...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
BLACK EUROPEAN ROYALTY
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Egmond Codfried: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Marc Washington: [qb] . . Here is some food for thought concerning black, some might say African, royalty of Europe: [/QUOTE] http://huguenots-france.org/france/celebrites/images/noue2.jpg [IMG]http://huguenots-france.org/france/celebrites/images/noue2.jpg[/IMG] [Francois de la Nouë, Huguenoths leader, nobleman, historian, military leader] Well I guess Marc Washington understands where I'm coming from with my research. Is this your real name? I was born as Egmond Codfried, I publish as Egmond Codfried and have no use for tacky nick's. It frightens me as if someone is wearing a mask and is up to no good. There are Black's in the European diaspora, and they need to be researched from a afrocentric viewpoint. According to Kaplan The Rise of the Magi it all really started with Charles IV of Luxembourg, having African courtiers and using Moors in royal, propogandistic images. I would say that he himself was an African European. According to Kaplan the image of the Black Magi of King was perfected by 1500, where his study ends. My research starts with 1500 and ends with the French Revolution. In 1500, with the Renaissance, I see a coloured European nation, taking over. They had classical knowledge and claimed Blue Blood, and Blue Men used to be the name of the Black's in medieval Europe (500-1500). They always showed the Moor as a Classical African. So they were Black and coloured, freely marrying among each other to become 'a fixed mulatto race.' They were like a 'pocket' of African and Asian DNA among the White's. From the iconography I would say that some looked more African, others more Asian or White. They were sometimes depicted as white of skin. But it's very possible that there was a major destruction of black images and portraits around the French Revolution (1789), so we might not get to see all there was. I also found proof that there are still portraits which are kept out of the public sphere. Black or White is a phenotype, it does not say anything about merit. As a researcher I'm out to dig up the facts and reconstruct the past, not to pass moral justment. But from my research I conclude that racism against Blacks came when the White's in Europe wanted to free themselves from this Blue Blooded oppression. This makes sense to me. They had to show the white's that Black was not superiour, but evil.so fake science was employed to come up with all these grotesque visions of Blackness. Which still haunts us today. This coloured elite portraited themselves with a Moor, a classical African and had a Black identity, a Black consiousness. Just like a Black leader who might be a tyrant but has a Black identity, wich will not prevent him from enslaving, deceiving, robbing and killing other Black's. Slavery was started with this European Black and coloured elite. But slavery could not last this long without the help of other Black and coloured Africans. So even today I watch Black's who attack other Black's just as Massa told them to do! In Holland every taxpayer pays for the upkeep of museums. So I would like to see Black's visiting these 'Halls of White Supremacy' and getting in on the action. Now they are only janitors and cleaners, not staff or curators. So I like Blacks to be asking questions about how history is presented. Why does a publice museum refuses to show Maurits Huygens? So what if he has African traits. Are Africans less human? Egmond Codfried [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3