...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Phoenician7 video
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Near: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Whatbox: [qb] Thanx. I wrote nothing more about him citing Brace '93 because, as that very study itself states, it was designed to verify what populations could not at all be part of eachother, population inaffinity rather than affinity and should not at all be taken as evidencing in the way of the latter. TABLE 4. Intra-limb bone length indices in US and Egyptian samples [i]********************* Crural indexA__ | ___[b]Brachial index[/b]B ******************* Males_ \ _Females | __Males___ \ _Females_ **************** Mean - SE \ Mean - SE | Mean - SE__ \ Mean - SE ****** U.S. Whites: 81.9 - 0.4 \ 82.0 - 0.4 | 74.3 - 0.4__ \ 73.5 - 0.5 ****** [b]U.S. Blacks[/b]: 83.7 - 0.4 \ 83.8 - 0.5 | [b]77.1 - 0.5_ \ 76.5 - 0.5[/b][/i] [b]Ancient Egyptians[/b]: 83.6c - 0.2 \ 82.8 - 0.3 | [b]77.9c - 0.5 \ 77.5c - 0.6[/b] - courtesy Raxter et. al. 2007 [/qb][/QUOTE]Thanks again. In one of his responses to me, he cited Brace '93 regarding Naqada crania (even though Brace apparently left out several African groups according to Keita's critique) in turn I brought up his 2005 study which shows Naqada closest to Somali, and modern and ancient Nubians. Apparently, he likes that study :rolleyes: [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3