...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Why do Afro-Nuts continuously post their Bullshit across the internet?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] ^^Maybe you can run it down. Here's the remainder of the old White Nord lying thread: 9)) Now lets take your bogus claim #9- a few sub-Saharans at an oasis means a “white Egypt” lol [b]“since Roman times, gene flow from the Sub-Saharan region has affected gene frequencies of individuals from the oasis.”( “Research on ancient DNA in the Near East” Mateusz Baca, Martyna Molak 2008) Regardless of the date, all the studies consistently show that sub-saharan dna appears to be small and the Molak study was just completed last year! There is NO WAY you Afronuts can refute this, so you bitch about an incorrect date. It doesn’t negate the fact, AFRONUT. [/b] Lol.. Is this all you got ‘Nerd”? what’s there to ‘refute”? All your precious oasis study shows is that, to quote the study: “since Roman times, gene flow from the Sub-Saharan region has affected gene frequencies of individuals from the oasis.” Lol… this is earth shattering? That a minor oasis saw some sub-Saharan gene flow? Lol [IMG]http://www.yourmoviestuff.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/dr-evil.jpg[/IMG] 10) Now let’s take a look at your miscellaneous claims re “white Africa’: [b]The peopling of northern Africa appears to be conditioned by the barriers imposed to the north by the Mediterranean Sea and to the south by the Sahara Desert, [b]which constrains human movement to an east-west direction.[/b] The harsh landscape, in which mountainous areas are surrounded by arid extensions, favors a dispersed, fragmented pattern of of human settlement… Demic diffusion of Neolithic populations from the Fertile Crescent is thought to have homogenized the genetic composition of the European populations (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1993, 1994), [b]and it created a major southeast to northwest gradient (Sokal et al. 1991)… population replacement during the Neolithic from the Levant[/b] could explain the genetic similarity between Libya, Egypt, and the European populations.” (Population history of North Africa: Evidence from classical genetic markers” Human Biology; Bosch, E; Calafell, F; Perez-Lezaun, et al 2005)[/b] The only thing wrong your “white Egypt” and “white Africa” claim based on this text is that the Sahara was not always a desert. It was a well watered greenbelt in various eras and in various areas, and populations moved back and forth. So the vaunted “East-West movement blockage” is a limited claim indeed. Also your passage says nothing about any Cakazoids taking over North Africa- it says [i]”thought to have homogenized the genetic composition of the European populations.”[/i] It says nothing about a white North Africa. It confines itself to the Europeanized populations that had moved in and what some scholars "thought." Your own source once again undermines you claim Ace. When did Chad Niger, Mali, or the Sudan become “white” in your passage? Most of these areas are above the Sahara and have historically been classified as “North Africa”. Again you fail. As for more recent references: here’s one that is gasp, MORE RECENT than your 2005 reference, and it disputes the alleged population replacement theory. Oooooohhhhhhh… more recent Ace…. [img] http://www.africanamericanculturalcenterpalmcoast.org/historyafrican/beng8.jpg[/img] -- [IMG]http://www.africanamericanculturalcenterpalmcoast.org/historyafrican/beng9.jpg[/IMG] ^^look Nerd look.. recent 2008 date on data from Keita... doesn't it "supercede" your stuff? lol 11) On your "White Fulani" mix claims: [b]" that “diversity” you speak so strongly all the time is in reality Caucasian dna that penetrated into deep Africa. Why it shows there is Western Eurasian dna in Fulani yet you insist this is natural black variation? LMAO. DENIAL! 8.1% is a large amount considering the distance it had to travel, yet you want to act like there were no whites in ancient Egypt! Remember slug this is just the maternal dna. I don’t care if that Western Eurasian dna stood at .01% in the Fulani, it is there and that is what accounts for the variation and you no longer need to be confused about their features. [/b] Only one problem “Nord”.. I said quote: “subsets of that diversity flowed out from East Africa to various other parts of Africa and outside Africa..” and I said this in relation to links with east Africa, not your inflowing “wandering Caucasoids”. And we all know ancient Egypt had gene flow from Persians, romans etc etc at various eras of its history. Your attempt to create a bogus strawman point fails miserably. But even if we grant you a white Fulani percentage, your own data makes the “wandering Caucasoid” influx rather less than impressive. Quote from your own reference: [i] The haplogroups of [b]Western Eurasian origin[/b] , such as J1b, U5, H, and V, were also detected but in rather low frequencies (8.1% in total).[/i] So your vaunted cakazoids weigh in at a mere 8%. [IMG]http://www.yourmoviestuff.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/dr-evil.jpg[/IMG] ooooohhhhhhhhh……… 8% wandering Caucasoids…. Impressive….. Looks like you fail again “Nord”… multiple at bats, multiple strikeouts… Isn’t there anyone in your "Aryan” camp that can get the job done better than you? Send in fat Madilda! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3