...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
O?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by castrated fool: [qb] Keith retracted his claim, like he also did regarding the Grimaldi as Negroid. Mistakes have been made, Afronuts though just cling to errors and obsolete science. Natufian crania is just robust Caucasoid crania. Mesolithic crania is thicker, as our ancestors at that time were still evolving. ''What little we have from Palestine, mostly scraps of bone and a few teeth, is also Caucasoid. For example, the Mesolithic Natufian skulls and long bones from that country are those of ancestral Mediterraneans'' (Coon, 1965). Note though in 1939, Coon, like Keith believed that the Natufians had ''Negroid affinities''. He also retracted this claim. Science is progressive, not static. It is now known the Natufians were not at all Negroid but ancestral Caucasoid Meds. [/qb][/QUOTE]The above is a perfect example of the racist bias of past anthropologists. Of course Keith retracted his statements because of two reasons. First of all the very presence of the Natufians in the so-called "Holy Land" (even if the Holy Land is right next door to Africa), and secondly because such features are also found in Upper Paleolithic remains of Europe such as Grimaldi. The problem is that science including anthropology truly has progressed to DEBUNK Keith and other racist views. In the case of the Natufians, genetics shows that the introduction of African paternal E lineages in the Levant correspond to the time Natufians appeared. In the case of Grimaldi and other Upper Paleolithic Europeans, well genetics has [i]confirmed[/i] that Europeans and Eurasians in general descend from people who left AFRICA, hence the "negroid" features. Again, this goes back to the double standard game racist scholars used to play-- Whenever a skull is found with a narrow nose and long face it is labeled as "caca-soid" even if such skulls are found in Sub-Saharan Africa, but as soon as skulls exhibiting "negroid" features are found outside of Africa in adjacent areas of Southwest Asia or *gasp* Europe, they then cease to be "negroid" but are suddenly classified as 'robust' "caca-soids" specifically of the "Eurafrican" or "Mediterranean" type. [b]LOL[/b] This silly game though has been exposed decades ago by anthropologists like Franz Boas, Larry Angel, and others and was finally exploded by genetics. [b]LOL[/b] You are so correct that science progresses which it has, yet why are YOU still stuck on outdated and debunked material?? :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3