...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
True History vs False History
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] @ TAP. ahem!! listen up! the topic started with the historical era. See St. Tigray's question. The whole premise is about "African" looking artifacts from about 500ad - 2000bc. Pleeeassseee shut up!! why don't you post in one of Jimmy Walker's or Derky's thread. We will jon you there later. This could easily be mistaken for "African". But is it African in the contemporary sense? [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/Shiva_Dong_Duong_Style.jpg/450px-Shiva_Dong_Duong_Style.jpg[/IMG] As I said there are many who believe Anyone with these features are African regardless to their genetic lineage or place of birth. The strength of that argument is . . .YES. . . all these people inherited these features from mother Afica.. . so they should be classified as Africans and since the white skin is NOT an African feature then Asian and European leucoderms are not "ancestral" ie Africans. In other words ALL y-hg lineage may be African, it is the autosomal feature (genetics) that did not originate in Africa makes one NON-FRICAN. Autosomal gene makes one non-African? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3