites were or how powerful. That was known known even before the French expedition to Egypt, as many European travelers along the had Nile noted. So, this is pure nonsense from beginning to end. It sounds like you are HAPPY that some whites threw you a crumb by claiming Kush was black, which is EXACTLY what they want. They want to use Kush as a TOKEN black kingdom on the Nile to appease blacks so that they can pretend Egypt was white.... Dude. If you are going to tell your history and promote it then do so, but don't talk Bullsh*t. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3