...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
awlaadberry or dana what are your thoughts on Arab slavery?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mike111: [QB] MORE WHITE NONSENSE REGARDING SLAVERY [i]Wiki India Arab slave traders also brought slaves as early as the 1st century AD from Africa. Most of the African slaves were brought however in the 17th century and were taken into Western India. The Siddi people are of mainly East African descent. [b]Article from another Wiki-like White source:[/b] Siddi tribe is one of the major tribal communities of Gujarat and this tribe is also known by the names of Siddhi, Sheedi and Habshi. This tribal community has occupied a considerable portion of the state of Gujarat. Apart from Gujarat, the Siddi tribal community resides in some parts of Karnataka, Goa and Maharashtra. The word Siddi is a derivation of the Arabic word `sayyid` or `saydi`. It means captive, or slave. Due to the rich heritage of the origin of the Siddi tribes, the anthropologists are being rightly attracted towards this Siddi tribal community and thus carried on several surveys on them over the years. Especially in Junagadh district of Gujarat, these Siddi tribes have got a major concentration. History of Siddi Tribe In the period of eleventh to nineteenth century, the ancestors of these Siddi tribes have migrated to several places of Gujarat. To be specific, knowing the strength and power of these Siddi tribes, all the royal kings of India hired most of these Siddi tribes and there was huge infiltration of the Siddi tribes from foreign lands. It is an ethnic group having Black African descent. It has been said that African ancestors of this tribal community came to India during the 10th century with the Arab merchants. In spite of their reputation as fine fighters, several of these Siddi tribes worked as domestic servants and as labourers in the farmlands. In order to create their own separate communities, a handful of these Siddi tribes also took refuge in the interiors of the forest areas. Much later in the beginning of the 20th century, in the provinces of Janjira and Jafrabad, small Siddi lands were formed. This Janjira Island was also called Habshan, implying to be the land of the Habshis. Quite a few kings of West Bengal in the 15th century were descended from the Siddi tribes. Siddi tribes also played a significant part in the history of West India, predominantly in the struggle between the Marathas and the Mughal rulers. Further, in the British era Siddi tribes have acclaimed the position of several military and governmental leaders.[/i] [b]^Even the White mans own bullsh1t is contradictory[/b] Siddi women [IMG]http://www.eth.mpg.de/cms/en/people/d/yimene/images/yimene_02.jpg_796586383.jpg[/IMG] [b]As before, this is the White man trying to explain-away the presence of African people, where his made-up White history doesn't want them. Firstly, part of the Black component there, ARE NOT Africans - they are ARABS! I quote from a correct to the Wiki article. "Siddis are categorized into two groups: the Zanji Siddis were brought to Pakistan and India by the Arabs as [i]soldiers[/i] during their first Islamic invasion of the sub-continent in 712 A.D" Now that makes a lot more sense, doesn't it? It is also supported by known historical behavior. [IMG]http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Images_Indus/Khan.jpg[/IMG] But the Siddis aren't really the issue - they are a very small community - less that 50,000. The White mans duplicity goes way beyond the Siddis. He is trying to explain-away the descendants of THESE people. [IMG]http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/Elam/Not_Kushite.jpg[/IMG] Anyone who has ever visited the University of Chicago's Oriental studies site, knows that they have these "Tribute Bearers to Darius the Great" circa 450 B.C. tagged as "Ethiopians". The problem is: the Persians NEVER CONQUERED Ethiopia or Sudan. The fact is, those people are not African at all, they are Asians from the northern Pakistani and Afghanistani satraps. (The Persian Empire stopped at about the Indus river in Pakistan). And the proof is VERY simple. "Tribute Bearers" brought goods from their OWN country! [IMG]http://www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/Elam/Nilgai.jpg[/IMG] BTW - The degenerate White man LIVES on the IGNORANCE of others. Thus you will see that Nilgai called an African Okapi by the White man. That is just to fool and confuse you. This is an African Okapi. Aside from the markings, the back is not as sloped, and the ears are large, they are not the same![/b] [IMG]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3161/2953860271_b48ddb845d_b.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3