...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
DNAtribes analysis on Tel Amarna mummies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Sundjata: [QB] The only differences I see with the extant specimens from South Africa and the Great Lakes is that the former seems to also share alleles with local Khoisan populations. That this would be somewhat more anomalous to people is understandable but why the Great Lakes matches would seem "odd" is beyond me and I give Manu no ground whatsoever as he is clearly confused and has no valid point. People need to heed what Al Takuri has already alluded to in that there were no Bantu-speaking populations in South Africa during the Amarna period, nor anywhere else. The dynamics of the Bantu expansion seems to be confusing some people. We are not discussing "Bantu ancestry". Those who shared that modern structure spoke some extinct Niger-Congo language which is why I invoked Niger-Kordofanian (people like Blench also see Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan as comprising a macro family). It is no surprise that afroasiatic speakers coming from adjacent territories would share the same or similar profiles with Africans from the Great Lakes and upper Nile, like Somalis or Chadic-speakers. It would be informative to compare them to modern Chadic-speakers for linguistic correspondences yet they don't have any samples from Chadic-speakers, who according to other studies share ancestry with Nilo-Saharans from the upper Nile and Great Lakes region. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3