...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
DNAtribes analysis on Tel Amarna mummies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Amun-Ra The Ultimate: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness: [qb] DNATribes analysis suggests that the Amarna familiy later migrated out of Egypt South and West [/qb][/QUOTE]This is one possible scenario. Another scenario would see all the groups involved sharing relatively recent common ancestors *then* splitting into different group *before* the foundation of Ancient Kemet. In that scenario, the 18th Dynasty mummies studied and the African ethnic groups wouldn't directly descend from one another but would share relatively recent ancestors, probably living at the same x location [i](maybe the Mountain of the Moon at the beginning of the Nile)[/i] , before the split into different migratory direction including along the Nile toward what would be later called Kemet and toward Southern Africa. This is just one possible scenario considering the DNA results. A combination of both those scenarios is also possible. With a constant ancient migratory movements across all the regions involved (Ancient Kemet, Great Lakes, Southern Africa, Tropical West Africa, Sahelian, etc). Well before and also after the multiple foreign invasion and occupation of Kemet by various foreign ethnic groups (Hyksos, Assyrians, Romans, Persians, Muslim Arabs, Greeks, British, etc). Invasion which would push the original inhabitant of Ancient Kemet further down south, following the migratory path of common ancestors in the past. [/qb][/QUOTE]Its seems you are going down the right track but I think your hypothesis is backwards. To analyze this you will have to break down what you describe as [b]"sharing relatively recent common ancestors"[/b]. How recent is relatively recent? If you are talking about "recent" as opposed to OOA then you basically support Swenet because you are talking about VERY old wide spread common ancestry....this goes WAY Back. This can be supported with ideas like widesrepad Barbed Harppoon points and aquatic technology and stuff like that. But then you are talking about 90-10 kya...that is a long time frame. http://www.springerlink.com/content/g36v03001423n142/ http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=007697 If you are talking about recent as in the last 3-6 thousand years then provide evidence of large scale migration from the great lakes region INTO Egypt. As far a recent movement the data actually says something else. See something like dotted wavy line pottery. Or even the distribution of cattle which did not exist in the great lakes region and comes much later....meanwhile Egyptian has loan works of Eastern Sudanic origin regarding cattle.. There is a actually a ton of info already in the thread about this. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3