...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Were the Tehenu, Tamahu, Libu ... Berbers?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by homeylu: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by The Explorer: [qb]That's exactly what I noticed about your post, a lack of understanding of what you cited. This further demonstrates your delving into a matter you obviously don't have a good grasp of. Really? I've asked you in the last post to give us concrete data of what makes the "KhoiSan" more diverse than any other group in Africa; instead you came back with more blabber and no data. LOL, this simplistic assessment is symptomatic of laypersons who simply try to debate matters they don't fully comprehend. Non-issue. Want to see naive, then here it is -- your poor reading comprehension, and hence, inability to deliver a relevant answer. Who said anything about "Europeans" et al. other than yourself of course? And so, you imagine that KhoiSans are the only groups who have this clade, right?...which would make them the "oldest" surviving people on earth. More BS. Even if it were true, which it isn't, how does having the highest frequency become tantamount to being the "oldest"? This is funny. So, only when clades come from out-groups who are not Africans, do you then consider gene flow from an out-group as "foreign admixture"? [/qb][/QUOTE]"You don't understand..you don't have a grasp..you don't comprehend" << Is this your elementary way of refuting a statement, WITHOUT offering an alternative view? Dissecting and critiquing individual statements out of its original context appears to be what you do best, yet in all this negating, you didn't offer a single alternative. Why?? Because you don't have one, and it's typical, next you'll be far off the original argument, choosing to debate individual sentences, which is also typical. You have yet to show an understanding of genetic diversity WITHIN the same group, which is definitely measured separately from diversity BETWEEN separate groups. If you don't understand this basis, then how can you possibly understand the theory of modern humans originating in Africa. It should be known by anyone claiming knowledge in this area, that the higher diversity WITHIN the same groups, helps determine the AGE of genes, I don't know what else I can add, except advice to read up more on it, and gain a better understanding. Why not simply show another tribe with genetics OLDER than the group I listed above without outside admixture, which would qualify as a REAL refutation, then come back and prove the statement inaccurate. And when you do, have it published in a scientific journal such as the one I posted above, and then you could be credited with not only refuting ME, but the SCIENTIST who published the information themselves. These are MEASURED results. When another group is sequenced to show a higher diversity, only then are the results of these findings invalidated. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3