...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
More proof of "black" Moors
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Sundjata: [QB] ^^You don't heed information as if to remain willfully ignorant. There was no "Indo-European" invasion per se because "Indo-European" doesn't describe any particular set of people, it describes a languages family. A dominant theory suggests its origins in Anatolia (Asia) and thus, rendering the said term a misnomer as it doesn't entail "European people". It's been pointed out before as well that more than half the words in ancient Greek were not accounted for in the Indo-European language, which even Palaima confirms in a critique of Martin Bernal, writing "[i]The lexicon of ancient Greek is noteworthy for the large proportion of potentially non-Indo-European words (60 per cent or more)[/i]". The earliest Greeks themselves described a "non-Greek" presence already settled in Macedonia and it's curious how Macedonians according to Arnaiz-Villena, share in substantial frequencies African genes most common to Ethiopians and others below the Sahara. ^I just think that it's closed minded, lame and stubborn to suggest that you have all of the answers and nothing else should/can be considered contrary to your conclusions based on ridiculous appeals to authority. You keep re-emphasizing pathetically how "real historians" won't accept such views, "mainstream scholarship" rejects such ideas, I mean, c'mon now, you seem childish. You keep asking people to take historiography, well you obviously need a few more courses in critical thinking. [i]"An appeal to authority or argument by authority is a type of argument in logic. It bases the truth value of an assertion on the authority, knowledge, expertise, or position of the source asserting it. It is also known as argument from authority, argumentum ad verecundiam (Latin: argument to respect) or ipse dixit (Latin: he himself said it). It is one method of obtaining propositional knowledge, but a fallacy in regard to syllogistic logic, [b]because the validity of a syllogism is independent of the qualities of the source putting it forward. The converse case is an ad hominem attack: to imply that a claim is false because the asserter lacks authority or is otherwise objectionable in some way[/b]."[/i] ^^Look.. Start offering some substance in your replies instead of making up accusations and claims about hypotheticals (what this person would think of your view or what would happen if you said that at this conference), it's silly! Stop pre-occupying your self with imaginary mainstream scholars and systematically refute the evidence being advanced. That's all I ask. If you can't do that, why not just ignore the people on this forum, since you think they're all quacks anyways and won't even give them the humane respect of offering up a thoughtful rebuttal. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3