So what, you think that because YOU posted the nonsense instead of one of the other idiot "White Boys Dreaming" it will now work?
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
Mike, it was not debunked. You better go look at the video. You will see the genetic markers!!! When I posted the original thread, I did not have the video footage. Now I do. YOU LOSE SUCKER!
Just call me Jari Member # 14451
posted
Birds of a feather.
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
^ you can say that again. they deserve each other.
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
"Tutankhamun had a narrow nose, buck teeth, a receding chin, and Caucasian features. Such features are typical of European, North African, Middle Eastern, and Indian peoples."
So what, you think that because YOU posted the nonsense instead of one of the other idiot "White Boys Dreaming" it will now work?
osirion Member # 7644
posted
"Tutankhamun had a narrow nose, buck teeth, a receding chin, and Caucasian features. Such features are typical of European, North African, Middle Eastern, and Indian peoples."
Also such features are common of Masai, Tutsi, Somali, Oromo, and Nubian people. After all these years you would think Gigantic ding dong would learn something.
You cannot use a haplogroup at an individual level to prove anything. It is only useful for population studies. A mixed race King Tut would not be news to me so his yDNA is meaningless.
xyyman Member # 13597
posted
Hope he being paid enough to keep this dysfunctional forum alive
That's right RAH. Keep us entertained!!
xyyman Member # 13597
posted
Aren't the Kenyans Caucasians. LOL!
=== Quote: Also such features are common of Masai, Tutsi, Somali, Oromo, and Nubian people. After all these years you would think Gigantic ding dong would learn something.
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Hope he being paid enough to keep this dysfunctional forum alive
That's right RAH. Keep us entertained!!
yes i'm begining to think these trolls are really mods trying to keep the debates fiery and alive.
osirion Member # 7644
posted
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Aren't the Kenyans Caucasians. LOL!
=== Quote: Also such features are common of Masai, Tutsi, Somali, Oromo, and Nubian people. After all these years you would think Gigantic ding dong would learn something.
You laugh but Eurocentrics are really serious about a Caucasian Kenya. Sort of a Southern extreme Caucasian refuge during the Upper Holocene. Problem is that the Capsian culture in Kenya is actually older than that of the North African version. Remains are also no different than that of modern day Kenyans. These people moved North and mixed with the Mechtoid peoples of North Africa.
alTakruri Member # 10195
posted
This is probably true of one mod I suspected a while back.
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing:
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Hope he being paid enough to keep this dysfunctional forum alive
That's right RAH. Keep us entertained!!
yes i'm begining to think these trolls are really mods trying to keep the debates fiery and alive.
alTakruri Member # 10195
posted
That's a policy from the Kenya Colony era that justified the white hi-lander farm ownership.
quote:Originally posted by osirion:
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Aren't the Kenyans Caucasians. LOL!
=== Quote: Also such features are common of Masai, Tutsi, Somali, Oromo, and Nubian people. After all these years you would think Gigantic ding dong would learn something.
You laugh but Eurocentrics are really serious about a Caucasian Kenya. Sort of a Southern extreme Caucasian refuge during the Upper Holocene. Problem is that the Capsian culture in Kenya is actually older than that of the North African version. Remains are also no different than that of modern day Kenyans. These people moved North and mixed with the Mechtoid peoples of North Africa.
Just call me Jari Member # 14451
posted
quote:Originally posted by alTakruri: This is probably true of one mod I suspected a while back.
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing:
quote:Originally posted by xyyman: Hope he being paid enough to keep this dysfunctional forum alive
That's right RAH. Keep us entertained!!
yes i'm begining to think these trolls are really mods trying to keep the debates fiery and alive.
If anyone is an undecover Mod its the /fradulent Busted tranny Dirk/Glider..etc.
Yall are giving Afronut too much credite he is here simply to bait people like Mike and XXY who posted in this thread...
xyyman Member # 13597
posted
HE is accusing me of feeding the troll. tsk! tsk!
TruthAndRights Member # 17346
posted
Interesting......considering that Europe didn't even exist at that time...but he was European....
Matter of fact, the 'White' People of the Mediterranean (sp?) referred to the northern wilds....which later became known as Europe....as very dangerous...and the people of that region were known to be dangerous savages...barbarians....
I'm just sayin'.....
htp
InsertNameHere Member # 17864
posted
Yes, they did say that. Blue eyes were seen as a sign of inferior barbarism. The word barbarian was invented for the northern savages.
I find it unlikely that Tut would be genetically European. It just sounds like bullshit. If he were to be anything but African it would be Middle-Eastern who do in fact carry the R1b gene haplotype in some amount. And it is easily possible that R1b didn't even develop in Europe.
All the DNA results show is that he may or may not have some European ancestry. His buck teeth and receding chin tell us he wasn't very good looking.
Yay for wastes of time! Perhaps they can tell us if Europeans share a more recent common ancestor with the more northern Africans versus the more southern.(Which is my theory on why Ethiopeans show up as 40% Caucasian on some DNA tests. Logically this theory makes sense.)
lamin Member # 5777
posted
The 40%--a bit high--applies mainly to the Amhara. And it is mainly J and not the European R, I, etc. So explain what you mean by "caucasian".
But don't forget that Greece is some 25% E3b--a prototypical African haplogroup.
InsertNameHere Member # 17864
posted
I mean what whoever used the word Caucasian in the study meant. It is likely just due to more recent common ancestry than other Africans between them and "Caucasians".
lamin Member # 5777
posted
This is nonsense. What "common ancestry"? Explain in specfics. Note that haplogroup J does not signify "caucasian".
InsertNameHere Member # 17864
posted
I have no clue what exactly the study was and I don't really care.
As for common ancestry, well the ancient Africans who were ancestral to Europeans would be expected to have been located closer to Europe. The descendants of those who remained in Africa would still have a genetic similarity because of their recent common ancestry. This is just my theory.
But I think haplogroup J is associated with people in the middle-east who are considered "Caucasian".
kenndo Member # 4846
posted
quote:Originally posted by osirion: [QB] "Tutankhamun had a narrow nose, buck teeth, a receding chin, and Caucasian features. Such features are typical of European, North African, Middle Eastern, and Indian peoples."
Also such features are common of Masai, Tutsi, Somali, Oromo, and Nubian people. After all these years you would think Gigantic ding dong would learn something.
hold on A min. those features are not that common to modern nubians or the masai i have seen.
some modern nubians yes,but some others no.i do not know to much about the Oromo,anyway
Caucasian looking features is not common for most arabized nubians in the sudan that i have seen.
I wish folks would think before they say stuff like this.
posted 
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)