...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
DNAtribes analysis on Tel Amarna mummies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Sundiata: Egyptian (140) Egyptian (28) Egyptian Berber (Siwa, Egypt) (98) Egyptian Copt (Adaima, Egypt) (100) El-Minia, Egypt (300) Egyptian Muslim (Adaima, Egypt) (99)[/QUOTE]So the ''Northern Africa'' pool in table 1 in fact included several Egyptians samples, yet, the Pharaonic STR profiles still have a low freq in that pool. Keeps getting better. EDIT: Either that, or the Egyptian and Sudanese samples were pooled under the ''Arabian'' header: http://www.dnatribes.com/sample-results/snp-sample-yoruba.pdf (see p3) Thats a pretty phucked up thing to do, I wonder how they justify such a grouping. Maybe they've changed it, though. Several groupings are rearranged on Table 1. The East African group, for example, shows up only as ''Horn of Africa'' on table 1. Either way, both the North African and the Arabian cluster are dwarfed when it comes to the compared STR frequencies. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3