posted
Note to self: hold off on the buying of a Trayvon Martin T-shirt for now.
facts Member # 19596
posted
RFLOL!!!!!!! A house of cards falling apart heh? LOL!! I swear Blacks make the best tragic story, EVER!!!!! This **** is hilarious and i know I should not be laughing considering someone was killed but damn! Blacks are fucking dysfunctional as shyt! They jumped into this **** without first being critical and reserving judgment.
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Note to self: hold off on the buying of a Trayvon Martin T-shirt for now.
Swenet Member # 17303
posted
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Note to self: hold off on the buying of a Trayvon Martin T-shirt for now.
Analysis: an example of a low IQ mind buying into the ad-hominem attacks of another low IQ mind. Dumbass, the T-shirts aren't there to put Trayvon Martin on a pedestal, or to make a saint out of him. They are simply additional calls for justice, just through a different medium. There is no reason why T-shirt owners should now be disappointed for owning a specimen.
facts Member # 19596
posted
Wrong! They are there to supply additional FUNDS to fill Trayvon mama's coffer. Did you not get the memo? Moms went and trademarked her dead son's name
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: They are simply additional calls for justice, just
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
Yeh, I saw that. Swenet and the rest of the wild-eyed lunatic bunch didn't seem to notice though. I still say let there be a trial so we can get to the bottom of this.
facts Member # 19596
posted
no need for trial. self-defense. case close.
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Yeh, I saw that. Swenet and the rest of the wild-eyed lunatic bunch didn't seem to notice though. I still say let there be a trial so we can get to the bottom of this.
This man got arrested for killing a suspected burglar in his house yet Zimmerman got off free for killing and unarmed teenager who was minding his own business walking down the street
facts Member # 19596
posted
That is like comparing one jurisdiction with capital punishment to another jurisdiction without capital punishment. YOU FAIL.
This man got arrested for killing a suspected burglar in his house yet Zimmerman got off free for killing and unarmed teenager who was minding his own business walking down the street
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
Miserably. But I think he will be arrested eventually though, the pressure is mounting.
asante-Korton Member # 18532
posted
quote:Originally posted by facts: That is like comparing one jurisdiction with capital punishment to another jurisdiction without capital punishment. YOU FAIL.
This man got arrested for killing a suspected burglar in his house yet Zimmerman got off free for killing and unarmed teenager who was minding his own business walking down the street
There both self defense situation, just shows you how fucked up US law is
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
facts Member # 19596
posted
no, they are not the same. General self-defense does not allow you to stand your ground. You are allowed to defend yourself within limits; restriction is placed on how you meet the threat. You must use reasonable force appropriate to the force met. Lethal force is only allowed when there is an eminent danger to one's life. The British guy was not even in the house, so where is the threat? He walked in on the home invasion. There was no threat to him. Anyhow, I dont know the laws over there but Im sure they dont have this stand-yyour-ground law we have in Florida.
quote:Originally posted by asante-Korton:
quote:Originally posted by facts: That is like comparing one jurisdiction with capital punishment to another jurisdiction without capital punishment. YOU FAIL.
This man got arrested for killing a suspected burglar in his house yet Zimmerman got off free for killing and unarmed teenager who was minding his own business walking down the street
There both self defense situation, just shows you how fucked up US law is
facts Member # 19596
posted
No marks or bruises on Martin. Bruises, bloody nose, injury to the back of the head on Zimmerman. who do you think was the attacker? Zimmerman NEVER laid hands on Martin. He asked a question, Martin asked a question, heated argument followed, words were exchanged, and guess who swings first? BTW, Zimmerman was in uniform so Trayvon knew he was working security.
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
Swenet Member # 17303
posted
quote:Originally posted by facts: Wrong! They are there to supply additional FUNDS to fill Trayvon mama's coffer. Did you not get the memo? Moms went and trademarked her dead son's name
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: They are simply additional calls for justice, just
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Yeh, I saw that. Swenet and the rest of the wild-eyed lunatic bunch didn't seem to notice though. I still say let there be a trial so we can get to the bottom of this.
However questionable her trademark request (assuming its true) may be, how does her wanting money for the T-shirts change the fact that the T-shirts are an additional platform, to call for justice? What, wanting both (compensation and justice) are mutually exclusive goals? Especially since one requires the other, i.e., lawyer fees. Damn, the low IQ troll gang just keep surpassing their own idiocy.
asante-Korton Member # 18532
posted
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
Zimmerman was the attacker, he walked up to a kid with a loaded gun
facts Member # 19596
posted
you are a fool if you do not see how this appears and how the greater public will perceive it. But by all means, carry on.
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by facts: Wrong! They are there to supply additional FUNDS to fill Trayvon mama's coffer. Did you not get the memo? Moms went and trademarked her dead son's name
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: They are simply additional calls for justice, just
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Yeh, I saw that. Swenet and the rest of the wild-eyed lunatic bunch didn't seem to notice though. I still say let there be a trial so we can get to the bottom of this.
However questionable her trademark request (assuming its true) may be, how does her wanting money for the T-shirts change the fact that the T-shirts are an additional platform, to call for justice? What, wanting both (compensation and justice) are mutually exclusive goals? Especially since one requires the other, i.e., lawyer fees. Damn, the low IQ troll gang just keep surpassing their own idiocy.
Swenet Member # 17303
posted
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
Dumbo, do you even realize you're still talking to CT? You know, the one you were having this discussion with earlier. who is convinced Trayvon attacked Zimmerman from behind?
facts Member # 19596
posted
liar!! Gun was not brandished. It was concealed at all times (until it was used during the fight) otherwise unless Trayvon was on drugs, he would not have fought him OR there would have been a struggle over the gun.
quote:Originally posted by asante-Korton:
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
Zimmerman was the attacker, he walked up to a kid with a loaded gun
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
Dumbo, do you even realize you're still talking to CT? You know, the one you were having this discussion with earlier. who is convinced Trayvon attacked Zimmerman from behind?
Who the fuk cares? I'm not saying Zimmerman was attacked from behind, try to keep up Jesse. lol
quote:the T-shirts are an additional platform, to call for justice?
LOL bitch STFU. so naive. You must be one of hem little high school kids or college hotheads, this must is your first protest eh? lol
Swenet Member # 17303
posted
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing:
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
Dumbo, do you even realize you're still talking to CT? You know, the one you were having this discussion with earlier. who is convinced Trayvon attacked Zimmerman from behind?
Who the fuk cares? I'm not saying Zimmerman was attacked from behind, try to keep up Jesse. lol
I know you didn't say that Dumbo, I was there, when you borrowed my arguments, remember? You're the one who apparently doesn't even remember who he's debating, don't put that jacket on me.
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing:
quote:the T-shirts are an additional platform, to call for justice?
LOL bitch STFU. so naive. You must be one of hem little high school kids or college hotheads, this must is your first protest eh? lol [/QB]
What are you saying then, that a mother, who has just lost her son, doesn't want justice? LOL
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted What, wanting both (money and justice) are mutually exclusive goals?
HaHHAHAHA
low IQ MF. lol
Swenet Member # 17303
posted
quote:Originally posted by facts: you are a fool if you do not see how this appears and how the greater public will perceive it. But by all means, carry on.
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by facts: Wrong! They are there to supply additional FUNDS to fill Trayvon mama's coffer. Did you not get the memo? Moms went and trademarked her dead son's name
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: They are simply additional calls for justice, just
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Yeh, I saw that. Swenet and the rest of the wild-eyed lunatic bunch didn't seem to notice though. I still say let there be a trial so we can get to the bottom of this.
However questionable her trademark request (assuming its true) may be, how does her wanting money for the T-shirts change the fact that the T-shirts are an additional platform, to call for justice? What, wanting both (compensation and justice) are mutually exclusive goals? Especially since one requires the other, i.e., lawyer fees. Damn, the low IQ troll gang just keep surpassing their own idiocy.
LOL. I just said ''however questionable it may be'', and then this turds tells me that I'm blind if I don't realize that the public may find it questionable. Is this guy dense or what?
asante-Korton Member # 18532
posted
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: What, wanting both (money and justice) are mutually exclusive goals?
HaHHAHAHA
low IQ MF. lol
You need money to pay for a good lawyer
asante-Korton Member # 18532
posted
quote:Originally posted by facts: liar!! Gun was not brandished. It was concealed at all times (until it was used during the fight) otherwise unless Trayvon was on drugs, he would not have fought him OR there would have been a struggle over the gun.
quote:Originally posted by asante-Korton:
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Self defense eh? Who was the attacker in the Martin case?
Zimmerman was the attacker, he walked up to a kid with a loaded gun
Zimmerman was instructed by police not to approach the boy, he should of just waited for them to arrive but instead he went up to a innocent kid with a loaded gun and started questioning him like he was the police
Swenet Member # 17303
posted
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: What, wanting both (money and justice) are mutually exclusive goals?
HaHHAHAHA
low IQ MF. lol
There is a diagnosis for people who laugh to themselves, for no apparent reason. Get yourself looked at son.
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by facts: you are a fool if you do not see how this appears and how the greater public will perceive it. But by all means, carry on.
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by facts: Wrong! They are there to supply additional FUNDS to fill Trayvon mama's coffer. Did you not get the memo? Moms went and trademarked her dead son's name
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: They are simply additional calls for justice, just
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Yeh, I saw that. Swenet and the rest of the wild-eyed lunatic bunch didn't seem to notice though. I still say let there be a trial so we can get to the bottom of this.
However questionable her trademark request (assuming its true) may be, how does her wanting money for the T-shirts change the fact that the T-shirts are an additional platform, to call for justice? What, wanting both (compensation and justice) are mutually exclusive goals? Especially since one requires the other, i.e., lawyer fees. Damn, the low IQ troll gang just keep surpassing their own idiocy.
LOL. I just said ''however questionable it may be'', and then this turds tells me that I'm blind if I don't realize that the public may find it questionable. Is this guy dense or what?
No silly boy, my post was in response to you assuming that I didnt think his mother wanted justice, "What are you saying then, that a mother, who has just lost her son, doesn't want justice?"
again, try to keep up. lol
Swenet Member # 17303
posted
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing:
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by facts: you are a fool if you do not see how this appears and how the greater public will perceive it. But by all means, carry on.
quote:Originally posted by Swenet:
quote:Originally posted by facts: Wrong! They are there to supply additional FUNDS to fill Trayvon mama's coffer. Did you not get the memo? Moms went and trademarked her dead son's name
quote:Originally posted by Swenet: They are simply additional calls for justice, just
quote:Originally posted by anguishofbeing: Yeh, I saw that. Swenet and the rest of the wild-eyed lunatic bunch didn't seem to notice though. I still say let there be a trial so we can get to the bottom of this.
However questionable her trademark request (assuming its true) may be, how does her wanting money for the T-shirts change the fact that the T-shirts are an additional platform, to call for justice? What, wanting both (compensation and justice) are mutually exclusive goals? Especially since one requires the other, i.e., lawyer fees. Damn, the low IQ troll gang just keep surpassing their own idiocy.
LOL. I just said ''however questionable it may be'', and then this turds tells me that I'm blind if I don't realize that the public may find it questionable. Is this guy dense or what?
No silly boy, my post was in response to you assuming that I didnt think his mother wanted justice, "What are you saying then, that a mother, who has just lost her son, doesn't want justice?"
again, try to keep up. lol
LOL. Look how nervous he is. He can't get even get his trembling hands to use the quote function properly. The post you're quoting wasn't even directed at you. Get yourself looked at, son.
anguishofbeing Member # 16736
posted
You quote me, reply to the quote, then say it wasn't directed at me. "Get yourself looked at, son." stop projecting, son. hehehehe
posted ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)