...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
King Tut DNA, Dr. Hawass
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bob_01: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Hammer: [qb] Barbara Watterson deals with the issue in her book on Akhenaten as well as the concept of red hair in general. Everytime red hair is brought up on this forum we get the same worn out knee jerk reaction i.e. hair dye etc. The ion microscope technology looks at hair at it's deepest level and according to Dr. Watterson is as accurate as a fingerprint. The woman has red hair, that we know. [/qb][/QUOTE]When the hell was a Egyptologist a biologist? I'm really hoping U of C, and other Art faculties get folded. I mean, is this a culture or what in that sector. I don't claim to be some expert in Baroque horse excrement. Cite the excerpt Hammer. We do it, you need to start doing that. Since we're dealing with SECONDARY evidence, why don't you post literature from biologists or forensic scientists those claims? i.e. hair color (the phene itself) is as accurate as finger identification. We also need the hair samples from Queen Tiye too. Provide the samples used for Tiye, and, also, how accurately the phene of soft keratin could be used to identify socially-constructed groups. I am finding this claim rather interesting. You'd expect someone who studied close to this area to easily spot bullshit. Oh, and we're not dealing with hair strand analysis. Instead we're referring to the pigmentation of the actual hair itself. Since we're dealing with "Caucasians", what evidence do you have that "Negroids" cannot develop such traits? What marker is involve in the development of this unique trait? Why is it found in Australia Aboriginals? Why is it found amongst Africans themselves? I mean, you're suggesting that the light brown hair, so common amongst Blacks (note: Horemheb is obviously some suburbanite) is rare. The problem here, you're comparing rather specific traits, with analysis based on cranio-facial analysis, body plain, AND melanin. The last two are most comprehensive. Why? Because it deals with the entire body. That's especially when skeletal samples suggest that greatest approximation is to Nile sub-Saharan Africans, so we must question the use of hair color. To heighten our discussion, which biologist has suggested that hair color, itself, is more reliable than those major traits? It would be akin to saying that the hair is as reliable as a source as the corpse itself. You need to valid your position. PS: Don't quote books unless you cite the literature being used. I didn't invest in an education in the sciences, that white kids don't want to do, so that I could be seeing an empirical system that is from radically different discipline. The way Horemheb cite sources, it's akin to consulting literature on say, Herrenknecht double shield TBMs, with a diameter of 9.51m in order to effectively employ microsurgery in a cardiac bypass operation. Let's stick to the discipline of discussion! :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3