...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Neandertal Admixture discovered in some Indigenous Africans
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by NonProphet: [QB] Are you aware the vast(0.9999+)majority of all your genetic ancestors lived less than 20 generations ago(400-500ya)? True, some older relic markers get passed down to modern groups and indicate past migration patterns or shared common ancestry. But to equate relic preserved markers in modern groups as representing significant ancestral populations is foolish. So you are stuck with the same old tired 'ancient=modern African proxy via eyeball' argument to advance your political 'pants off' exposed agenda. My pants are on, my feet on the ground and guided by evidence which btw is much more interesting. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Kalonji: [qb] But a modern groups CAN preserve some of the oldest mutations that these ancestral groups would have had. Eurasians don't belong to this group. Not even close. Just get over it.. Your people carry a subset that evolved off of Mtdna M and N, the latter two evolved off of L3 which is indisputably African. You can twist it however you want, the fact remains that you are the derived result of a people who looked like Africans, in terms of skin color, limb elongation and a whole plethora of other osteological traits. So where does the below leave you? With pants on or with pants down? [QUOTE]MODERN groups can't be ancestral genetic founders.[/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3