...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
True History vs False History
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] @ Doug. (will post on hg-I later Mike, if someone doesn't beat me to it. But check out the 50+page thread). "Nonsense" point of view, maybe. The only point of view I emphaticaly posted on is. . . .I supported Marc on his premise "Whites are new to Europe". The genetic data coming out is now supporting my nonsense point of view that HG-I is the group that developed the white skin. This gene developed during the LGM probably through genetic bottleneck ie isolation via diet/lack of UV. From there the gene spread south into the rest of Europe. I beleive the paper said "selective sweep" occured around 1500BC. Point is just as Melanese/Austialians may look similar to mainland Africans but are genetically very distant. The data is now coming out that HG-I and hg-R1b/a may be also genetically distant although they look very similar. That is MY nonsense point of veiw. And as I did Explorer, let me spoon feed you.. . .looks like you missed it also. To SOME people (I am on the fence with this)negroes=negritos=negroid=black====AFRICAN. Therefore IF you hold that point of view, YES, Africans built these ancient monuments. IF you do NOT hold that point of view then Africans did NOT build these ancient monuments. Both group agree that black people built these monuments. The debate is what they should be classified as... . . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3