...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
The Mechta-Afalou/Mechtoids redux thread
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: It doesn't constitute a type, since there is no single look between the specimens that are misleadingly designated as such. The articles presented here further clarify this fact. [/QUOTE]Good example: [i]the [b]most ancient[/b], i.e. [b]those from Taforalt[/b] in Morocco, [b]Afalou-bou-Rhummel[/b] in Algeria and [b]Singa[/b] in the Sudan, [b]cannot be considered as being either Negro or San[/b], whereas the [b]later[/b] Jebel Sahaba sample (c. 12000 B.P.), the Wadi Halfa (c. 11950 - 6400 B.P.) and the Mechta-el-Arbi individuals (c. 8500 B.P.) and the Jebel Moya sample (c. 2950 - 2350 B.P.) are [b]not significantly removed from the Negro populations[/b].[/i] And the author goes onto say... [i]Apart from the Mechta 3 individual, they are also [b]not significantly removed from the San male population[/b], but the Jebel Sahaba and the Jebel Moya males and the Jebel Sahaba 8905 individual are all significantly different from the San female population.[/i] They don't even have the same degree of robusticity. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3