...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Rahotep, feel like dancing??
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ Indeed, not only is he a fraud and coward, he is obviously suffering from delusion. Notice how whenever any of his notions is soundly debunked and refuted by evidence, he ignores it. For example, he keeps bringing up the fallacy of a "North" and "Sub-Saharan" dichotomy of African populations. My last post above cites two major studies showing that the Sahara desert did not always exist and that there was both population and cultural continuity between peoples and cultures south of today's Sahara and those north of it in ancient times. In another thread, he brings up how Tut's skull does not resemble black Africans when it obviously does... [QUOTE]Originally posted by DaHotip101: [qb] Lest you think I'm hiding this... Tut's head was unusually long, but his facial features were more in line with the caucasoid... [URL=http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/15/tutcompared.jpg/] [IMG]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/153/tutcompared.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/qb][/QUOTE]Lest we think you're a complete and utter moron... There is nothing "unusual" about Tut's elongated skull. This is a trait known as hyper-dolicocephaly and is in fact quite common among BLACK Africans including those in Sub-Saharan regions. [IMG]http://birds.intanzania.com/files/images/James-and-Maasai.preview.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lh5j55ML6k1qawpkeo1_400.jpg[/IMG] As far as his facial features are concerned here is what one expert said of Tut's skull who helped with the National Geographic reconstruction. Dr Susan Anton: [i]I actually didn't choose the term "North African Caucasoid" that is the term used by another team (there were three that worked on separate reconstructions)... A narrow nose is more typical of more northerly located populations because nose breadth is thought to be at least in part related to the climate in which ancestral populations lived. A narrow and tall nose is seen most frequently in Europeans. Tut's head was a bit of a conundrum, but, as you note, there is a huge range of variation in modern humans from any area, so for me [b]the skull overall, including aspects of the face, spoke fairly strongly of his African origins[/b]..[/i] Ausar tells her about the importance of considering African phenotypic diversity since many anthropologists have already confirmed about the tremendous diversity of facial features in Sub-Sahara alone and that these traits include hyper-dolicocephaly and alveolar prognathism which is Tut's and the other 18th dynasty's "buck-teeth". To which Dr. Anton answered: [i]Yes this is true and this is precisely why I felt [b](although I did not know where the individual was from) that this was an individual of African ancestry, and why I so stated.[/b] Alveolar prognathism was taken into account [b](at least by me, I can't speak for the other groups) and is another part of the reason for my estimation of African ancestry in this individual. You should recall that all the other groups that worked on this individual knew that this was Tut's skull[/b]. We did not know either who this was particularly or if it was a forensic case or an archaeological case (I worked from the CT reconstruction of the skull from which it is impossible to infer such.[/i] ^ Yet he gives no response. One of the signs of delusion is to ignore reality or aspects thereof i.e. evidence. I agree with Jari, Kalonji you should make counter-attack youtube videos to debunk him there as well. It's obvious we are dealing with another Euronut not interested in truth but in his ethnocentric lies. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3