...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
NYTimes article on Saharan Graves
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bettyboo: [QB] "Knowledge" you missed my point. I never said he said that one of the skulls ARE the ancestors of the Egyptians, so-called berber, tuareg. I watch the interview and [he] pretended to use uncertainty to confuse people into believing [they] are unaware of such differences so [they] must find out more information about the so-called skulls. The agenda is already laid out. He already knows what the outcome and analyses will be. My question is... what is so odd about two skulls incongruent with one another. Why do that pull such amazement? Why do the skulls 'suppose' to look or be the same? Why shouldn't anyone find different skulls that comprise of different facial features? What is so interesting about that? Why does it need studies? Certain regions or land areas in Europe houses different groups with different phenotype. Why can't it be possible in Africa? If it is possible, why do it wound up with a "true negro" and "not-negro" concept? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3