...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
True History vs False History
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Marc Washington: [QB] [b][Mind over M writes][/b] quote:Originally posted by Marc Washington: [Marc writes] [i]The straight / wavy hair of Australians is surely the result of white men sleeping around:[/i] Actually Marc, as told you over and over this is the same outdated view held by Eurocentrists so why do you adhere to it? Eurocentrists also posit that straighter hair in Africa is due to admixture with white men which we know from genetic analysis is certainly NOT true, so why do you adhere to it? Genetics (Y-dna and Mtdna) disprove all of your erroneous claims Marc, Mike and Clyde too bad so sad...There is no evidence for these people being admixed with white men sorry guys. [b][Marc writes][/b] The human being some 7 million years ago emerged from what was then the human being/chimpanzee [b]clade[/b]: i.e. a single ancestor from which a branch came leading to human beings along one line and chimpanzees along the other. As chimpanzees have straight hair along with other apes, it does stand to reason that the first human beings had straight hair. However, my point was that some rather assume the aborigines have naturally wavy / straight hair but that does not take into account that in a single generation, an African parent with woolly hair and a white parent with straight hair almost invariably produces offspring who WILL NOT have woolly hair. The hair of offspring will be wavy / straight - sometimes very curly. It is a fact that when Captain Cook and the other white men entered the Pacific, they had sex with every woman they could get their hands on and this resulted in offspring who naturally would be in large numbers and show a phenotypic shift from original aborigine characteristics to white. It must be a fact that some degree of the wavy / straight character seen in Australian aborigine hair reflects hundreds of years of white men's sperm just as there are millions of Americans passing for white who trace their ancestry to African slaves but racial dilution washed the black skin color and kinky hair away. Brown and tan Afro Americans have white men who monkeyed around with the black women in their ancestry. But, based on the pictures the arrogant, presumptuous, racist Doug showed of early aborigine (not the penciled, faulty drawings but photograph) [IMG]http://www.beforebc.de/Made.by.Humankind/Real.People/02-16-100-00-30a.jpg[/IMG] aborigine hair was more like African hair, i.e. when not fashioned, standing out like a ball/bush or helmet on the head: In the 1800s, it looked more curly, wavy and tightly curled and more often puffy and rounded bush-like than the loose wavy, purely straight version we see so often today. But, my argument is not with the aborigine. I speak of the full-featured, woolly haired people, that dimension of Africans as my definition is constructed, who stand at the foundation of world cultures. . . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3