posted
Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Brada-Anansi Member # 16371
posted
Define north and south example Romans conquered Britannia,Kush conquered Kemet conquered the people north of them,Axum conquered Kush,Moors conquered southern Europe the Inca conquered their northern neighbours etc, point out the north south divide first.
hottoddi Member # 15917
posted
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
posted
Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
posted
Just silly thinking. That would make the Eskimos the world's most evolved humans. LOL!
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
^Should I take that statement seriously?
Apocalypse Member # 8587
posted
quote:Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
1) Then logically doesn't this imply that "lower lying" humans are the ones who are more "evolved", or at least equally evolved, since they're the agents of expansion?
2) Hasn't it been established that tropically adapted black Africans were the agents of this expansion to the north in homo sapiens?
3) If migration is the touchstone of evolution then what about westward migration?
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Stroking your little thing and musing huh?
Ignorance is truly bliss, but here is reality.
Q: Who conquered the advanced Black cultures of Europe? A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Latins and Hellenes).
Q: Who conquered the advanced western Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Goths).
Q: Who conquered the advanced Persian culture. A: Illiterate Black nomads from Arabia.
Q: Who conquered the advanced eastern Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Turks).
Do you see a pattern?
Ya, people who have something, are always conquered by people with nothing.
MelaninKing Member # 17444
posted
^ True. The People of The Sea are an excellent example. Described as having no tradition of the own, no language, and no ritual. No wonder they assimilated into Egyptian culture so readily in all things EXCEPT Pharaoh making. The absence of this last detail is what kept them from being truly Egyptian and finally led to their expulsion.
hottoddi Member # 15917
posted
We're all fish, better teach your folk Give them money to eat, then next week they're broke So when you sleep, they're reachin for your throat.
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
quote:Originally posted by Apocalypse: 1) Then logically doesn't this imply that "lower lying" humans are the ones who are more "evolved", or at least equally evolved, since they're the agents of expansion?
OOA Homosapiens are more evolved than their immediate ancestors, Homosapiens in Africa.
quote: 2) Hasn't it been established that tropically adapted black Africans were the agents of this expansion to the north in homo sapiens?
Yea and homo erectus is the agent of homosapien, and simian is the forrunner to homoerectus. I fail to see your reasoning.
Apocalypse Member # 8587
posted
quote:OOA Homosapiens are more evolved than their immediate ancestors, Homosapiens in Africa.
This is your opinion and as such is worthless.
quote:Yea and homo erectus is the agent of homosapien, and simian is the forrunner to homoerectus. I fail to see your reasoning.
Therefore neanderthal was more evolved than homo sapiens who was "lower lying?"
Was migration a consequent of higher reasoning or higher reasoning a result of migration?
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
^I thought this subject was on Homosapien.
alTakruri Member # 10195
posted
I don't understand. When did there evolve another species of human after Homo sapiens? Who are they and what follows Homo in their genus name?
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
^I dunno. Why are you bringing that up?
Brada-Anansi Member # 16371
posted
^Then why did you made this thread? And what was your outline for the north south divide?
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
I never said anything about another species rising out of homosapien.
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: ^Then why did you made this thread? And what was your outline for the north south divide?
Brada-Anansi Member # 16371
posted
Gigantic Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
Then what did you mean by this?
osirion Member # 7644
posted
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Man you lost in the first post. Good going idiot!!@!!@#!@!
Simple - Italy is South of Germania.
Aztecs are South of Chereokee.
On and on.
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Gigantic Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
Then what did you mean by this?
hehehe
the gigantic dummy doesn't get it.
the lioness Member # 17353
posted
quote:Originally posted by Mike111:
quote:Originally posted by Gigantic: Why is it nearly all southerly people have been conquered by people of the north? What is it with northerners that make them capable of imposing themselves on their lower lying neighbors?
Stroking your little thing and musing huh?
Ignorance is truly bliss, but here is reality.
Q: Who conquered the advanced Black cultures of Europe? A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Latins and Hellenes).
Q: Who conquered the advanced western Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Goths).
Q: Who conquered the advanced Persian culture. A: Illiterate Black nomads from Arabia.
Q: Who conquered the advanced eastern Roman culture. A: Illiterate White nomads from central Asia (Turks).
Do you see a pattern?
Ya, people who have something, are always conquered by people with nothing.
He asked why they were able to conquer not who they were.
Gigantic Member # 17311
posted
This is why you should always stay out of grown folk business. This is what I said, fool:
northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes
Do I speak of a new species, Turd?
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing:
quote:Originally posted by Brada-Anansi: Gigantic Early human evolution paralleled early human expansion, northward. As humans evolved, migration northward expanded. Thus, it can be said, northerly humans are higher evolved humans to those in lower lying lattitudes.
Then what did you mean by this?
hehehe
the gigantic dummy doesn't get it.
Mike111 Member # 9361
posted
^Actually you do in a way.
The White European is actually a Dravidian Albino. since Albinos are not part of the "Natural" order, it could be said that they are a "New" species.
Apocalypse Member # 8587
posted
quote:Do I speak of a new species
You were certainly trying to suggest it when you said this:
quote:OOA Homosapiens are more evolved than their immediate ancestors, Homosapiens in Africa.
posted