...
EgyptSearch Forums Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

» EgyptSearch Forums » Deshret » Scientists Discover New Branch on Human Evolutionary Tree » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
vwwvv
Member # 18359
 - posted
-http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=003878
 
Brada-Anansi
Member # 16371
 - posted
http://egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=bag&action=display&thread=666
VWWVV your link was not complete hope you don't mind
 
Mike111
Member # 9361
 - posted
Dumb White boys can get money for any nonsense study.
 
Clyde Winters
Member # 10129
 - posted
Nice article but it is an attempt to attack the Out of Africa idea. This paper claims that the Melanesians are related to some ancient group that lived in Siberia in the ancient past.

This theory is bull. If you read the article they provide no firm dates for this hominid--so their conclusion lacks any validity due to the fact their findings are not reliable.

The Melanesian language is related to West African languages. They also share many placenames with West Africans and probably only arrived in the Pacific region with megalithic culture which only entered the area after 2000BC. So there is no way they met this population over 60kya.

The journal Nature like the European Journal of Human Genetics is very Eurocentric. They rarely publish any letters to the editor disputing their findings--which usually aim to isolate Africans in Africa, and Africans being influenced by Europeans and Asians carrying African genes through a back migration.


The recent discovery of African skeletons in China that are 100ky old suggest that the OOA event probably took place much earlier than the precent agreed upon date of 60kya.

You can read about the Chinese skeletal fine here:


1.[Liu:Zhirendong:2010] Liu, Wu, et al. "Human remains from Zhirendong, South China, and modern human emergence in East Asia." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Early online).

.

.
 
Clyde Winters
Member # 10129
 - posted
You may want too check out John Hawks blog on the new material

http://johnhawks.net/taxonomy/term/180

.
 
Clyde Winters
Member # 10129
 - posted
Neanderthals do not support an ancient existence of the contemporary European type. Neanderthals like other ancient homonids looked African.


These researchers fail to remind people that some of the earliest neanderthal remains come from Africa. This being the case Neanderthals were also Black.

Europeans have invented a lie that Neanderthal looked like modern Europeans when they did not. I show a picture of the recreation of Neanderthals in my video below at 3:35 :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iSC8O7_3Bs

As you can see the Neanderthal looked African too. They are using the myth of European appearing Neanderthals to fool people into believing that Africans are not their ancestors. Sad is it not.
 
Gigantic
Member # 17311
 - posted
Neandertal looked African LOL!! You are the bomb, Clyde. I don't even think you see your psychosis.

 -

Sure looks African to me! (facetious)
 



Contact Us | EgyptSearch!

(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3