...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
NYTimes article on Saharan Graves
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Boofer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Knowledgeiskey718: [qb] Originally posted by Boofer [QUOTE]Knowledgeiskey, what is the significance of your post? Are you simply showing me "black" Africans that have Mediterranean skulls? [/QUOTE]Actually, if you did read what I posted. You would've realized, I was showing how Africans are falsely classified as Mediterranean. The skull possesses a prominent occipital bun and is prognathous among others.. Is this somehow Mediterranean to you? If so, which group, please elaborate... nitwit?? [IMG]http://www.plosone.org/journals/plosone/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0002995.g005&representation=PNG_M[/IMG] (A)-Top view of mid-Holocene adult male (G1B11; ~4645 B.C.E.) buried in a recumbent hyperflexed posture. (B)-Bottom view of burial in A showing a mud turtle carapace (Pelusios adansonii) in contact with the ventral aspect of the pelvic girdle. [b](C)-Skull from burial in A and B showing high calvarium, narrow zygomatic width and more prognathous face. --Paul C. Sereno[/b] [/qb][/QUOTE]It seems you assumed that I knew what features of the skull were considered "Mediterranean" in the first place. I do not. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3