...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
what are the similarities between British Israelism and BHI ?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: [QB] Being clean does not entail being free of leprosy. People can listen to you or to Hebrew scripture[i] "if the [URL=http://www.]leprosy have covered all his flesh[/URL], he shall [URL=http://www.] pronounce him clean[/URL] that hath the plague; [URL=http://www.]it is all turned white[/URL]: he is clean. But whensoever raw flesh appeareth in him, he shall be unclean.[/i] Lev13:13-14 That's straight Hebrew Torah. Quoting from the Greek gospels is no substitute for Torah law nor it's Hebrew&Aramaic mishnaic interpretations. Hebrews neither use nor need Greek scripture but on the other hand Greek scripture relies on the Hebrew which it is not faithful to in the least. The Greek scriptures have no bearing on Hebrew literature be it Tanakh or Mishnah&Gemara. We go to the Hebrew literature for statute law (Torah) and case studies (Mishnah&Gemara) for application of the statutes. This is beyond understanding of racial cultist untrained in any authentic mainstrean traditional Judaism, such as the "teachings" of the BI/CI or the BHI. Quite clearly the one who is white from head to toe "the leprosy have covered all his flesh" and though "he is clean" he still "hath the plaque." He can become unclean again if "quick raw flesh" later becomes noticeable in his skin. Again for the ignorant rabble there are four colours of leprosy as explained in mishnah: 1 - white like snow (undertones of wine) 2 - white as Temple lime (milk & blood) 3 - white as an egg's skin 4 - white as wool; they are not all reddish-white as distorters pushing racialist agendas would make believe. Gehazi is an example of a clean leper, white from head to toe as was the Syrian captain Naaman who though a leper was clean (all turned white) not with reddish-white spots which would be unclean. [QUOTE][i] But if the raw flesh again be turned into white, then he shall come unto the priest; and the priest shall look on him; and, behold, if the plague be turned into white, then the priest shall pronounce him clean that hath the plague: he is clean. And when the flesh hath in the skin thereof a boil, and it is healed, and in the place of the boil there is a white rising, or a bright spot, reddish-white, then it shall be shown to the priest. And the priest shall look; and, behold, if the appearance thereof be lower than the skin, and the hair thereof be turned white, then the priest shall pronounce him unclean: it is the plague of leprosy, it hath broken out in the boil. [/i]Lev 13:15-20[/QUOTE]We see that the clean leper could be subject to bouts when his status could revert to unclean for a while until it returned to a clean state. It is because of the inanities like the post I'm replying to, that you don't find rabbis or morehs teaching Hebrew law and principle to non-Jews but let them go merrily on their way down the wrong road since after all the Hebrew laws, principles, interpretations, and literature still stand intact as they have a good 2400 years at the least. For those truly wanting to learn without racialist motivation as their reasoning I suggest a study not a mere reading of the entire 13th chapter of Leviticus even from a Christian bible. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Confirming Truth: [qb] You do not know what you are babbling about. A person whose leprosy has spread from head to toe is not a "clean leper." Such a statement is an oxymoron, as one cannot be a leper and clean simultaneously. Once the leprosy takes its course and either spreads over the entire body or is stopped then that person's basar [flesh] is considered tahaer [clean]. No where in torah is anyone called a "clean leper." People are clean from leprosy (not clean with leprosy as you suggest) and are tahaer to mingle in the camp. Just to give you an example of this, consider the following new testament narrative (in part): Mar 1:42 And as soon as he had spoken, immediately the [b]leprosy departed[/b] from him, and he was cleansed. Notice it says "leprosy departed..." This is why your statement is an oxymoron. If leprosy either spreads all over the body, stops its spread or the raw flesh turns white then that person no longer has leprosy. Being white from head to toe is called "laban" (white) and that is it. Stop interpreting your prejudices and hangups into the law. If you had an iota of understanding of leprosy you would know that [b]adamdam ve'laban[/b] (white and reddish) is a required symptom if one is to diagnose that the basar is indeed infected with the plague. A person with white skin bears no resemblence to a leper. Take that pseudojudaism to the other board and peddle it there buddy. [QUOTE]Originally posted by alTakruri: Being white from head to foot classified them as clean lepers as per Leviticus 13:12-13 -- And if the leprosy break out abroad in the skin, and the leprosy cover all the skin of him that hath the plague from his head even to his feet, as far as appeareth to the priest; then the priest shall look; and, behold, if the leprosy have covered all his flesh, he shall pronounce him clean that hath the plague; it is all turned white: he is clean. [/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3