...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
THIS AMAZINGLY RACIST TWEET GOT ME THINKING..
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by zarahan- aka Enrique Cardova: [QB] Different screen name, same pathetic BS.. always debunked.. --------------------------------------------------- [b]THE FAKER'S BOGUS CLAIM PART- 15 - QUOTE: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/Cassiterides: posted 14 January, 2012 11:41 AM If you are a white heterosexual male in Britain you have virtually zero chance of getting a job. All the jobs go to blacks or other immigrants.[/b] ^^LOL - Idiotic nonsense. As of 2001, 92.1% of the UK population identified themselves as White, leaving 7.9%[270] of the UK population identifying themselves as mixed race or of an ethnic minority. The population of the United Kingdom in the 2001 census was 58,789,194, UK Office for National Statistics- 2001. That leaves approx 54 million white people. About 33% of that population were adult men. Let's take away 8% or so for minorities. So you are saying then that 25% of the approx 54 million white people in the UK are all unemployed? Damn you are dumb, but you only expose the bankruptcy of your racism. [IMG]http://siongchin.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/YueMinjun6.jpg[/IMG] [b]The Fake C-Ass -Hole exposed PART 14 - BOGUS "NORDIC BLONDS FLITTING AROUND EGYPT[/b] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/Cassiterides: posted 29 December, 2011 06:05 AM Hetepheres II was a blonde [/QUOTE]^^Hapless dullard, you are exposed in another lie. Your own reference was checked. It yielded detailed citations which revealed a quite different story. Scholars say in the mainstream Cambridge Ancient History: [i]"We must give up the idea that she was of Libyan origin, an attractive theory which was based on blond hair of Hetepheres II, who was then thought to be her daughter. It is now evident that the yellow wig is part of a costume worn b other great ladies."[/i] --I. Edwards, C. Gadd, N. Hammond. 1971. The Cambridge Ancient History. 3ed Volume 1, Part 2, Early History of the Middle East Yet another history says: [i]"The walls of this interior room are decorated with hunting and fishing scenes, including a charming image of Meresankh and her mother, Hetepheres II picking lotus flowers from the river.. The pillars have images of Meresankh wearing a blond wig." [/i] --P. Lacovara. 2004. The pyramids and the SPhinx: tombs and temples of GIza [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 13- HIS BOGUS CLAIM OF "NORDIC" EGYPTIAN ROYALTY[/b] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/Cassiterides: posted 28 December, 2011 05:40 PM Early dynastic & old kingdom royalty was Nordic (blonde and fair skinned)[/QUOTE]^^^Ha hahahahah you stupid mass of camel vomit! Up above you reference scholar Frank Yurco, but here is what Yurco said about the 12th Dynasty, debunking your claim of "Nordic" Egyptian royalty. You dumbass.... You are again debunked, with your own "supporting" references... lmao... [i]"the XIIth Dynasty (1991-1786 B.C.E.) originated from the Aswan region.4 As expected, strong Nubian features and dark coloring are seen in their sculpture and relief work. This dynasty ranks as among the greatest, whose fame far outlived its actual tenure on the throne... Because the Egyptian rulers of Nubian ancestry had become Egyptians culturally; as pharaohs, they exhibited typical Egyptian attitudes and adopted typical Egyptian policies." [/i] - (F. J. Yurco, 'Were the ancient Egyptians black or white?', Biblical Archaeology Review (Vol 15, no. 5, 1989) [IMG]http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/9665/afropharaoniclinks.jpg[/IMG] [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 12 HE says Egyptologists like Frank Yurco says the Egyptians were "Caucasoid" --- "Virtually every egyptologist believes the egyptians were Caucasoid" -- [/b] BUt Yurco says nothing of the sort.. Here for example, is what he says about the 12the Dynasty rulers aho were Nubian descent: They seem really "Caucasoid"... yeah, right.. - quote- [i] "the XIIth Dynasty (1991-1786 B.C.E.) originated from the Aswan region.4 As expected, strong Nubian features and dark coloring are seen in their sculpture and relief work. This dynasty ranks as among the greatest, whose fame far outlived its actual tenure on the throne... Because the Egyptian rulers of Nubian ancestry had become Egyptians culturally; as pharaohs, they exhibited typical Egyptian attitudes and adopted typical Egyptian policies." [/i] - (F. J. Yurco, 'Were the ancient Egyptians black or white?', Biblical Archaeology Review (Vol 15, no. 5, 1989) - Another dodge is to twist an old chat/forum discussion statement by conservative Egyptologist Frank Yurco out of context. Yurco rejected those who [i]"a priori"[/i] claimed the Egyptians were "black", that is, a dogmatic claim without presenting empirical evidence. He never rejected reasonable argument with data showing the Egyptians were an indigenous African population -QUOTE: [i].. basically a homogeneous African population had lived in the Nile Valley from ancient to modern times.. [/i] (Yurco 1996- An Egyptological Review, in Black Athena Revisited) [b]The Faker exposed- part 11 [/b] [QUOTE] Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/Cassiterides: ^You claim Vanessa Williams is a black woman when her heritage is white welsh and native american [/QUOTE]------------------------------------------------------------- But when Marc Washingrton smoked him out, and the actual facts were checked, Anglo-Pyramid/Cassifaker is lying again: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1354054/Vanessa-Williamss-ancestry-revealed-Who-Do-You-Think-You-Are.html [IMG]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/02/05/article-1354054-0D0CBCBB000005DC-596_634x356.jpg[/IMG] According to the Faker, anyone with any white ancestry is not "really" black. SO since a majority of African Americans have white ancestry ranging from 5 to 30% then most Black Americans are not "truly" black you see... [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 10 [QUOTE]Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/Cassiterides: ^ Eurafrican is Caucasoid. [/QUOTE][/b] ^^You are once again exposed. You said EurAfrican is Caucasoid, and cited Serti in support. But using your own citation any reader can see that Sergi considers EurAfricans to be an amalgamation or mixture of many types, directly contradicting your claim. SErgi says: QUOTE: [i] "This human species, with cranial and facial characters thus well determined, I call Eurafrican; and this because, having had its origin in Africa, where it is still represented by many peoples, it has been diffused from prehistoric times in Europe... The Eurafrican species thus falls into three races: the African, with red-brown and black pigmentation.. Thus the Mediterranean stock is a race or variety of the Eurafrican species."[/i] --G. Sergi You have again failed and are once again exposed. ------------------------------------------------------------ [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED PART 9- HE CLAIMS ALL THESE HIGGINS "DISTORTIONS" BUT WHEN ASKED TO NAME THE SPECIFIC WEBSITES OF THIS ALLEGED "AFROCENTRIC' HORROR, HE RUNS AWAY. WHY IS THAT FAKER?[/b] In fact, Godfrey Higgins ALSO says this about "negroes" [QUOTE] "I believe all the Blavk bambinos of Italy are negroes- not merely blacks; this admitted, it would prove they very early date of their entrance into Italy." pg 286 pg 434 "the ancient Eturians had the countenances of Negroes, the same as the images of Buddah in INdia." pg 166 pg 474- "They aere in fact, all one nation, with one religion, that of Buddah, and they were originally NEgroes" pg 59: "nor can it be reasonably doubted, that a race of Negroes formerly had power and pre-eminence in India" pg 59- AS TO ETHIOPIA: And it is probable that an Ethiopian, a negro, correctly speaking, may have been meant, not merely a black person; and it seems probable that the following may have ben the real fact, viz, that a race of NEgroes or Blacks, but probably of the former, came to India to the west."[/QUOTE]Anglo-Pyramid/CassiRETEDES own source debunks him. Note the footnote by his own author- QUOTE: [i]"may not have been Negroes, though Blacks, though it is probably they were so."[/i] His own source says they may not have been Negroes then adds: THOUGH IT IS PROBABLY THEY WERE SO." ^The Faker once again, debunks himself. And he seems not to realize that Ethiopia is in "sub-Saharan" Africa.. lol.. pathetic incompetent.. And he never shows these massive number of websites "all over the internet". Like what? How many? If they are "all over" then he should at least be able to give direct links to 6 showing pages where the "Afrocentrics: are "distorting" Higgins work. LEt's say what the faker has besides hot air. [b] Post DIRECT LINKS to 6 of the huge number of alleged "Afrocentric" websites where the Afrocentrics are "distorting" Higgins. SHow how they are distorting Higgins with specific quotes and specific context.[/b] Watch the Faker duck and run when he is again called on a claim, or make up yet another lie to cover his exposure... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [b] THE FAKER EXPOSED- part 8:[/b] [QUOTE] Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/Cassiredes: [b]"Fair hair and light eyes colours are only found among Caucasoids, esp of Europe.[/b]" [/QUOTE]But then, in your own thread, by your own hand, you present a picture of an African albino that has pale skin, light brown or hazel eyes and fair hair. You said it was impossible, but then debunk yourself with your own posted picture.. This is like the 8-9th time you keep tripping over yourself with lies, contradictions, and bogus claims. [IMG]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/6743/africanalbino2.jpg[/IMG] ------------------------------------------------------------------ RECAP [b]The Faker exposed- part 7[/b] Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/Cassiredes: [b]"Fair hair and light eyes colours are only found among Caucasoids, esp of Europe.[/b]" ^^Your claim is is completely bogus. Native diversity or albinism causes some tropical Africans to have light eyes and light hair. You fail againn.. [IMG]http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/9409/nativeafricanblondism.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/2535/redhairedafricankids.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://knol.google.com/k/-/-/3q8x30897t2cs/nb0mms/tropical2diversitytall2.jpg[/IMG] ================================================ [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 6 1-- ^^Faker! In your initial posts you claimed that it was Cavalli-Sforza talking 'bout negroes "mutating" from Pygmies. Now in your "corrected" post, YOU STILL APPEAR A FAKE. [/b]You now remove Cavalli- Sforza's name on the "mutant" claim, admitting that you were lying all along! Bwa ha aha a hah a ha ahahaha aha ahah.. [b]2-- Second point- Peter Frost is debunked by Cavalli-Sforza who says as to his so-called "mutation" theory: [/b] QUOTE: [i]"It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."[/i] --Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194 [b]Frost mentions Cavalli-Sforza in connection with sexual selection, and movement of some groups from Nigeria-Cameroon to other parts of Africa. He never says Cavalli Sforza talks bout any "negro mutation" and in fact any mutation claim is directly contradicted by Sforza. Sucka, you not only lied bout Cavalli-Sforza, you lied about your own white writer- Peter Frost, and misrepresented him.[/b] [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 6 [/b] Anglo-Pyramid/CassiREDES says: [b]''There are then no Australoids with blonde hair past the age of about twenty''[/b] ^^LMAO! Totally fake! Credible up to date sources note that blondism is prevalent in early life BUT, contrary to your claim that: "There are then no Australoids with blonde hair past the age of about twenty", the shade of color varies. In maturity the hair usually turns a darker brown color, but sometimes remains blond. See: "Gene Expression: Blonde Australian Aboriginals". Gnxp.com. http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2005/08/blonde-australian-aboriginals.php. [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Nlj5Y08ayWY/TGTRXlZHWII/AAAAAAAAAEQ/NrqdO2-sGPA/s1600/GOSFORD-Jimmy-donegan-NATSIAA-winner-2010-682x1024.jpg[/IMG] ^^Here is one of your Australians over 20 years old who does have blonde hair. YOu are caught out spinning bogus claims AGAIN!. Bwa ha aha a hah a ha ahahaha aha ahah.. - -------------------------------------------------- [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 5a [b]So where are these tropical african peoples with pale white or fair skin? blonde red hair? [/b] ^^You fail again. African populations can readily produce blond or reddish blond hair as noted by hair study author Hrdy 1978 himself, and he references Nubia as an example. Albinism is another source of red or blond hair in Africa, and albinism is much more prevalent in African populations than among Europeans. Even African Americans produce more albinos than white Americans. (The pigmentary system: physiology and pathophysiology- By James J. Nordlund 2006: 603) (E. Roach and V. Miller 2004. Neurocutaneous disorders.) QUOTE: "In general, the prevalence of albinism in Africa is much higher, in the range of 1 in 1 100 to 1 in 3900." So Africa can and does routinely produce red and blond hair. All non-Africans are MORE LIMITED subsets of ORIGINAL African diversity. THe originals have more built-in diversity than the limited sub-set populations. This is straight science as noted by the quote from TIshkoff 2000. Nor are Africans the only tropical peoples who can produce reddish hair or blond hair. Among Australian Aborigines, some tropical groups produce 100% of individuals with blond hair. Melanesians can also produce blond or reddish hair, and do so routinely. White people have no monopoly at all on that hair color. They merely show more of it, but even among whites, red hair for example is minor- occurring in less than 5% of the overall European populations, mostly in northern Europe. So the claim that there are no tropical Africans with such variation is once again, proved fake. You made the claim. ------------------------------------------------------------------- [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED: PART 4 ime and time again, you stand debunked and exposed for falsifying claims and references. Let's recap: [/b] Originally posted by Anglo-Pyramid/CassiFAKedes:: [QUOTE][b] The source is Cavalli-Sforza's book on the Pygmies entitled 'African pygmies' (Academic Press, 1986). This work shows that Negroids mutated from an ancestral pygmy population around 9,000 BC in West Africa. So the 'true' Black African today is a recent mutation. Caucasoids and Mongoloids predate them. [Wink] Negroids only migrated into other parts of Africa during the Bantu expansion or slightly earlier. Prior to them, Caucasoids inhabited North Africa and Bushmen (Capoids) to the south who were displaced by the Caucasoids from the Mediterranean around 12,000 BC.[/b] [/QUOTE]^^A bogus reference. Why should anyone take your word for it given past bogus references? Quote where Cavalli-Sforza says these so-called "negroids" "mutated" from Pygmies. The burden of proof is on you, since you made the claim. While you scurry to cover your tracks with yet more bogus claims, Cavali Sforza, in his well known The History and Geography of Human Genes, 1994 Cavalli-Sforza summarizes his 1986 work on Pygmies and specifically debunks the "Pygmy as ancestor" theory held by other older writings. QUOTE: "It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population." --Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194 SO much for your lying claims of "mutations" from "Pygymy" ancestors. In short, you lied about Cavalli-Sforza, creating a falsified claim and a bogus "supporting" reference to a claim that is nowhere supported in his work. You are once again exposed as yet another racist faker You are not fooling anyone. ------------------------ [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED-PART 3- YOu then tried to cover up your lie with even more bogus nformation and STILL fail[/b] You "modified" your Cavalli Sforza claim by including page numbers, and then changing some wording to "adaptive radiation" hoping to divert attention from your exposure.. lmao.. However pages 361-362 of Cavalli Sforza's 1986 book says absolutely nothing about any Negroes "mutating" from pygmies, nor any "adaptive radiation." It merely discusses Pygmy history and geography. You picked out a page at random, not knowing it can be verified via Google Books. You were asked to provide a direct quote but are still running. Now why is that? [i]""It remains difficult to pinpoint an ancient place of origin for the Negroid type which includes all West, Central and South Africans. Contrary to many earlier opinions, modern Pygmies and Khosians are not good candidates for a proto-African population."[/i] --Cavalli Sforza et al, 1994. The history and geography of human genes. 194 -------------------------------------- [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 2 And Your pathetic "modification" STILL turned out to be bogus. You then said: [i]"True" Black Africans appear as a recent adaptive radiation apparently branching off from an ancestral Pygmy population — a line of ancestry also indicated by osteological data (Coon 1962:651-656; Watson et al. 1996). [/i] [/b] ^^But in fact, Watson 1996 has nothing to do with osteological data and does not even mention it. It has to do with mtDNA. ---------------------------------------- [b]THE FAKER EXPOSED- PART 1C YOU THEN PROFFERED ANOTHER FAKE CLAIM BELOW: He says: [QUOTE] "Note that in the Old Testament the Danites are the only Hebrew people described as being maritime and associated with ships.." [/QUOTE][/b] ^^Complete Nonsense. In the Old Testament, the tribe of Zebulun is mentioned as specifically associated with ships and maritime elements. QUOTE: Genesis 49:13 [i] "Zebulun will dwell at the shore of the seas; Yea, he will be at the shore of the ships, And his side toucheth upon Sidon. "[/i] [b]Anglo-Pyramid/Cassi-Fakdes: MULTIPLE TIMES AT BAT, MULTIPLE EXPOSURES AS A FAKE... [/b] --fake claim that no Australian Abo over 20 is blonde -- fake claim that NO tropical Africans have any diversity in hair, skin or eye color -- fake Cavalli-Sforza citation -- 2nd fake Cavalli-Sforza reference -- Faked Watson reference -- Faked Biblical reference -- FAke representation of Peter Frost's work -- Fake claim that "studies" say [i]"egyptians were dark are not like 'light-skinned Europeans"[/i]. COnveniently, the alleged study is missing.. --Fake Higgins claims --Fake claim that Guiseppe Sergi's EurAfrican race concept is negro-free --Fake claim that Vanessa Williams has no black ancestry but is "white and Indian" --Fake claim that Egyptologists like Yurco consider the Egyptians "Caucasoid" --Fake claim of white Nordic Egyptian royalty --Fake claim of "blond" Hetepheres --Fake claim of white males in BRitain "unable to get jobs" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3