...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Deshret
»
Black Characters in 'The Hunger Games' Gives White Racists A Fit
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Troll Patrol: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Anglo_Pyramidologist: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: Correct! Over 20% in southern Europe + 10% in central Europe + 3% in northern Europe. This all equals to over 33% as in [b]one-third[/b]! However your silly racialized terms of "negroid", "capoid", and "caca-soid" etc. are non-existent and futile. The E lineage originated among [i]indigenous[/i] Africans period. And color wise these indigenous Africans are 'black'. The fair-skinned North African in your pictures spam is obviously of foreign-mixed descent and does NOT represent the autochthonous or aboriginal populations of the area. We all know how the carriers of E-M78 looked like as per the skeletal remains in Lake Nubia! [b]LOL[/b] You and your ancestors have BLACK ancestry so get over it! [/qb][/QUOTE]What got taken into Europe was E1b1b1b, the ''"Berber marker'' which originated in Maghreb (north-western africa) and E1b1b1a. Both are not found in Negroids (unless you consider recent admixture). These are North African Caucasoid markers, not Sub-Saharan African... Indigenous North Africans are Caucasoid, there is nothing remotely 'black' about them. Another problem with your theory: If Southern Europeans are 30% ''black afro'' as you claim why do they look fully Caucasoid? The people of southern europe where E is the highest aren't nappy haired with wide noses... :rolleyes: [/QB][/QUOTE][i]E1b1b1a is E-M78. Berbers carry E-M81. South Europans carry E-V13 dumbass, which is a downstream and genetic drifted. Populations like the Masalit and Fur carry the paragroup of this marker, EM78. Berbers reside in Northwest Africa not in Northeast Africa and so is their genetic marker E-M81. That's the differences dumb Muktaba. It's N* gger blood. As desperate as you are to disprove otherwise.[/i] E-M78 [IMG]http://i746.photobucket.com/albums/xx108/khazraj/flickerwaltercallens.jpg[/IMG] E-M81 [IMG]http://moroccotravelblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/pasha-glaoui-morocco.jpg[/IMG] BJMG 11/2 (2008) 25-30 10.2478/v10034-008-0030-0 ALU INSERTION POLYMORPHISMS IN POPULATIONS OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS Litvinov S* et al. [i]Although it was not possible to determine a contribution of Neolithic farmers to the Caucasian gene pool, the principal component analysis showed clear differences between these populations and those of Europe, Siberia and Asia. No evidence of correlation between genetic and linguistic data in our populations was disclosed.[/i] [i]Armenians are a separate ethnic group, which originated from Neolithic tribes of the Armenian Uplands. In the 12th- 11th centuries BC...[/i] [i]However, we cannot exclude a Neolithic contribution to the contemporary gene pool. The possible reason for the absence of the frequency distribution gradient can be genetic drift, reinforced by isolation that could conceal the influence of Neolithic farmers on the Caucasus populations [1,21]. [/i] [i]While an Alu insertion marker does not have enough power of resolution to assess the contribution of the influence of Neolithic farmers on the Caucasian gene pool, it clearly separates both South and North Caucasus populations (except Karanogays) from Siberian and Asian populations.[/i] http://www.familytreedna.com/public/ArmeniaDNAProject/default.aspx?section=ysnp http://www.familytreedna.com/public/ArmeniaDNAProject/default.aspx?section=results C.L. Brace (2005): "If the late Pleistocene Natufian sample from Israel is the source from which that Neolithic spread was derived, there was clearly a sub-Saharan African element present of almost equal importance as the Late Prehistoric Eurasian element." [IMG]http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Images_Anatolia/hunter.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://sdt.sulinet.hu/data/c90420b9-66ba-411f-861c-811fa8238da1/1/3/ResourceNormal/29_a.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://wysinger.homestead.com/fig147.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.lnsart.com/JachCampChiefSudan.jpg[/IMG] Larry Angel (1972): "one can identify Negroid traits of nose and prognathism appearing in Natufian latest hunters.(McCown, 1939) and in Anatolian and Macedonian first farmers, probably from Nubia via the predecesors of the Badarians and Tasians... The Emergence of the Natufian The emergence of the Natufian is explained by Bar-Yosef (1998) as follows: “On the one hand, climatic improvements around 13,000BP provided a wealth of food resources. On the other hand, contemporaneous population growth in both the steppic and desertic regions made any abrupt, short-term climatic fluctuation a motivation for human groups to achieve control over resources” (p.167). He sees a semi-sedentary lifestyle resulting from environmental change which led to a “shift of resource scheduling” (p.167). Fellner (1995) states that “the transition from the Geometric Kebaran to the Early Natufian culture can be described as the most important cultural change within the Epipalaeolithic of Palestine, as the lifestyle of the Natufian groups differed very substantially from that practiced by their Geometric Kebaran ancestors” (p.122) The Natufian is usually seen as a key stage in Near Eastern Prehistory as it represents many features usually associated with the Neolithic. - courtesy of neareast historians, uk; epipaleolithic background. The Mushabian is founded in southern Jordan, the Negev, and Sinai. It is usually divided into an earlier phase (c.14,500-12,800bp) and a later phase which overlaps with the Early Natufian (12,800-11,000bp). The Classic Mushabian is characterized by a dominance of arched-back bladelets, La Mouillah points, and scalene triangles, all of which were truncated at one end using the microburin technique. Helwan lunates are also featured. Evidence for economic activities are few and far between – there are very few botanical or faunal remains, but some rare pounding tools suggest that plant exploitation was a feature of the economy. Bar-Yosef and Meadow (1999) hypothesize that the subsistence strategies employed in the Mushabian were much the same as those of the steppic Geometric Kebaran and Hamran groups. The Mushabian was traditionally thought to derive from North Africa via the Nile Delta and the Sinai: “The Mushabian sites in Sinai are interpreted as the remains of mobile groups budded off from the Nile region who were attracted to the expanding, lusher steppic environment” (Bar-Yosef and Meadow 1999, p.55). This view was based on the early occurrence of the microburin technique in industries like the Sisilian. “However, the recent discovery of even earlier use of the microburin technique in the Azraq Basin fundamentally weakens the argument, and may even indicate diffusion of this technique in the other direction” (Fellner 1995, p.26). Fellner believes that the Mushabian is most likely to derive from the Nizzanian of the Negev. - courtesy of neareast historians, uk; epipaleolithic background. "From the Mesolithic to the early Neolithic period different lines of evidence support an out-of-Africa Mesolithic migration to the Levant by northeastern African groups that had biological affinities with sub-Saharan populations. From a genetic point of view, several recent genetic studies have shown that sub-Sabaran genetic lineages (affiliated with the Y-chromosome PN2 clade; Underhill et al. 2001) have spread through Egypt into the Near East, the Mediterranean area, and, for some lineages, as far north as Turkey (E3b-M35 Y lineage; Cinniogclu et al. 2004; Luis et al. 2004), probably during several dispersal episodes since the Mesolithic (Cinniogelu et al. 2004; King et al. 2008; Lucotte and Mercier 2003; Luis et al. 2004; Quintana-Murci et al. 1999; Semino et al. 2004; Underhill et al. 2001). This finding is in agreement with morphological data that suggest that populations with sub-Saharan morphological elements were present in northeastern Africa, from the Paleolithic to at least the early Holocene, and diffused northward to the Levant and Anatolia beginning in the Mesolithic. Indeed, the rare and incomplete Paleolithic to early Neolithic skeletal specimens found in Egypt - such as the 33,000-year-old Nazlet Khater specimen (Pinhasi and Semai 2000), the Wadi Kubbaniya skeleton from the late Paleolithic site in the upper Nile valley (Wendorf et al. 1986), the Qarunian (Faiyum) early Neolithic crania (Henneberg et al. 1989; Midant-Reynes 2000), and the Nabta specimen from the Neolithic Nabta Playa site in the western desert of Egypt (Henneberg et al. 1980) - show, with regard to the great African biological diversity, similarities with some of the sub-Saharan middle Paleolithic and modern sub-Saharan specimens. This affinity pattern between ancient Egyptians and sub-Saharans has also been noticed by several other investigators (Angel 1972; Berry and Berry 1967, 1972; Keita 1995) and has been recently reinforced by the study of Brace et al. (2005), which clearly shows that the cranial morphology of prehistoric and recent northeast African populations is linked to sub-Saharan populations (Niger-Congo populations). These results support the hypothesis that some of the Paleolithic-early Holocene populations from northeast Africa were probably descendents of sub-Saharan ancestral populations...... This northward migration of northeastern African populations carrying sub-Saharan biological elements is concordant with the morphological homogeneity of the Natufian populations (Bocquentin 2003), which present morphological affinity with sub-Saharan populations (Angel 1972; Brace et al. 2005). In addition, the Neolithic revolution was assumed to arise in the late Pleistocene Natufians and subsequently spread into Anatolia and Europe (Bar-Yosef 2002), and the first Anatolian farmers, Neolithic to Bronze Age Mediterraneans and to some degree other Neolithic-Bronze Age Europeans, show morphological affinities with the Natufians (and indirectly with sub-Saharan populations; Angel 1972; Brace et al. 2005), in concordance with a process of demie diffusion accompanying the extension of the Neolithic revolution (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1994)." [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3