...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Blacks have never created an ancient civilization
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] ^^lol.. [IMG]http://thewhitebull.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/god_made_your_penis_small.jpg[/IMG] [b]The "racial reality" work below cited by race proponents seems strangely obsessed with black penis size. This may be part of the inferiority complex seen in white racists. [/b] Racial Reality authors Sarich and Miele, cite a number of Greek depictions of Africans that show black penis sizes as larger than that of nearby whites. QUOTE: [i]"The genitalia of black Africans were also deemed noteworthy to the Greek and Roman artists. Within the same art piece, black males are depicted with penises larger than those of white figures, and in others are shown as being erect." [/i] --Vincent Sarich, Frank Miele. 2005. Race: The Reality of Human Differences. pg 41 [b]Obsession with black penis size also enters into the work of other racist authors, like JP Rushton, who conducted detailed "self-assessment" in penis size compared to the potency exhibited by Negroid [sic] data..[/b] QUOTE: [i]"Then there is the issue of Rushton's data and disparate sources one of the most heavily cited in his earlier workd is an 1898 book, by an anonymous French army surgeon, a repository of anecdotal information about the penis, breast, and buttock size of different native populations. His reliance on these kinds of data led to some strong criticism. More recently Rushton has used a wider variety of sources, including census data, studies of military recruits, and brain scanning techniques. He argues that such data reinforce his original conclusion that human populations can be ordered in a scale of evolutionary advance from blacks, to whites, to Orientals." [/i] --Stringer and McKee, African Exodus 1996 and -- [b] more obsession with Negro indexes on penis size. Note trembling "self-assessment" by white "biodiversity" author Rushton..[/b] QUOTE: [i]"No criteria are ever set up to decide how these groups are established or what traits should be used in determin- ing membership. This means that his acceptance of "race" is ultimately arbitrary and subjective. When "the races" are compared in terms of appearance and performance in the quantities of uncritically collected data assembled in his book, "racial" identity is determined by "self-assessment." Rushton's basic units, then, are rooted in folk belief and not in biology. The possibility that the vast majority of the human biological traits that have been shaped by evolution are clinally and independently distributed in association with the relevant selective forces is never once considered, and the word cline is simply missing. One running concern is how these folk categories compare on such matters as intelligence and reproductive behavior. Sex rears its head again and again in the discussion, with much of the information on comparative sexual performance based on "self- assessment." Rushton is obviously much taken with the "salience of... buttocks and breasts" (pp. 167, 231) as measures of sexuality, although there is a dearth of objectively collected data. More telling is his evident fascination with the "Negroid" penis as an index of "potency" and libido. In his earlier publications on these matters, his information came from "self-assessment."[/i] --FROM: Review: Racialism and Racist Agendas Author(s): C. Loring Brace Reviewed work(s):Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective by J. Philippe Rushton Source: American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 98, No. 1 (Mar., 1996), pp. 176-177 [IMG]http://www.pinknews.co.uk/images/gayhitler.jpg[/IMG] [b]WHite "biodiversity" scholars protected by university tenure, even as they solicit students to engage in penis size studies of negroid indexes.. Rushton was a tenured professor at UWO in the 1990s.[/b] QUOTE: [i]"In other words, Rushton took advantage of students who didn’t know that in the case of his study they had the option not to participate without incurring additional work. As punishment, the psychology department barred him from using students as research subjects for two years. The second instance also occurred in 1988. Rushton conducted a survey at the Eaton Centre mall in Toronto, paying 50 whites, 50 blacks, and 50 Asians $5.00 each to answer questions about their sexual habits. For this, he was again formally reprimanded, this time by the University of Western Ontario administration itself, because he had failed to submit the project for approval by the university’s ethics committee, as required for research projects off campus. This was “a serious breach of scholarly procedure,” according to the university’s president, George Pederson. " [/i] NY review of Books. 1994 "Pioneer" http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1995/mar/23/pioneer/ [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3