...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
EGYPTSEARCH'S NEW DEFINITION OF RACE
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by awlaadberry: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mike111: [qb] [b]awlaadberry - From YOUR link.[/b] The Missing Years Gap in Aryan History Until the Start of Median / Persian History The end of the Kayanian dynasty appears to coincide with the closing of the Avestan canon. Some disruption appears to have put an end to ancient Aryan history, especially Zoroastrian history [b]in Central Asia.[/b] After a significant gap in time the missing years of Zoroastrian history - the next we hear of the Zoroastrian Aryans is not through legend or scripture, but with the [b]emergence of the Medes and Persians a thousand kilometres to the west.[/b] In our pages on Aryan Religions we examine the possible reasons for the gap in Zoroastrian Aryan history - the war of religions - where the Zoroastrians (and perhaps even the Aryans) may have lost their claim to power in Central Asia. They could very well have continued to live and be part of the Central Asian kingdoms, but without a Zoroastrian king on the throne, until that is, the rise of the Medes and the Persians. After the hiatus, the [b]Medes and the Persians[/b] reasserted the tradition of Zoroastrian-Aryan kingship, and once they had consolidated their power, they brought back into their domain, the traditional Zoroastrian-Aryan eastern (Central Asian) lands as well. The one change was that the seat of power of the federation of Aryan kingdoms had now shifted westward. This section brings our examination of Aryan prehistory - the first, Eastern, phase of Aryan history - to a close. The reader can continue to follow the sequence of pages under our History menu listings, or proceed to the page on Ranghaya which introduces the reader to the second, Western, phase of Zoroastrian-Aryan history. [b]Though the above is actually a religious/mythical presentation and not REAL history. But it does seem a plausible and even an honest attempt at Central Asian history. But that is NOT what YOU were saying, and it makes NO attempt to identify the Persians and Medes AS Aryans, only that they shared the religion, which we already knew. Aside from that, there is a wealth of REAL history, supported by artifacts and written material generated by the Persians themselves, to draw from concerning their history. But yet you choose to present myth as Persian history. And even "Boldly" told me that it "Is History". But this is good! I think there are people who felt that I was unnecessarily insulting to people of your persuasion. But the fact is that like the others, you knew that you were presenting a made-up lie as history, yet you did it anyway. Just as the Whites in Europe and all over the world do. I know of no place on Earth, where liars are due or given respect. Therefore I give your folks none.[/b] [/qb][/QUOTE]Mike. I have no idea of what you are talking about. Anyway, WHATEVER. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3