...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Black Egypt - The Final Proof
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: [QB] Horsenation why don't you stop mucking about you know all this nonsense about a Caucasoid white Kemet is just that nonsense since non hails from Caucasia spoke no Indo European language practiced no Indo-European Culture at best you will find "some" Kemites with less woolly hair and angular features, but that is not the result of incoming Caucacs..those were local African developments [IMG]http://lvvfsa.bay.livefilestore.com/y1piddRKo_5Xk_qG-jcWbqyNGcVgvdCeuYERcSDcisiy-jBvcs8FbXdxhtid7146RS29ZwdNx4B3HLPIty6ZZIpURlSraGAKLzm/c7c2.jpg?psid=1[/IMG] And folks like you keep projecting your own state of mind on others,do really know how this mess all started any way? read up on Nott and Gliddon. Racial anthropology, pejoratively also scientific racism[1] is the use of scientific, or ostensibly[2] scientific, findings and method to investigate differences among the human races, specifically in a historical context of ca. 1880 to 1930. As a term, scientific racism denotes the contemporary and historical scientific theories that employ anthropology (notably physical anthropology), anthropometry, craniometry, and other disciplines, in fabricating anthropologic typologies supporting the classification of human populations into physically discrete human races. Racial or physical anthropology was most common during the New Imperialism period (ca. 1880s–1914), in the second half of the 19th century, wherein theory conflated with racial supremacism in justifying white European imperialism. Since the end of the Second World War (1939–45) and the occurrence of the Holocaust, scientific racism in theory and action[clarification needed] was formally denounced, especially in The Race Question (18 July 1950), the UNESCO moral condemnation of racism and official debunking of scientific racism: "The myth of ‘race’ has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years, it has taken a heavy toll in human lives, and caused untold suffering".[3] Beginning in the later 20th century, scientific racism has been criticized as obsolete, and as historically used to support or validate racist world-views, usually based upon belief in the existence and significance of racial categories — typically with a hierarchy of superior and inferior races.[4] [IMG]http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.saqqara.nl/img/Cont_Glossary/Deel3/_350/Schepseskaf.png&imgrefurl=http://www.saqqara.nl/context/glossary/shepseskaf&usg=__-rPaa_znAiBIAv3xflaTlMxyx3k=&h=349&w=308&sz=23&hl=en&start=71&zoom=1&tbnid=LPt5tLFHo79GtM:&tbnh=130&tbnw=123&prev=/images%3Fq%3D4th%2Bdynasty%2Begypt%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG%26biw%3D1024%26bih%3D576%26tbs%3Disch:10%2C1638&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=124&vpy=230&dur=2042&hovh=239&hovw=211&tx=133&ty=162&ei=wXqZTJuCJY-jnQenqdT7Dg&oei=rnqZTPiPF5DyvQO87MDoDA&esq=5&page=5&ndsp=15&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:71&biw=1024&bih=576[/IMG] Neither this guy This didn't make the cut for your video now did he? [IMG]https://www.courses.psu.edu/art_h/art_h111_bac18/head2.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://tte2uq.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pRKyv2oRwk9UcpcIEEzbjKwIGqLvMxRjjAZ7UyxMU2hFC4Q5bS-bAcF5nqL-qi1sSprYrCpXwiMnWT4rlAad3_9tjFvAy-2iK/Shepseskaf%20-%20fourth%20dynasty.jpg?psid=1[/IMG] Gliddon was influenced by the racial theories of Samuel George Morton (1799–1851), one of the inspirators of physical anthropology. Morton collected hundreds of human skulls from around the world and tried to classify them. Influenced by the common racist theories of his time, Morton claimed that he could judge the intellectual capacity of a race by the cranial capacity (the measure of the volume of the interior of the skull). A large skull meant a large brain and high intellectual capacity, and a small skull indicated a small brain and decreased intellectual capacity. By studying these skulls he decided at what point Caucasians stopped being Caucasian, and at what point Negroes began. Morton had many skulls from ancient Egypt, and concluded that the ancient Egyptians were not African, but were instead Caucasians. Stephen Jay Gould (1941–2002), an American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist and historian of science, studied from a historical perspective these craniometric works in The Mismeasure of Man (1981) and concluded [b]that Morton had fudged data and "overpacked" the skulls with filler in order to justify his racist opinions.[/b] Other historical studies alleging a black-white difference in brain size include Paul Broca, 1873, Bean (1906), Mall, (1909), Pearl, (1934) and Vint (1934). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gliddon They were distortion junkies from the beginning they had to jump through all kinds of hoops replace basic definitions to arrive at a certain conclusion but even then that was only an illusion,easily debunked by anyone who cared you are a continuation of Morton and Gliddon. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3