...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Keita: " Ancient Egyptian Origins" - NatGeo (2008)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by JMT: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by KemsonReloaded: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by JMT: [qb] S.O.Y. Keita may very well be a brilliant scientist. But what amazes me is the extent to which people develop a complex to rationalize Keita's actions. Keita's reluctance to simply say "yes, I believe the Ancient Egyptians were black Africans" is rather troubling. If Keita believes the Ancient Egyptians were undoubtedly black (I've read on this forum there's little to no evidence which contradicts the hard evidence of the black Egyptian premise presented by Keita) then he should explicitly use the word BLACK. See how easy that was. There are methods for Keita to be diplomatic in his approach while conveying his true feelings [b]based on the grounds of his own scientific examinations [/b] without sidestepping the issue for the sake of appeasement for those who sign his checks. I understand everyone has bills to pay. But I don't understand why some choose to compromise their character or beliefs to coddle a dichotomy which isn't interested in the truth. Everything people do is political. But there comes a time when you just have to stand up and throw that political BS out the window and go with your instinct. [/qb][/QUOTE]The word "Black" is clearly a very powerful word. The Black Africans of Ancient Kemet had symbolized the word Black with incredibly powerful meaning and upon discovering these meanings, it has been a primary priority for Euro-Western specialists to pervert, bastardized and completely destroy almost all positive associations to the word "Black". White/Jewish/Arabs have attempted to negate all positive meanings and elements associated with the word "Black" at mountainous levels. We can see a start of institutionalized attack on the word "Black" by Euro-Western specialists simply by looking at the definition of the word "Black" in the dictionary (paper dictionary or dictionary.com). In this case, for the sake of convenience, I used dictionary.com. Dictionary.com defines the word "Black" in its first two sections as follows: 1. lacking hue and brightness; absorbing light without reflecting any of the rays composing it. 2. characterized by absence of light; enveloped in darkness: a black night. "a black night"? are there any other nights of different color we don't know of? Unfortunately, #2 undoes some valid meanings in #1. Black represent the absorption of all light therefore, it is the total presence of all light in there most intensive state. In fact, what we perceive as light can only be seen only if Black color or Black-element exists as foundation. How can light be seen in light? Light can only be seen in the dark (Black). Meaning "Black" is actually light or a light matter allowing all other lights to be seen. Yes, Black light is real! Next Dictionary.com goes on the define the word Black in more negative ways: " 5. gloomy; pessimistic; dismal: a black outlook. 6. deliberately; harmful; inexcusable: a black lie. 7. boding ill; sullen or hostile; threatening: black words; black looks. ... 9. without any moral quality or goodness; evil; wicked: His black heart has concocted yet another black deed. 10. indicating censure, disgrace, or liability to punishment: a black mark on one's record. 11. marked by disaster or misfortune: black areas of drought; Black Friday. 15. illegal or underground: The black economy pays no taxes. 17. deliberately false or intentionally misleading: black propaganda. " The above are all direct and continuous efforts to remove almost all positive symbolism and meaning of the word "Black" by Euro-Western specialist. For instance, there is no such thing as a "black lies", if so "white lies" would be worst than any "black lie" considering the amount of resources exerted for centuries now hiding, perverting, destroying and scattering the foundational roles of Black Africans in human history. Words like "illegal", "disgrace", "misfortune", "disaster", "drought", "harmful", "hostile", "threatening" being associated with the "Black" have absolutely nothing to do with "Black", yet, they are attempts by Euro-Western specialists to destroy positive associations of the word "Black". Furthermore, dictionary.com describes "Black" as follows: "9. without any moral quality or goodness; evil; wicked: His black heart has concocted yet another black deed." These were nothing more than attempts reverse the spiritual symbolical meaning of what Black actually means and alway meant before the coming to Whites/Jews and/or Arabs; "Black" was always symbolized as: sacred, holy, powerful, goodwill, reborn, resurrection...and so on. People like S.O.Y. Keita are in a struggle attempting not to make White people feel bad. It is clear that Ancient Kemetians were 100% Black Africans from head to toe and the very presence of the word "Black" along with the word "African" is of such power that it gives an effect similar to having mountain sized lies come crashing down. Even the worst derogatory terms directed at Black people begin to loose their negative effects. Suddenly, the centuries of resources spent towards the great White/Jewish causes in destroying all things positive associated with "Black" is reduced to nothingness. This of cause becomes a big blow to White/Jewish dogma of Black African history. For the White, Jewish and Arabs elites and specialists, as well as their greater populations to acknowledge the undeniable positivity and foundational roles "Black African" have played throughout human evolution, history and civilization, Black African peoples must continue to research, study, document and publish Black African history no matter who else does it. Black African people must also use Black whenever it is appropriate to do so. The late, great Pharaoh of intellect, Dr. Cheikh Anta Diop directly attributed Black African accomplishments to Black Africans (Negroes) whenever it was appropriate without resorting tricky terms to satisfy racist White or Jewish persons. In many of S.O.Y. Keita, when dealing with direct genetic research (blood and dna), as well as scientific markings of these specialized areas, classification by skin color/skin tone/features are mostly inappropriate because of the massive varieties humans possess. On the social level, because of the damages cause flawed and racist Eurocentric system of teaching, which has conditioned many individual to visualize Black people and the word "Black" as negative by default, it imperative that good willed scholars directly and explicitly cite and use "Black African(s)" when attributing credits of accomplishments in regards ancient African histories and civilizations. S.O.Y. Keita reluctance to utilize the word "Black", or "Negro" or even "Negroid" in his work when dealing with the laymen masses is the ensure his checks keep coming. Maybe Black scientist and specialists had to be a bit more creative and work a bit harder for revealing and maintaining the truth, but Cheikh Anta Diop's check kept coming, as was Ivan Van Sertima's, John Clark's and many others. Maybe one day even Keita will find a way to actually say "yes, Ancient Kemet were 100% indigenous Black Africans and all genetic findings support it." Until then, the rest of us will continue to build on the great works of Keita and other intellectual giants and by that time, Keita needn't be pressured into using the proper term "Black African" because everyone else around him will be using it. [/qb][/QUOTE]I nominate you to take Keita's place, KemsonReloaded. (smile) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3