...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Why has Sub-Sahara Africa never have a civilization?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Just call me Jari: [QB] You're failed attempt to accept Antar as black is due to your racist assertion that because of his Arab blood he was a good poet. The Arabs at this time were mainly illiterate Nomads. Antar was a hated subjugated slave whose Dark Skin was a daily reminder of his Rape Origins and inferior birth. Modern Day Muslims and Arabs consider Antar to be black. Antar overcame his status to become a great poet. Stop with the racist tendencies and get over yourself. Al-Jahiz is enough to prove you wrong. While you're Tin Isle ancestors were throwing Sewage into your Drinking supply and while the Greatest building your Tin Isle Ancestors created was a strawhut, and the Greatest Literature contained to Irish Monks, Al Jahiz was developing "The Book of Animals" in the 9th century, which would later insipire "Origin of the Species". [QUOTE]Originally posted by cassiterides: [qb] Mulattos = blacks? I guess then you consider someone who is half-white half-chinese to be white... If you are mixed race, you are NO race. Hence on census forms across Europe, if you are mixed you have to tick the ''mixed'' box. You can't choose the race your parents are. Antar was racially Arab/Black, which means his heritage was mixed. He was not Black. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3