...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
OT: 100 things you SHOULD know about Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by legeonas: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mystery Solver: I take it that you don't know the answer to the simple question?[/QUOTE]Apparently you don't know what a relative comparison is. [QUOTE]I take it that you didn't bother reading the link. If you did, then tell me what is wrong with William's assessements from the concrete evidence he studied.[/QUOTE]Apparently you did not read Frank Yurco. [QUOTE]The study *supports* the idea that Ta-Seti [in so-called "Nubia"] elites were integrated into Nagadan "elite social layer", as suggested by archeological evidence. If you understood this point, then "great" for you.[/QUOTE]No it does not. It supports that they had similar phenotypes. That is it. Could be they had common ancestors 500 years before. It does not mean one derives from the other. [QUOTE]Apparently the person who wrote this so-called "critique" didn't bother to read the study in question; Zakrzewski mentioned in detail the tombs and burial sites [including periods they belong to] where the specimens came from.[/QUOTE]Apparently he held questionable the sources of those places because of their lack of recency. [QUOTE]See post above. No one cares about a 'critique' that fails to 'refute' the findings in question, which would be to say that the specimens, as described as "tropical body plans", is inaccurate, and why.[/QUOTE]Read the post again. It states that the sample was not comprehensive enough and that more studies had to be done. [QUOTE]In which case, you had no point in talking about those studies in the first place.[/QUOTE]Hardly. The study took place. I just don't have it. Much like you guys claim Diop's studies. [QUOTE]A hypothesis without basis. The burden is on you to produce evidence that "Meroitic" script develops from "Europeans" or "Indians", as opposed to the Meroites themselves, from pre-existing Nile-Valley developed scripts [demotic and heratic].[/QUOTE]Similar amount of lettering, is one coincidence that could be a basis for the hypothesis. As I did not write it, it is irrelevant to me. It is as valid as the one that it only evolved from Meroitic, especially considering their is no reson for the differentiation. [QUOTE]What technology did Europe have at the height of Malian complex's wealth? However knowledge in Mali is well attested to in its wealth and the body of evidential material of literature, and other associated relics saved from that period. What was "London's" technology at the height of the Malian wealth? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_technology [quote]I ask again, what "primary texts", not "Ecowas" [Ecowas doesn't date to that period, nor is it a "primary text"], dating back to the period coinciding with the height of Malian complex, tells us about the population numbers of that complex? [/QUOTE]First answer your own question. What primary sources do you have? Encarta is the one that states that it was 40,000 in the 16th century. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3