...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Multiregional vs. Out of Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jari-Ankhamun: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Recovering Afrocentrist: [qb] The sub-saharan African is not considered in the bible geneology table. The reason for this is the OT writers did not consider them as part of the human family. In the eyes of the hebrew writers, these people were "Beasts," marked by their lack of writing, codified law, political structure and an organized and well ordered standing army. Basically they were uncivilized. It is during the xtian age, that the geneology of Ham is extended to the far reaches of Africa (of that time). Originally, that was not the case. Ham is originally the father of four specific tribes of people; Egypt, Libya, Nubia and Canaan. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Bettyboo: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Bob_01: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Bettyboo: [qb] I don't believe in the scientific beliefs of homo erectus or those other "pre-human-type" creatures theories. I am the only one on ES who believes in the bible, and if I believe the bible to be true then I believe mankind and is multiregional and has been since the beginning. [/qb][/QUOTE]Afronut, the multi-regional hypothesis doesn't suggest that the genus homo didn't originate from Africa. It suggests that the development of anatomically modern humans occurred in parallel. That is, the homo erectus left Africa, as dark skinned individuals, and developed as pale skinned Europeans within Asia. I don't remember the Bible speaking much about European people. The cultural and linguistic history of the Bible is heavily tied to Africa. There were no Indo-Europeans in the region, nor Turks, nor Sino-Tibetans at that time. The medium of Abrahmic religions clearly has an African origin suggesting that the population was such. The Ethiopian language, Amharic, is a semitic language and Somalis are more connected to Hebrews than Germans or Swedes. Technically, the Sinai Peninsula is part of Africa and remember, the text doesn't obey popular geography. The indigenous in this region and much of Southern and West Asia are still dark. The Western experience where light skin or European approximation was a strong requisite for access to immigration is going to severely limit one's understanding. White people have a very limited role in the region. [/qb][/QUOTE]You're spewing emotional afrocentric bullshyt. I don't believe in a "homo-..." anything. Mankind is regional and there has never been pockets of people leaving out of Africa populating the world. Branches that spread out through the world came from Asia more likely from Cushitic background, and "Indo-Europeans" are in the bible. What you don't find in the bible are nappy-headed broad nose, big lip,large skull, short broad-type Africans. The only Africans that are in the Bible are nations of Ham which are heavily populated in the farthest northeast region of Africa. There is no "Africa" in the bible so I wish you people stop claiming black Asians as African or Afro-Asiatic. [/qb][/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE]Where do you pull such bullsh@t from. My God you are fucking stupid...DAMN **** you are STUPID!! Do you even read the **** you post?? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3