...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Chinese are Ancient Egyptian's Descendants
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by rahotep101: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Just call me Jari: [qb] Thats the problem in the U.S Indians are "Caucasian" but in the U.K they are Asian, while Asians in the U.S refer to Far Eastern peoples and IndoChinese. For example people in America would consider a Turk an Asian. Esp. if he does'nt look white. If Mongoloid is to be used it should include people associated with Mongol type people from the Steppes. Which would include Afghans, Arabs, Some Indians, some Persians, and Turks etc. I don't really use the term much but how can an Arab or Turk be Caucasian when they stem from Mongol Tribes... There are "Caucasian" Steppe people though like Persians. That the thing about using terms like Cuacasian, Negriod, and Mongoloid...its too restrictive and can often be blurred.. [/qb][/QUOTE]The Turks have their origins in the Asian Steppes, but the Arabs don't. Arabs are indigenous to Arabia. Turks only arrived in the middle east in about the Ninth Century AD, but Arabs were always there. Nothing mongoloid about the Arabs. Obviously Turks of Turkey have picked up a lot of Caucasian DNA, despite having mongoloid ancestors. Ataturk looked like an Englishman. I'm English, but a Turkish friend of mine thinks I look like a Turk! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3