...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
DNAtribes analysis on Tel Amarna mummies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] I get the sense that some here had doubts about the indigenousness and Africaness of AEians. What else can they be? The really intriguing question is how far SSAians migrated. Is greater Africa a fact or fiction? As cited in the middle East/falasheen thread. African female lineage(L*) extended into the Arabian Peninsula going as far back to the end of the LGM. And in that University of Barcelona study 50% of the ancient lineage were MtDNA (L*). Maelstrom et al concluded that modern Europeans are genetically different to ancient remains. He discovered they were primarily mtDNA – HG-U* with origins again, in the Great Lakes region. And I always go back to craniometric studies, ie Sergi, where he stated it all started around the Grate Lakes region. And these people reached as far is Iberia, Stonehenge, ancient Persia etc I have to admit I was a skeptic when I first started reading, now, to me, the real question is how far these African peoples extend into Eurasia. Of course, the present population of Eurasia is far different. Which lends credence to what Mike and Clyde have been saying from day one [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] What else would they be, other than indigenous people from that part of Africa? To claim anything otherwise is ridiculous. And shows a lack of understanding of demic diffusion and how man lived prior to the age of intercontinental travel. The “highways” of pre-history were the river and lakes of the land man lived in. It is lunacy of anyone to suggest Tut and his family is anything else but people from that part of the world/Africa. [QUOTE]Originally posted by .Charlie Bass.: [qb] http://dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2012-01-01.pdf Geographical analysis of the Amarna mummies was performed using their autosomal STR profiles based on 8 tested loci. 4 Results are summarized in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 1. Maps for individual Amarna mummies are included in Figures 2-8 in the Appendix. Discussion: Average MLI scores in Table 1 indicate the STR profiles of the Amarna mummies would be most frequent in present day populations of several African regions: including the Southern African (average MLI 326.94), African Great Lakes (average MLI 323.76), and Tropical West African (average MLI 83.74) regions. These regional matches do not necessarily indicate an exclusively African ancestry for the Amarna pharaonic family. However, results indicate these ancient individuals inherited some alleles that today are more frequent in populations of Africa than in other parts of the world (such as D18S51=19 and D21S11=34). [IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/b96ao0.jpg[/IMG] [/qb][/QUOTE][/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3