...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
True History vs False History
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Marc Washington: [qb] . . [b][Doug the delusionary racist writes][/b] Yes Marc, there were blacks in ancient China. But all of them were not blacks and there are STILL Chinese who aren't black with features EXACTLY like those above. So are they AFRICANS? [b][Marc writes][/b] I am not going to play this silly game with you posing pictures of people you know I will say are not Africans as they don't fit the definition I made. By the way. The second picture of the man with the deformed mouth and teeth. Would you post a picture of a white person like that? . . [b][Doug writes]:[/b] Africans(indigenous) did not build ancient China, the Maya civilizations or the civilizations of South Asia and the Pacific. The indigenous people of these areas are not and were not Africans, no matter if they were black and woolly haired.. [b][Marc writes]:[/b] You are a delusional racist to deny an existant reality. You can't stand the word African used in a context your racist self can't stomach. Here is the definition of [b]definition:[/b] [i]A definition is a formal passage describing the meaning of a term (a word or phrase). Terms have different meanings in different contexts. A stipulative definition explains the speaker's immediate intentional meaning.[/i] Here is my stipulative explanation of the word "African." [b]African:[/b] A person, such as the aborigine of Australia, with woolly or wiry hair and full facial features who have given the world its civilzations though those coming after while carrying those civilizations on have disenfranchised and subjugated such persons. [b][Doug writes]:[/b] Africans(indigenous) did not build the civilizations of South Asia and the Pacific [b][Marc writes]:[/b] Yeah. Right. These guys are from the battle ship Galactica. [b]South Asia and the Pacific:[/b] [IMG]http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/02-16-400-05.jpg[/IMG] http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/02-16-400-05.html [b][Dr. Winters writes]:[/b] The Indus Valley civilization was founded by Dravidian speaking people who came from Africa. This is supported by the archaeological evidence. The Dravidians were very recent to India. They were part of the C-Group people. [b][Marc writes]:[/b] Look at the archeological evidence below and also compare pictures 3 and 4 from Africa and the Indus Valley above where the hair styles are identical: [IMG]http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/08-10-00-16.jpg[/IMG] http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/08-10-00-16.html [IMG]http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/02-16-600-55.jpg[/IMG] http://www.beforebc.de/400_neareast/02-16-600-55.html Yo Doug. Those people up in Ontario. They ain’t Caucasian but aboriginal whites from France? Doug. I heard you are going to win the Nobel Peace Prize for your acts of great nobility showing destitute aborigines thrown into their plight by your relatives who stole their land but whom you have brought a liberty of sorts to because of all your flickr shots. I heard they going to make a statue of you too, larger than and placed next to the Statue of Liberty for the inroads you’ve in single-handedly as a white guy (or are you an aboriginal white, too?) re-classifiying the black peoples of the world. Shazamms. Me take me hat off to you. . . [/qb][/QUOTE]I posted pictures of people in China matching the features of the SO CALLED black Chinese person that you posted. You simply don't want to admit that your specious arguments about labeling people as Africans with certain features is empty and meaningless. It does not thing to describe the FACTS about the distribution, features, culture or identity of many different black populations world wide. You simply want to use the label African as a way to avoid the critical research required to prove the presence of various populations world wide who were black. And in fact your African label actually would cause a lot of black populations that did exist to be EXCLUDED because you are stuck on meaningless labels as opposed to critical core facts. Not to mention you are identifying people as African that aren't/weren't even black to begin with based on flimsy illogical evidence. Case in point, that statue is black because the paint came off. There is nothing about that statue that PROVES the people portrayed were black in any way. Not only that, but that statue has none of the features YOU call African to begin with, yet that doesn't stop you from making your usual absurd posts. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3