...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
New E3b paper totally destroys East African "Caucasoid" myth
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Knowledgeiskey718: [QB] ^^^That post is so imbecilic, contradicting and evasive, I don't even know where to start. I really shouldn't even waste my time with your strawmen, but hey let's go..... :rolleyes: [QUOTE]Jackassoben brays: there was no "admixture" between Paleolithic Asians and incoming post OOA African migrants to produce any new population. By the time post OOA Africans came Europeans were not paleolithic, Asian or black. [/QUOTE]Lmao, now you're acting like you're telling me this? :rolleyes: Anyway, as we look at the genetic and skeletal record of migrations and admixture from post OOA Africans into Europe, we see it was well after Paleolithic Asians had settled Europe, and were already gradually adapting to their environments. [QUOTE] :confused: : writes: And these modern inhabitants (whites) didn't merge with incoming Africans to produce a new population, which would be a "hybrid". [/QUOTE]Of course when post OOA Africans mixed with Asians in Europe the Asians weren't white, but they were considerably cold adapted, during the LUP and Mesolithic, Europeans matched up closer to recent Europeans in limb proportions indicating cold adaptations. Whereas their Paleolithic ancestors were tropically adapted and matched closely to recent Africans. [QUOTE] :confused: : writes: You see, hybrids [b]are not the "Mixing of two populations with morphological differentiation"[/b] you silly illiterate child. [b]Hybrids are[/b] products of two or more of the alleged racial groups; or to put it another way, [b] products of two populations with morphological differentiation. [/b] [/QUOTE]Lmao, did you just say that? Wow, talk about contradictions, this is the worst. Remember: Anything you say, can, and will be used against you.... Bwahahahahahahaahahahaahaa :D [QUOTE] :confused: : writes: So Bowcock et al. argues: Europeans are hybrids, products of already differentiated Asian (not post Paleolithic Europeans) and Africans; arose as a result of admixture between two already differentiated populations Asian (not post Paleolithic Europeans) and Africans. You still fail to prove this. [/QUOTE]Post paleolithic Europeans are Asian derived humans who received admixture from post OOA Africans to create the modern day European gene pool. Of course Bowcock argues that Europeans are a result of Asians and Africans coming together to create the modern European gene pool, which has been thoroughly validated many times. [QUOTE] :confused: : writes: In fact, what you actually show is not two differentiated populations merging to produce a new, not racial divergence, but simple population expansion and evolution. [/QUOTE]Girl shutup. I proved Europeans are result of Asians and Africans. Point blank. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3